How long until unisex multi-stall bathrooms become commonplace in the United States?
Pic unrelated.
>inb4 people don't realize this is an impossible shape.
>>71687153
Nah, not impossible, just not enough information to solve. But let's discuss the topic at hand. How long will it be?
>>71687202
When trump becomes president, obviously.
>>71687202
No, it's impossible. the measurements it gives don't make sense when you get down to it.
treat the sections as triangles.
Use pythagoras.
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
25 + X = 64
X = root 39
X = 6.25
>middle length is supposed to be 12
>overall length of the bottom is supposed to be 16
>12 + 12.5 is somehow supposed to equal 16
>>71686944
Dude please don't post that picture.
Last time it caused a shitstorm of retarded people trying to solve it.
So to prevent that, let me tell you that it's an impossible shape with the given lengths.
(Missing side of triangle = sqrt(8^2 - 5^2) = sqrt(39)
12 + 2sqrt(39) does not equal 16
Therefore it's an impossible shape, which is the entire point of the picture.
Now please don't be retarded trying to solve it.
Thanks.
>>71687503
Don't need to get so fancy. The triangle it makes it impossible because a + b < c --> 5 + 2 < 8. physically impossible shape.
Make it fabulous, Number 1.
Is this bait? It's base times base divided by two times height
((12 times 16) divided by 2 ) times 5
>>71688027
You just had to do it, didn't you?
Read the thread, you ballsack.
>>71688134
http://www.mathgoodies.com/lessons/vol1/area_trapezoid.html
Okay base 1 + base 2 but regardless, maybe this isn't taught this way in the Netherlands, but I immediatley recognize that problem as wanting you to use that formula.
>>71688454
read the thread
>>71688134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shO9ecpLIh0
>>71688578
pls red dread
i beg u bro
>>71688578
>>71688454
The point is that the shape is impossible as described.
thank god I graduated the year before common core was enforced
I'd be driven mad by this shit
>>71687547
5x12=60
2x5=10
60+10=70
This is what they expect and will score you points!
>>71688641
>>71688704
okay, that's funny I get it I'm sorry.
>>71688706
Eh it's only being enforced for the classes of 2018 and beyond, everyone else was grandfathered in I think.
>>71687704
>>>71687503
>Don't need to get so fancy. The triangle it makes it impossible because a + b < c --> 5 + 2 < 8. physically impossible shape.
Are...are you retarded?
>assuming lines are parallel
Nothing wrong with the data you autists
>>71689789
Are you?
>>71689935
Why is the 8 on the right larger than the 8 on the left?
>>71689789
Are you? If c is larger than the other two sides combined it can never make a triangle. Not even a straight line can match the distance between the ends of c....
>>71690084
because the figure is not drawn to scale you fucking moron. You should only assume what you are given. A quadrilateral with side lengths 8,16,8 and 12, with shortest distance between one corner and the opposite side being 5.
This is actually a pretty good problem.
Does the possibility of the shape matter? It's like how Dr. Suess books are used to teach reading despite being full of gibberish words, because the process to read them is the same and what's being taught.
3 equations, 3 unknowns.
>yfw common core actually had interesting problems all along but ameritards are too stupid to realize it
Are you guys retarded?
A = 70
>>71690575
Still you would've been given no points since what they want you to write is this >>71689156
>>71690578
>Pic unrelated
Don't lie OP. No one posts that pic by accident.
>>71690704
>learning is about scoring points
>>71690970
No, but school is.
>>71687547
Round the decimals down, and it works.
Decimals are racist, anyway.
LOL SKEPTICS BTFO
LOL SKEPTICS BTFO
LOL SKEPTICS BTFO
LOL SKEPTICS BTFO
LOL SKEPTICS BTFO
>>71690575
THE ANSWER REALLY IS 70
THE ANSWER REALLY IS 70
THE ANSWER REALLY IS 70
THE ANSWER REALLY IS 70
THE ANSWER REALLY IS 70
>>71689789
>what is the Triangle Inequality
>>71689935
correct
I did this in the last thread and someone got real buthurt about it
>>71690575
why not just do this instead of complicating shit with additional unknowns?
>>71690575
That swastika is backwards :/
>>71692290
I rounded, but its close enough
>>71692507
ooh, dismiss that 3.. hopefully i still did the math right
Pretty sure we're still dealing with 1/2((Base 1 + Base 2 ) * Height)
>>71686944
I hope soon. I have a piss fetish
>>71687153
>>71687503
>>71687704
Angles aren't specified, faggots. Not enough info to solve.
>>71690285
>shortest distance
Says who?
>>71690285
If the dotted line is the shortest distance, there should be a fucking box marking it as the normal.
So, does this mean that using a urinal is white male privilege?
If they force me to use a stall and take away my urinals, you bet your fucking bitch ass I'm going to piss ALL OVER THE SEAT AND FLOOR.
>>71692155
>triangle inequality
>op's pic is actually related because he's talking about equality issues.
Kek
>>71686944
>>71686944
what's supposed to be wrong wiht OP's image?
>>71686944
For your consideration
>>71696703
You cannot have a triangle with sides measuring 2, 5 and 8.
It's physically impossible.
>>71687503
No, it actually is possible. There's just not enough information to solve. You are assuming that 5 is perpendicular to 16 and, presumably, that 16 is parallel to 12. Neither of those assumptions is valid.
>>71696703
>For your consideration
You pulled a bunch of shit out of your ass and smeared it all over a common core problem, making it even worse.
>>71688027
>>71688454
>>71688578
You just went full retard.
>>71690285
>with shortest distance between one corner and the opposite side being 5.
>shortest distance
No... Other than that you're right.
>>71690822
I didn't claim to have posted it by accident, I just said that it's unrelated. Which it is.
>>71691648
Oh so we're doing troll math now? Okay.
>>71692574
There is not enough information to solve
>>71692817
Nope
>>71694061
No, they're going to keep urinals in the bathrooms, just replace the male/female signs with unisex signs. And when new bathrooms are constructed I assume that small ones will only have toilets, while large ones will have urinals (possibly in stalls).
>>71694255
Well fuck, I guess I shouldn't have said pic unrelated.
>common core trapezoids are responsible for bathroom inequality
>getting rid of common core will make all bathrooms become unisex
>dat 55
>Kek wills it
>>71690575
This assumes that the line of length 5 is orthogonal to the line of length 16, which it is not necessarily since there is no right angle square.
>>71687503
This guy is right
>>71687202
and it said find area: A= a being area faget theres anuf information
>>71698511
This also implies that the problem is not solvable, as the only pertinent data is on the perimeter, which cannot yield information on the area for quadrilaterals (proof consider perimeter and area of a square of side length 4 and a rectangle with side lengths 6 and 2)
>>71699278
We also know that it is possible to draw a line of length 5 from the intersection of the 12 line and the left 8 line to some point along the 16 line. This narrows down our range of possible solutions.
>>71699762
Yes, infinitely many though.
>>71699904
Indeed.
I don't know why we're so worried about Common Core when we have this many idiots trying to solve an impossible problem.
