Clinton pays 1 million for people to shill on social media. Doesn't shill on 4chan. Why? Is /pol/ losing relevance?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/21/hillary-pac-spends-1-million-to-correct-commenters-on-reddit-and-facebook.html
/pol/ calls shills out even when they aren't real shills. Plus everyone here typically goes out of their way to point out political corruption and tyranny, both of which are the only two things she's good for.
we do it for free
Because 95% of /pol/ probably wouldn't vote for Hillary anyways.
It's best to try to persuade voters that you actually have a chance with, rather than throwing your money at people who already hate you. It's pretty common in politics to avoid campaigning in areas where you know you will do very badly, much better/more efficient to focus on swing voters.
>pol is as large as reddit or facebook
555-come-on-now
there are paid shills all over social media, comment sections, message boards
4chan probably sees more than anyone because it is anonymous.
>>71756916
What is she playing /pol/?
>>71756916
As if they'd claim to be shilling on /lpol/.
That would be silly. Where do you think all these Cruz shills come from. They're not all from rato
>>71756916
You are a shill.
How does cruz feel about tubman on the 20?
>>71757697
Pokémon
She defeated all the scandals and is on her way to defeating the Elite Nominees. She probably flicked her bean hard when she found out about Missingo.
>>71756916
>Doesn't shill on 4chan
they did, Adam Parkhomenko was caught posting here
>>71758516
Just looked it up. Cruz wants to bump jackson entirely. Fuck that cuck I would have voted for him if he got the nom but not now.
>>71758317
FUCKEN FLAG
FUCKEN FLAG
FUCKEN FLAG
FUCKEN FLAG
>>71758317
Sta...y st...ill
Wait, so this is why faggots always rush to Hillary's defense within 40 seconds of me saying something bad about Hillary on twitter?
Good god, it's worse than I thought. /pol/'s anonymity protects it from these paid shills, it's easy to ignore them one post to the next or for them to specifically argue with a single person.
>>71757641
It doesn't make sense to shill here. All the threads are short lived, nobody bothers with archives. There's trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls and there's "triggering" content everywhere.
>>71756916
> Is /pol/ losing relevance?
Implying /pol/ has any relevance to mainstream anything ever.
>implying as always /pol/ wouldn't immediately notice the influx of shills
