>"colored people" is racist
>"person of color" is respectful
explain to me this liberal doublethink, ameribros
pic unrelated
>>71823673
Don't you have a bull to prep gallego?
>>71823817
Out of the big EU countries Spain has the least level of cuckery. One can agree that you have a broader problem with illegal Joses and Ernestos
>>71823999
Ernestos and Joses are no problem compared to rabid niggers storming Spain in force, collecting welfare and raping white womenz
>>71823673
Because they are a person first and colored second you shitlord
>>71824733
you need a bigger wall
>>71823673
>explain the liberal mindset
No rational person can
>>71824789
I call bullshit.
>>71823673
You can't explain their Insanity that's why they're insane
>>71825321
Because the term "colored people" has been used as a racist term in the past while "people of color" hasn't been used that way.
>>71823673
If it's said by a ciswhitemale it is racist.
If it is said by a liberal SJW vagina, it is respectful.
>>71825505
this
its like asking why blackface is racist
>>71823673
The euphemism treadmill. Soon enough POC will become offensive too and they'll find another flowery name to call niggers.
A few have realised the futility and just gone back to calling them black.
>>71825505
fucken pocs.
I just remind people that using POC makes you a POS.
>>71825505
>>71825687
And, yet, that's still laughable reasoning.
They, essentially, are the same phrases, regardless of use; but, apologists just want to make sure no one's feewings am hurt.
>>71825505
>while "people of color" hasn't been used that way.
Yet.
Same thing happened with retards. They were originally known as idiots, cretins, morons and so on (these were the legit medical terms for various mental disabilities).
So they dropped those and came up with the nice, inoffensive word retard.
>>71825505
>racist term
It was never a racist term. Neither was Negro. Those were the polite, innocuous eays to refer to darkies and niggers until the 1960s when the kike Soviet subversion agents turned them into straw men for their nigger ape pets in the Black Power movement to work over. You should hear some of the words my grandparents used for them. Now THOSE were the actually racist terms.
>>71823673
all liberals suffer from cognitive dissonance
like how they support gays, but want muslims to be a part of the society
and how they supposedly fear hate, but end up being the most hateful group of them all
I'm not even that racist. I'd say a reasonable amount of racist. But "person of colour" sounds really degrading to me. You're just defining them by their race. Isn't that what they've been whining about for centuries?
>>71823673
helpful reminder that black people are not assyrian even tho the black people are super confused about who they are.
hint: niggers
>>71826027
Pretty much. That kind of name makes it sound like they are politely tip-toeing around a severe disability.
Which they basically are.
>>71823673
It's shit most people don't care about.
> be me 35 and in college.
> assigned project with black guy
> he's always calling me nigger, and it bugs me.
Lightbulb.exe
> call him nigger back. "Hey man you can't say that". If you don't like being called that, then don't call me that.
> he agrees and we finish working.
It was a little more intense than that, but one on one, most people don't but into the tumblr crap you're asking about. It's when you have a pack of tumblrinas, that they feel it's ok to edit your word choices.
>>71825935
Get back to making tinfoil hats, kid
>>71826275
That's it. It's like fucking "differently abled."
>>71823673
what is racist/not
and what is respectful/not is entirely subjective
anyone can decide at any moment ot categorize anything in anyway, either boosting or "hurting" their emotions, and going along with the groupthink or not
>>71826027
Not only that but you're grouping dozens of ethnicities into a single homogeny that means ''not white''.
>>71825895
I know this. One of the reasons this happens is because of people turning words like "retarded" into an insult or degrading term. In the U.S., President Obama was basically forced to officially make the term "retard" an incorrect term or some bullshit like that. The lady who ;ed the movement came to our school and talked about it. While I do not necessarily agree with her, I do understand where she was coming from.
>>71823999
Spain has 25% unemployment
>>71825833
its not laughable reasoning because they are not the same context
"coloured people" has always been used in within negative contexts by non-coloured people. a white person never considered or called themselves "coloured", it was blacks, indians, asians, etc who were coloured. no coloured people allowed on public transport, no coloured people allowed to vote, no coloured people allowed on broadcasted media.
"people of colour" is sort of reclaiming the term, but in a positive light. coloured people have been called "coloured" for 200 years, so its up to them how they wish to use the word when referring to themselves. it gives back some power in a way. it takes something racist and makes it empowering. this is easily comprable to nigger vs nigga and how they use the latter positively amongst themselves.
if you want another non-race related example, the same argument would be valid for the term "gay", and its mixed use throughout the past 200 years. it originally meant happy or carefree, then it was used as a derogitory term for homosexual people. eventually it was used as a way to express negative feelings toward ANYTHING; "that's gay", "you are gay". homosexual eventually reclaimed the word though and now call themselves gay and even encourage people to call them gay as they consider the word to be politically correct. even though at one point it was on the same level of faggot.
it is all about reclaiming and changing words and phrases that once had negative meaning and turning them into something positive for those who felt victimised.
would you be more offended if someone called you "whitey" or "white man"?
>>71823673
Same thing liberals complain about autistic people.
You're supposed to say "persons with autism! "
Reason is "you have to establish that they're a PERSON first!"
>most latin languages
> noun then adjective
> English
> adjective then noun
According to liberals, speaking English is racist
spain is a bigger failure than rome because they choose to keep on living as cripples. very sad empire to have in ones blood.
power level: peso.
>>71826693
They've got the wrong end of the stick. It's not the word that offensive, it's what its describing that's offensive.
You can call a retard whatever you want and it won't change the fact that this shiny new word is now just another way of saying retard.
To make the word not offensive you don't change the word, you correct the problem with what it is describing.
>>71826736
20, but point taken
>>71823673
>explain to me
>doublethink
Seems you already figured it out.
>>71827067
tldr they are being what they want to ban
>>71826984
>According to liberals, speaking English is racist
I fully expect that to e a thing already.
>English being the language of the USA disadvantages American Persons of Indeterminate Origin...
>>71824733
>spain
>white
pick 1
>>71826984
>let me just make some roundabout illogical fallacy to make liberals sound bad
Nj kid, are you proud of yourself?
>>71827117
> 1 of every 5 Spaniards don't have jobs
What the hell, Spain? Please tell me this includes people who are unable to work (old & disabled / children)
>>71827221
Let's try that again:
I fully expect that to be a thing if it isn't already.
>>71823673
Soon they will want to tell me that I can't call a mullato a mullato despite the fact that he is a mullato!
This is just silly.
>>71823817
Jesus Christ you are absolute cancer.
Fuck off to /int/ with your country based shitposting.
Every time you shitpost about a country you are being a useful idiot for a psuedo kike like moot. Holy Kek new /pol/ fell for the classic divide and conquer hard.
Daily reminder that forced flags ruined this board.
>inb4 but I love muh ebin bantz XDDDD
>>>/int/
>>71827221
I don't even consider myself American and I think this is bullshit. If you're butthurt about English, learn another language and use it. Then stop being a faggot.
>>71827287
You good I understood you. Ive done that quite a few times on my phone
>>71827263
>he pointed out something that makes people I agree with sound illogical
> it must be fallacious
> he must be a small child!
This is how liberals actually argue.
>>71827555
That was a complete slippery slope, go back to the fifth grade and learn how to form a sound statement. Referring to someone as a person before autistic or colored acknowledges that you consider that person to be just as important or valuable as you are. If you can't comprehend basic social science maybe you should get out more and stop sitting on your computer complaining about "dirty liberals" and "society".
>>71823673
It's like the pronouns thing. They want to correct you and have some short of superiority for knowing something they made up and you had no way to know.
>>71827067
Retard literally means "slow"
People who get offended because of this are retarded (yes, slow. As is slow to catch the point) The word should only be offensive if the meaning of the word is intentionally offensive. Saying some one is slow is different from saying someone is a half-witted cunt.
But just the fact that I have this opinion is offensive, because people get offended by anything.
>>71828207
>you had no way to know
get out of the house once a week and you'll be fine
>>71823673
I like the term person of color, or PoC. The abbreviation has a nice sound to it, almost like a slur.
Puck.
>>71828283
I was under the assumption we were talking about how words have evolved and devolved, not what they meant circa 1500 A.D.
>>71828283
You're kind of correct, but the term is derived from mentally retarded.
Amusingly enough, it's a fairly technical term, despite the fact that people use it in a more colloquial manner.
>>71823673
It's all about who agreed upon what. Since "colored" was an oppressive term in previous generations they do away with it. Even if "poc" means virtually the same thing, it was established by a non-oppressive entity.
>>71823817
>Don't you have a bull to prep gallego?
hau, anyone have that pic of spanish leftists complaining bc no rapefugees want to come to Spain?
>>71828328
This isn't Sweden; nobody on the street gives a shit about tumblr's made up pronouns. Only time you will ever hear it is if you interact with some rainbow-haired fat cunt on a college campus.
>>71828369
Also consider PoCs is like Pox
>>71828651
Or watch any news station asides from Fox
>>71828630
So you're saying we need to take it back
>>71823673
You obviously haven't had your coffee of morning yet.
>Colored Person means that "people" aren't colored and therefore oppressive.
>Person of Color means that "people" lack something if they are not "colored" therefore it is empowering.
Learn your SJW propaganda plebs
>>71828636
R A R E
A
R
E
>>71828636
R A R E
A
R
E
>>71828636
snag the rare one
n
a
g
>>71823673
PoC...its subtle soft bigotry from the Left.
>Yfw you realize they've been referring to their non-white constituencies as Pickers of Cotton this whole time.
The Liberal vote plantation is alive and well in the USA
>>71828064
>intentionally changing the grammar of English to establish that you're "culturally sensitive" is "basic social sciences"
You notice how all this shit is entirely subjective? That's because it's not science. It's "cultural subjectivity". If you're offended, fantastic! Be offended! But if you're so butthurt that you think we need to entirely rework the structure of the English language, you should try some anal cream. It's not our responsibility to make you feel better about yourself
>>71828771
This.
It establishes and reinforces the Us vs Them mentality.
>>71827489
>forced flags ruined this board
It's just /pol/ in general. Like going into any YouTube comment section and seeing some faggot spewing every buzzword he can think of in a paragraph. Parrots who still think chan culture has any sort of edge left. Usually old fucks or underage too stupid to realize 4chan stopped being cool in 2010.
>>71826920
>would you be more offended if someone called you "whitey"
I wouldn't but then again, I'm not hypersensitive to ridicule (plus it helps that the referent of whitey is such that the insult just doesn't stick).
>>71828394
Good. Then learn English.
>>71828532
Words develope different connotations over time, but I still find it important for people to know what the words actually mean. When I was first leaning English in America I would use "retard" for slow because I knew no one would understand "lent". Americans got painfully butthurt because I didn't instinctually know that their words had different meanings than the ones they actually have
>>71823673
Things are whatever I say they are. If you disagree with me, you should be fired from your job and denied the ability to provide for your family. Just consider yourself lucky we don't kill you. That comes later.
>>71827270
Hahahaha.
No.
Globalism is a pox.
>>71823673
Is this a catch-22 situation? If niggers are rassist, then how come niggers aren't rassists?
>>71824888
We tried, but EU cried.
>>71828636
A MOTHERFUCKING GALLEON
Dank
>>71824789
Colored person = a person who has color
Person of color = a person who is composed of color
The first is actually less derogatory. It treats the person as a person, with their color just one aspect of who they are. Whereas the latter implies that color is the only thing of importance about the person.
>>71829329
That's a beautiful verse.
>>71827489
Thank you.
>>71829309
> no, it's not just the ones that can't/aren't supposed to work
... I'm sorry for your loss. Great Spanish empire will never raise again
Speaking of pronouns and "offensive" words, what would happen if someone claimed to be a trans person "before surgery" and preferred the pronouns
nig/nigger/nigga?
Would a television channel be forced to say it? IIRC there's a state in the USA where it's illegal to "deadname" a tranny.
>>71828901
Sometimes they do it such that it obscure the grammatical subject, like "person of interest" rather than "someone (we're, I'm, the FBI is) interested in".
>>71823817
Ha
>>71828702
I watch CNN mainly, never heard anyone say xir or xe or whatever. Go back to tumblr and/or get your head out of your ass, autist.
>>71823673
Just call them niggers
>>71829482
>Will never rise again
Everything has two states.
Activity/Innovation-Fiesta (Spanish empire reconquista, etc...)
Rest/Repetition-Siesta(Now, muslim conquest)
We're in siesta, but eventually we'll awake.
>>71823673
>explain to me this liberal doublethink
Read the novel 1984 by George Orwell. It's the best explanation one can give to libthink.
Liberals attempt to control thought by controlling the language. They manipulate and threaten others using creative re-definitions and abuses of the language, amplified by the power of the media Jew which acts as the official Propaganda Engine for the liberal cause.
>>71824733
there's a fucking ocean between that wall and spain you idiot.
Holy shit who is this bitch? I live right next to Mustang
>>71826920
>"coloured people" has always been used in within negative contexts by non-coloured people.
You're an idiot. The fact is that leftists continually change what is acceptable so that they can keep having something to complain about.
>nigger
Don't call us niggers, call us 'negros' please
>okay negro
Don't call us negros, call us 'colored people' please
>okay colored people
Don't call us colored people, call us 'people of color'
>okay people of color
OMG you fuckin racist
>>71829158
Lent?
Regardless, I don't think "retard" was ever a term that was commonly used in daily conversation. It's more of a technical term used in medicine, engineering and science. I've never heard anyone use it as anything other than an insult, except in my engineering textbooks, which were in English.
>>71827270
>1 of every 5 Spaniards don't have jobs
57% of unemployed are immigrants.
Although the number is much higher than 20%. It's probably 30% or above. Receiving some kinds of subsidies put you out of the unemployed statistics. Like if you burn your unemployement aid (one year maximum depending how long you've been working) then you have a one in a lifetime aid that you can request (lasts 4 months I think and it's 3/4 of the unemployement aid) under the condition that you lose your unemployed status. Also people that work a single day is left out of the statistics for an entire month.
>>71825935
>It was never a racist term. Neither was Negro.
This. In fact, many older blacks still identify as Negro. So much so, that it was an official designation on the 2010 US census.
>>71823673
They're insane.
That's basically it.
>>71829741
They don't change it so they will have something to complain about. The process is that the reality of niggers always shits up any term you give them. Call them "beautiful roses" and eventually the reality of what niggers are will dirty up the term "beautiful roses," and a new term will have to be given. It's like how niggers shit up neighborhoods. Make a nice new neighborhood for them and move the niggers in. The niggers then shit it up, and you have to move them to a new neighborhood, over and over. Niggers shit everything up, neighborhoods, schools, countries, continents, and even the words you call them.
>>71829714
Hello Alonso De Ojeda
>>71828064
Nope, liberals are making themselves look bad. He was right, English is generally adjective then noun. You have a problem with the way English works.
It isn't about anything but control. You're trying to force other people to speak the way you want them to entirely out of a narcissistic need to control them.
Social science isn't science.
>>71828328
There's no way if a person wants to be called "he/she/it/them/depends". Also we don't have this problem in Spain yet. Not even fags care about pronouns here.
The coloured people/people of colour is also a non issue here. We say black, white, asian without any problems.
>>71823673
>>71828207
>>71829309
>>71829329
>>71829587
>>71829714
>>71829922
>>71830194
20,000 UNIFORMES
20,000 UNIFORMS
>>71828636
HOLY FUCKING RARE
>>71829787
> lent?
Means slow in French, retard does too but we use it more for "delay"
> not used in common conversation
Probably explains why people still don't know what it means. If they did, they probably wouldn't get so offended by it. Connotations can be awful, but with "retard" it seems you always assume the worse, regardless of context
>>71830441
you'll see what is fun when the legion is allowed to charge at shit.
>>71830441
So someone in a basement made 20k uniforms. So?
>>71829741
>>okay people of color
>OMG you fuckin racist
??????
you are just spouting bullshit now
no one would get mad at the term person of colour
the term POC is plastered everywhere and is heavily encouraged by non-people of colour to use
you just want to defend your legitimate right to use the word nigger tho don't you
>>71830768
>no one would get mad at the term person of colour
Yet. Wait 15 years and it will be considered offensive in certain circles. Just like "black" and "African American" and any other name they've had in the past.
>>71830972
They think that they can change reality by changing the word for it, but it actually works in the reverse, that reality changes the meaning of words.
>>71823673
It's 1984, you see.
Welcome to Airstrip One. The proles are getting restless.
>>71831087
The terrifying fact is they reject reality entirely.
If you've ever read 1984 you'll know what I'm talking about. They're dong the same thing.
>>71831213
Orwell's 1984 was meant to be a representation of actual societies that existed at the time. Everything in the book had its parallel in the real world. So what about Newspeak? What was the parallel that Orwell was making to the real world? I assume there was something he was riffing off of, but I don't know what it is.
>>71830595
I don't think retard actually means slow. I think it means "to slow down". This seems to correspond with what you say it means in French; to delay.
I also think it has very specific uses. You can't really say "the bus was retarded (delayed)" or "the car retarded (slowed down)".
I think it's strictly a technical term used in science and medicine.
HAS RECYCLING EMOJIS IN HER DESCRIPTION
THROWS TRUMP SIGN IN THE GARBAGE
>>71831537
lol nice catch.
>>71831334
Addendum: Objective reality rather.
They believe it instead to be subjective. What people think is reality is reality. What people can be made to think is reality then becomes it.
It's a war for the mind.
>>71831487
My interpretation of it is the parallel between the made-up bullshit today of mashing together words to find meaning that isn't there. The whole destruction of gender and decolonization concepts. It then promotes doublethink. "There is one race - the human race - celebrate diversity" etc.
Thankfully, we have yet to hit the point where we start losing words every year. At least we're adding to our dictionaries.
>>71831334
Was there anything in the USSR or Mao's China that was similar to Newspeak? I know the Chinese would make all kinds of strange names for things, like "capitalist roaders" and "five black categories," but I haven't been able to find anything where they really started manipulating the language like Ingsoc does.
Sadly we DON'T learn to accept each others' differences if we keep saying things like all races are equal. This kind of unrealistic humanism will eventually lead to destruction of humanity.
It's still "white people" though, right? Not people of white? Just trying to keep up.
>>71831487
OK, so that's happening now. But what was happening when Orwell was writing? I think there must have been something going on in Russia that was like Newspeak, but I don't know what it was. If we want to understand what is happening now, we need to know what was happening then. It's the same tricks being used. Orwell is just fiction, but he was talking about something that was really happening. We need to know what it was.
>>71832018
Meant to be a response to this >>71831771
>>71831771
>At least we're adding to our dictionaries.
Yeah, but the new words are garbage. Recent additions Merriam-Websters include: TMI, hella, revenge porn, and wacky-tabaccy.
http://techcrunch.com/2016/04/21/fomo-tmi-and-icymi-added-to-merriam-webster-dictionary/
>>71831526
> You can't really say the bus was retarded (delayed)
Yes you can. That sentence made complete sense.
And it means slow in French too, but it's usually used to infer a delay. "Il y a beaucoup de retard" means it's very slow.
If its a technical term, it's only because people started getting offended by it. I've heard older peoples on flights taking on the phone saying "they retarded my plane!" Though I'm not sure if that woman was a native English speaker
>>71825824
>POC
>Picker of Cotton
it's like they're not even trying anymore
>>71831847
Yes. PC has it's origins in the USSR.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness#Early-to-mid_20th_century
In the early-to-mid 20th century, the phrase "politically correct" was associated with the dogmatic application of Stalinist doctrine, debated between Communist Party members and Socialists. This usage referred to the Communist party line, which provided for "correct" positions on many political matters. According to American educator Herbert Kohl, writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s,
The term "politically correct" was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the CP line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance.
—"Uncommon Differences", The Lion and the Unicorn Journal[3]
In March 1968, the French philosopher Michel Foucault is quoted as saying: "a political thought can be politically correct ('politiquement correcte') only if it is scientifically painstaking", referring to leftist intellectuals attempting to make Marxism scientifically rigorous rather than relying on orthodoxy.[29]
>>71823673
>Spaniards
>White
fuck outta here, Miguel
>>71827489
I like flags. I like knowing who's posting.
I like flag bantz too to a limited degree
I agree that posts like this are cancer though, and divide and conquer and everything else you said. Moderation...
>>71823673
Great, now no one will know who donald trump is.
>>71831945
The new ethnonym for "white people" is racists.
>>71832476
That's why we asked, we're unsure at what we're supposed to be mad at.
>>71825505
Black has been used as a racist term
If I say African American in a condescending tone of voice it can be more offensive than a naive person saying "colored"
Thereby your explanation of why colored is horrid and POC is 100% PC is retarded and gay
>>71832320
But in particular, did the USSR manipulate words, like "colored people" and "people of color" such that one was politically correct and the other was not? Did they have something like Newspeak where words were dropped from the language, and things like "double-plus good" were added"?
Orwell made a big deal out of Newspeak. It was important to him. So what was he referring to that was happening at the time he was writing? There was something, but we've lost it. It went down the "memory hole."
>>71827067
If you use a descriptive term only.
But when you start using bullshit appreciation as "real woman" for an obese woman, or "strong and humble woman" for a transgender?
You'll have to use it sarcastically to make it an insult, and it's more difficult to tell when it is or not according to Poe's law.
>>71823673
It's not logic.
>>71832506
The problem with flags is that they make shit divine and conquer as fuck
>Indian posts a valid comment
LE POO GOES TO LE LOOOOO XDDD
>american posts a valid comment
LOL GET SHOOOOT! FATTY!
>Spaniard posts a valid comment
LOL UNEMPLOYED SPIC SIESTA KEEEEK
At least it's easier to know shitposts since strayans nearly never post ANYTHING of value. Rangeban when?
I just want to be called black. Person of Color like what the fuck?
I heard another fucky one the other day...
Instead of someone being autistic, they're "Mentally diverse"
Person of Color is dangerously close to Person of Interest.
>>71828636
>Saint Pierre and Miquelon
I learned something today
>>71832729
>Did they have something like Newspeak where words were dropped from the language, and things like "double-plus good" were added"?
Newspeak comes from here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_English
Orwell was briefly a proponent of that. Then rejected it with this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_and_the_English_Language
There's also a bit of the old soviet naming convention of contracting things. I.e comintern, politburo etc.
>>71832168
You seem to be mistaking how words are used in different languages.
I mean, in Norwegian, we have the word "hvorfor", which means "why". In English, you can technically use the word "wherefore", which is the English analogue of the word "hvorfor".
However, while you might be technically correct when using this archaic term, no one is going to use it outside of a Shakespeare play, and people are going to comment on it. The same goes for "retard" in play of "delay", which I don't think was ever in common use.
>>71832783
There's a time and place to enjoy all those comments--anytime that it's actually funny and not high jacking something that is actually valid or intelligent.
Unfortunately we have to take a lot of shit, but like many things here just gotta tune it out. But if it means when i read something in depth i know who it's coming from its worth it to me. If it means when I ask Iceland bros to explain something to me i know the person replying is actually in Iceland it's worth it.
Honestly it doesn't bother me as much as the just plain stupid and not creative posting that has increased.
>>71833354
Well that makes shit complicated as fuck for ESL.
>this word means this except it doesn't
>English words only apply by their definitions when noone gets offended
Then again, it's not like English isn't known for making shit complicated. >Chair means a thing to sit on, unless its a verb.
> literally any noun can be made into an adjective by putting it in front of another noun
>>71827489
>op's post is country based shitposting
>my post is country based shitposting
I don't see the problem
>Jack is a smart man.
>Jack is a man of smartness.
Once again we have to fuck everything up to accommodate the niggers. You'd be surprised how many problems can be solved by simply getting rid of niggers.
>>71834027
OP had a valid post regarding what is acceptable language in a country he doesn't live in. You can't call it definitively a shitpost, even if it's lighthearted and poking fun
You just ran to a meme and sexually denigrated someone for no reason.
Hence the divide and conquer accusation.
I think
Colored people
Make them
sound
weird
inferior for
white
they are
bunch
of
weird
colored
shit
Person of color
More
submissive
try to
say
white people
are inferior
don't have
color
because is
not
person of color
make
the colored
people
feel
powerful
with
white
loser
submission
trying to
look
like shit
to please
their
entitled
racist
feelings
of wanting
to see
white
being
losers
submissive
for them
try to
feel
powerful
superior
The
more
submissive
and worse
for men
because is
also
emasculated
pathetic
loser
humiliation
being
submissive
unlike
women
also when
they
are
piece of shit
against you
Women
fantasy
about
submission
Men
forced to
submission
become
emasculated
destroy
his life
self-esteem
self-image
faggotry
loser
against
human
evolution
of men
for
years
in
nature
>>71834400
The website will wrap your text automatically m8. You don't need to do it yourself.
>>71834400
>>71834546
you again
you fucking retarded attention whoring macaco
jst get a tripcode and fulfill your dreams you special snowflake
>>71828854
I prefer to use the term Perpetrators of Crime
>>71827270
.>>71826736
Ceuta, Mellilla (moroccan soil cities) and Andalucia. All of these 3 are uttershitholes thanks to socialism and/or moors
>>71827244
>Most of us are of Anglo-Spanish descent but let's just call them not white
>I also am an Indian rape baby probably but let me tell you what EUROPEAN countries are white and which ones are not
>>71823673
das rite, premodification is bad, postmodification is good
political
social engineering
forced
unnatural
Loser
submissive
culture
is
worse for men
make them
even
less
attractive
less
masculine
destroy
their
self-esteeI think
Colored people
Make them
sound
weird
inferior for
white
they are
bunch
of
weird
colored
shit
Person of color
More
submissive
try to
say
white people
are infefor them
try to
feel
powerful
superior
The
more
submissive
and worse
for men
because is
also
emasculated
pathetic
loser
humiliation
unlike
women
fantasies
submissive
>>71834704
> not just leaving it at Anglos aren't white
Juan...
>>71826920
>"coloured people" has always been used in within negative contexts by non-coloured people.
>"coloured people" has been used negatively in some contexts whilst not in some other contexts by non-coloured (i.e. white) people
FTFY
you're a retard, you can give all the examples you want, but to imply that the term "coloured people" has only been used negatively is absolutely retarded
Your argument might've been relevant in the 70's, when the term was used by whites to discriminate other races, nowadays literally no one uses the term anymore, so to imply it still retains a negative connotation is farfetched, on top of that, simply because something used to have a negative connotation doesn't imply it's 'racist' to use it, it all depends on the context, which you actively ignore.
>this is easily comprable to nigger vs nigga
For some reason, "people of colour" are allowed to say the word 'nigga' whilst a white person would be considered a racist for using the term, this is at the very least discriminating based on race. 'Nigga' has no discriminating connotations, as it's a positive term, thus whites should be able to use it, but they aren't allowed to, because 'nigga' is apparantly equally racist as 'nigger', yet the former has never been used in racist contexts because it didn't exist (it's as you said, a reclaimed term).
Again, the same type of reasoning follows for gay people. Call them gay, and they'll shit on you, but they're allowed to call themselves 'gay' because it's a 'reclaimed' word, as if 'reclaiming' allows them to effectively decide who's allowed to use it or not, this borders Orwellian situations.
>would you be more offended if someone called you "whitey" or "white man"?
How offended I were to be doesn't matter, what matters is the context in which the phrase is said and used.
>"hey you're a nice whitey"
In no way is the word 'whitey' used in a derogatory sense, yet your reasoning would mean that the whole phrase is utter evil and offensive.
>>71826920
My guess is he woudn't be offended because he doesn't have an inferiority complex, leftists, on the other hand...
>>71828064
That's fucking stupid. No one thinks that much into the implication of two words switched around
>>71833837
It has nothing to do with people getting offended. As I said, I don't believe retarded was ever in common use.
That being said, it's being partially phased out as a technical and medical term, due to its connection with the slur.
Also, there are plenty of words that have similar meanings, but are used differently for whatever reason. For example, you say "to cut someone's hair". You don't say "to slice someone's hair", even if cut and slice means the same thing.
>>71823673
Speaking as a black guy. Person of color sounds like something only cucks and people who have never been around minorities say.
Colored/Negro is what I expect that kindly old confused grandma who stopped giving a fuck but means well to use.
Nigger from degenerate blacks, thugs, losers, betas, and 4chan.
Black from normies.
>>71823673
Because colored person implies a normalcy of being white that is tarnished by being colored (pencil vs colored pencil).
But white people are still white people and not persons of no color.
>>71835579
>it has nothing to do with people being offended
The use of the word referring to mental illness itself is because people were offended.
>The first time the word “retard” was printed in American newspapers was in 1704. At this time, it was used in a way to describe the slowing down or the diminishing of something.
>The first time that any form of retard was used to describe mentally disabled people was during the 1960s when "there was a push among disability advocates to use the label mental retardation."
>This push from advocates was because older terms for the mentally disabled, like moron, imbecile, feeble minded and idiot, had developed negative meanings.
>Retard was not used to refer to mentally disabled people until 1985. It was widely accepted to refer to people who are mentally disabled as mentally retarded, or as a retard.
I don't know about the frequency of its usage, but that really shouldn't matter. The definition of the word hasn't changed, people's response to it has
>>71836257
>I don't know about the frequency of its usage, but that really shouldn't matter.
It does. If no one ever uses it to refer to a bus stopping, then it's natural that people are going to react to that if you use it. Not because it's offensive, but because that's not how people use the word.
As I mentioned earlier, even if a word is defined to have a certain meaning, that doesn't mean it's correct to use it in every situation where a synoym could be used. Refer to my earlier cut/slice example.
>The definition of the word hasn't changed, people's response to it has
It obviously has changed, or at least expanded. Retarded is now a slur used against retards. Before 1985 it was not, so it's definition has at least changed in one way.
>>71823817
>Spaniard preps the bull
>>71834886
bot??
