A swedish professor emeritus in criminal law has proposed a law that says all sex without pronounced consent will be illegal. This is truly progress, and a source of pride for us Swedes.
http://www.aftonbladet.se/debatt/article22682523.ab
pic related
>>71950635
>>71950635
I don't really care, people who practice casual sex/sex without love in general should all be in prison anyway.
>>71950635
>A swedish professor emeritus in criminal law has proposed a law that says all sex without pronounced consent will be illegal. This is truly progress, and a source of pride for us Swedes.
Did you read the legal council comment on this?
Since there is still nobody to be an objective witness, this changes nothing. It's still just word against word.
They're changing the law to do virtue signalling, without actually doing anything at all.
>>71950880
>>71951093
Alternately 20 lashes in the town square, we'll see which is more effective at disparagement.
And how do they plan to prove that he/she pronounced consent?
Let's say I'll decide that the last girl that slept with me actually raped me. I'll go to police and say "I didn't consent and she slept with me, that's rape". Next time they'll bring her in and she'll say that I consent. Now what?
This is the plot to Cherry 2000, i'm losing all sense of reality
>>71950635
Well, it is not that stupid with the current situation. Would atleast stop this SJW flood of retarded cases which end in a money hole clustrefuck. Just start selling consent form right next to the condoms and now you can engage in totally legal sex.
>>71950880
>love
Why are there still people on this site believing in such things?
>>71950635
This is racist against migrants, who are unable to receive confirmation of consent due to language barriers. Thus they will be exempted from this law.
This is good right? If there is no pronounced consent, then even "regret drunk sex" will be illegal for both parties, so no more pussy pass for women.
>>71950635
>before we bang, please sign here, here and here
>>71951549
>check the box for where you would like me to finish
>>71950635
I see, the point is to make rape rates the same for kebabs and swedes. Then they can claim it's radioactive masculinity that's the problem.
>Mari Heidenborg
Finnish why
>>71950635
So... they are reinventing marriage?
>>71950635
It just comes across as autistic
"Would you like to have sex with me?"
"Yes I would like to have sex with you"
>>71951543
>implying they'll give men the option to not consent
If drunk sex happened and neither party consented it would still be considered rape by the male
Has anyone actually ever tried to ask, "EXCUSE ME MAAM, BEFORE WE CAN ENGAGE IN SEXUAL COITUS, I'M AFRAID I'LL NEED TO ASK YOU TO PRONOUNCE YOUR AFFIRMATIVE AND ENTHUSTASTIC CONSENT REGARDING THIS ENDEAVOR. DO I HAVE YOUR AFFIRMATIVE AND ENTHUSIASTIC CONSENT AND PERMISSION TO PARK THE SAUSAGE IN THE MEAT GARAGE?"
I imagine it shrivels a vag right up.
>>71951653
>please rate your experience from 0 to 10 in the box provided for a chance to win an iPad Mini
>>71951549
No matter how formal or explicit consent is, women can always say that they felt pressured to consent. Doesn't matter if you weren't the one putting pressure on her. Maybe she felt a general social pressure to put out because all her friends were getting laid. Boom, her consent was coerced and invalid.
>>71951549
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-7QFImmIkM
>>71952033
>>71951705
>Heidenborg
Exceptionally finnish sounding last name, good try thou.
>>71951402
I think the idea of all this is basically to give women a really easy way to retroactively withdraw consent if they decide they don't really like chad or how they had sex with him later on. Ultimately I think feminists want women to have this power with whatever mental gymnastics it takes to justify it. The whole attitude seems to be "if you've done nothing wrong to a woman you'll never have anything to fear!"
>>71951543
>then even "regret drunk sex" will be illegal for both parties
That's funny that you think they give one iota of a shit about fairness like that. Remember, this is a country where it's legal to be a prostitute but not a John.
>>71952068
This
>>71950635
Sexcrime. Do leftists read 1984 for ideas.
>>71952547
Or rather illegal to be a john and not a prostitute.
Basically they want to make sure men never have a foolproof "out" that will save them from a rape accusation. That is unacceptable.
>>yfw this is a good thing when muslims start enforcing it on women too
then in a few years they redefine "consent" to be marriage and they come full circle back to tradition
>>71951475
this
arranged marriage > romance, as it was for thousands of years
>>71950635
Feminism fighting against themself
>>71953505
>>71951475
That's why I added in sex with love as an option as it was in the garden of Eden, sex with love = wed in spirit in the eyes of God.
non-whites don't care about consent anyway
>>71951703
Bingo!
If they have this new law pass then they should be forced to tell them the race of their "attacker" and then we'll see who's really doing all the rape over there
>inb4 swedish cover-up become majority rapists were muslim
>>71950635
Swedens hatred of the white male really know no bounds.
Give us a ring when you've had enough and wan't to join our empire again.
>>71954358
Swedish women would never admit they were raped by mudslimes since that's considered racist. Only Svens are rapists.
>>71950635
BUT ANON SOMETIMES A "YES" MEANS "NO"
>>71950635
Just because some profesor emeritus proposed it doesn't mean they will pass it. Easy Swecucks
Sweden is nearly there. Only a few more before this policy becomes a living meme.
>>71954845
This is actually a draft of legislature based on a state approved investigation of sexual crimes. Soon we'll all run around with these consent forms.
>>71955457
Draft has to be approved or it it already approved?
This is after injecting only 1 marijuana
Say no to drugs
>>71955192
Swecucks should pray to Allah that sand niggers will overthrow swedish government soon enough.
>>71955808
Is this really the same bitch?
>>71950635
This is already the law in California, we've outcucked you Sven.
>>71950635
Ah, the third wave feminism switch from the old "no means no" to the new "yes means yes" campaign. I guess there are still too many women having sex with men for the lesbians in charge and the betas who serve them in order to appear "progressive". Thank God this is destroying the societies who implement it, so we won't have to worry about it to spread. It's just a shame it happens here and dooms us, when it would serve mankind better to happen in Africa or India, but of course it's tied to technological advances and higher degrees of civilization. It will soon be over and we'll possibly see a long era of new "dark ages" with violence, decay and fragmentation, probably largely influenced by Islam. And after that, after another thousand years or so, some societies will get back on their foot, get a higher degree of civilization, and new feminists will emerge, pointing to our long lost "Western World of the 21st century" where women were equal and even ruled, like our feminists point to long forgotten societies in the past; "see, back then women had rights, women were leaders!" and use it as argument to implement this as well, not as a warning from olden times that all these societies did not survive.
>>71951973
>DO I HAVE YOUR AFFIRMATIVE AND ENTHUSIASTIC CONSENT AND PERMISSION TO PARK THE SAUSAGE IN THE MEAT GARAGE?
That oughta stop actual rapes. Great idea, Sveed'n.
>>71955808
Looks like before and after feminism.
If they want to stop rapes, why don't they stop importing 3rd world niggers? This isn't fucking rocket science.
>>71950635
I mean why would any swede oppose, since no one has sex there, no one will care
>>71951034
well then should for example a native swedish girl and a glorious negroid male want to engage in coitus they should have a designated witness. Preferably a native swedish man to observe said verbal consent as well as to observe the woman's physical body language to ensure it indicates consent as well.
>>71955847
I'd rather live in turkey as an atheist than sweden as a swede desu.
>>71950635
Now if only that applied to muslims
>>71956233
Link to the description of that cucklifornian law?
>>71950880
>prison
why waste the money when you can just execute them right then and there?
>>71951034
>>71956860
...or the swedish government should make sellers of condoms include legal consent forms(like pic related) so that it's not just "word against another word".
>>71957019
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/03/living/affirmative-consent-school-policy/
It only applies to college students but its the same concept as OP's link
>You said yes
>-No I didn't
this changes literally nothing
>>71957019
Oh, there he is again. Using his favorite new word, like the lemming he is. "Oh, I heard somebody else use it and it makes me feel REAL POWERFUL to toss around this term that I barely understand." That's it, little simpleton... keep repeating it.
"Cuck".
The word flows effortlessly from your fingers onto the keyboard. As you type the word and try to imagine new and exciting ways to use the term in fun and fanciful new ways, you softly fantasize about what it really means... you gently touch your tiny cock as you imagine a giant black dick becoming the central part of your life. That's right, keep whispering it. Keep typing it. We all know how much it really REALLY means to you.
>>71957616
C U C K
U
C
K
>>71956961
As far as I understand they hsven't passed it yet.
>>71952547
>>71952970
Muslims got it right 4 male witnessses.
>>71957608
ITS BEAUTIFUL
>>71950760
That picture is actually from Britbongistan
