Really makes you wonder....
>>72438089
Please point to the amendment that says breaking into the country and fucking children is a right.
>>72438089
Woah... I think I might have suddenly become a Hillary supporter!
>>72438089
They aren't refugees they are economic migrants, if you can't see it you are willfully blind. And no amount of propaganda should make you care about them.
>>72438089
>refugees
You'd rather have a man to blow himself up rather than someone that properly handle their weapon?
>Trans
You want the opposite watching you use the restroom. Either way it has nothing to do with gun control.
>gun control
So you don't want people to protect themselves? Just because some lunatic gets their hands on a gun doesn't mean a law abiding citizen will go on a murderous rampage.
Fellow /pol/ murrikans: Would you trade closed borders and no tranny degeneracy for your guns?
>>72438563
No. If things got bad enough we could always shoot the trannies and immigrants. If we give up the guns we wont be able to shoot the next problem.
>>72438563
Never. I'd move way up north and begging training for the apocalypse.
Is there a specific name for the fallacy of comparing issues that have nothing to do with each other and calling your opponent a hypocrite for attitudes you yourself have assigned the strawman
>>72438089
>muh children
Great let's ban all gun so only thug and criminal can have them.
also let's fuck the constitution because of some disinformation
>>72438089
Oh? I wasnt aware guns were responsible for a persons mental health.
You convinced me OP
goddamn australia
>>72438853
Yes, a false equivalence
>False equivalenceis alogical fallacywhich describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency
>>72438859
>>72438853
A fallacy.
>>72438089
The difference is just a constitutional amendment.
>>72439061
I know it's a bait thread anyway, but it's for the lurkers
>>72438089
only one of the three examples is a right enshrined in the constitution, which one is it?
>>72439155
>>72438256
here's the difference
>one is a right to own and bear arms
>one is letting in unknown masses of people with their own problems, who have no skills to contribute to the economy and in many cases will refuse or cannot learn english, who cannot be vetted because no documentation exists for these people, who our government leaders and officials in the FBI/national defense/etc. have all said that "ISIS WILL INFILTRATE THE POPULATION THAT COMES", and they're bringing in a dangerous religious extremist philosophy where over 50% are in support of Sharia Law (honor killings anyone?) and over 1/3rd are sympathetic towards ISIS as a group, and I could go on and on
3. using fucking bathrooms isn't even a fucking issue, stop trying to put it on a national security level or compare it to our constitutiojnal rights you massive twats
>>72438089
OH SHIT.. /POL/ BTFO
>>72438089
>>72439443
quoted the wrong post, meant for OP
Secret Amendment 0 which was hidden by republicans who didn't agree with the message of the liberal founders.
0: A well-regulated bathroom being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people/otherkin to enter a restroom of chosen gender shall not be infringed.
>>72438089
I'm actually for mixed gender bathrooms. But that said I'm one of those perverts that take creepshots and grope chicks in public transport.
So maybe that should be taken as a "let's not do this" for the average person.
Now reverse it because whoever made this image has a anti gun bias and can't understand they exposed their own hypocrisy
>>72438089
>Really makes you wonder....
This is spam
>>72440061
ahmed pls go
>>72438089
Also on gun issues.
>>72438089
>sandy hoax
>>72438089
The worst-case scenarios of the first two instances could easily be rectified by a couple of accurate bullets.
I don't understand the point of this argument. Using anti-gun logic, if guns are too dangerous and must be extremely-heavily restricted, if not banned, then so are refugees and transsexuals. This is similar to the argument that Americans have no right to oppose immigration that will overwrite the current population because our immigration overwrote the native population (and that was immoral).
I am too autistic for this shit.
>>72438089
Retarded equivalence.
Letting immigrants freely roam across your country is letting your government have a security risk for simple moral posturing.
Letting sexual deviants inside opposite gender's bathrooms is letting your government endangering children for yet more moral posturing.
Letting people legally register and keep guns is letting your government upholding your right to protect your life against people who would easily obtain guns or other lethal weapons anyways.
All of them cause a risk, but the first two provide no reward and are self-serving to a minority of morons while the latter is a risk that provides an essential freedom for everyone.
>>72439061
look what happens when people use firearms for self defense. The homocide rate plummets dramatically. even though 10x more people pull gun on criminals than criminals use guns on innocent people, the homocide rate proves that its undeniably safer to own a firearm for protection
>>72438089
What part of "shall not be infringed" do you fail to understand?
If you disagree with the constitution of the United States of America, feel free to move to a country more in line with your personal opinions.
>>72438256
fpbp
