If you decided to enter politics by joining a political party, would you prefer party whose ideology matches yours' almost exactly, but has pretty much no chance of gaining enough votes to have representation, or the one whose ideolog slightly differs from yous, but has real chance of actually gaining some seats?
I am guessing for burgers it'd be choosing between libertarian and republican party?
>one party states not allowed
>>71934920
>fascist/communist
That doesn't even make sense.
>>71935071
>authoritatian ideologies, with strong and omnipresent state where personal liberty is suppressed
Really the only thing they really differ in are economical policies. But that is not the point of this thread.
>Fascist/Communist
...
>>71934920
I want libertardians to leave
>fascism
>majority rule
>>71934920
This image has to be a joke right?
>>71935071
That's what happens when retards on /pol/ lump social and economical policies together.
>>71936593
>>71936793
Explain how they are different when it comes to individual freedom.
>>71936764
I dont now, i just used first politics related image i found.
>>71934920
The more important axis is this one.
>>71938214
>nationalism isnt the most nationalistic one
ok
>>71934920
>implying the Republican Party isn't full of big-government neocons
bump i am p curious
>>71940567
>>71939636
You could say tribalism is nationalism diffused to most extreme extent.
>>71942510
>Fascism is majority rule
lolk
>>71942510
fascism is pretty corporativist too senpai
>>71942806
>>71943125
>Republicans aren't authoritarian
>>71943565
>>71943867
you do know that 'libertarian' is just made up buzzword that americans use to refer to classical liberalism right
>>71944470
>>71936877
You can be a republican communist.
It being an economic ideology means you can tack it on at then end of anything. So adding it demonizes a side for practices its not about which is not logical and only serves to weaker you position with unnecessary bias.
>>71934920
>2016
>Still believing in a left-right political spectrum.
Dumbass.
>>71944931
>ignoring what OP is about
>not even understanding the OP picture either
it has nothing to do with left/right spectrum
