>my sides
He makes a point, we males always are starting wars and killing each other.
>>71869704
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OSuohq1dCY
yeah
>just a couple of nations not talking to each other
as if women ever shut up
>>71869704
She's not wrong
She's right, women are completely capable of of leading a society beyond cavemen.
>>71869704
>Who was Margaret Thatcher?
We would be starving to death rather than fighting
>>71869776
>He
It's like everybody forgot how Hillary started the Libya war.
>>71869704
>Who is Indira Gandhi
>Who is Margaret Thatcher
>Who is Madeleine Albright
>Who is Hillary Clinton
>>71869704
Merkel is exactly why this statement is so hilarious.
>>71869704
Are you saying the application of power is gendered?!? How dare you! Cis White scum!
I can't wait for the wiki entry on WW3 to include the reason: "President Stacy said that Chancellor Madeline's purse looked thotty"
>>71869960
France and much of EU would have done it without her help but she certainly had a hand in the dirty execution of Gaddafi.
You Americans are literally about to elect a woman who personally ordered the execution of a world leader.
>>71869704
This bitch underestimates men's capabilities to be passive aggressive. Does she not remember the Cold War?
>>71870170
The US had gadaffi targeted for decades. Even Bill took a shot at him.
>>71869776
>Males always are starting wars and killing each other
We fight because sitting on our laurels while our people are abused and taken advantage of my the international community is not a situation in which you can sit on your laurels. There's nothing dishonorable about fighting to help your people. Anyone can be greedy and selfish, and anyone can be honorable and just. Those traits are limited neither to men nor to women.
>>71870346
>women being passive aggressive
nothing of value happens
>men being passive aggressive
usher in an era of scientific advancement under the pretense of a dick measuring contest
God damn, is there really nothing man cannot do? That's what separates man from woman. We can at least to a degree take our negative energies and put it towards something productive.
>>71869704
Delusional as fuck.
>>71869908
/r9k/ have their own island?
>>71869847
She is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorian_era
>>71869847
lol no
>>71870748
If all the retards of the world had their own island, we would be far better off then we are now. Why are mentally disabled people even allowed to live past infancy?
>>71870148
Females are pretty reasonable, they just turn their nations in cucks or make the nation hate them.
Tatcher saved UK and they hate her.
Elizabeth №2 cucked them and they love her hysterically.
Only Russians are the exception here, because we cant really hate. IDK if it`s genetical or cultural.
>>71870170
They did it because he wish to introduce a new gold-back currency and didn't want to get paid in petrodollars, threatning the jewish hegemony.
Just like Russia and China are doing.
The nuclearclock have never been so close to 12.
nah have you ever seen these new age supposed competent women?
they're batshit crazy. women can't be successful and not be sociopathic weirdos
>>71871106
Because killing them reduces their parents' morale.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html
Who is Joan of Arc?
Who where the female soviet snipers?
Who was recently allowed to be included in Special Operations?
Who where our honeytraps?
Who make up a small portion of the stars on CIA's memorial wall?
Who are the dykes in the military?
>>71871773
Oh no... women are incapable of violence
^^Sarcasm included^^