because we're not libshits.
why else?
>>71683368
Monarchism should be changed to Nationalism.
How is anarchism right next to communism? They are 100% polar opposites.
>>71683368
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why your diagram is wrong.
>>71683368
Because Liberals are literally jackasses
>captcha "STOP Weimar"
There's so much space between liberal and conservative in reality though.
Fascism is far left, not right
>>71683368
Who the fuck made this?
How is Anarchism slavery?
Left wing basically means more government and Anarchism is no government. So wtf?
It all filtered in after the Trump campaign started.
>>71683368
thats not how the political spectrum works
>>71683954
I almost replied but then I saw your leaf
>>71684038
Because no laws means you become a gayboy berserker or a smegma crazy or a slave, unless you just walk away
>>71684269
Cringe.
>>71683368
But fascism and nazism are left. . . Anarchy is far right
>Nazism is different than socialism
How do people graduate high school and not know that it's real name was the National Socialist party?
>>71683368
Okay, this is probably the only way to correctly post.
..............fascism..............
.
Communism .............. Liberalism
.
.
............ Anarchism
>>71683368
>2 dimentional spectrum
Are we in first grade?
>>71683368
>national socialism
>right wing
Kek a lefty obviously made that chart
>>71684673
>he thinks national socialism is socialist in any significant way
>>71683842
I was just thinking this.
>>71684673
How do people graduate highschool and not know the difference between it's and its?
>>71683368
>fascism to the right of nazism
wew lad
>>71683954
Fuck off jew.
>>71683368
>the age old false dichotomy of left-right politics
news flash, political ideologies have more than one dimension.
>>71683842
Because the person who made this is a fuckin retard
>>71685656
there stupid I guess
where not though
oh syntax, you rascal
*tips fedora*
>>71685389
sup?
>>71683368
>thinking like a 2d pleb
expand your thought process beyond the 2 dimensional
>>71684169
/pol/'s been this way LONG before Trump
>Anarchism
>Far-Left
>Right next to Communism
>>71683368
>anarchism
>on any side
>>71683368
nazi isn't even right wing. it's just smart/viking wing
lmao where my RepubliCANs at haha :P
just hung up my work boots, amen, ready for some Hannity
>>71683368
That graph is fucking retarded.
>>71683842
>>71685596
No, they're on completely different spectrums. Anarchism is on the far libertarian end of the libertarian<->authoritarian spectrum. Communism is on the far socialist end of the socialism<->capitalism spectrum.
Communism can co-exist with anarchism or totalitarianism or anything in between. So can capitalism.
>>71684755
Apparently.
>>71684675
You're just as fucking retarded. Fascism is nationalist authoritarianism. Someone can be authoritarian without being nationalist. Therefore, the y-axis spectrum should be authoritarianism/totalitarianism<->anarchism/libertarianism. And liberalism is not about economics. Liberalism in the true sense of the word means the same thing as libertarianism, but of course the word has been very twisted by modern politics. Even still, it's not an economic ideology and therefore is not the opposite of communism. The opposite of communism (pure socialism) is pure capitalism.
>>71684453
>buying into the left-right false dichotomy
Good goyim.
Even if you're going to go with the fucktarded left/right system you're still wrong considering left has historically referred to valuing liberty (of course that is less true now than in the past) so anarchism would be far left by the original left/right spectrum. But it doesn't fucking matter because left/right is a false dichotomy.
>>71684673
Nazism is a combination of nationalism and socialism.
tl;dr
Politics: authoritarianism<->libertarianism (totalitarianism and anarchism being at the far ends, respectively)
Economics: socialism<->capitalism (communism being at the far end of socialism)
>>71683368
>monarchism left of national socialism and fascism
> anarchy far-left
Who the fuck even thinks that political ideologies can be gauged on a two-ended spectrum and actually knows what their dealing with?
>>71683368
Why are you using that inaccurate graphic?
Nazism quite literally was socialism paired with nationalism. And it was perfection for everyone that was neither a degenerate, or a minority. The only slavery was inflicted on people who had no right to be in Europe, and were offered trips to the middle east by Hitler.
The only catch was they had to convert their wealth into German made goods that would be shipped along with them to the shit hole they were going to. Surprise surprise when the Jews refused to be parted from their shekels.
>>71684038
As I said above, left/right is a false dichotomy, but traditionally "left" has referred to valuing liberty, that is, less government. So if you're going to try to force anarchism into a fucked up spectrum, it would be left, not right. But you're correct that it's the opposite of slavery and whoever made that graph is fucking stupid.
And no, modern democrats are not "leftist" in the slightest in the traditional sense of the word.
>>71683929
Liberal and conservative are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to value both liberty and tradition.
>>71685894
That graph is fucking stupid too. Libertarianism and authoritarianism can both exist at either end of any of those three spectrums. Having libertarianism, fascism, anarcho-capitalism, and anarcho-syndicalism on that cube is fucking stupid.
>>71685894
Neo-con... nationalist. You're funny. Neo-con and Neo-Lib should really just occupy the same box. At least if we are talking American Political terms here. Both parties are transnationalist, collectivist, and while I disagree with labeling it "captialism", they absolutely both support the ultra wealthy.
>>71686887
>and while I disagree with labeling it "captialism", they absolutely both support the ultra wealthy.
If you're referrering to CEOs and such, that's corporatism, not capitalism. If you're referring to bankers, there's not really a non-/pol/-tier term for that. /pol/-tier term would be "good goy" or "servant of the ZOG".
Democrats are centrist on the capitalist-socialist spectrum, Republicans are fairly capitalist, but not purely capitalist.
>>71683368
>monarchism
Wut?
Also the rest of it is pretty fucked up but that one jumped out to me as completely fucking retarded.
>>71683368
that thing makes no sense
>>71683368
National Socialism is the nemesis of the New World Order, Communism and Capitalism. The only true system to support the worker, and the greatest economic recovery in the history of the world in the shortest time imaginable were National Socialism. That is why the entire Capitalist and Communist world combined to destroy National Socialism. The only real enemy of International Jewry. Is it any wonder they discredit it at every opportunity?
>>71685894
>thinking like a 3d turbopleb
If you can't comprehend politics in a 4th dimensional spectrum, you shouldn't be able to vote
>>71683368
>Naziism
>Right wing
How to spot an idiot
Because Rome fell to liberal agenda and degeneracy. We aren't stupid to want it to happen to our own nations.
>>71683368
>Anarchism
>Left wing
>Slavery
What the fuck?
The political spectrum doesn't really work that way
