Would pol ever let their country be run by a dictator if that leader was superior and redpilled?
>>71596004
yes
Yes
>>71596004
Maybe, Democracy sucks. Way too inefficient. The problem would be when the Dictator died and a lesser man took his place.
>>71596004
Yes.
We're already red-pilled. But yes of course, we love strongman who kill leftists. We spit on Stalin. He is son of ours.
>>71596004
No, because being redpilled is no promise that the bastard won't screw the rest of us redpills over.
If he was Superior and Redpilled he would be fighting for a decrease in the size and power of government, not seeking to increase it.
>>71596320
This
/Thread
Yes, but only if we got a representative form of government back after he died. I don't think there would be anything wrong with having a mechanism whereby the electorate could just say "Okay, we're fucked" and then hold a referendum for a dictatorship. Problem is, the electorate is probably too stupid to pick the person that could fix the country.
>>71596004
Yep. Historically good emperors led to centuries of peace and prosperity but the problem always been poor replacement candidates, succession and transitioning.
