>not trying to get elected with the lowest amount of votes possible
>Vermont going red
>>72480486
>georgia
>texas
>blue
r u tryin to ruse me sir?
>>72480724
>>72480938
Are you two dense? In the OP he clearly states the motivation for that map, it's the route to 270 with the least amount of votes. Notice all the high pop states are blue, because states with lower population have more voting "power".
>>72481020
Texas ever going blue is about as likely as CA going red
>>72481191
That's not the point of that map. In no way is that a likely scenario, it's probably just all the highest voting power states voting red vs the lowest voting power states voting blue.
>>72481020
Doesn't matter. This shit is completely unrealistic and a waste of time
This the "0 A press run of Mario 64" of elections.
>>72481303
So is wasting countless hours on this site
>>72481191
Off topic because that's not even the point of his thread, but Texas isn't just a bunch of cowboys lynching niggers all day anymore. Lots of people are expecting it to go blue this year.
>>72480486
Fl, TX, GA, NC Red. You are an idiot.
>>72481278
>In no way is that a likely scenario
http://www.270towin.com/states/Texas
Last time it was blue was 1976, 40 years ago.
Since 1970 the population has quadrupled at least
http://indicatorsproject.com/demographics/population/
Where is your proof?
>>72481422
>3 1/5 A presses
