Discuss.
>>71621157
This guy fell for the esoteric bullshit that "quantum computing" actually is.
Was literally a response any intelligent human could have given after spending 10 mins on Wikipedia.
Wasn't he begging reporters to mention that shit?
>>71621387
Even the educated papers and publications on that topic aren't much better.
Everything is very vague.
There is some theoretical ground work like Shor's Algorithm, but every experiment seems to be a one-off, even if success is claimed and published.
(Of course all these papers are behind pay a wall)
This whole subject seems extremely fishy.
>>71621157
A FUCKING LEAF or wave, I'm not sure.
When asked if this dude was intelligent, they pitched he was "emotionally intelligent" instead of actually answering the question.
It was staged. Jesus Christ are you faggots retarded.
>>71621157
DUDE
>>71621157
Not only is this planted but its not impressive in anyway. This was 30 seconds of parroting something this faggot read on wikipedia
