Would Jesus vote republican or democratic?
>>71886480
God doesn't exist grow up
>>71886480
Neither
>>71886545
Prove it.
>>71886480
Stop spamming /pol/ with baseless religious shit shill
>>71886480
Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and Give to God what is God's
>>71886545
*tips fedora*
>>71886545
what does that have to do with the question
>>71886480
Jesus would run third party and lose for our sins.
>>71886545
He talked about Jesus the man, not god you dumpy faggot.
Jesus wouldn't vote
>>71886480
Jesus was a libertatian
>>71886480
Jesus wouldn't vote, he'd rule. And will.
Left
>>71886676
No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Render_unto_Caesar
Jesus made some BAD DEALS desu.
>>71886545
>>71886545
/thread
>>71886480
an illegal cannot vote
>>71886730
>>71886596
Yes, give your 3% to Caesar and 10% to God.
>>71886480
Jesus wouldn't vote for either of those scumbags
>>71886590
No proof you delusional twat
Jesus was a kike, so statistically, odds are he'd vote democrat.
>>71886884
Jesus would love everyone equally, that's why he wouldn't vote. There's a difference.
Why always Jesus? How would Muhammad vote? Buddha?
>>71886917
I'm an atheist who has a disbelief in God. I never claim that God doesn't exist, however. There is no evidence that he doesn't exist and because you claimed he doesn't exist, you need evidence to backup your claim.
Logic is a bitch, eh?
>>71887060
Same with Buddha. Buddha and Jesus were pretty synonymous in their ultimate goals.
Who cares about Muhammad.
>>71886480
He wouldn't vote at all. He would enter the capital and cast out all the congressmen, declaring himself Divine Emperor.
My Last Day (English)-- the Jesus Anime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIDYvg73RuM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYq03HajrhI
>>71887060
>How would Muhammad vote
Republican.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVpfcq4pV5U
>>71887060
muhammad would try to kill them and rule
buddha would not give a fuck
liberals try to cite jesus because they believe any and everyone that doesn't march lockstep with them is a bible-thumping evangelist.
>>71886480
He would run for president as an independent
>>71887503
>try
he already succeeded m8
>>71886618
>dat pic
New atheists are so fucking annoying.
>>71887432
Muslim are globalists, teuton.
They have the same value as the democuck and most leftists: destroy the culture of the Other and force your will on them with the full power of the law.
The right is freedom obsessed.
Jesus would never vote since democracy is absolutely shit.
Democracy killed Jesus and saved the bandit Barrabas.
>>71886618
>this is my gospel
So you changed from blindly following one religion to another.
>>71888095
How is it democracy if the crowds were all Sanhedrin shills?
>>71886480
Neither. Both are selfish. Also he would vote for himself.
>>71888192
The crowds are always shills in demotrash
>>71888095
Technically Jesus was killed by a wop with a spear.
>>71886480
Jesus wouldn't vote but since the vast majority of Dems don't believe in Jesus and would reject him, he'd lean more with the Republican side.
>>71887113
1. Christians claim God exists
2. Logician asks for proof or else God can't exist (proof by lack of conclusive evidence)
Conclusion from Christians: God exists because he exists (circular reasoning, a fallacy)
God can't logically exist.
he wouldn't vote.
Voting isn't required by law, as a Christian you're required to obey the law if it doesn't conflict with faith but voting isn't required to submit to earthly leaders.
>>71887060
>Why always Jesus? How would Muhammad vote? Buddha?
Islam isn't just a religion, it's a political system as well. He'd form a Sharia Third Party. Once Islam outbreeds everyone, he'd force Sharia democratically by only need a 51% majority. Isn't Democracy grand some time?
>>71887113
There is no ark, we would find evidence of the flood as well; we havent.
>his mom saw him come back!
>Jesus
>Roman times hippy
>voting
>>71888981
NUH UH
>>71887113
Carbon dating disproving most of the stories in the bible and therefor breaking it's credibility
>>71886480
Neither. Earthly politics are not a concern of the Father.
That was the whole point of "render unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers, render unto God what is Gods."
Applying Jesus to Earthly powers misses the entire point.
>>71888981
>There is no ark, we would find evidence of the flood as well; we havent.
That's a pretty stupid thing to say, wasn't it made out of wood? I'd doubt it last thing long under those conditions. There are also belief that a massive global flooding did happen
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/evidence-for-a-flood-102813115/?no-ist
>mfw I thought /pol/ was full of jew hating right wing conservatives
>mfw it's nothing but egotistical fedora tipping edgelords
>>71888981
>we would find evidence of the flood as well; we
Not a christfag but there is actually evidence of massive floods all over the world some 12000 years ago (end of the last ice age) caused by huge glacial dams in vid related a lake the size of Lake Michigan drained across the US midwest in a matter of days
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Na-yPW-52I
There are some full length documentaries on jewtube as well, it's not ancient aliens tier shit, it's accepted as fact by geologists
>>71886480
He would vote for the American Falange
>>71889251
What are you even talking about you actual retard? Most of the historical stories have been proven true, like the story of David and his conquests and the story of the Assyrian-Israelite war.
Why are you posting when you have no idea what you're talking about?
>>71889431
>being an atheist
>instantly fedora tipping edgelord
wew lad
>>71889571
>implying simply being able to measure life past 6000 years doesn't disprove the entire book
>historical
well no shit historical
>>71888981
Is the ark not a metaphor for something else?
>>71889843
That's pretty much what all I'm seeing on this board, I'm not saying all atheist are elitist assholes but the anons on /pol/ are.
>>71886545
>>71886811
(you)
>/pol/ believes in a boogeyman that's sole argument for existence is "you can't prove he doesn't exist"
holy shit all my wew and lad. i don't know what's more tipsy, militant argumentative atheists or the tools that actually believe the god delusion. this shit's makin me euphoric, but yall niggas still retards
He was a Jew so umm democrat.
you realize without religion your movement will never take off, right?
>>71887113
You can't prove a negative. It's your responsibility to prove the positive.
>voting
>Implying there isn't a higher power that knows what's good and bad for you and has the power to decide what you should be allowed.
so yeah pretty much left.
>>71886480
>Would Jesus vote republican or democratic?
Democratic.
>>71886480
Jesus wouldn't vote.
>>71896670
>Pope Francis
spineless coward who isn't worthy his title
>>71886545
Hes talking about Jesus.
Jesus was an actual person who existed.
Stop being triggered by religion.
>>71886480
He would flip his shit over the modern day Pharisees and smite them all.
>>71886545
then neither do you
>>71886480
jesus would tell you to give all your possessions away to the poor (not the church) and go live among the homeless preaching love and having communal property
>>71896806
>spineless coward
He's a normal Christian pretty representative of Christianity.
>>71886480
Jesus would pass out after a bowl and forget to vote.
>>71890528
as a christfag what are you even doing on /pol/ ?
i am a christfag and god gave me a glorious depression, and when i get better i wont have any reason to be here anymore.
>So what the hell are christfags doing on /pol ?
>>71896993
Not sure if that thing in the pic is an ugly woman or an old gaylord.
WELP
>>71896993
i assume you are orthodox christian...what is your opinion on non-orthodox christians?
>>71897268
>Not sure if that thing in the pic is an ugly woman or an old gaylord.
She's representative of Christians.
Jesus wouldn't vote. He'd be walking around the country living the hippy lifestyle spreading gospel everywhere he goes.
Jesus would be a weird mix of Libertarian and Statist. He'd accept no Earthly authority or laws. Instead of laws he'd follow morality, which is exactly what Libertarians want, but he'd also know that there's a God who can punish him for breaking God's laws, which is Authoritarian.
He'd probably lead the entire world into a Libertarian society where most people avoid doing bad things because they're afraid of God instead of following non-aggression principles and other Libertarian concepts.
>>71897346
Ivan, quick! I need the vodka to remove this image.
>>71897298
>i assume you are orthodox christian
/pol/ is an anti-Christian board, anon. Rather assume that I am against all religious nutters.
>>71886480
Jesus would probably vote left, but closer to the center, like Bill Clinton left. Back in the day, Jesus wouldve basically been considered the Bernie Sanders of messiahs.
>>71897186
What are we doing in 4chan?
>>71897357
Jesus wouldn't have been libertarian. There's no way he wouldn't be for universal healthcare or welfare programs.
>>71887060
For the record Saudi Arabia is literally the most perfect representation of Islam. Probably second place is Iran. So pretty much that. Very theocratic, very limited freedom based on a strict interpretation of Sharia Law, led by a few monarchs, not very cultural but extreme sense of right and wrong.
Buddha is places like Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, India. Really confused but has many elements of goodness and extreme freedom, such as free prostitution but its wild and not quite as much regard for human life based on the non attachment of things and people Buddhism preaches.
Jesus would basically be late 1700's France. Or 1600 Italy. Freedom of choice, lack of theocracy but piousness is front and center, and Catholicism is the moral compass for the nation. While money making is free and people are prosperous, wealth is forced not to pool too strongly in the hands of a few, charity is prized and people who don't respect this are hung on gallows or beheaded. Culture is everything because it glorifies God in everyday life.
Islam despises idols so they typically don't paint much religious themes.
Jesus would tax megachurches and for profit churches but leave charities tax free.
>>71897549
*against
>>71897524
Jesus hung with Whores and criminals.
So we are hanging out with Virgins and neats.
>>71897346
Representative of what?
I will tell you a secret:
When you fuck the Holy Orders, you destroy the entire Church.
If this poor thing orders priests or deacons, there is not Baptism nor Eucharist.
They are no longer Christian.
>>71897387
>anti-Christian
more like anti-religion
>>71897632
>They are no longer Christian.
By what definition? Yours? Are you the Holy Uber Pope of the Correct Interpretation of the Holy Bible? Lol.
>>71887333
god damn, the animation is pretty good for not actually being a japanese studio.
>>71897549
He wouldn't be for forcing people to pay for welfere programs. You honestly believe Jesus would pay people with guns to go take money away from people?
He's Libertarian as fuck. He encouraged helping those in need instead of going ''you aren't helping the poor? I'LL FUCKING TAKE YOUR SHIT, FAGGOT''. He's no Robin Hood.
>>71886480
He would be an Independent candidate
>>71886545
*dib*
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>>71886480
democratic or socialist, the disgusting commie
>>71887113
I believe that a pig create the universe... You can't prove me wrong so fuck you.
See? That's not how things work
Jesus was not involved in politics. This is why Judas turned on him. Judas wanted someone to start a revolution and Jesus was not about that at all.
Jesus was about the bigger picture.
>>71897573
>Jesus is for taking money at gunpoint
Sure, he would be for those things if they were funded by voluntary donations.
>>71886589
/thread
to the left is the state
the the right is the cross
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c
FUCK ALL LEFTIFTS!!!
He wouldn't care about this. The politics of the Earth are nothing before Christ. It would be like a human caring about ants.
>>71897874
>Jesus was about the bigger picture.
This
Democrats stand for infanticide so I doubt Jesus would vote for them
>>71897758
But he would.
You don't seem to realize how left wing Jesus was, historically speaking. I wouldn't be surprised if he would be a communist.
>>71897720
I will correct myself:
They are no more in comunion with the rest of the Christians, so they are excomunicated at their own will.
Catholics and Orthodox, wich conform the only Church that really cares in terms of Christianism.
Democratic. Jesus was liberal and a jew
>>71886545
in other words, "only satan exists" ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqQdc0mX1_c
LEFTIEEEEEEE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
OUTTA HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>71898043
>Jesus told people to give to the poor
>Somehow this means he supports worker ownership of the means of production and democratic workplaces
retard
>>71886545
daily reminder that being atheist is autistic
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036880
>>71898043
Forcing people to pay charity goes against everything the bible says.
Him saying that you should help the poor isn't the same as saying he wants to force everyone to help the poor.
He was all about freedom of choice (i.e voluntarism) and morality derived from god (i.e universal morality).
He's the ultimate Libertarian.
If you don't want to help the poor and keep all wealth to yourself you will be judged by god, and all that shit.
>>71886480
The one who is worthy
>>71887113
You are a retard.
>>71886480
>Jesus returns to cast vote.
Jesus just returned moron.
The election is off.
>>71886480
Christ would know left and right, republican and democrat are just memes. Idols worshiped by the foolish. He would vote as his spirit told him.
>>71897066
This. The original hippy fag.
>>71886480
Neither
He hated moneylenders, and guess who funds the Democrats + Republicans?
Well, except Trump
>>71886480
Jesus would be deported back to Mexico
>>71886480
You faggots are missing the point of Jesus.
We killed him. Humans killed God. He wouldn't vote because if he came back to Earth, we'd kill him again because we're fucking garbage.
That's the message of the Bible.
>>71898126
I'm not just talking about that. Jesus was for government control and taxation. Just about any historian would acknowledge this.
>>71898216
We aren't talking about Christianity, we're talking about Jesus of Nazareth, the historical figure.
>>71886480
>Son of God
>"vote"
When he returns it will be to rule. Not to fucking vote.
>>71887397
This Buddha and Jesus in the same message in their story. Which was don't be a bastard be kind to others.
>>71887060
>>71886480
Jesus would vote Democrat because he was a jew hippie, Muhammad would also vote democrat for the sweet gibsmedat. Buddah would throw away his vote on some irrelevant shit party or write-in "nobody".
Religion typically favors a state of monarchy. This thread is a waste of time.
>>71886842
that less than i pay in taxes now... i could live with that.
>>71898628
wrong, it was all part of the plan, the lord rises
Roman:tell me about Jesus, why does he preach? A lot of loyalty for a hired sword!
>Or perhaps he's wondering why you'd shoot a man before throwing him off a cliff
At least you can talk! Who are you?
>We are jews, god's chosen people. no one cared who i was until i was called spoke the word of god. who we are doesn't matter, what matters is father's plan
If i crucify you will you die?
>It would be extremely understandable
you're a forgiving guy
>for you
was being caught part of your plan?
Of course. Judas betrayed me in favor of your offer, he had to follow god's will
Well you got yourself caught! What's the next part of your master plan?
>dying for your sins... with no survival!
