Why are 100% of women only attracted to the 20% of men? Was it always this way or is it a modern development?
>>71708178
Well, 100% of men are only attracted to about 3% of women, so it's basically a non-issue.
>>71708178
I think it was developed after so called "sexual liberation (revolution)" in the 70ies
>>71708178
Distributing women evenly in favor of a superior family structure and more content working class via monogamy is a modern developement. (((Leftists))) have convinced them to revert back to the behavior of animals. If you do not teach people restraint they will eventually eat each other.
>>71708178
The best way for a female to spread her genes is to mate with the fittest male she can find. Raising an offspring is difficult and time consuming, so there is an incentive to be selective. The best strategy for males however, is to fuck as many females as possible.
>>71708641
actually the best way for a female to spread her genes is to find the most loyal partner she can find
>>71708281
>100% of men are only attracted to about 3% of women
>>71708783
not anymore. Just get some super hot and fit guy to knock her up and then get some cucked beta male to raise the kid.
>>71709992
I'd raise the kid of my crush if she had one
I'm madly in love
>>71708178
It was designed by thousands upon thousands of years of natural selection, not some new phenomenon of of modern society. Genetic studies showed that in the past about 80% of women managed to reproduce but only 40% men did. This means that the average man did not reproduce.
>>71708783
Are you for real?
No wonder your women don't want to fuck you anymore.
Women are validated by the quality of man she is able to tie down.
Men are validated by the quantity of women trying to tie them down.
>>71710740
Have you ever thought it's not because muh 20% but because many young men died while fighting for their tribe and thus poligamy was needed?
because they was kangs an shit
>>71708783
dis nigga....
>>71710740
Black Pigeon Speaks, my nigger!
>>71708178
Just like quails. Or deer. Or chimpanzees.
>>71708178
It was always so. They are genetically wired to get the best mate they can.
>>71709992
despite /pol/ memes cucks are hard to come by
even most betas refuse to get involved with single mothers, they're universally despised by all men
>>71710740
Sexual revolution has always been one sided and undetermined the natural order of things.
Also it's not that men are checking out, it's because women betrayed society.
>>71710702
k
y
s
>>71708178
they are not.
in the end of their hatching period they will take which ever serial killer that would pay them attention.
It's easy to get a woman mate.
>>71708178
You would be surprised how low women's standards are and what some find attractive
>>71708178
It's a myth.
Why would women be attracted to attractive men? Doy.
>>71710740
many people didn't manage to become old enough to reproduce
>>71710702
Good for you.
>>71708281
More like 100% of men are attracted to 90% of women. Guys will fuck anything that isn't hideously ugly.
That's why women are courted and not the other way around. It falls on them to weed out massive amounts of losers and betas that will inevitably try to fuck them.
Ever wonder why men aren't offended when they are called honey, sweetie, or baby by random women? It's because they take any sort of flirtation as a complement because it rarely happens to them. Women act like it's the end of the fucking world when an ugly guy says that shit to them because men throw themselves at them all day and they get sick of it.
>>71708178
Has been a long time since I was attracted to end girl don't know why. And no I'm not gay. There is just no fucking quality on girls today.
>>71711864
Tell me more I'm interested.
>>71712042
wouldn't that work both ways?
>>71708178
>Was it always this way or is it a modern development?
It was always this way but civilization/society/morals fixed the problem until recently (last 50 years or so).
>>71710702
You really are white Argentina.
