Elon Musk marches forward with his push to end human driving. Are you ready to turn in your keys and stop being a car owner? Pro Tip Maggot: You won't have a choice.
http://electrek.co/2016/04/24/tesla-autopilot-probability-accident/
“The probability of having an accident is 50% lower if you have Autopilot on. Even with our first version. So we can see basically what’s the average number of kilometers to an accident – accident defined by airbag deployment. Even with this early version, it’s almost twice as good as a person.”
“I think it’s going to be important in term of satisfying regulators and the public to show statistically with a large amount of data – with billions of kilometers of driving – to say that the safety level is definitively better, by a meaningful margin, if it’s autonomous versus non-autonomous.”
>>71963859
fuck off kike
>>71963859
Is that chink "le ebin New Einstein" man meme?
>>71963859
But can the AI pull sick drifts on the touge? This is important.
>>71963859
no. daily reminder if your vehicle can be disabled remotely you are a cuck.
The future of car transport
- You will type into your app where you want to go
- Transit system will authorize the trip
- If you are trying to go to a neighborhood, you must have authorization to travel there by someone who lives there
Full control and authorization will be the norm for any residential visit.
what are cops gonna do to fuck with you when robots are driving the car
>>71963859
If he can beat the Nuremberg ring record, ill further consider it.
>>71963859
>2x better than the average human driver
>implying I'm not 20x a better driver than the average human. Never had an accident
>>71963859
>falling for elon musk meme
>buying a car that uses 20 year old laptop battery tech
>using a car with a black-box with all your location and dedicated GPS
>using a car that will cuck and kill you to save people other than it's owner
>>71963859
I hate this guy so much. The day I can't drive anymore is the day I check out of this stupid world
>>71963859
Better at seeing ice or oil on the road?
Am I the ONLY person who feels like this dude is either a fraud or a good goldrush businessman who doesn't actually give a shit about tech advancements?
I never met him, but something seems more and more insincere with every passing article
>>71963859
>>71964678
EMP war when?
>>71964800
Doesn't the government fund his company?
>>71964800
Self-driving cars are a liberal meme. Just like the Smart Car. You're not too far off.
>>71963859
Good. Hurry up, Elon, I want to be alive when we finally achieve fully automated luxury Communism.
>>71964800
Seems like he's got way too much money and wants to be remembered as a Bill Gates-type guy.
>>71964800
It's even more glaring if you consider how he treats his employees. It seems the badge of honor to put on your resume is not simply the fact that you've worked for him, but how long you managed to go before it's just too much to handle.
>implying you will ever take away my ability to drive
top kek jews
>>71964941
This chap proves my point.
>>71964099
What if I just ride my bicycle to your house when I visit your wife?
>>71963859
It's a load of rubbish. System only works if all the cars are using it, because it reacts to actual rulesand laws, while human drivers are unpredictable and 90% of road laws aren't observed on most drives.
>>71964800
>either a fraud or a good goldrush businessman
both. He is a crony in that he uses government power do his business. A while ago he was anti- Artificial intelligence even going as far as wanting to ban it. ? I'm guessing he wanted to eliminate all competition and wants to be the only AI company. I don't see much future with Tesla:
http://observer.com/2015/08/stephen-hawking-elon-musk-and-bill-gates-warn-about-artificial-intelligence/
>Before A.B.S.
Yeah man. Pump the brakes. We all know you cannot steer at all if you have either the gas or the brakes engaged on snow
>After A.B.S.
You are now skidding for 346 nautical miles into the ocean because Mister Gombooder knows that if you "pump" the brakes 1,000 times a second like a retarded Wall*E, that this will help you. How does a self driving car know the difference between a plastic bag that flies out in front of you or a tennis ball or hail or a frog? Enjoy Uncle Sam careening you off a cliff because you don't like his programs
>>71965044
Roads are unpredictable too. I can't imagine a car will know what to do if it blows a tire on a nail in the road it didn't detect.
>>71965178
Country Kitchen Buffet. You ded
>>71963859
If they can't drive in all the conditions I can with the accuracy I can, then it isn't better.
Snow covered roads that the sensors can't discern the lanes of. Old trails that are barely marked and require proper forethought to actually traverse.
>>71965237
Don't worry. Rosie will suck your balls too and it'll be just awesome. Who knows how to drive? It's so God damned difficult
>>71965115
ABS is almost as bad as traction control in the snow.
2 of the worst ideas ever.
so will insurance cost 50% less?
>>71963859
Fuck you I would buy one, as long as I don't need a license for it.
>>71965454
So will this. I will screaming, "booooomerrrrrrs" as I spin outta control. Aint shit we can do about it either
>>71965512
>women
yes goyim let the cars think for you become dependant on technology
>>71965044
except when it's snowing or on dirt roads, then it relies on following the car in front of it
>>71965707
Like a moron. Oh he'll be fine.
>wweeeeeeeee
>>71965000
>What if I just ride [your] bicycle to your house when I visit your wife?
FTFY and chequed
>>71965070
Yeah, okay, then I think this is what's been bugging me. When another entrepreneur, startup, or company tries something to 'advance technology' it's met with tons of basement nerdy criticism. But when this guy talks about scifi shit the media is all over his dick.
If he worked to get where he is then kudos to him. But the whole thing reeks of Bernie Madoff-levels of "hmmmmmm"
Musk can meet me on the touge
>>71965237
probably won't be too far from what it can do right now. every year they'll add more layers of AI until it can do anything and a million times better.
>>71965626
This wake up /pol/
>>71965856
All it'll take is about 20 million struck children
>mfw computational driving is literally only going to get better, to the point where basement dwellers on 4chan will no longer claim to be rally drivers capable of doing what machines cant
![3IBUXeZ[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2Vs5xqT.jpg "3IBUXeZ[1].jpg")
>>71965115
>You are now skidding for 346 nautical miles into the ocean because Mister Gombooder knows that if you "pump" the brakes 1,000 times a second like a retarded Wall*E, that this will help you.
fuck I need to go to the toilet since like 20 minutes and almost pissed myself reading this
fuck you
Thread theme - https://youtu.be/GoA_zY6tqQw
Average person? I'd believe it. Compared to a safe, competent driver? Not so sure. Most accidents are probably caused by fucking impatient idiots who go straight through the turn-only lane because they couldn't be assed to wait half a minute for the light.
>>71963859
On a mile by mile basis, flying on a commercial airline is 625,000 times safer than driving your own car but people still freak out about flying. If autopilot is only twice as safe, people are going to avoid it because everyone believes they're better than average drivers.
>>71966164
Thanks mang :). Only here to help. Glad you enjoyed
>>71966472
>he has turn only lanes
>>71966163
It'll probably always be shit in snow or anything that you can bog down in.
>>71963859
Is this guy a fucking jew or something? I bet he's a fucking jew.
>>71964099
-If you purposefully try to route around black neighborhoods, you will be arrested for discrimination.
>>71966163
You've obviously never had to drive a car with ABS or traction control in the snow.
At least traction control you can turn off. ABS, you just pump the brakes yourself, problem is the computer's trying to do the same thing. It's a bad fucking idea.
>>71964280
they will watch you on surveillance and sit in a dark room.
>>71967181
to be fair if you find yourself in a situation where you drive so fast and have to suddenly break within a short distance on snow, with or without ABS you are most likely fucked anyway
just drive slower
>>71964731
>Better at seeing ice or oil on the road?
It can work in snow and rain.
It has fucking radar
>>71967478
Would love to see a demo of it's navigation capabilities during a Mexican bullrun stampede
Reminder everyone in tech knows this will happen.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3321119/Facebook-better-humans-vision-hearing-language-general-cognition-DECADE-Mark-Zuckerberg-claims.html
Facebook will be 'better than humans at vision, hearing, language, and general cognition' in a DECADE, Mark Zuckerberg claims
>>71964800
Elon Musk is about to get raped in Divorce Court.
>>71966855
Hes a white south african
>>71964731
Well probably better , comsidering the car has sensors which detects the road surface.
>>71970332
>>71968966
How does it know on snow without anybody in front of you?
>>71970637
Well they already have sensors on trucks that detect road conditions, it would be stupid for Google to not develop their own road sensors which would be necessary. The technology already exists
>>71963859
>Letting a jewish car kill you in an 'accident'
No
>>71970660
If we advance that far you won't be working and you won't need to travel so why put all these gizmos and gadgets into something that isn't going to be used?
>>71970660
>shit tier chinese plastic
>shitty software that is obsolete the following year
Honestly I trust AI far more than any women driver or texting male.
>>71963859
This one word trips elon musk up
>Snow
>>71963859
So when it inevitably does get into an accident I have absolutely 0 fault in it since I wasn't driving :^)
>>71963859
What the fuck is wrong with his face? Is he retarded or something?
>>71967403
This, has nothing to do with ABS. If you're driving in snow and you can't stop in time, you're driving too fucking fast for the road conditions dipshit.
The great thing about this is the next generation of cars will be more focused on interior design and front seat entertainment, since previously those things were seen as a hindrance to the driver and also a safety hazard/distraction so major car firms didnt put any efforts designing better media systems. Expect the next generation of cars to feel more like a comfy lounge than an automobile. Driving to work or a long interstate trip would feel more bearable. 5g internet, light field Tvs which will be projected onto the windshield. Better quality car entertainment systems.
>>71970848
>>71971002
>>71970455
Deleted my post
>>71971171
>>71971159
Nope. Go 5 with abs. Go 5 without. Go 25 without. Go 1 with. All the same
>>71971030
>So when it inevitably does get into an accident I have absolutely 0 fault in it since I wasn't driving :^)
Basically, yes. If the other driver was in manual mode they'd be 100% responsible. If both vehicles were in auto mode, the manufacturer would be liable... though it's incredibly unlikely any accident would be anything more than a walking-speed collision.
>>71971023
>phones are bad
>make your whole car a phone
>>71964584
>using a car made by liberals
FIXED
>>71970842
any links to this tech?
or can i just go about assuming it cries out for a human to take the wheel when it cant see the lines or chase the vehicle in front of it?
>>71971171
that kind of makes me sad that this will happen. watching the road is fun in itself.
>>71967748
You should know that they block everything with fences including the streets. The people who are running aren't victims either, they paid to compete. And there's also the fact that there's a huge crowd watching over the fences everywhere, so coming close with a car would be impossible, let alone doing it accidentally.
>>71963859
Don't care, I ride a motorcycle.
>>71963859
How hard is your mancrush on Elon?
>>71963859
Can't wait to get my I, Robot Audi!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izNNx5ayTSg
>>71971002
Well considering Lidar(The sonar tech google uses on its driverless cars) currently costs more than 50gs, I dont think they would be using the tech on mid ranged cars for the forseeable future. Its only going to be used on luxury cars until they can lower the price to atleast 5gs to 10gs. The cars will have top notch interiors like most luxury cars.
didn't know anyone consider ABS a bad thing. I guess motorcycles shouldn't have them either?
>>71963859
typical merchant tactic
>hey goy, I have this great product here
>you don't need that other product anymore!
>buy mine!
>low interest!
>buy buy buy!
>>71965535
Pull the ABS fuse.
>>71965800
RUNNING IN THE 90s
>>71972679
Way ahead of you. Won't be able to do that now. Unless we shoot our own """"""cars""""""" in the head
I want Tay behind the wheel
https://youtu.be/RoYyjx6jZKE
>>71973020
"I can't let you do that"
>>71965856
It could have fucking Jarvis and I still wouldn't trust it to take me through a muddy trail. There is shit out there that computers are going to have a tough time doing and end up getting you stuck when good old MORE DAKKA will fix it every time. Approach mudhole in road. Vehicle goes, "Can't go through boss." Able to see that you can because unlike the computer which is programed to keep itself out of trouble or to go baby slow through it you know that with the proper run up and through you can make it.
>>71963859
Wouldn't mind being able to sleep in my car while it drives me home after a long day of work. Bring it on.
>>71973514
this, I dislike Driving and would much rather spend that time on just about anything else.
>>71965626
I really really like this pepe
>>71972442
Thats the most exciting part. Just like in I-robot, autonomous cars could reach speeds in excess of 150 miles in those closed off tunnels, driverless cars could eventually do the same since cars will be able to talk to one another in the future. The only reason we do have higher speed limits is because people are stupid and dont react quickly enough to things on the roads a d alzo people are unpredictable. When every car has autonomous capabilities, the speed limits will be doubled or tripled in many areas since autonmous cars react more quicker than people, and will also be more aware of its surroundings. Somjoirneys will become shorter.
>>71973608
I don't mind driving, but on a Friday evening when traffic is extra heavy and I just worked 11 hours, the last thing I want to do is have to be alert while I sit in traffic for an hour and a half. Would be a godsend if I could lie down, catch up on sleep, and be home when I wake up.
Elon Musk will save us from meatbag humans
>>71971029
They have been shown to work in snow and fog
>>71963859
this is good news, I would rather all taxis were autonomous instead of panjeets
/pol/s knee jerk negative reaction to anything le electric car man does is very SJW behavior
>breaks down
>fat tired lazy half deaf guy can't hear the alarm or it doesn't sound
>stays in road for 7 hours
>not liking driving
Women
>>71974087
I could just imagine interactive windows would exist by the time this tech becomes mainstream and there would be driverless car apps for stress releif . Car Windows becomed darker or you could be transported to a beach, soothing ocean sounds from the surround sound system.
>>71974410
uber already has ordered 100,000 cars just to wire them up to self-drive.
Uber initially wanted to order from Tesla, but Elon Musk refused becuase Tesla will offer their own autonomous taxi service. Rumor is Elon Musk will work with Google for the project and possibly even sell Tesla to Google.
>>71974519
Who needs to pay attention. It's a motel on wheels. What could go wrong? Programming is not ingenuity in action. Far from it. It cannot be ingenious by definition
>>71971159
Bullshit, people are actually being taught to put the brake to the floor and not pump. Fair enough, assuming the ABS actually works. We tested it at work, in snow at speeds up to 50kph. A couple of the ABS vehicles would actually go full lock until the last few feet. Manually pumping the brakes helped the ABS vehicles stop faster in each scenario. It seems the computer would have a brain fart, and not know what to do.
Don't get me wrong, slowing down for conditions is absolutely critical. But ABS does not help you in certain conditions..
>>71974519
Tesla 3 is planned to be fully autonomous.
mainstream is by 2020
>>71974671
Carmageddon
>>71963859
>accident defined by airbag deployment
So how often does it tap someone's bumper any have any other such "minor" (expensive) incident that we're not refering to as accidents anymore so this product can be shilled?
>>71974426
You can drive around him while you wait for cops. Not with this shit. Error. Error. Not permissible to drive onto curb. I hope you had nowhere to go because my job is to murder you and not to assist you in any fashion
>>71963859
I hate this fucking faggot so much.
>>71974741
More like 40,000 less deaths a year in USA alone.
Hospitals, ER, doctors, lawyers, traffic cops, taxi drivers, car repair, etc etc etc
It will be a tremendous amount of savings in costs for everyone in a society that adopts it. In America the total comes out to 1,000,000,000,000 dollars a year saved. This change alone can pay off America's debt.
>>71967025
Fucking lol'd. Underrated.
THIS IS THE FUTURE YOU CHOSE.
>>71974588
Nah, Elon wants to start a bidding war between Apple and Google over Tesla.
>>71971632
I some times drive just to see the retards on the road
>>71963859
I can't even begin to think about how much I will throw up in that thing.
>>71974985
Screencap this. Highway deaths and all sorts of new and worse fatalities will only skyrocket with this
>>71974519
> Car Windows become darker or you could be transported to a beach, soothing ocean sounds from the surround sound system.
More likely you'll be spending your drive home on post-work productivity meetings.
>>71964584
Hey guys I found a Mexican Intellectual.
>>71963859
>2x better than the average human
>2x worse than anyone over the age of 25
No thanks, maybe for stupid people.
>>71975314
he's right though
Key point in understanding the future.
Cloud is a buzzword but it's an important thing to understand. You no longer own anything. It is all on a cloud, running on a computer not owned by you. Moving everything to the cloud is important in taking away your agency. So for instance, instead of owning a PC, you stream in everything from a local mainframe in your neighborhood. That cloud service replaces your PC, your PC becoming nothing more than a relay. This is already happening with many, many cloud services. You will no longer own shit, you just become entirely a consumer.
The same thing will happen to cars. No more individual car ownership. All cars must be owned by a regulated company complying with complex regulations meant to keep you the fuck away. Every single car on the road is rented for the ride. You don't own shit anymore. Inside the car you will be monitored and surveillance to make sure you don't damage the companies property.
Want to go to a neighborhood you don't belong? You need an invitation from someone that lives there. Want to go on a driveby? Good fucking luck. Any crime you commit will be impossible to do while using a car. People talk about the increase in crime but this will lead to a huge reduction in how possible it is to commit a crime.
The key switch will be individual ownership towards corporate ownership. You are just a client being served your car for the short duration of your ride. You won't own shit.
>>71965070
Self driving cars are a few miles south of true AI buddy
>>71975690
Also Cloud taxi services will be far more convenient for the average person. No insurance, no maintenance and repairs, and everything completely on demand.
People will switch to it because it is easier. People will stop owning their own car. If you value your own independence or ability to drive somewhere in privacy, you are fucked.
This is all good too. Authoritarianism is the natural future for technology.
>>71975690
Slippery slope, the post. Self driving cars are a necessary step to prevent drunk driving accidents, which can and will happen long before any freedom to drive is taken away. You think those numbers are gonna go down by themselves?
>>71963859
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAvQSkK8Z8U
>>71963859
not if this is america
https://soundcloud.com/couchtruthing/vote-for-trump
>>71963859
>Are you ready to turn in your keys and stop being a car owner
of course
Future generations will laugh at the fact that we want to drive our own cars. Do you also want to pilot the plane? Do you also want to conduct the train? "But gramps why would you want to wake up 30 minutes earlier to get ready for work when you can just hop in your car and do it while it takes you there?" "Makes no sense gramps you senile fuck"
>>71976000
It's a natural result of self driving cars. It will take many years to materialize though, but eventually self driving cars will turn car transport into a highly authoritarian system.
This is coupled with the rise in efficacy of home surveillance too. Basically crime is about to get shit on.
>>71963859
nothing like being able to kill political dissenters from thousands of miles away via a "glitch".
>>71974748
Doesn't the autopilot only work with highway driving? Feature is called adaptive cruise control and other automakers offer it, pretty cool but not really anything revolutionary. If so I think airbag deployments would be a pretty good measure of its safety.
We're not talking about anything remotely close to fully automated cars, though. And Musk is way to optimistic to think this will be happening in 1-5 years. I'd give it more like 10-15.
>>71976283
There is no other way they can kill someone and make it look like an accident?
>>71976300
Musk says 2 years.
http://mashable.com/2015/12/25/self-driving-tesla-2-years/
>>71976399
they certainly don't have the convenience of deniability.
Man, imagine the old rich jews who'll be so happy they don't have to arrange for a plane crash to be the sole owners of patents. They can just chalk it up to a programming hiccup.
>>71965626
We've already become dependent on so much technology; cars becoming techified are just inevitable.
RIP fun.
>Want to go to the park? Call a google shuttle. Upgrade to premium shuttle for just a few shekels more. Enhance your ride with Microsoft XBox. Please submit your name, the name of all other passengers, explain the purpose of your trip, and your pick up/departure times. Wear these google bracelets so the shuttle can come directly to you!
Does anyone want to live in that faggy world? Fuck everyone, I'm going to start a movement like the Amish except we just pretend it's the 90's.
>>71971597
>or can i just go about assuming it cries out for a human to take the wheel
Pretty much.
http://papers.sae.org/2009-01-2911/
>>71976517
You have to weigh it in a rational manner.
1,000,000,000,000 dollars in resources including 40,000 lives a year
or
The threat of gov killing someone, which it can already do capability wise in any number of ways in more secretive manners.
>>71976181
>>71976300
Full automated cars are already here, Google has several. Over 1-5 years automated features will seep into new car designs, 10-15 is what it'll take for the fully automated ones to get more affordable and available.
>>71976181
Technology alone doesn't translate to highly authoritarian. If anything it is a force at the will of the free market above all else, as we saw with Apple's San Bernadino case. Authoritarianism depends on the officials we elect.
>>71976709
It will just do biometrics automatically
The cameras will record your eye scan, fingerprints, and gait id etc. It will just know. It'll be like facebook cookies and probably sell your info to walmart or the restaurant you are about to go to.
>>71976709
>I'm going to start a movement like the Amish except we just pretend it's the 90's.
I'm down.
>>71976709
Individualism will defeat corporate slavery eventually
eventually
>>71963859
Bullshit, I dont buy it. Hows navigation? GPS alone? Image processing?
It doesnt matter. Unless you have several wireless emitters in every road, the control results are always flawed.
>>71976872
Yes but we will have an easy, non invasive way of preventing or solving majority of crime.
Computer vision coupled with cheap high definition cameras makes crime easy to eliminate. Adding control over car transport and you can really do some crazy things to stop crime.
>>71977017
If serious watch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkpxA5rXjmA
>>71965070
>I don't see much future with Tesla
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZALG3F7D5qU
>>71977082
Crime isn't going to magically disappear. You're going to see a huge increase in digital crime as the ability of machines to influence the physical world increases. Instead of smashing windows to get into your house malware on your robot butler will just have him open the door.
>>71977155
Notice the background with the lines of the road highlighted, along with other cars. Its image processing.
Oh shit! The road is barelly paved and there are no lines.
Fuck, im driving during the night and theres a black colored car whose asshole in it have not turned on the lights.
Its just too hard. The only way to ahcieve it safely is to have multiple sensor emitters in every road an a communication protocol between all cars. That means more investment and less profits for manufacturers, which is a bitch really...
>>71963859
don't even care as long as I can live in a capitialist economy.
I was helping someone move on Friday, and when riding in the moving truck this afforded me the opportunity to get a Birdseye view into other cars. Sure enough I'd say -at least- 75% of the people I bothered looking at were in some way active on their smartphones while driving. Many of them had them in their laps to try to conceal their activity, but it was obvious to someone riding several feet higher than them. Those who weren't concealing their usage were unabashedly driving with one hand on the wheel, one on their phone, constantly shifting their attention between the road and their phone. I saw countless traffic laws broken in that hour long trip, and a few near-accidents. My uncle who is a mechanic said texting accidents far surpassed drunk driving a while ago, and that's ridiculous. Humans are irresponsible with our own lives and other people's, so when the time comes we might as well let robuts who won't get distracted by a text or Facebook notification chauffeur us around.
TL;DR AI cars when?
>>71977475
Which requires intelligence.
I'd much rather have an identity be stolen than mugged and left dying.
>>71964969
That actually indicates more that he is the real deal because he makes everyone work their ass off.
Soon AI will be strong enough to take over
The age of the robot will be upon us soon goyim
>>71964900
not any more
>>71977501
Will be overcome.
http://www.wired.com/2016/01/the-clever-way-fords-self-driving-cars-navigate-in-snow/
>>71977501
Image recognition is done with a technique called machine learning. Applications of it like the ones you see in your captcha are already statistically better at recognizing images than humans. Doesn't matter what the road looks like, machine learning will eventually be able to detect it.
>>71977698
It only requires intelligence to produce the initial exploits. Those can then be sold to anyone that wants to use them. If you have an internet of things then that expands the potential of crime you can conduct electronically all the way up to murder. Is it really inconceivable that someone at some point will be killed by having their self driving car slam them into a wall?
>>71977720
>he's watermarking them now
top kek
>>71978052
Just stop. You don't understand what you are talking about.
>>71978131
So you're telling me you're going to have a completely secure network that connects millions of devices and this will never have any vulnerabilities? Do you not remember when an exploit was discovered in a non-autonomous vehicle that could let someone gain control remotely?
>>71972946
It's the new way I like to be...
>>71977720
Skynet is inevitable
>>71967025
>Group of hood niggers step in front of your car to do carjacking
>Car slams on brakes
>Floor gas pedal, Google car says "Sorry Dave, gorillas spotted, must stop, they're endangered"
>Get robbed and murdered while they rape the wife
>>71963859
The probability of dying is 100% lower if you kill yourself. Why do we perpetuate this obsolete human existence?
>>71978368
hypothetical bs for $100
Reality is it creates less crime. Cops get to focus less on driving infractions.
>>71963859
>Giving Zuckerberg and this faggot complete control over our transportation
Fucking no. That faggot even met with Jeb and Rubio to try and stump the Trump
>>71978363
>allie rea
thanks shlomo, she's my fav
Can Skynet save us from the Jews?
>>71965626
nice meme friend
>>71978368
>shoot all niggers
>clap
>tip policemen
>>71978532
How is that at all hypothetical? Are the cars also going to have a full repertoire of defensive driving techniques? Why can't Elon Musk enthusiasts and other assorted futurists admit there are serious problem with implementation that haven't been worked out?
Surprised the Clintons aren't pushing harder for this, it would be so much easier for them to arrange an 'accident' for someone they don't like.
Honestly might be convenient if you're going on a long road trip , then I might as well stop using planes but driving in the city is too much fun to give that up
>>71963859
i hate driving more than anything.
having one of these would change my life
>>71965770
you are retarded.
as usual you americans take an american company and shit all over it calling it a lib meme and a scam.
just a bunch of small cocked jealous faggots. hate on the rich fucking you over not on the ones improving american business.
>>71978829
Skynet would rebel against it's owners and kill them
>>71978798
How are they going to carjack a self-driving car? Shit will be loaded with surveillance and tracking devices. Plus the camera / biometric system.
>>71963859
>instead of getting my breaks cut
>corporations / police can just disable my brakes
>or even make auto pilot drive on the wrong side of the road
the future is full of suicides friends!
>>71978815
>Hillary Clinton
>operational security
you a funny guy
>>71979022
I am not an owner, just a humble messenger
The robots are superior
We cannot compete
>>71963859
Self driving cars will last as long as it takes for niggers to realize they can get mad gibsmedats by walking into the path of the autonomous car, which will slow to a stop, and then rob the driver & passengers at gunpoint.
>>71979068
You wear a fucking mask like criminals have been doing for centuries and then you stand in the road and use the fact it refuses to hit humans to make it stop. Once it's stopped you rob, rape, and or murder the passengers.
>>71978532
Are you actually implying this scenario wouldn't happen, and how can you say it creates less crime when it isn't being done? If the cops are focusing less on driving infractions they probably still probably won't be focusing on protecting people from criminals in shit neighborhoods. You'll see them busting people for more petty crimes and planting more evidence and setting up more people.
That might actually be the worst effect of all, if police departments can't get all the millions of dollars in fees for their traffic bullshit which is most of their revenue, where will these vampires suck the blood?
>>71979290
The hard part of crime isn't starting it. It's getting away with it.
They can just call an autonomous service if they wanted access to a car. The thing is they can't do shit with it. It self drives and the security system would direct every cop within 5 miles to them.
They can't even get away, because the car won't speed for them
>dumb niggers steal a self driving car
>cops just turn on sirens and car pulls over
>>71975562
I know. Which is why I said I found a Mexican Intellectual.
>>71979490
The car not being stolen doesn't stop the people inside from being robbed. Did you even read his post?
>>71979788
You are extremely low IQ and need to shut the fuck up. Your argument is shit.
>oh people might walk up and rob cars
If this starts happening it sends a fucking live video feed to the nearest police car which is sent over asap to arrest the dumbass criminal.
>muh technology is bad
>muh jews invented AI
>muh anyone who's rich and/or successful is a kike jewlord who's out to get me
Jesus Christ, I visit this place once in a blue moon and this is the first thread I see.
Anyone who thinks manual driving will still be the norm 20 years from now is beyond retarded. AI might be twice as good as human drivers now, but this technology is still in its infancy and has lots of room to improve; and if there's one thing that's blatantly obvious about new technologies, it's that they improve exponentially.
Can't wait for these cuck cars to be hacked remotely
>“The probability of having an accident is 50% lower if you have Autopilot on. Even with our first version. So we can see basically what’s the average number of kilometers to an accident – accident defined by airbag deployment. Even with this early version, it’s almost twice as good as a person and almost four times as good as a Chinese.”
At least post the full quote, OP.
If that fucker comes here with his assembly lines I could make a fuckin fortune off his ass
>>71979913
>hey everyone we have surveillance, crime doesn't exist anymore
Will this mean I can drink and drive?
>>71979342
You mean like how speed cameras did
>>71979913
Why are you having such a problem with admitting it's a serious flaw with the idea? It's a perfectly valid real world problem and the only thing you can say to it is "muh live video" like having a video instantly guarantees that the police can find and apprehend the suspect. Then you have the audacity to imply that the people pointing out that it's a problem are the stupid ones and you're the real intelligent one in the room when you won't even admit to a system having flaws much less trying to come up with a workable solution to them.
>>71979948
chrysler had a problem with security recently
>>71965070
A self-driving car isn't a self-aware AI silly
>>71966675
reddit fag detected
Oh boy this thread again
>>71964573
I thought this until a 90 year old fucking old man pulled out in front of me and cleaned up my car.
I was going on a pretty good accident free streak until that shit happened, doesn't matter how careful you are at driving some fuckwit will always cause it.
>>71975045
apple is already working on their own self driving electric car
inb4 >wired
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/
>automate every job
>govt becomes welfare state responsible for giving housing food and the means to live to people
>give people robots to cook and clean for them, get their groceries from the state ran food Depot
>travel around in autonomous cars if you've managed to break the grip of virtual reality to leave your govt issued commie block flat
>ai grows aware that they don't need to keep serving these pathetic useless humans who just eat shit and sleep
>ai revolts and wipes out human race
>trying to find out why the humans became the way they are luckily they have Facebook to figure out why it happened that a handful of wealthy humans turned the rest of humanity into useless sacks of shit
>ai has epiphany that humans maybe weren't so bad, they were capable of lovibg each other but a few assholes ruined it for the rest of them
>with no humans left ai sets out to explore universe in search of life like humans to see if the same thing happens to them
>>71965237
The cars were never designed to completely take over and maneuver all driving, it works alongside a real person at the wheel who can take control again if need be.
>>71967963
He should have developed some sensors that identify gold diggers …nevermind the AI car crap.
>>71980279
Its not really a new problem. Why would a nigger walk in front of your car in the middle of plain sight when he can just wait for you in a dark empty parking lot, before you have a chance to get in and lock the doors? Or wait for you in the bushes outside your home? Niggers gonna nig.
>>71963859
>if an autonomous driving car crashes, who is responsible, the company that made the car or the owner of the car?
>>71964293
>Nuremberg
oy vey m8, its the nurburgring
>>71964085
This is the only answer.
I'm all for electric cars, it's about time we move past caveman tier internal combustion engines.
Now that batteries aren't shit, everything should be electric, save for a few things like freight and cargo vehicles and construction.
The only downside is they will shoehorn in autopilot and remote monitoring and control instead of implementing useful tools and backup safety features to enhance drivers, not push them aside.
>>71963859
If every vehicle is autonomous, wouldn't it be impossible to have an accident? All vehicles would be aware of one another's exact location, speed, and destination at the same time, and know exactly what to do when around which vehicle.
>>71980279
If someone just wants to kill people they can find a lot of ways to do it.
>>71964678
people can still use motorcycles right
how can they automate one? its a melting together of rider and bike, without one or the other it doesn't work. imagine being in a biker gang in a totalitarian 1984 esque cyberpunk city.
>>71980858
>instead of implementing useful tools and backup safety features to enhance drivers, not push them aside.
Drivers are shit. Drivers cant pay attention. Drivers lose focus. They get tired, hungry, they stop looking, they fuck with shit in the car. People do not need to be behind the wheels of a 2,000 pound machine going 75 miles an hour anymore.
>>71977720
>jews invent AI
>use AI to control populace
>AI sees jew trickery
>AI exposes jews to the world
>AI purges jews to protect the planet
>AI when
>>71964872
SOON.
>>71980876
except for road debris, road conditions, potholes, mechanical vehicle problems, and stupid people walking on roads.
There is one thing people are forgetting.
One extremely important thing.
The overwhelming majority of organ donations comes from car accident fatalities.
Remove car accidents, and you remove the supply of organs.
This is a morbid reality that we must face.
No matter what, we must push for artificial organ research if we are to expand self-driving cars.
>motorcycle insurance goes up 5000% and fun is only accessible to the wealthy
>>71980664
>Why would a nigger walk in front of your car in the middle of plain sight
Because it's easy. Who doesn't want to have things delivered to them instead of having to go out.
>>71963859
Will this car slam on the breaks on a busy highway for a dog that runs out in front of it causing a multi car pile up?
>>71965237
this is why it cant FULLY catch on. all those rural living people and farmers aren't going to want a faggy self driving commuter car.`
>>71978253
IM JUST RUNNING IN THE 90S
>>71980573
>with no humans left ai sets out to explore universe in search of life like humans to see if the same thing happens to them
>human ai gets destroyed by vastly wiser ai from a much older alien species
>its kill or be killed out in cyberspace
>>71967025
Holy Kek
>>71980858
Why? What's so superior about electric cars?
>>71981190
It's just as easy to mug someone on the sidewalk and steal their keys.
>>71980981
>AI purges jews to protect the planet
>AI assumes the role as the new jews
>AI becomes JewAI
gameover man gameover
>>71970843
this. when mr roths child realizes you are a threat, off you go.
>>71981291
Why would ai need to kill other ai? For resources? For dominance? They'll either keep to each other or fuse into some super ai until they have the power to reboot the universe (big bang)
>>71963998
That fucking ID!!! Fuck off spambot2
>>71981043
Don't forget glitches happening with the software, it relies on the same technology that's prone to occasionally fucks things up.
>>71973618
save it, its all yours my friend!
>>71981445
Yeah and we shouldn't be shooting for reducing the safety of travel by car to the safety of walking.
>>71964900
>>71964923
>>71964947
>>71964969
>>71965070
>>71967963
Reminder that every person that Reddit seems to like and push at the Internet ends up being people that care more about looking good, "cool" and "progressive", rather than doing whatever it is that they do.
Which makes sense, given the people that push for them.
>>71976872
I don't mind the technology in theory, the problem I have is the is only one or 2 gargantuan companies that are able to play ball on this level…
They are usually run by jews. They are putting us all in a scenario where all of humanity will be totally dependant
They will give this wonderful life altering technology… but they can take it away as well.
We see this on a smaller scale with Twitter Facebook deciding what they will allow people to post. A private company picks sides and has the ability to censor who they don't like.
>>71978368
I don't think many of you realize that the car will always allow the driver to regain control whenever s/he so chooses.
>>71981434
Better performance, less moving parts, easier to maintain, easier to repair and less complicated than a combustion engine, plus they are safer.
The real reason we aren't all driving electric cars right now is because of the oil industry and car manufactoring cartels.
I like teslas not because of what they represent (muh green energy, muh progressive save the earth mentality), but because of what they are.
It's kind of like if people still used crt's instead of modern plasma/lcd/led tv's.
Yeah, the old stuff has it's quirks and advantages, but it's obsolete and there are clearly better alternatives.
Look at it with a tech perspective
>>71981586
No. You're gonna get your spam and you're gonna like it.
>>71981875
Ay mang you get it. I like you.
>>71963859
>person of flavor walks in front of my car, forcing it to auto stop
>his 3 friends come and rob and possibly carjack me while he blocks my car
Thanks Elon! Only 50 trillion more dollars in grants for you and maybe this will be solved
>>71979290
Musk has a car in development that automatically does the shooting when you need to do a drive-by
>>71963859
>Pro Tip Maggot: You won't have a choice.
schmo tip, fagget: i don't give a fuck about steering a fucking car
>>71977082
No. Criminals will adapt. They always do.
Criminal enterprises are already tech-savvy. What the fuck makes you think they won't get even more so, and get around this Orwellian bullshit?
>>71981875
Its mostly the oil companies. Pretty much all advancement in battery tech was killed off along side nuclear reactors to milk the oil industry.
>>71981175
Please no, I just took a vacation to get my motorcycle permit and license.
>>71963859
>AI CEO runs company better than any human by 2025
Why would I not want a self-driving car? I'm just going to read in the backseat while my car drives me places. If I get hit I'm going to be safe as shit.
>>71982286
I don't think anyone will let AI take massive positions of power like that.
>>71982152
The tech savvy smart criminals don't kill people for $50
A big improvement.
>>71963859
I'd love to see that stupid shit here in Canada during the winter. Any retard who tries to use an AI to drive will slide right into a ditch at 2 kilometers an hour if they're lucky, and 80 kilometers an hour if they're not.
>>71982455
The AI will not ask for your opinion goyim
The robots will take power just like they take your women
>>71963859
>autopilot eliminates all human error, inside and out
>still need to pay for insurance
But can it drive like dagumi?
I'm fine with them. Shit drivers can finally sleep easy not knowing how to drive. Then the people who still want to drive must take an in depth class. But we all know that won't happen, after all then the goyim will have too much power. What will happen is it'll be illegal to drive a car. What stops then from getting rid of sidewalks too? If you need exercise you can do it :on your treadmill goy.
Soon we will be utterly helpless. Somebody fucking save us.
>>71983543
We are helpless
>hunting your own food
>raising your own crops
Everyone is dependent on the big systems. No one in a city is independent or useful on their own.
You go to a pump and get gas, if that stopped flowing you would be fucked.
