>tfw can't decide between national socialism or libertarianism
national socialism is just socialism, it breeds a generation of cucks which will devolve into communism anyway
>>71853486
>edgy teenager problems
>>71853486
Libertarianism is liberalism for murifatties.
>>71853602
>halal shop problems
deciding which failed ideology to argue over online is quite possibly the most important decision you'll ever make in your life. i wish you the best of luck
>>71853486
>Supporting meme ideologies
>Not being a based mainstream conservative
>>71853657
libertarianism is classic liberalism, because modern liberalism is such a different beast nowadays, in its "progressiveness."
>>71853486
libertarianism is a jewish idealogy, which is why it's allowed
national socialism is a white ideology, which is why its demonized
>Can´t choose between literal polar opposites
what.jpg
>>71853486
Ethno National monarchism
be a racist libertarian
>>71853751
Yes in murifattie rhetoric. Rest of us have these "classical" liberals in goverment.
Libertarianism is a non-ideology for fencesitters. Between Communism and National-Socialism is the mass of tv watchers and comic book readers. PICK A SIDE WHITE MAN
>>71853666
based moldova
>>71853853
Nationalist libertarian. Take care of my people and nation. Fuck everyone else.
>>71853789
I think it's quite rational.
The gent is essentially a libertarian, but sees the value in conformity and strong links to one's community, heritage and identity.
Libertarianism is nice in theory, if everyone were a normal, civilised conservative. As they are not, degeneracy persists and perhaps the mere existence of it means the OP is drawn to an ideology that stamps such perversions out.
>>71853486
>safety at the expense of liberty
or
>liberty at the expense of safety
you don't belong here
>>71854222
trips confimed for truth
>>71853867
No, most European countries have pseudo-socialists who are systematically collapsing their countries through increasing taxes.
Even "conservatives" nowadays seem to be pushing higher taxes and state controls.
>>71854222
This basically. Neither socialism can libertarianism would work in a non-homogeneous culture. You see great socialised healthcare and education systems in Europe but without nationalism they've adopted atrocious immigration policy. This will just turn Germany and Sweden into ugly, crime-ridden welfare states.
>>71854288
Which system is best senpai?
>>71854222
So, he´s a liberal who hates liberty? A liberal in existential crisis?
Does he find freedom cool´n´stuff, but wants state to control all of his life?
Does he see national socialism as transitional period to create a new man who can live without control of the state?
Also you dont need totalitarian society to have links with your community and heritage.
>>71853486
>want freedom of religion but also for Christianity to be the national religion
>>71855452
Why can't you be a nationalist and a socialist without the facism?
>>71853722
>conservative
National capitalism
You can have a free market capitalism while still have nationalism and no democracy
Look at pinochet
>>71857583
Why can't you be a fascist without the socialism
Any sort of socialism ends up being shit, nazi Germany would have collapsed, the USSR collapsed, and modern day democratic socialists will collapse
Why not both?
>>71857583
Semantics. There are national socialist and there Nazis. I assumed he was talking about nazis, since we are on /pol/, not to mention national socialism is hardly coherent political orientation onto itself.
>>71858376
What site is this?
National Libertarianism >> National Socialism >>>>> Libertarianism >>>>>>>> Socialism
>>71853486
what about national libertarianism
Nationalist Oriented Capitalist Socialism
>>71853486
to make any difference, the smart people must unite under one flag
