continuted from >>72507255
First for /pol/ doesn't know anything about biology or genetics.
>>72518940
Thanks for continuing that thread, Based Luxbro.
>>72519082
welcome, nothing more comfy than a ancient thread on a saturday.
Just in case people don't see the previous thread..... here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)
>>72519200
(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.
>>72519228
(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.
>>72519091
geolbro here, what were you saying my pommy friend (sorry I need to go soon, it's 1.21am here)?
>>72519253
(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.
>>72518940
>* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
magyar master racers... again
>>72518940
>Coincidence
A prime example of people saying retarded things because they are to lazy/stupid/both to inform themself about what they are talking
>>72519271
(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)
>>72519200
Gonna need some sources, vegemite. Even if they're shitty.
I am neither a creationist per se nor an evolutionist per se. I think that there are elements of truth in both creationism and evolutionism, but neither creationism nor evolutionism provide us with the complete story of human life (and, indeed, of all life in general).
>>72519368
What the fossil record indicates to us is quite creepy.
Plants first appear in the fossil record about 450 million years ago. There is no indication of them having developed out of any earlier form. They simply appear. What's more, every major form of plant arrives together. This can only be explained in orthodox evolutionary terms if none of the millions of intermediate stages which led to this dramatic development ever fossilised. The chances against this are ASTRONOMICAL.
The first flowering plants also appear in the fossil record fully formed. Although we have an abundance of fossils of the earlier, non-flowering species, not a single one of these can be described as an intermediate form on the evolutionary path to flowers. At one point, there were no flowering plants. At another, flowering plants were all over the place.
You find exactly the same bizarre pattern in the animal kingdom.
The earliest fish with spines and brains appeared some 450 million years ago. In all the many curious lifeforms discovered in the sea, they had no apparent evolutionary ancestors. According to orthodox doctrine, the cartilaginous skeleton found in the certain fish - like the ray - gradually evolved into a bony skeleton. The fossil record shows cartilaginous fish appeared (without apparent ancestors) 75 million years AFTER bony fish.
Orthodox doctrine also insists fish with jaws gradually evolved from jawless varieties. The fossil record shows nothing of that sort. Fish with jaws suddenly appeared, with no discernible ancestry. Furthermore, these jawed fish somehow evolved into one jawless species - the lamprey - despite the fact that jawlessness is supposed to be a characteristic destined to be selected out of the life stream. (end of part 1)
>>72519396
(start of part 2) Darwinian theory suggests that lung-fish, capable of breathing both on land and underwater, eventually evolved primitive legs out of their gills and crawled onto a beach to become the first amphibians. Amphibians certainly exist. What isn't known to currently exist is a single intermediate fossil tracing the famous lung-fish gills-to-legs evolutionary sequence. Some 320 million years ago, fossils of fully a dozen orders of amphibians began to be laid down. All had well-developed limbs, shoulders and pelvic girdles. None showed the slightest sign of having evolved from fish or even from anything else that evolved from fish.
Fish species themselves show no signs of evolution. The shark who terrifies swimmers today is the same beast he was 150 million years ago. Oysters and mussels have been around unchanged for even longer - they appeared in their present form and were arguably just as delicious 400 million years ago.
Mammals appeared suddenly as well. The orthodox theory suggests that they evolved from a single, tree-dwelling, shrew-like creature that expanded into the niche left when the dinosaurs perished. There was indeed such a creature, but the fossil record gives no indication whatsoever that it evolved into anything. Instead, 10 million years after the dinosaurs disappeared, a dozen or so separate and distinct mammalian species turn up without warning in the fossil record... in areas as distinct as South America, Africa and Asia. There are no intermediate fossils showing a connection between these mammals and the earlier shrew. There are no fossils showing any inter-species evolution either. Among the fossil mammals that appeared so abruptly at that time are lions, bats and bears that you would recognise IMMEDIATELY if you were chased by them today. What's going on here? (end)
>>72519368
Wrong, Biology and Quantitative Genetics in particular explain everything. The problem is that there is no way to replicate everything in our lifespan as a form of proof.
>>72519037
or paying denbts
>>72519013
>>72519270
>Are you not using the phi ratio as evidence to support your idea that the formation is unnatural? This is the claim that I find unsubstantial. There is no indication that the percieved phi relationship is any more than a coincidence. If there were many such volcanic trios then maybe something could be going on, yet even then it may be related to some thus undiscovered principle of magma resevoirs. What we have here is an interesting formation to some people, however it is ultimately lost in the noise of natural variability.
so it is agreed that phi is present in the dimensions of Easter Island
>Easter is 2375 miles from Nazca. This is 9.54% of the circumference of the earth, or 34.34°. The axis point is 6218 miles from Easter and from Nazca. The ratio between one side of the terrestrial triangle and the baselength of the triangle is 2.618 to one (2375 miles x 2.618 = 6218 miles). The terrestrial triangle formed by Angkor Vihear, Easter’s antipodal point in the Indus Valley and the axis point has these same dimensions with the same φ2 ratio between the side length and the base length. The terrestrial triangle formed by Easter’s antipodal point in the Indus Valley, Giza and the axis point has these same dimensions and the same φ2 ratio.
how many coincidences does it take before there is a link?
>>72519396
>>72519431
>plants
Bullshit
>fish
Astronomical bullshit
>lung-fish
Bullshit
>sharks are identical
Bullshit is hitting the fan
>mammals
Ocean of bullshit
Typical Australian shitposting
You have images of that fossils even in child books
>>72519396
The first multicellular organism to escape the primordial muck of the oceans was a plant.
>>72519326
I have many highly reliable sources, but you won't get even a single source from me because I honestly couldn't care less whether you believe me or not. I do this for me, no-one else. Next! :)
>>72519509
>The problem is that there is no way to replicate everything in our lifespan as a form of proof.
How convenient. :)
>>72518940
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5DNvYMtkyk
to answer a post from previous thread
>>72519368
one to add to you're list is how did the great apes with 24 chromosomes create humans with only 23? did the random mutation take place in a male and a female at the same time?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5qJYwfAju8
>>72519687
But we can easily replicate it in labs that exist thousands of years later. However that is completely unnecessary when you can just change a complete genetic makeup to your liking with mere electrocution of the cell.
Through the mists of time, one can find ancient myths in the cultures of people worldwide that suggest our ancient human history as taught by the academic orthodoxy is partially, if not completely, erroneous. A myth is a belief based on a story embedded in the collective consciousness of a culture. In this sense, a myth is not necessarily a false belief but rather an expression of the way that a culture lives.
In this comment, I will share some ancient myths with you that suggest human histories different to the one taught to us by the academic orthodoxy and leave it up to you to decide whether or not these myths have any empirical truth to them.
* The Pima tribe of Arizona speak of how their ancestors came from an island at the centre of the world before that island sank beneath the ocean. Leading the relatively few survivors from that island was South Doctor, the heroic progenitor of the Pima tribe. South Doctor was a powerful medicine man. South Doctor held magical crystals in his left hand and guided the survivors from a cataclysmic deluge to safety between the Gilla and Salt Rivers. (end of part 1)
>>72519921
(start of part 2) * Ancestral traditions throughout Mesoamerican civilisations and Andean civilisations consistently describe their founding fathers as tall, bearded, light-skinned and blonde-haired/red-haired.
* The Australian Aborigines recall the 'Land Of Mystery', which is also known as the 'Land Of Perfection'. The 'Land Of Mystery' was a huge city surrounded by four walls, their exterior covered entirely in white quartz. The 'Land Of Mystery' was described as mountainous, volcanic and luxuriant in plant growth, among which stood great buildings of domes and spires - this from a people to whom architecture was unknown until relatively modern times.
* The Incas believed that their civilisation had been founded by Kon-Tiki Viracocha, a red-haired, light-skinned man who appeared in the Andes from the east following a terrible flood.
* Polynesian legends tell us about light-skinned, blonde-haired culture-bearers who fled to the Pacific islands after their homeland sank into the ocean. (end of part 2)
>>72519942
(start of part 3) * The Aztecs traced their earliest origins, not to America, but to a vanished island far away across the Sunrise Sea (their name for the Atlantic Ocean). Their founding fathers were culture-bearers from this far away island.
* Several Native American tribes, such as the Menominee of the Upper Great Lakes Region, recount in their oral traditions how a worldwide flood was precipitated by greedy foreigners, the light-skinned 'Marine Men', who dug into the ground to gain riches (especially copper).
"You Greeks are all young in mind. You have no belief rooted in old tradition and no knowledge hoary with age. And the reason is this: There have been and will be many different calamities to destroy mankind, the greatest of them by fire and water, lesser ones by countless other means...
But in our temples we have preserved from earliest times a written record of any great or splendid achievement or notable event which has come to our ears whether it occurred in your part of the world or here or anywhere else; whereas with you and others, writing and the other necessities of civilisation have only just been developed when the periodic scourge of the deluge descends, and spares none but the unlettered and uncultured, so that you have to begin again like children, in complete ignorance of what happened in our part of the world or in yours in early times...
You remember only one deluge, though there have been many, and you do not know that the finest and best race of men that ever existed lived in your country; you and your fellow citizens are descended from the few survivors that remained, but you know nothing about it because so many succeeding generations left no record in writing." - Timaeus 22d-23c (end)
>>72519200
Island nigger STOP.
>>72519903
are you saying that the only provable way of making new species, is to do it with genetic modification?
>>72519995
Make me, Americoon! :D
>>72519992
Source?
>>72519431
>>72519396
>>72519324
>>72519271
>>72519253
>>72519228
But geology's principle of uniformitarianism already explains a lack of intermediate forms. Not every dead body is preserved, and only a fraction survive lithification and consequent erosion. There are millions, if not billions of years of geologic history missing from any given location on Earth.
>>72519530
To a degree of accuracy, it is reasonable to say that your percieved ratio exists when the THREE BIGGEST volcanoes of Easter Island are joined with straight lines to form an isosocoles triangle. This does not imply that the ratio had some role in determining their formation, and even if it did there is a chance some previously unknown principle of volcanism is the culprit. I find the latter highly unlikely, as I have yet to see evidence from other volcanic systems to support this.
Dr. Peter Gariaev is a Russian scientist who took eggs that were laid by a frog and then zapped those eggs with a laser light that had gone through eggs laid by a salamander. When the 'frog' eggs hatched, salamanders emerged from them - not frogs. The only thing that is necessary to rewrite DNA is wave information, which means that evolution can occur not through millions of years but instantaneously.
The agricultural division of the Ciba-Geigy corporation (now Sygenta) discovered that existing plant seeds could be transformed into extinct varieties, simply by zapping them with a weak electrostatic current. This process generated stronger and faster-growing wheat, extinct fern species, and tulips with thorns. Italian scientist Pier Luigi Ighina energetically transformed a living apricot tree into an apple tree, actually causing the fruits on the branches to metamorphose from apricots into apples in only sixteen days. Ighina also zapped a rat with DNA-wave information from a cat, and this caused the rat to grow a cat-like tail in four days.
>>72519200
It's obviously a fucking conspiracy set up by aliens who control us and want to deceive us into thinking that they're not controlling us. They're so fucking clever that we almost don't notice, but thanks to heroic OP and his goanna-fucking buddy, we're finally beginning to see a few clues and realize how massive this alien conspiracy might be.
How should we reward our new saviors, other than by making them King and Butt-King of /pol/? I propose we erect a giant statue in gold and that all posters in this thread also make their asses available for use by this mighty twosome on any occasion that they wish satisfaction. Any advances on this?
>>72519997
If you are very impatient, yes. Or use species with extremely small generation times such as microbes, to incur mutations at a much faster rate.
>>72519790
The unfinished obelisk has pound marks, no lasers or machinery were needed only time.
>>72518940
star gate universe was based around this subject check this out brothers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHmr80Bf0zg
>>72519997
In the short-term, yes. If you have a lot more time you just can do it via careful breeding programms.
>>72520217
its not about the pound marks, its about the weight, good luck putting freaking 1200 tons up 3000 years ago
>>72520124
fascinating
>>72520124
The universe is essentially a hologram and the human brain is a tool to interpret it. Read The Holographic Universe by Talbot. You would get a lot out of it.
>>72520451
Yes, I completely agree with you. I own The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot and I've read all of that book. The Holographic Universe is my equally my favourite book of all time along with Forbidden Archeology. What we call 'reality' is holographic in nature, so we are in fact smaller versions of the whole (which you can call 'God', if you want). Every part of the whole contains the whole and, to be more accurate, IS the whole. And just as a drop of water contains the same qualities as an entire ocean of water, we likewise contain all that is within us - but merely on a smaller scale.
"To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour." - William Blake
>>72520124
now THAT is a shitpost
can you back any of that up?
>>72520195
kek. oy vey, the alien IDF has arrived
>>72520200
so are you arguing for natural evolution, or directed? or something else?
>>72519790
>>72520217
are we talking about the stone of the pregnant woman in baalbek?
>According to Discovery News , the German archaeological team have now found a third building block next to the Hajjar al-Hibla stone and underneath it. Still partially buried, the monolith measures measures 19.6 meters (64 feet) in length, 6 meters (19.6 feet) in width, and at least 5.5 meters (18 feet) in height. Its weight has been estimated at 1,650 tons, making it the largest known stone block from antiquity
>>72519271
Archaeology bro here
No dating system is perfect
Anything that's dated and accepted by mainstream arch must fit context.
In my work we have received plenty of chemical process dating results that were way too old or too young to fit the context of all other evidence in the dig.
When that happens --
you either form a hypothesis and try to find more evidence to support the anomaly or you throw out the results because it's too outrageous to ever find evidence to support.
Say we date a bit of charcoal amongst an excavated midden (trash) pile where everything points to 500 BCE
The charcoal comes back as 10,000 BCE.
We're not going to assume everything is now thousands of years older than we thought before...
We'll likely assume it's a bad test or they were burning drift wood. Drift wood can at times be much older than surrounding contemporary wood.
I would guess all of these outrageous dates that fit no other narratives are published evidence that the writer threw out.
Then popular media sees this date in the academic literature and sensationalizes it.
>>72520451
Heard about this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>72520602
did you hear about this
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe
>>72519530
this graph loks like some constellation i read about...god damn it...cant remember it now.
>>72520602
>you throw out the results because it's too outrageous
>We'll likely assume
what do you make of this great circle alignment?
http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/index.html
"Easter Island, Nazca, Ollantaytambo, Paratoari, Tassili n'Ajjer and Giza are all aligned on a single great circle. Additional ancient sites that are located within one tenth of one degree of this great circle include Petra; Perseopolis; Khajuraho; Pyay, Sukothai and Anatom Island.
Near Ollantaytambo, Machupicchu and Cuzco are within one quarter of a degree. The Oracle at Siwa in the western Egyptian desert is within one quarter of a degree. In the Indus Valley, Mohenjo Daro and Ganweriwala are within one quarter of a degree. The ancient Sumerian city of Ur and Angkor temples in Cambodia and Thailand are within one degree of the great circle. The Angkor temple at Preah Vihear is within one quarter of a degree.
This circle crosses over the source and the mouth of the Amazon, the dividing line between upper and lower Egypt, the mouth of the Tigris-Euphrates, the Indus River and the Bay of Bengal near the mouth of the Ganges. The circle also crosses over a number of areas of the world that are largely unexplored, including the Sahara Desert, the Brazilian Rainforest, the highlands of New Guinea, and underwater areas of the North Atlantic Ocean, the South Pacific Ocean and the South China Sea."
>>72519569
Shup up nigger, and post sause.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR8NO5R74OA
>>72520124
This isn't evolution, that's altering a genetic makeup of a species through electrocution of the organism cell. Evolution requires thousands of generations to form and is almost perfect as far as the organism fitting the environment it inhabits goes, because it went through many different mutations by trial and error until it found the most adept one.
>>72520591
>so are you arguing for natural evolution, or directed? or something else?
We are heading towards a very interesting future, since we humans are now able to understand the intrinsic nature of evolution through Genetics, and are now able to direct it to our choosing. The obvious answer is to strive for the most perfect, environment-adapted genotype, which is by definition a result of natural evolution, and NOT man-made.
looks straight like star gate shit
>>72520780
the orion constellation maybe?
>>72520856
A parenthesis that there is no perfection in evolution, just a "best possible course of discarding and accepting mutations".
>>72520124
>Dr. Peter Gariaev is a Russian scientist who took eggs that were laid by a frog and then zapped those eggs with a laser light that had gone through eggs laid by a salamander. When the 'frog' eggs hatched, salamanders emerged from them - not frogs. The only thing that is necessary to rewrite DNA is wave information, which means that evolution can occur not through millions of years but instantaneously.
gonna need some fucking evidence for this claim senpai. like repeated demonstrations.
>>72520602
Hey bro, what is job security like for archaelolgists at the moment? At one stage I was really keen on becoming one, but I wasn't too keen on all the financial instablity I would hear about so went with geology instead
>>72520966
I don't know about Gariaev, but electrocution is a very easily proven manner of altering a species' genetic makeup. Also, there are like 2-3 other ways to alter a Genome if I remember correctly.
>>72520692
Civilisation is officially recognised as having begun in Sumer about 5,000 years ago, yet the sophisticated ruins at Gobekli Tepe are AT LEAST 3,000 OLDER. Ancient ruins like Gobekli Tepe and structures like the ancient pyramids around the world (ESPECIALLY the Great Pyramid in Egypt) are a legacy of an older global civilisation that no longer exists. This is the reason why about 5,000 years ago, ancient civilisations in places like Egypt and Sumer seem to have appeared virtually overnight and also seemed to suddenly have knowledge of astronomy, mathematics, agriculture, etc. It's because that knowledge was INHERITED from that previous civilisation (some people call this previous civilisation 'Atlantis', but personally, I think this shit is WAAAAAY BIGGER than Atlantis). When this previous civilisation collapsed, their successor civilisations created structures with certain mathematical principles encoded into them because they knew then (just like we know now) that mathematics is a UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE and that, when the time was right (which is basically now), we'd notice the mathematical principles that they encoded into their structures and that the REASON why they encoded mathematical principles into their structures was because they wanted to bestow upon us a MESSAGE - a MESSAGE that we are now READY to decipher.
>>72521019
i dont buy it, its just too much weight
we need huge huge crans to lift more than 500 tons nowadays
>>72521089
* AT LEAST 3,000 YEARS OLDER
>>72520352
They would keep pounding under it until it was supported only by a thin spine in the middle. Then it would be snapped off using levers.
The people who created the Moai statues at Easter Island used very similar methods for quarrying stone, as did many other groups around the world.
>>72521072
Theres a difference between electrocution and creating the wrong species from an egg
The leap is so large. It would presuppose all the data of life is not in the egg at all, and we know it is, so that can't be true
>>72520591
You didn't disprove my theory, though, which shows just how truthful it really is. Ad hominem attacks are only every tried at theories that are true. It's the last resort of someone who doesn't otherwise have a decent position to argue.
Also, can you please tell me how much of a faggot you are? thx
>>72521170
looks there was some mechanical tools used there like some very big scoops, how do you pound like butter through hard granite?
>>72520451
An interpreter that is part of the thing it interprets?
>>72521140
Occams razor..
It was hubris and a stupid ruler was just going to hope it could be lifted. It was never completed because the stupid ruler was proven stupid and everyone agreed to stop wasting resources on it.
>>72520591
Hey friend, are we finished with >>72520097 ?
I'm pretty keen for bed now
>>72521170
>>72518940
>Forbidden Ancient Knowledge
WE
>>72521269
If they were doing it easily they'd have covered much more distance. It was therefore likely very difficult. Just because it looks like it was done easily doesnt mean it was.
>>72520352
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCvx5gSnfW4
>>72520821
GIS/geomatics fag here.
I don't want to shit on your theory bro but speaking of alignment on 2d approximation of 3d object is kinda vague. Explanation of common alignment is relatively simple, they all used same celestial reference to position buildings, I.e. Brightest celestial bodies and recognizable constellations. Space is our common proto religion.
Also if you like this kind of shit check astro-theology and it's influence on early religions.
>>72520856
>We are heading towards a very interesting future, since we humans are now able to understand the intrinsic nature of evolution through Genetics, and are now able to direct it to our choosing.
that's not answering the question
how could we choose between three hypotheses: complete random evolution, completely directed evolution and assisted evolution?
>>72521072
so easily provable that you don need to include any proof, just a claim?
>>72521089
plausible
>>72521226
you ad hommed in your post, then complained about me ad homming?
in answer to your question, slightly less than you
>>72520097
>To a degree of accuracy, it is reasonable to say that your percieved ratio exists when the THREE BIGGEST volcanoes of Easter Island are joined with straight lines to form an isosocoles triangle. This does not imply that the ratio had some role in determining their formation, and even if it did there is a chance some previously unknown principle of volcanism is the culprit. I find the latter highly unlikely, as I have yet to see evidence from other volcanic systems to support this.
you never answered about the phi squared ratio present as I stated in this post >>72519530
>>72520886
No, Giza piramids are Orions belt but whole orion is much more complicated.
When I was kid I read comic book made by Elrich von Daniken he waved in some of those "unfitting" archeo findings in to rly nice story.
Later on when I read more and more books about topic I came to conclusion modern archeo is just fanclub of people who dont like to be chalenged at their work. Even when they find big ass city buried under the sand but it wont be fitting in to their narrative they either destroy it or call it a fake so little safe world of archeo is nice and cozzy.
>>72521269
>A team of workers would line-up side by side and pound their sections with a diorite pounding stone.[3] Such pounding stones can be found all over this quarry and others in Egypt.[4] This pounding only broke off millimeters of granite at a time, but eventually these troth-like sections would emerge at each workers station.[5]
I bet it's aliens. It's ALWAYS aliens.
>>72521168
>checks flag
chuckled m8, keep up the shitposting
>>72521470
-He helped himself with modern tools
-he is playing around with 500kg blocks
the ones at stone edge are 10-20tons each
-try the ones which weigh 200 tons
Here is a description of the yugas according to the Linga Purana:
"In Satya Yuga, people were always happy. There were no inferiors or superiors. All individuals were equal. The climate was neither hot nor cold. Hatred and jealousy were unknown. Hunger and thirst were not felt. The Earth yielded an abundant supply of juices and mankind lived happily on this. There was no need to build houses. People lived on the shores of the oceans and in the mountains. There was no concept of sin (papa) and store of merit (punya), no need of Heaven or Hell. People were naturally righteous.
In Treta Yuga, things changed somewhat. Clouds formed in the sky and it started to rain heavily. The Earth no longer yielded a plentiful supply of juices. But because it rained so much, trees began to grow and people lived on the sap of these trees. But individuals slowly turned evil and started to fight over the possession of these trees. The trees no longer provided sap. But they did provide fruits that humans could live on. They used the barks of the trees as clothing. But when people continued to fight over the possession of the trees, the trees started to wither away and disappear. Heat and cold became manifest. Houses now had to be built so that one might protect oneself from the heat and cold. Earlier, there had been no need to build houses. When all the trees completed disappeared, people learnt to practice agriculture so that they might live. The first practice of agriculture and animal husbandry goes back to Treta Yuga. But irrigation was not needed. The land irrigated itself. Artificial irrigation became required much later, when people grew even more evil.
Mankind really started to suffer from the time of Dwapara Yuga. Most evil traits like hatred, jealousy, quarrels and fraudulence can be traced back to that time. Famine and drought were first felt on Earth in Dwapara Yuga. (end of part 1)
>>72521470
Damn. Just damn.
>>72521679
(start of part 2) Kali Yuga is the worst period of all. This is a time when holy men are not revered. No-one pays any attention to the shastras and it is evil that prevails. People are habitually liars. The shudras are the last of the four classes. As such, their duties are to serve the other three classes of brahmins, kshatriyas and vaishyas. But in Kali Yuga, the shudras lord over everything. Even the kings are shudras and oppress the brahmins. Kings are thieves and thieves become kings.
Kali Yuga is such an evil period that people will start to lend money so as to earn interest. The evil has its effects in terms of reducing the productivity of the land. Life expectancy is reduced to only sixteen years. The only redeeming feature of Kali Yuga is the fact that a minor righteous deed in Kali Yuga brings undying punya (i.e. positive experiences due to righteous actions)
But Kali Yuga will not last forever. When its duration is over, Kalki will be born so as to re-establish righteousness on Earth. For twenty years, he will travel around the world, killing the evil and protecting the good. He will destroy the shudra kings and bring back the religion prescribed by the Vedas." (end)
>>72521631
the same principle would apply.
you move the stone using the rocks technique
then you keep putting things underneath it and leaning it from one side to another
>>72521542
But I did. I've agreed that the triangle you've pointed out has your phi ratio, under a certain degree of accuracy, but this isn't useful information because it is easily within the bounds of natural variation
>>72521631
>he is playing around with 500kg blocks
He is one dude. Give him hundreds of workers and decades of time and he will build you some pretty impressive shit.
>>72519200
>>72519228
>>72519253
>>72519271
Footprints and shoes. They should have called it Bad Archaeology. This is just evidence of advanced human traits among our ancestors and cousins going back a couple million years. Not billions Carl Fagan.
>>72521631
Do you honestly believe these techniques can't be scaled up in size and manpower? But, yeah, probably ancient aliens or Atlantis.
>>72521470
>white people (or one person) discovers this technique thousands of years ago
>another white guy discovers this technique thousands of years later
THE REST OF THE WORLD IS FINISHED
WHITE MEN MOST CREATIVE CULTURE OF ALL TIME
>>72521542
The correct term is Electroporation, I just used electrocution as a layman's terms. The process is much more complex than a simple electrocution, obviously.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_(genetics)
>how could we choose between three hypotheses: complete random evolution, completely directed evolution and assisted evolution?
>A: complete random evolution
best possible evolution to fit our genotype to our current environment (oxygen levels, muscle strength etc)
>B: completely directed evolution
evolution best used for a fast fix-up (ie the atmosphere becomes more thick with methane so we develop a gene to transform our lungs to be able to process methane as well as oxygen in the process)
>C: assisted evolution
same as B
>>72521814
>>72521908
he was doing it on a concrete ground.look at the video. He is cheating. At stone edge , there is mud and soil.
also
how did the block come there in the first place? on a lorry?
>>72521908
Yeah but moving blocks in circles isn't the same as standing up giant stones or placing rocks the size of a house on top of something as high as a pyramid. In South America a lot of times you have instances of them having to go up a mountain before going up a pyramid.
>>72522065
i expect they cut the rock from a quarry and transported it there
i also expect theres simple solutions to a muddy ground such as throwing leaves and sticks onto it to create some tension... or waiting for summer to continue the build
>>72521477
>speaking of alignment on 2d approximation of 3d object is kinda vague
which bit is 2d?
>Explanation of common alignment is relatively simple, they all used same celestial reference to position buildings
ok, but that doesn't explain why they all used the same alignment, or what the alignment was. I appreciate they could work out longitude and latitude, but this great circle is off from the equator by 2pi
>check astro-theology
will do, any recommends?
>>72521543
>I came to conclusion modern archeo is just fanclub of people who dont like to be chalenged at their work
seems that way, or they have an agenda to hide things
>>72521631
also, how do you move blocks using stones over soft ground?
>>72521679
>All individuals were equal
fucking ancient marxists
>The Earth yielded an abundant supply of juices
wut?
>because it rained so much, trees began to grow
derp
>This is a time when holy men are not revered
those poor dears
>>72521821
have you admitted the second part? that the ratio phi^2 is found in the triangle made by easter, nazca and the axis point? that this is the same as that between the opposite point to easter, angkor, indus and axis, and the same as indus, giza and axis?
>>72521679
* completely disappeared
>>72521998
not sure if you got what I was asking
I meant, how could we tell if evolution in the past was a, b or c
>>72522330
Oh wow, I must have been so wrapped up in volcanoes that I completely missed that part, sorry. That sounds like a novel relationship, but I'm not sure why cultures with relatively little in common should be significant enough to create points in a triangle? I'm by no means an archaeologist, but didn't each of those civilisations reach their monument building prime at different times in history? I guess what I'm not seeing is the non-geometric relationship.
I really need to go now. I've enjoyed discussing this, usually I don't get the chance to talk about these things to interested people unless my mates get stoned (heh). I hope my little snippets of information helped your understanding of geology in some way
>>72522822
enjoy, good talking to you
>>72522330
I know, those descriptions of the yugas are weird. But I'm just interested in the cyclical conception of human history that pre-Abrahamic cultures had. The Ancient Greeks had a cyclical conception of human history that was similar to the cyclical conception of human history that the Hindus had (and STILL have). The Ancient Greeks had a Golden Age (equivalent to Satya Yuga), a Silver Age (equivalent to Treta Yuga), a Bronze Age (equivalent to Dwapara Yuga) and an Iron Age (equivalent to Kali Yuga). I call the model of human history that is currently dominant among historians 'the linear-progressive model of human history'. The linear-progressive model of human history basically says that the further back in human history you go, the more primitive humans, their cultures and their technology becomes. The linear-progressive model of human history embraced by modern historians and modern anthropologists actually has its roots in Judaeo-Christian beliefs, ironically enough. Virtually EVERY pre-Abrahamic culture WORLDWIDE embraced a conception of human history that was CYCLICAL, with civilisations rising and falling one after the other over VAST periods of time and humans being EXTREMELY OLD. Take the Puranas (a collection of ancient Indian writings), for example. The Puranas describe human lineages going back over a BILLION YEARS into the past and we have PHYSICAL EVIDENCE (in the form of fossils and artifacts) that confirms this.
>>72520966
>(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
>How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
There's videos on youtube. I'm talking TV rips. Because in the 80s and 90s, people were fascinated by this. It's all in German, though.
>>72523170
You have to realise that just cause it happened on TV doesnt make it verified?
If it were so simple to recreate an animal in a different egg people would be doing it constantly for novelty
>>72523045
even the christian cross comes from the ancient sun cross, between the galactic plane and the solar plane, or some say from the equinoxes and solstices imposed over the solar year
I've heard about the galactic year, I suppose the 4 ages could apply to the 4 galactic "seasons" in some way
I'm not saying there is nothing to be gleaned from the ancient texts. AFAIK the most ancient creation myth is the sumarian "book of Enki", it's quite an interesting read, especially the way they describe our solar system, including noting the colors of trhe 2 ice giants(neptune and youareanus), that we thought were gas giants until fairly recently, and how they created us to be workers
the sumarian kings list describes rulers ruling for thousands of years at a time
>>72518940
Good friends with a ghost author on this. The book is written by Krishna monks. Not that this discredits it, but these guys do not believe in an ancient Earth. I would just be wary of their starting point, this wasn't written from a blank slate.
>>72522330
Map is 2 d representation and it suffers a lot of distortions to approximate celestial body like a planet. We use coordinate system like you mentioned Equator is part of it, WGS84 and it is our xreation to help us with a lot of things. It doesn't have any reference in nature. Ancient cultures on Northern hemisphere used star Polaris as true North orientation, we don't. It might explain 2 pi shift but I will look into it.
Santos Bonnaci is good lecturer and you can find it on yt. Under mumbo jumbo he has some really interesting points.
>>72523493
>the sumarian kings list describes rulers ruling for thousands of years at a time
Yes, I'm glad that you mentioned the Sumerian King List. Also, the whole thing about rulers ruling for thousands of years at a time can be correlated with descriptions of extremely long life-spans in other cultures. For example, in Ancient Indian writings, the average life-span of a person in Satya Yuga was 100,000 years, the average life-span of a person in Treta Yuga was 10,000 years, the average life-span of a person in Dwapara Yuga was 1,000 years and the average life-span of a person in Kali Yuga (considered by most orthodox Hindus to be the current age) is 100 years (if even that) and at the end of Kali Yuga, it supposedly becomes only 16 years. The Bible also describes people who lived for many hundreds of years (like Methuselah, for example). Anyway, to get back to the topic of the Sumerian King List, the Sumerian King List spans over 200,000 years.
People say that the Sumerian king list is not legit because it describes kings who reigned for many thousands of years, but that still doesn't explain how near the end of the Sumerian king list, the lengths of time that the kings reigned approaches more 'believable' lengths of time (for example, the last king reigned for a mere 23 years).
>>72519037
Agreed. All of this stuff is fucking retarded and Ancient Aliens tier garbage.
>>72523792
>a ghost author
yeh, nah
ghosts don't exist, moran
>>72524182
>People say that the Sumerian king list is not legit because it describes kings who reigned for many thousands of years, but that still doesn't explain how near the end of the Sumerian king list, the lengths of time that the kings reigned approaches more 'believable' lengths of time (for example, the last king reigned for a mere 23 years).
unless it encodes something other than ruling durations of kings
did you read the book of enki senpai?
>there are people who believe in god
>not believing in a alien race that has been experimenting on us over the past 10000 years even where there is proof of this shit everywhere at all time periods
Aliens created god, we believed they were the holy one, which in a way they are being that they are so advanced from us they formed us. There is so much proof from pyramids to the nazi advancements that they exist and are the holy ones, and that god is merely a creating of man and them
>>72523981
>Map is 2 d representation and it suffers a lot of distortions to approximate celestial body like a planet
there are great circles that can be drawn on oblate spheroids though? as long as all the calculation is done in 3d, the representation should be accurate
>>72523981
>Santos Bonnaci
flat earth?
>>72524221
thanks for stopping by, do feel free to leave whenever you want
out of interest, what do you make of the ratios pi and phi being encoded in the dimensions of the great pyramid?
>>72524365
>unless it encodes something other than ruling durations of kings
Why not both? It would not be the first time that an ancient book had multiple levels of meaning encoded into it.
>did you read the book of enki senpai?
I've heard of it, but I haven't read it. I'll read it soon. Also, I have a book to recommend to you: Lost Star Of Myth And Time by Walter Cruttenden
>>72524630
Yeah, he's pushing the Flat Earth bullshit now. Fuck that guy.
>>72524461
Yes of course. And yes he is semi insane but correlations between myths and astronomical events are spot on. I have other sources but I'm on mobile sorry.
>>72524687
Nothing because it's only based on what they're estimating its original size was.
>>72524776
any idea where to get that book?
>>72524965
>yes he is semi insane
kek
you might like this then ... thunderbolts of the gods, tries to explain some of the ancient cave art drawings from around the globe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUA7XS0TvA
>>72521543
actually it is the constellation cygnus, orion does not fit right
guess where the "comet swarm/dyson sphere" is? cygnus
>>72525405
I don't know. Amazon?
>>72525392
but why do they occur so many times? if not by design?
the 5 minutes from 54:35 in this vid shows some of the ways pi and phi are encoded
https://youtu.be/eVwaftPSRd0?t=3275
the whole vid is quite good, but the last half is better
>>72521370
WUZ
>>72525527
any source for this preposterous claim?
>>72525527
Gisa plateau is basically star map on the ground.
>>72525405
These things are always fascinating. Common expressions of groups and individuals thousands of miles apart.
>>72525930
what are you doing abu hajaar?
>>72525973
>Gisa plateau is basically star map on the ground.
of orion or cygnus?
>>72525537
dammit
>>72523792
>Not that this discredits it, but these guys do not believe in an ancient Earth.
What are you talking about? Michael Cremo and the late Richard Thompson believed/believe in an ancient Earth. They're not Young Earth creationists. They're devotees of the Hindu god Krishna and Hinduism isn't against the idea of an ancient Earth, in fact it describes cycles of time that are BILLIONS of years in length (like the kalpa cycle, for example):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpa_(aeon)
>>72526510
You're wrong, sorry. I know these guys very well. They will openly admit to you they don't believe in ancient Earth.
Also, Hinduism comes in many flavors. The cult claiming devotion to Krishna is totally different from the others. They believe humans have been present in all time.
>>72526510
>They're devotees of the Hindu god Krishna
you list that as if it doesn't discredit them as absolute nutters
>>72525986
Telling people about forbidden ancient knowledge.
>>72526686
>You're wrong, sorry.
No, I'm right. Cremo himself said that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old (which it is).
>Also, Hinduism comes in many flavors.
Yes, it does.
>They believe humans have been present in all time.
You obviously didn't even read the link I posted, which says that a kalpa equals 4.32 billion years. Yes, there are many flavours of Hinduism, but NONE of the mainstream varieties of Hinduism are against the idea that a kalpa is 4.32 billion years.
Golden spiral in the Star of Inanna
>>72519200
I'll keep an open mind to this, but what exactly is the benefit of knowing this?
What can we change if we learn this to be true?
>>72526949
>Replace Krishna with the god of Christianity.
Doesn't seem so 'nutty' now, does it? It's all relative and subjective. Besides, at least Cremo and Thompson honestly said at the start of Forbidden Archeology that they were devotees of Krishna. Cremo and Thompson made a good point that EVERYONE is biased to a certain extent and that true objectivity is impossible for us humans because EVERYTHING we think is influenced by our experiences, our opinions, our pre-conceived ideas, etc.
>>72527587
>Doesn't seem so 'nutty' now, does it?
yes
in case you missed this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD9-8MuEbTI
bretty intredasting geo matrix
>>72528857
you cant summarise a 5 hour video for me?
>>72528977
ive watched it
tldr: he proves all major pyramides from south america and egypt are linked to eachother and with some star constellations, based on some very complex math
>>72528228
>Implying that all Christian scientists are Young Earthers, Bible literalists and Bible inerrancists
Some Christian scientists are okay and I don't even adhere to any religion, bruh.
>>72528857
amazing vid
>>72528977
all(well over 260) ancient monuments tell you their location info, in latitude and longitude
>>72529147
christians don't drink cow piss and consider cowdung antiseptic, and lay it on their floors AFTER cleaning
>>72529448
You realise that Cremo and Thompson are white Americans, right? kek
bump
>>72529590
white american hindus?
>>72525838
>but why do they occur so many times? if not by design?
It probably has something to do with structural integrity/centrifugal force from the earths spin. Pretty much that anything that was not in these places/built with the golden ratio/pi, has long since dissipated back into the enviorment.
>>72532492
the great circle alignment is 30 degrees from the equator
>>72532695
That doesn't invalidate my point, it just means the "safe" zone is 30 degrees from the equator.
I'm not disagreeing with the ancient earth hypothesis, just that the reason we don't have evidence for them is because of the rate of decay over most of the planet except for certain things built under certain conditions.
I'm also saying that this is why archeologists have no idea how to truly carbon date things. because almost every single spot on the planet has a different tidal pull, gravitational pull, atmospheric density etc.
This is probably why you get things like >>72520602
>Say we date a bit of charcoal amongst an excavated midden (trash) pile where everything points to 500 BCE
>The charcoal comes back as 10,000 BCE.
Its probably from 300,000 BCE from a whole different civilization cycle, but in a almost neutral decay zone.
>>72529448
amazing and pretty old
i wonder if any study was made since
>>72533538
wait, were you claiming that things not built to encode phi dissapated into the environment?
fucks sake
there are hundreds of pyramids that don't encode phi
dating is a bit tricky, on stone especially, since the ratio of carbon isotopes is the same as the rock it was cut from
>>72533689
only seen it mentioned on a few sites that were shilling cropcircles
and nothing since 2008
all those idiots thought the world was ending in 2012
These threads are always fascinating.
What if the future gets so bad that the humans create a time machine to go back billions of years ago and start a civilization then?
>>72533902
I didn't say anything not phi dissipated. Just that anything built with it or a similar "natural" number will outlast anything else and therefore will have more examples and more correlation.
I also theorized that there are places on our planet that are low entropy zones from the results of millions upon millions of gravitational adjustments by the surrounding celestial bodies.
It could have absolutely nothing to do with the golden ratio tbth, it could just be that mathematics of that level was necessary to have someone who was autistic enough to line up his buildings with the stars. Add in statistics of math+austism+luck and you have us by chance finding low entropy zones and thriving and settling those regions because we did better there then other places.
>>72518940
Lloyd Pye was right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5qJYwfAju8
we are a genetically altered race
>>72535095
>Just that anything built with it or a similar "natural" number will outlast anything else and therefore will have more examples and more correlation.
stob id!
>>72535138
yes
>>72521072
could the laser have caused a mutation do to radiation exposure that made the frogs look like salamanders? Amphibians are extremely sensitive to pollution and radiation.
>>72521089
Also the 5,000+ year old historical records from Sumer have extensive details of kings and rulers going back thousands more years.
I find it unlikely that someone in a fledgling civilization would decided to "invent" and carve into rock thousands of years of history that never happened.
>>72536249
did you read the book of enki?
>>72536625
nope, just articles on ancient history
kek at all these conspiracy noobs exploring the beginning of madness, stop right here or you fall in the hole of redpills and can never turn back.
But for beginners if you want more, watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXuTt7c3Jkg
>>72536916
check it out
>>72537203
yeah, buddhism, right
>we wuz aliens an giants an sheeit
HOLD UP
>>72526368
Orion belt.
This thread is still on wow.
>>72537203
This guy knows, there is no end to it really, rabbit hole that official science dismiss for no valid reason.
>>72539219
>This guy knows, there is no end to it really, rabbit hole that official science dismiss for no valid reason
any proofs?
I bought Genesis of the Cosmos by Paul LaViolette
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbPaUcFn9vA
>>72539655
science dismisses anything that is not empirical. That's just how it works.
>>72540899
exactly, its called confirmation bias. We are still in the dark ages, we are just not realizing it.
>>72540899
what would you call something that wasn't empirical? got any examples?
>/x/ tier garbage
Anyone who unironically falls for this is a fucking retard.
>>72541153
any form of spiritualism.
anything not bound by our physical universe. It is not a stretch to assume there is something more. Theoretically there are infinite spacial dimensions.
>>72539655
Is this RT live? What proofs do you want check the thread. Pi and phi ratios embedded into pyramids, geometric relations between sites, unexplained archaeology sites etc.
All of these are being dismissed as tinfoil mumbo because it doesn't fit current model.
>>72541285
>Theoretically there are infinite spacial dimensions.
unless you can prove that there are, then there aren't
>>72541539
but it's provabale, and therefore empiric
>>72541211
ha, jokes on you, I fell for it ironically
moran
>>72519271
that last one is about the "klerksdorps" (sp?) spheres
>>72541955
These are found everywhere.
>>72518940
Everything in this retarded book has been debunked a million times.
The average human cranial capacity has shrunken since we were supposedly "simpler" people. how the shit is that possible that humanity goes through reverse darwinism that would reward less intelligent people when the baseline was supposedly wiping their asses with leaves and the world was carried by a giant lark? granted it's all dependent on cultural values and division of labour and when that gets to be a thing, sometimes the dumb dumbs win.
made a thread about this earlier, but no luck, so just throwing it in now here instead.
The picture I am posting is of a native american (I assume he is pure), but when you compare it to a certain man then you can see something interesting.
The man I saw in him is Bastian Schweinsteiger, a German football player.
https://www.google.se/search?q=bastian+schweinsteiger&safe=off&espv=2&biw=1680&bih=949&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiEp7iQ67XMAhXLHpoKHdm4AeoQ_AUIBigB
Discuss it, please.
ps. in case the native american has german blood in him then we could just scrap this thread right away (ps again, if Schweinsteiger has native american blood in him, then we can scrap thread too)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlDNrHGUoOQ (3:50 file pic)
>>72519921
Thanks for these posts bro. Interesting stuff, and fuck the midwit spergs who >x this shit when 50% of the topics are pure shitpost.
>we know everything about our world and it's history and we know that because God can't be real
>>72544864
don't post your ved= it can deanonymize you, infact, none of it is necessary apart from the q parameter
and what are you trying to prove? some guy looks like another guy?
>>72542696
>Bosnian Pyramids
pic doesn't look like a pyramid shape
>>72546367
ved=?
daily reminder that carbon dating is not reliable past 50k years
>>72546881
the rest of the shit on the google url is not necessary and identifies you
just post https://www.google.se/search?q=bastian+schweinsteiger
>>72547010
Alright, I didn't know that. Thank you for the help
Well we know Jews were around a long time ago, so
>>72547187
always a pleasure to help someone be free of jewgles machinations
>>72543014
free online article critical of similar expositions
>http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/2000/01/001stengel2.htm
>>72546770
It is reference to this supposed pyramid site, balls have been found close to it. Theory by our local Indiana Jones.
Far fetch but he did found Neolithic site nearby and there is medieval castle on the supposed pyramid.
>>72542952
Good laugh, thanks for that.
>Finnish
>never started
>>72542952
Makes more sense than anything else in this thread
>>72518940
I made an Archaeology thread a few days back and some retards starting spouting off a bunch of bullshit.
Coming to /pol/ and talking about Archaeology with facts is like going to a Trump Rally in support of Trump as a black man, everyone hates you and you get shut up.
>T. Archaeologist
>>72551288
yeah? well I'm a lawyer, a judge, the president of several countries and best tetris player in the world, so imagine how I feel
