ITT we showcase the most shilling blogs and magazines in your country:
>pic related
>>72199441
WSJ, Fox, Drudge, Real Clear Politics, businessinsider
NYT
>>72199441
Are there any publications as well written as the economist, that aren't so biased to the left?
>The Economist
>shill magazine
It's Left leaning Libertarian with a decent sense of humor. I think theyre respectable. They hate Trump, but if you call them shills just for that you're exemplifying the meme about /pol/ that you all just shout "shill" at people who disagree with you.
>>72199794
I wish desu, I wish
>>72199441
I respect The Economist as at least it doesn't pretend to be anything but a Neocon's dream mag.
>>72199441
The Guardian.
>>72199794
The Economist is biased to the left? Are you nuts? It's packed with neocons and globalists and capitalists. It has no interest in hippies or socialists.
>>72199794
>so biased to the left
They perpetually trash left wing populist governments in Latin America.
>>72199441
>partly owned by the Rothschilds
>>72199983
You wouldn't believe how many socialist hippies I know slurp it then
>>72199829
Nigga I bet to differ. I used to love them when they stuck mostly to economics and had this cold, detached scientific outlook. Now they are getting progressively (kek) worse. I used to read a very insightful article on ISIS by the guys a while ago and it made me actually subscribe to it. Then it spiralled.
Coverage of the situation in Poland - biased and unsubstantiated.
Sucking Obama's cock, by ommiting all the badies.
Language heavily gravitating towards memes and sophistry.
Todays article: "Muh voters dont vote for Shillary for she's a woman".
Tbh thats mostly why people actually do vote her.
Man. Check their facebook page its a shitshow.
Give it a year and its the Huffington Post Deux
>>72200461
Isis appeared in 2014, they already were cucked by then. Very neo liberal and pro immigration. Its readers are highly educated and the comment section is usually pretty intresting to read, they have been complaining about the the papers quality in the recent years tho. Unfortunately these people have trouble understanding that an executive CEO or a brilliant scientist taking a job oversee isn't the same as letting millions of useless migrants move from one country to another. I bet none of these people have seen a mudslime before. I used to love them, but I take it with a big grain of salt when they praise merkel or the TPP.
