What do you think of this man? Is he red pilled?
![b26f7fb3ace86087c39d24edbbab67d8[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/RPn7Hmu.jpg "b26f7fb3ace86087c39d24edbbab67d8[1].jpg")
>>71783259
>lying to someone's face is hard
What the fuck is it supposed to prove having him say something?
That being said, the destruction of our planet, regardless of what crazy leftists picture it as, or as wacked out right wings see it, is our greatest issue in the long-run. We are facing an issue where we are being far too wasteful and raising pollution.
That being said Bill Nye is a fucking faggot who can suck my dick.
>>71783259
Which man?
bill nye the bachelors guy is a meme
>>71783259
>Climate "change"
>redpilled
pick one.
>>71783259
Same exact type of liberal trash that all of them are clones of. Also... LEAF
>>71783259
I hate these fucking CIA asset Carl Sagan ass mofuckas
>>71783259
Didn't he say skeptics of climate change should be jailed?
I call commie. Prepare the helicopters!
>>71783686
>honorary doctorates
abuses the authority and respect that scientists have as a front for his political activism. truly a cynical person.
Climate change denial should be hate speech.
>bachelors in engineer from scrub uni
>host of a TeeVee show
>show teaches children basic shit
Somehow this man has fooled people in to thinking he is a scientific expert and his opinion matters
>>71783829
all the rage among scienticians :^)
>mfw when humans solve climate change
>we did it
>Earth gets rekted by solar flare
>>71783994
Women aren't people and they never will be
>>71783981
>>71783259
Why are you same-fagging your thread?
>>71783623
Glass China and India.
Problem solved.
>>71783259
I can't take a full grown man in a bow tie seriously.
>>71783981
>>71783259
another "celebrity" who has ended up taking himself far too seriously
which tends to kill the buzz
so i look elsewhere for my entertainment
putting himself out of a job
I never liked him as a kid. All of the facts in one episode could be explained in sixty seconds, and 75% of it was him making weird noises and faces and general encouragement of autism
>>71783994
I honestly didn't have a problem with Bill Nye till I saw this comment. Anyone who subscribes to the notion of patriarchy oppression is either an idiot or a shill.
>>71783259
>>71783623
50% of people are women, so 50% of construction workers should be women.
>>71783259
I wish he would actually do research.
>>71784538
50% of people are women so enough men should identify as trans so 50% of mother's can be men
>>71783259
You cant be truly red pilled unless you accept God's authority to be the ultimate truth
>>71783829
Yeah Kayne West has one too
>>71783259
He's an dumbass pretending to be a scientist.
>>71784717
>>71784717
I agree with you but it takes more than that.
Bible belt Americans are some of the most brainwashed people in that country, unfortunately. Easily manipulated by people like Rato
>>71784586
Bill Nye confirmed for believing that organisms stop evolving once they become a new species except for skin color.
>>71783994
>Half of the people in the world are women
>Half of the people who are scientists should be women
>Two thirds of the people in the picture are women
Science cuck btfo
>>71784795
*teleports behind you*
*whispers in your ear*
God is real
>>71785002
NZ the new AUS?
>>71784336
>>71784776
He's a person who realizes the most important thing he can do is get other people to care about the environment. He's not the most brilliant person ever, but he's a popular person, and I appreciate that he is willing to use his popularity and self-expression to promote more selfless efforts.
I grew up with him, sure, but I respect him for the same things today as I did then: he cares about his audience, and he wants to see us succeed.
>>71784644
He can't even stay consistent with his terminology
>>71785094
I would respect him if he hadn't made completely unscientific comments about women and men being completely equal, and race not existing outside of skin color. As far as I'm concerned, he's just a shill.
>>71783259
These people like to pretend that Humans are not the most versatile animals on the planet. We adapt to whatever fucking environment we live in. We can live in fucking deserts, frozen tundra, fucking jungles, and so on. So what if the fucking weather gets slightly hotter over the next few hundred years? It's not like we can just chose what weather we want and keep that indefinetely, thats not how this shit fuckign works. You can't control that shit, and if anything, it goes against how the cogs rotate. We adapt, thats our thing. Go cry me a river about how its colder in the winters and warmer in the summers, it fucking happens
>>71785094
Except he's not talking about protecting the environment. The environment doesn't need protecting from the majority of stuff we do. He's talking about switching to Clean Energy™.
He's a shill or just another retard virtue signalling, nothing more.
>>71784654
Stop ignoring genderfluids and otherkin, shitlord
>>71783259
bill nye is one of the great scientists of our time
>>71785599
>scientist
show me proof of a degree. oh wait, you cant.
>>71783994
>Public "man of science"
>Failed logic 101
What hath god wrought
>>71785237
It's a point that he's trying to make, that benign physical discrepancies do not limit the significance of any individual in a society. Just because Bill's a scientist doesn't mean he can't hold opinions about political and societal concepts. It doesn't necessarily mean we should take his opinion as expert, but considering how many vapid celebrities spew wildly inaccurate opinions that people believe, I'm personally glad someone who is, if nothing else, more knowledgeable and educated than the general populous, is willing to speak up.
>>71783259
Bill Nye the Cuck Guy is literally, LITERALLY as cucked as you can get.
Do I really need to prove that global warming is a doomsday prophecy death cult that has no basis in actual science? I mean, everybody here is based already, right?
>>71785447
>Mentioning genderfluids and otherkins but ignoring multi-gendered non-animated sexual association-kins
Exactly what I'd expect from a cis scum ultra shitlord like yourself.
>>71785365
You seriously believe that humans aren't responsible for the changes in our environment?
Not that I think this would change your mind if you haven't been convinced already, but some "shills" with evidence purport we do a lot more harm than good. Grow up kid. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/earthpulse/human-impact.html
>>71783623
so rename all their shitty courses
>women science
>gender science
>gender engineering
etc
>man
that's a reptile if I've ever seen one desu senpai
>>71786296
>gender engineering
how many more genders could they possibly engineer.
Denying facts is a God given right so FUCK OFF!!
>>71785754
>Bill's a scientist
Bachelor's in mechanical engineering.
>>71786080
That link essentially boils down to
>h-humans exist! That's wrong! Why can't humans live like animals and live off the environment instead of modifying it to suit their needs!?
>c-carbon dioxide is bad for the environment!! (provably false)
Overfishing is the only part of that link that has any value and even that's not very important, it's a natural part of the ecosystem. Animals overhunt, the food dries up, the animals change to some other food source or die off, the overhunted animals come back (assuming they weren't completely rendered extinct).
Fuck off with your fake science.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owm25OHGglk
>>71783981
hate speech isn't a thing down here bubbo
>>71783994
Oy vey
>>71783259
>>71783981
>>71784431
This. I'm starting to realize the real problem in society are victimization cults.
Who is this youtuber and why does anyone take him seriously?
>>71783259
He is right but nor red pill ed because he did not mention government/powers at be weather control
>>71784586
South Africans are white and they live by the equator
Our climate has been increasing regardless of what we have been doing through pollution.
>>71785754
No, it's even worse that somebody who's highly influential among people who trust the judgement of scientists is making completely non-scientific assertions that would cause young people to lean towards a liberal perspective, instead of limiting his scope of observation to a purely scientific realm.
The statement he made about race is completely contradictory of the fundamental mechanism of evolution, and implies that organisms within the same species cannot contain genetic differences, and that new species just pop up randomly one day through mutation.
People like him are the reason I'm skeptical of climate change. It's simply not my field of expertise, and scientists have proven their not immune to political pressure. No scientist could ever get funding from the community if he were to ever attempt to conduct social experiments dealing with race, or attempt to disprove human-caused climate change.
>>71783981
>>71786888
>a leaf
>>71784586
>>71784644
>>71783623
>>71783259
Literally all of these things aren't unreasonable or indeed: lies.
We are of the same species as niggers, that is undeniable at this point. That doesn't mean that every black person as identical DNA/genetics as every white person. Indeed, white people have different DNA. That doesn't mean that they should be included into western civilization, nor that they have traits inferior to us, just like they would have traits superior to us. Only difference is that they evolved to be suited to different environments to us. And that over their evolution, aggressive traits were not reduced. Taker the MAOA gene, perfect example.
Also: there's nothing immoral with having roughly half of the scientists in the world as women. It's only when we cross the line into forcing people to do or not do things that this becomes an issue.
Pic related: a black guy that is whiter than many whites.
>>71783829
>>71783997
His honorary doctorates aside, wasn't his alma mater Cornell? I wouldn't exactly call that a 'scrub uni'
>>71786888
Wow 67 million?
The government receives hundreds of millions from Clean Energy™ companies so the climate change hoax can continue and they stay making billions.
>>71786888
Poor fucker didn't stand a chance against real Jews.
>>71787097
We aren't the same species though.
>>71787182
>triggered
I'm sure you ignore facts when you tell people you are really a woman trapped in a man's body
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_XsLNL-fff8
>>71787415
>facts
You're the one who believes in a theory which fabricates evidence and relies on half truths.
Remember when global warming was going to lead to the polar ice caps melting meaning half the world would be flooded by 2008?
Living in waterworld sucks doesn't it! I wish I could see land again.
>>71787097
>Also: there's nothing immoral with having roughly half of the scientists in the world as women. It's only when we cross the line into forcing people to do or not do things that this becomes an issue.
I agree, but that isn't the narrative he's pushing. The narrative that's being pushed is that society is responsible for women not going into science, therefore we need to change the way we act to cater to them. It is even worse because it's being pushed by a group of insane people that believe society is not only responsible for the choices of women, but is a malevolent force that attempts to oppress them.
>>71786890
In America, they indoctrinated us at youth to like Bill Nye. They would show his videos to us in the 90's in science class (and as a kid they are fun video, I have to admit).
Well, 90's fags have grown up and are being all nostalgic and faggy over Bill Nye. Anything he says will be taken as gospel by 20-30 somthing year olds in America.
More proof that public school is the most effective tool for indoctrinating the youth.
![65_Myr_Climate_Change_Rev[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/t4OBcKa.jpg "65_Myr_Climate_Change_Rev[1].jpg")
>>71784618
>45 year period
>>71787719
I think you missed the point.
>>71786617
Arguing against this for a second, Humans are an animal that is capable of much much more than any other organism we've ever seen, and can cause an unprecedented level of extinction if we're not careful.
The introduction of Trees as an organism managed to cause an extinction level event on earth at one point in time. Human's are obviously far more impactful than trees in a short period of time.
>>71787406
A white person and a black person can produce fertile offspring. That is a sufficient condition for two organisms belonging to the same species. The fact that you don't like it does not change the fact that we are, by definition, the same species.
>>71787934
> That is a sufficient condition for two organisms belonging to the same species.
Wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liger#Fertility
>>71787406
Yes we are retard. Dogs can range from poodles to german shepards, but they're still the same species.
>>71783994
women act like there's a science police that only lets men study STEM
just do it or shut the fuck up, what does it have to do with me
>>71787934
Wolves and coyotes can produce fertile offspring and have produced new species: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coywolf
Producing fertile offspring is not sufficient proof that the parents belong to the same species.
>>71787934
That's not correct. Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals could mate and produce fertile offspring, but they were still different species.
That said, Every human currently on earth is the same species and belongs to the classification of Homo Sapien, but there can be, and are differences among organisms even within the same species.
>>71786474
please refrain from opening anymore of pandora's boxes with such questions
>>71788002
Well, fugg.
Nevertheless, that is the formal definition of species. There isn't any better one. Maybe lions and tigers should be considered the same species.
>>71787934
This pic gets me every time
>>71788309
>Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals could mate and produce fertile offspring
We already knew this though, people mate with abbos all the time.
And aren't humans homo sapien sapien rather than just the one sapien?
>>71783259
Bill Nye is the one who reclassified Pluto.
Bill Nye "invented" a sun dial that works on Mars.
Bill Nye is not a scientist.
>>71788398
>comparing the great Neanderthals with abbos
Triggered desu
>>71783259
He's open to thought crimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlk4Lt__Sn0
>>71783259
Who else here thinks that this guy has a few skeleton's in his closet. I wouldn't be surprised if he started making too much noise and all of a sudden former child actors that where in his show start coming out about being molested by Bill "He blinded me with science" Nye.
>>71788571
good link
>>71784586
>>71784644
Bill Nye the cuckold guy
>>71787097
All races of humanity are the same species, however there are different subspecies. Still capable of interbreeding, yet showing marked anthropological differences (way beyond just skin color).
Anthropologists can tell whether a human is African, Mongoloid (Asian), European, or Australian Aborigine by examining the shape of their skull. There are differences in the ligature, musculature, skeletal structure, average heights and weights and IQs and testosterone levels and social behavior etc etc.
Do you say that a chihuahua and a pitbull are exactly the same animal? No difference? They can interbreed. Whether you term it different "breeds" or "subspecies," it's the same thing.
>>71788338
No, it's just a single formal definition of species, which is highly debated in the scientific community.
>>71787934
If a black person performs blackface is it considered: Autoracism?
>>71787163
He's a professor there and, at least according to my former team leader, an asshole who barely knows half of what he teaches.
>>71788398
Abbos are still Homo sapiens. They're in fact more closely related to whites and asians than some populations in Africa because they were apart of the group of Humans that departed out of Africa at the same time.
Generally, it's believed that every human on Earth doesn't differ genetically by more than roughly 50,000 years, which isn't usually enough of a seperation to produce different species
A true scientist doesn't let PC stop him from seeking the truth.
I bet he really knows deep down why women aren't getting into STEM and leader positions and why there are way more homeless and suicidal men.
>>71789046
>He's a professor
What? No he isn't.
>>71783994
50% of people are women, so 50% of roadkill collectors should be women.
>>71783719
Climate change exists, but it isn't caused by cow farts or old cars.
>>71783259
He believes that fixing climate change should be the job of the government instead of private industry. Because the government is so good a fixing problems.
>>71783259
what? of course it is! now be a good goy and pay your carbon tax!
He was an ok dude before he really started hammering climate change, when he's really not in a position to talk about it since he's only a mechanic.
I liked his debate with Ken Ham but after that it seems like he went off the shitlib deep end. So no; he is not redpilled.
But Dawkins seems to be getting more and more redpilled these days. He's started shifting his focus to roasting mudslimes and SJW's. Plus he accepts that races are subspecies and have different capabilities(which really is a no-brainier since he is an evolutionary biologist)
>>71789122
Pretty sure there's speculation that AA interbred with some form of archaic human, research shows interbreeding with both Neanderthals and Denisovans, plus more recent interbreeding with modern Indians some 4-5000 years ago. They were the first group of humans to leave Africa, and so have had the most time to actually evolve separate from all 3 other subspecies of Human.
AA left Africa some 70k years ago apparently.
>>71788483
When you work as an aeronautics engineer at Boeing helping to develop parts for the 747 then maybe your opinion wont be so worthless.
>>71788719
I'm not sure if what you were saying was meant to be a challenge to what I said or not, but I completely agree with what you have said. As far as I'm aware, Bill Nye nor any other reputable scientist (of today anyway) has said that we are all genetically uniform. He has merely stated that we are all Humans and that the genetic differences present do not constitute a scientific classification of separate entire species.
>>71783259
Bill is a cool guy. Very much underrated.
>>71789781
>But Dawkins seems to be getting more and more redpilled these days. He's started shifting his focus to roasting mudslimes and SJW's. Plus he accepts that races are subspecies and have different capabilities(which really is a no-brainier since he is an evolutionary biologist)
Oh shit, I didn't know this. I'm gonna start paying more attention to Dawkins since it seems like he's not a shill like Bill Nye and Neil DeGrass Tyson.
>tfw have a higher degree of education
>not considered a "scientist"
This faggot is as bad as Ahmed the Clock Maker.
>>71789987
Well, I agree with you that we are all the same species, however my point is that the 4 big "races" of humanity follow trends. In other words, Caucasoids are more similar to each other than they are to Africans or Mongoloids etc.
Basically I'm disagreeing with your (supposed) statement that differences between races are just standard genetic variation and not a marked divide (ie a subspecies) brought on by 50-70k years of separate evolution in different environments.
I could just be misinterpreting your statement.
>>71789903
Hmm, didn't know that. The dates of Homo Sapiens leaving Africa are a widely debated subject so it's hard to find a consistent date, but your theory makes sense. Abos are obviously not completely apart of the same group of other non-Africans because they don't contain Neanderthal DNA.
>>71789507
Private industry is good at pursuing profits, nothing more. There's no short-term money to be made from addressing climate change, thus private industry will do fuck all about it. This then necessitates Government action. In Australia under our carbon tax, emissions went down every single quarter, and a vast amount of additional revenue was generated. Since it was removed and replaced with "direct action" (literally giving billions of taxpayer dollars to polluters in the hope they build some solar panels), emissions have started rising again, the government is in even more financial strife and the unemployment rate is at record highs. Private industry cannot be trusted with any important issues; for more evidence of this see the US health system. You pay TRIPLE per capita just from taxes than any other country, and you still have to pay exorbitant amounts to private companies on top of that, while the rest of the developed world gets it for free with their nice government-run systems. In the US, massive companies literally piss in the mouths of the general populace and tell them it's raining. And you're all slurping it up, it's pathetic.
>>71790321
>as long as Dr. Shillsberg retains his right to rape my wallet LONG LIVE CAPITALISM
>>71790220
The truth of the matter is: my knowledge of the subject is limited to light reading and small personal research. I'm not educated in such matters and are thus unable comment on it without seeming like I'm talking out my ass.
>>71783259
No, he isn't.
He's a "scientist" who has no understanding of the practical means to achieve goals.
To bill, global warming is paramount, so we must do everything to fix it. No actual area to focus on, no idea of who is going to pay for it, no massive donations on his part, and no idea of how it will impact the economy.
Furthermore, he has no idea how he's going to force other countries how to cooperate.
Yet, at the same time he wants to tell us what we need to do.
Fact is that a scientist has no place dictating policy. The impact of policy is not something we can do full science on; it's out of his depth.
>>71786474
Son, there aren't enough letters in the alphabet
>>71787612
SHOTS FIRED
>>71786888
YOU
WILL
NEVER
BE
AUSTRALIA
>>71788483
If you don't understand why Pluto was reclassified you shouldn't be commenting about it, nor should you blame a single scientist for it.
Making a sundial for Mars is badass and if you don't understand why, I don't believe you have much interest in science at all. So you really don't get to define 'scientist'
>>71788934
I'm sure you've cherry picked one that makes blacks and whites separate species. Care to link it?
>>71783259
Well he is a fascist but just your run of the mill liberal fascist
>>71787665
I saw him give a talk when he came to my University. There was a massive lineup just to get in the hall. Everyone I spoke to after the event said it was amazing.
The talk was complete fucking shit. Rambling all over the place. You could see he was trying to thread together a cohesive point with everything, but consistently failing. Then at the end he tacks on five minutes of "you guys are the future, you can change the world!" Just awful.
I really had that nostalgic 90's fag view of Bill Nye before the talk.
>>71787612
>strawman - the post.
Siberian "perma" frost and Greenland's glaciers are already melting. Low-lying Pacific islands are already becoming inundated. Every single national science organisation in the world (CSIRO, NASA etc.) all state without qualification that climate change is real, we are contributing to it, and that it is the largest danger we face as a species. 99% of those who oppose it are in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry, trying to sow doubt and indecision - just so oil and mining companies can have a few more decades of billion-dollar profits. It's pathetic.
>>71794700
>Siberian "perma" frost and Greenland's glaciers are already melting
They've been "melting" for years. They'll eventually refreeze later on after they actually melt anyway.
When are we going to see the effects of global warming?
>Every single national science organisation in the world (CSIRO, NASA etc.) all state without qualification that climate change is real
True. The climate undoubtedly changes.
>we are contributing to it
False. There's no proof.
>and that it is the largest danger we face as a species.
Also false. Nuclear war.
>99% of those who oppose it are in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry, trying to sow doubt and indecision - just so oil and mining companies can have a few more decades of billion-dollar profits. It's pathetic.
99% of those that support climate change are in the pocket of the Clean Energy™ industry, trying to sow fear and panic - just so Clean energy™ companies have a few more decades of billion-dollar profits. It's pathetic.
>>71783259
>Lecture Western world about Climate Change instead of calling out China and India
It's just like lecturing law abiding citizens about gun control and ignoring niggers and gang members.
>>71783259
>Climate change
Because half baked international accords and ransoming our enviromental and energy policy to cosmopolitan globalist bureaucrats will truly fix anything.
I agree its a problem, but unless you're willing to purge the developing world, china, saudi arabia, and the indian subcontinent, you're not doing jack shit to change things.
Most developed countries are well on track to meet the Kyoto accords, even those who weren't signatory members of the charter.
>>71786888
climate change supporters
1. APPLE
2. Microsoft
3. General Electrick
4. EU
5. UN
6. HOLLYWOOD
7. Media
8. Bill Gates
9. IMF
10. Warren Buffett
11. George Soros
12. Richard Branson
13. GOOGLE
14. Federal Reserve
would you like me to continue?
>>71796479
You forgot arguably the most important, most world leaders including Obama.
I'm sure if the 1st Amendment didn't exist he'd make it illegal to deny climate change, I've heard some countries have already tried.
>>71783259
Fuck this faggot. He's not a scientist., ,he's not even an engineer. He's a fucking clown. Quit making engineers look like shit.
>>71797250
these scientists that rec. govt grants want to exclude "deniers"
watching "scientists" act like religious zealots yuck
the man is a piece of shit
>>71795887
>When are we going to see the effects of global warming?
I dunno, maybe here: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/religionandethicsreport/what-do-you-do-when-your-country-is-sinking/7340512.
Their island is literally sinking into the sea. There's a reason that Pacific nations are the most vociferous proponents of climate action. They are seeing the impacts first hand.
Please read this: http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
If you really think there's "no proof" for anthropogenic climate change, you're insanely delusional.
I don't see any massive Corporations promoting climate change acceptance at all. They don't need to, scientists tell us all we need. Those same scientists could easily take million-dollar payouts from fossil-fuel companies, which would far dwarf the remuneration they receive from often non-profit research organisations. However, science is about integrity and truth, hence why 97% of climate scientists accept that humans are causing the earths climate to change.
>>71798121
>the consensus meme
Literally straight from the abstract.
>We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.We find that 66.4% of abstracts expressed no position on AGW, 32.6% endorsed AGW, 0.7% rejected AGW and 0.3% were uncertain about the cause of global warming. Among abstracts expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
That is totally dishonest.
>>71783259
> Bill Nye
> Scientist
>>71783623
Well, he's not entirely wrong in principle about the girls. It would make sense to capitalize on ALL the existing labour force and enable them to avhieve whatever it is they can do the best, whatever that will turn out to be.
On the other hand you cant be a dumb commie about it and randomly decide they have to be x or y because it suits your personl vision of society. Mankind never needed 50% of its population, let alone only among the males, to achieve what it has.
Plus it's hilarious to help a basic degree engineer project his own scientific inadequacies on 50% on the world population. Of he cares so much about it, why isnt he a scientist himself? He certainly can afford the tuition fees.
>>71798121
>I don't see any massive Corporations promoting climate change acceptance at all. They don't need to, scientists tell us all we need. Those same scientists could easily take million-dollar payouts from fossil-fuel companies, which would far dwarf the remuneration they receive from often non-profit research organisations. However, science is about integrity and truth, hence why 97% of climate scientists accept that humans are causing the earths climate to change.
Wrong wrong wrong
If you think corporations are the only ones who influence the debate you are not looking at the complete picture. Government and institutions stand to gain from this, ones that wouldn't exist if there wasn't consensus on this problem. Ones that aren't ending the problem but by implicit acceptance of this "problem" they profit and live comfortably running their not for profits and never actually taking action that dfinitively ends the problem.
>>71798121
>Their island is literally sinking into the sea.
>island
>sinking
And?
Things tend to sink when you put more heavy objects on them than they can handle.
Also, funny how that single island is the only one you can point at. Why aren't beach front properties under water?
>nasa link
You do realize those graphs are fucking stupid right? Look at their time scale. It starts in 1880. Funny that, you'd think they would start about a century earlier on to include the industrial revolution because that would support their theories. Don't you think that means it might not support them?
How about we switch to a bit of a larger graph.
>>71798121
>heir island is literally sinking into the sea.
b/c this has NEVER happened before....oh wait it has
LOL the 97% of scientists LIE
a. last 1000 years cooling NOW its going back to "normal"
b. scientists caught manipulating data
c. hot year on record still happened in the 90's
70s global cooling
80's - 90s global warming
NOW climate change
BTW all CLIMATE models have been wrong. AL Gore WRONG. every few years they say we are soo close to ruin....guess what NOTHING happens..
you really dont see massive corporations promoting climate change??? (apple, GE, etc)
How about BANKS because they are promoting the shit out of climate change. WHY...MONEY you stupid fuck
Look you repeated the 97% lie again. What a good little monkey you are
>>71798737
>never needed 50% of population to be scientists
I meant
>>71783259
I liked this guy in school but as of now I ain't feeling him he literally said those who deny climate change should be put in prison, he has your typical liberal mindset of if yo disagree with me you need to die.
>>71799004
>Things tend to sink when you put more heavy objects on them than they can handle.
is this a joke? you're not one of those people who thinks islands float on top of the water are you?
>>71799371
>you can push down on anything as long as it isn't in water and it'll never sink
Bit of a retard aren't you.
>>71799371
Right off the top of my head, Venice and Amsterdam have been technically sinking for centuries tbqhwy fampai
>>71783259
How hot is the world supposed to get?
How hot can the world get before we die?
When is the world supposed to get too hot?
What will kill us about the world getting too hot?
Why can't we survive with all the scientific knowledge that we possess?
It sickens me that I watched bill nye the commie guy as a child. Truly evil soul sucker of innocent children that daemon is.
>>71783259
>>71783623
>>71784586
If you think about it, he's basically the same as those "creationist" "scientists" who deny evolution. He's just on the other side of the spectrum.
Like the shit he says is completely unrelated to science and the methods he suggests to use are completely unscientific, yet he tries to pass himself off as a scientist
Bill Nye is in the same league as Neil Degrasse Tyson: (raging climosexual)
>>71785955
>Mentioning genderfluids, otherkins, and multi-gendered non-animated sexual association-kins but ignoring Genderfluid Dwarvenistic DragonBorn Falmerkin
Just what i would expect from a Stormclock Shitlord like you
>>71783994
50% of rapist are women
>>71799033
You're just blatantly lying. The hottest year on record was 2015. The 2nd hottest was 2014. When you can't even get the most basic of facts right, how can anything else you say be trusted?:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513
>>71799482
Tell me you aren't actually suggesting that entire continents are sinking into the sea because we are building on them
>>71783259
god I want S.E Cupp to be my sexually abusive mother.
>>71799795
Nah he's lower since Tyson at least has a doctorate.
>>71799913
>entire continents
Island.
You still haven't explained why that specific island is sinking but no beach front property is effected. It's the same ocean (although maybe under a different name).
>>71799874
>hottest year on record
Noice post m8
>>71799004
Sinking as in being consumed by the sea. And nice un-sourced chart you have there. I'd definitely trust that more than NASA and the American Meteorological Society. Oh wait, that'd be fucking stupid.
>>71783259
I hate Bill Nye.
He took all my childhood memories of him and tainted them with bullshit and petty politics.
I honestly won't bat a fucking eyelid when he dies.
>>71783259
Asshole who uses the fact kids know him as Bill Nye the Science Guy to portray himself as a real scientist so he can push liberal scaremongering regarding climate change onto the general populace. Guy's not a real scientist, he has a bachelor's in mechanical engineering and worked for Boeing. The guy's a charlatan of the higest degree.
>>71783259
No he denies the flat earth and thereby God. Shill nye and Neil smoking grasse trisome are literally the science equivalent of Jon Stewart and Stephen colbert... As in lol they said a witty meme that isn't true but comfy and it's popular to. Be wrong so I will do that and be with the crowd.
Tl;Dr he's a faggot
>>71799913
I dont think he was saying that unilaterally for everything. But there are parts of the world where cities have been built on shaky grounds, meaning constant naintenance is required to subsist said cities.
Are you talking about bangladesh or what specifically? Because there is an argument to be made between localized pollution and global climate change.
>>71800149
>I'd definitely trust that more than NASA and the American Meteorological Society
You fucking retard, the NASA chart is the same chart with a considerably smaller length (about 150 years compared to 400,000). You still haven't mentioned why the removed the industrial revolution from the graph, an era where polution was in abundance.
>>71800144
Again, nice little chart you have there, I'm sure NASA and the American Meteorological Society have never seen it before, better send it to them, they'll probably give you a job as a result of this important revelation you've uncovered. Orrr more likely they'll call you a spastic retard who has no understanding of the topic at hand..
>>71800201
Nice bait
>>71799371
>hurr durr durr what is mud? what is soft soil? what is erosion? what is plate tectonics?
>>71799371
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaning_Tower_of_Pisa
>>71800373
>who has no understanding of the topic at hand
You're supplying graphs with a scale of ~150 years. Humans have been around for ~200,000 years. Pollution really kicked off around 300 years ago (or about 50k because of the abbos).
Climate """science""" BTFO!
>>71800201
Oh fuck off already, just because people have grown suspicious after 4 decades of false predictions doesnt mean they've gone full retard.
By the way, mankind embraced the geocentric model since the ancient greeks. The flat earth meme has been irrelevant for much, much longer than that.
>>71799874
NOPE sorry they manipulated data. THEY WERE CAUGHT. fuck aussie get your shit together
>>71783259
I think leaf shitposting is on an all time high.
>>71800373
>create chart
>limit scope to last 100 years
>show warming trend over century
>ZOMG THE WORLD IS ENDING GIB MORE GOBERMINT GIBSMEDATS TO "GREEN" COMPANIES
>HELP US ELON MUSK YOU'RE OUR ONLY HOPE
>>71800638
and yet the earth was COLDEST during some of the biggest jumps in industry...
i remember during Katrina all the "scientists" were saying 'see this proves global warming so expect more hurricanes' and now we have RECORD LOWS
The same thing was said about tornadoes...guess what happened?
>>71799874
I thought NYC was suppose to be underwater by now....
>>71800321
>I'll just ignore every scientific institution in the world because of one chart I don't understand that uses data from the exact same institutions.
That's literally your argument. Do you have any idea how retarded you sound? Increased Co2 levels that impact climate change didn't manifest until the end of the industrial revolution, hence the NASA chart. Of course scientists realise that the climate has changed significantly before. However they also realise that the current rate of change not due to natural forces, and humans are the primary cause. It's really quite simple. If they wanted to suppress this chart, they wouldn't release it. The scientists behind the chart you have are the exact same scientists telling us that climate change is real; you're just too simple minded to understand the complexity of their research.
>>71801004
Who ever said that? The strawman in your post is overwhelming.
>>71800756
trudeau did this
>>71800638
>pollution kicked off 300 years ago.
No, it didn't. It kicked off in a significant way after the Industrial revolution, please, get the basic facts right so you don't look so spastic.
>>71801040
>I'll just ignore every scientific institution in the world because of one chart I don't understand that uses data from the exact same institutions.
No, you ignore the data because it has a very small sample size.
>>71801040
LOL the amount of co2 humans contribute to the atmosphere is soo fucking small. Higher levels of CO2 during the fucking dinosaurs. Of course the change is due to natural forces
>>71801040
On what basis do you make the assertion that this "rate" (please define your terms) is "unnatural"? (define; particularly interested in what separates it from a natural rate of climate change)
>>71801129
>It kicked off in a significant way
That is generally what kicked off means.
>>71783259
>current year 7*3*3*2*2*2*2*2
>there are people in this world who still deny the existence of anthropogenic climate change
wew, i can't imagine how good of a mental gymnast you have to be to pull that off
>>71801279
https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/our-data/publication/ice-cores-and-climate-change/
Pls read, if your
>American education
allows you to understand words over 2 syllables.
>>71801004
Dont forget about the amazonian forest either. It's technically supposed to have been BTFO since 2014.
I used to believe in climate change but I just dony understand why the scientific community/pro AGW side doesnt address why it made so many false predictions. Surely they have to explain that beforehand if they wish to restore trust with the public, and why this time it would be different.
Are they too thick to understand the moral of the boy who cried wolf?
>>71801058
Al Gore dummy.
strawman? showing that their predictions are coming true is a strawman argument?
>>71788946
Don't be stupid. Blacks can't be racist.
Only whites can be racist.
>>71801351
>https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/our-data/publication/ice-cores-and-climate-change/
funny you mention ice...since the caps are increasing in size...
>>71801373
*not
>>71801269
Oh yeah, the massive increase correlating exactly with the industrial revolution doesn't exist at all, you're such a genius! Those spastics at every single national scientific research organisation are all so stupid, they should have just consulted you.
>>71801351
No, I asked YOU, my petrol huffing friend to define your terms you used in your assertion. Without you defining them it is utterly meaningless.
>>71801473
please show the Previous 10k years you idiot
>>71801444
Nice myth you have there, based on a fundamental lack of scientific understanding. Funny how that happens when 99% of climate skeptics aren't climate scientists, or scientifically trained in any field at all really:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/05/27/climate-skeptics-think-you-shouldnt-worry-about-melting-polar-ice-heres-why-theyre-wrong/
>>71786900
i really hope you're trolling
>>71801058
Confirmed for underage. The climate change side has been making rather bold claims since the 70s.
>wah we gonna freeze
>wah we gonna boil
>wah we gonna fry the oceans
After a while, you do wonder what the fuck they are doing. It almost seems like the scientific commmunity is writing its own eschatological maymay...
>>71801533
They've defined it for me, far easier than me merely re-wording the article. Of course, people like you aren't used to dealing with science or facts, so thinly-referenced rhetorical fallacies are your favoured method of argument.
>>71801594
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/05/19/updated-nasa-data-polar-ice-not-receding-after-all/#3546bd2132da
you are just an idiot
>>71801269
>LOL the amount of co2 humans contribute to the atmosphere is soo fucking small. Higher levels of CO2 during the fucking dinosaurs.
Remind me again how many humans were thriving during the dinosaurs?
>lol the blast zone of man made explosives are so fucking small
>there were bigger explosions from the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs
>explosions are caused by natural forces
Nigga there is a bomb IN THE BUILDING
>>71784717
Fuck off muhammed
>>71801721
>Remind me again how many humans were thriving during the dinosaurs?
There were plenty of living creatures and plant life.
Fucking idiots WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU GUYS!?? WE'RE SPEWING GREENHOUSE FUMES INTO THE ATMOSPHERE AT A GRADUALLY INCREASING RATE WHAT THE FUCK? ARE YOU GUYS RETARDED?
When you're spewing chemicals into an environment its going to have a fucking effect on it what the fuck? How is that so fucking hard to get?
KRAKATOA CAUSED FAMINE AND THAT WAS A NATURAL DISASTER. It was a huge fucking punch to our environment and it caused the Earth and our ecosystems to get fucked up.
And that was just a natural fucking disaster. We're making all that shit and more at an increasing rate.
Where the fuck do you guys think that shit goes into? Trees?
>>71801659
>The climate change side has been making rather bold claims since the 70s.
To be fair this is more of an issue with the media (who are by and large retarded) who take the most extreme scientific models and blow it out of proportion despite that not really being what the science says. The same thing happens with Climate Change, it's just that most scientists actually agree it's a problem just not one we'll be feeling immediate effects of like the media says.
>>71801709
>Forbes contributor
don't blogspam please
>>71801709
Your article focuses on sea ice/ice extent.
Land ice is shrinking. Your article doesn't dispute that.
You're the idiot.
I don't really understand the anti-climate change argument
If there really is climate change, we should do everything we can to stop it if it's man made.
If we are not sure if it's man made, we should still do everything we can to stop it.
If it turns out climate change is not real, we just wasted time.
If it turns out it was real, we Ded
>>71801895
>Where the fuck do you guys think that shit goes into? Trees?
Wait, where do YOU think it goes into?
just curious
>>71801858
>There were plenty of living creatures and plant life.
There are plenty of living creatures around oceanic thermal vents. I fail to see your god damn point.
Do you know what equivocation is? 2 is a number. 3 is a number. All numbers are numbers. So 3=2. That's equivocation.
You just equivocated you dumb motherfucker. Learn to argue intelligently or fuck off.
You do realize that denying climate change is like being an anti-vaccination nutjob.
Both of those kinds of people are not even worth listening to.
>>71801908
media is told what to report....the powerful are pushing climate change
forbes contributor...nasa data.....
>>71801895
>WE'RE SPEWING GREENHOUSE FUMES INTO THE ATMOSPHERE
Oh no, however will we survive with all that water vapour in the atmosphere.
>>71801659
Orrr, climate skeptics take 1 or 2 random studies that were never scientific consensus in the first place, and start shouting "hurr durr 7 random scientists in the 70s said the world was going to freeze, now we don't have to listen to what hundreds of thousands of scientists say now". It's just fallacious, and demonstrates an entirely simplistic understanding of science. Of course scientists aren't right 100% of the time; however when something is as agreed upon as AGW, it's just retarded to wholesale deny it. The exact impacts and processes of it are still not completely settled upon - but the fact that it is occurring most certainly is.
>>71801659
I'm pretty sure the scientists mostly make rather vague and general claims, like 'it might get warm' or 'we think its going to get colder' but them a newspaper gets hold of it an turns it into 'Every body's gonna die!!!!'
>>71801858
It matters not. The flora and fauna of the current day is adapted to the current conditions.
>>71801964
The funniest thing is a lot of the people who would deny AGW and say we should do nothing, are the same people who will the use the same argument to say you should believe and worship just in case God turns out to be real. Don't point that out to them though. They can't handle such a high dose of reality.
>>71801935
you are a fucking retard
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg
>>71783997
That's exactly how you make people worship you. Trick them into thinking you're a scientific authority when they're young, and they'll defend anything you say, even to the point of murdering "deniers" on your orders.
It worked for Hitler, it worked for Stalin, and it works for Bill Nye.
>>71802119
Al Gore even predicted the Arctic ice cap could completely disappear by 2014.
>>71801964
If it turns out it's not real, we spent trillions of dollars on worthless gadgets making a group of billionaire fraudsters.
You left out that part.
Also, why should we stop it? The temperature goes up, the temperature then goes down and there's an ice age. If anything we should be stopping that ice age from occuring at all costs, ice ages fucking suck.
>>71792937
Woah woah woah. A sundial, for mars.
Dude just count in earth hours for how long Mars rotates around his axis. Its 24.6229 hours. So what you do on mars (if you ever get on it) is bring a modified digital clock, and you are done.
Why the fuck would someone spend time inventing a sundial for mars? YOU ALREADY HAVE THE SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM?
>>71802168
>Global Sea Ice
>Sea Ice
Jesus fucking Christ please learn to read the graphs you link so your sources don't blatantly contradict your argument you colossal fucking retard.
>>71802168
>sea ice
Right, I'm the retard, but you keep pointing out the same irrelevant bullshit.
Kudos.
>>71802119
More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/19/more-countries-caught-manipulating-their-climate-data/
>>71802166
>It matters not. The flora and fauna of the current day is adapted to the current conditions.
And why wouldn't we adapt? Humans are the best adapters we've ever encountered.
>>71783259
Yep. Pretty hard to.
>>71802226
Why does Al Gore being wrong about climate sceince nullify the professional opinions of 97% of climate scientists?
Explain this.
>>71802100
Replace water vapor with methane and see how livable this planet will be.
>>71801706
Nah I'm just fucking with you m8. I've read the same thing you have, I'm just not convinced this isn't the modern equivalent of people hearing the voice of their dead relatives in ham radio static.
I remain unconvinced they aren't just picking favorable data points out of a sea of statistical noise. They claim to have a model but then their models predictive power is BTFO.
In the end it doesn't matter who is wrong or right. Humans will continue using resources and the ONLY logical path forward is investment in technologies that can deal with the potential problems.
Reducing consumption is a non-starter. Modern green tech is just a money siphon for government gibsmedats that don't solve any of the problems long term but instead shift the carbon, a veritable 3 card montey with carbon footprints lel.
>>71802272
lol polar ice increasing and polar caps melting. yup makes sense..are u a tard or what
>>71802370
WOW the 97% lie AGAIN. you ppl are fucking parrots
>>71783259
>Cucked science man redpilled?
No. Climate change is not the number one priority we have now. We have fucking endless wars going on in the Middle East, countries in Europe going bankrupt, illegal mass immigration crisis in both the US and in Europe. There is much more than climate change in which many scientists agree / disagree on. I'm sick of Bill Nye's democrat cock sucking.
>>71802168
As several others have pointed out, you are retarded and have no actual understanding of what you post. Please leave.
>>71802100
Water vapour is an extremely potent greenhouse gas. It absorbs a huge amount of IR radiation.
>>71802330
We might with our technology. We might be able to force adaptation in our crops and farm animals.
For the rest of the environment it will be adapt or die. The faster the change to more likely the outcome will be die.
>>71802100
>Oh no, how will I live with this one drop of snake poison
>>71802523
b/c artic ice is increasing and the caps are decreasing?...fuck aussie
>>71802533
>Oh no!
>Nature will have to do that thing by which biological organisms adapt to their environment
Oh the horror!
>>71802300
>http://dailycaller.com
Nice reputable scientific source for your information you have there. Definitely trumps NASA and every national scientific research organisation in the world.
>>71802593
I was going to type up a big post explaining why you're wrong, but that's too much effort. Read this instead:
https://www.skepticalscience.com/antarctica-gaining-ice.htm
>inb4 "obvious a shill website"
>>71802462
>97%
>lie
[citation needed]
>>71802670
the article quotes
http://news.heartland.org/newspaper-article/2015/05/18/temperature-fibbers-being-investigated
are your parents brother and sister?
>>71802722
I guess NASA is wrong?
thats fine if its not
what is then
>>71802740
lol you are asking ME for a citation....HAHAHA you made a claim that CAN NOT be proven you fuck tard
>>71802377
Climatologists are to meteorologists what astrologers are to astronomers.
They pretend they can see the future in the iterative magnification of statistical imprecision in their models, just like fortunetellers of old read futures with tarot cards. And, like fortunetellers of old, they can't even get it wrong often enough to be a reliable predictor on the contrary.
It won't be the first time people have died by the millions to sell snake oil, and it won't be the last. The name Bill Nye will one day join those of Lysenko and Mengele in infamy.
>>71802838
What would NASA be wrong about? A theory?
There's competing theories you know. Just because NASA holds one doesn't mean it's necessarily the most legitimate one
>>71783259
so wtf does climate change hafta do w/ insurance rates, dammit!
>>71786474
>how many more genders could they possibly engineer.
Oh. Oh dear. You poor boy.
There's enough words in the english language to name over 200,000 genders.
It'll never be over.
>>71802838
NASA isn't wrong. You just don't understand why you are.
>>71802895
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
Holy fucking shit I had a citation. It's amazing what you can find with 3 seconds of google.
>>71802920
i agree.... they believe in climate change....They are wrong
>>71802774
Well let's take a look at your sources here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute
>In the decade after 2000, the Heartland Institute became a leading supporter of climate change denial. It rejects the scientific consensus on global warming, disputes that human activity is driving the warming, and says that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.
A political activist group? Not the most unbiased source, but that's ok as long as the author is an accredited scientist
>Ph.D. (2001) in Applied Philosophy from Bowling Green State University
Huh, guess not
>>71802838
No, NASA agrees with that. You're just a retard for misinterpreting the data.
>>71802641
Adapting does automatically mean thriving. For many species to adapt simply means to migrate, for others a change in behaviour might be enough, for some it will mean death.
You are aware of the concept of extinction I presume. Not all species are lucky enough to adapt.
>>71802981
you had a citation for the 97% comment?
>>71783259
He's a cunt who should go back to teaching kids on PBS. He has nothing relevant to say to rational adults, and his political ideals are brainwashed nonsense..
>>71802376
Methane is already there, it's 0.6%.
