The original thread was archived to make room for important on topic discussion on cuckold and exploitation of young white girl porn. I hope we can revive a worth discussion on Alex Jones, the sleeper cell red pill.
>>71548582
To the original thread creator, I think you're being serious and not just baiting.
Assuming this is correct, I agree with you. Jones is better read than 80% here in America (which is not a difficult task.) Jones is also relatively resistant to the more extreme social engineering agendas.
He seems to cuck on weird points, but as you say, I contend that he does this in a spergy way to 'throw off the enemy.' I know for sure based on his old, c. 2000 off radio videos that he is red pilled on race realism. There is 0% chance I see him allowing his daughters to get BLACKED, despite his praise of MLK de temps en temps.
He also has flat out said that Hitler was fighting the 'New World Order' and went into a (relative) amount of depth on this. This was after 9/11 and before his significant rise. Admittedly, he is less willing to discuss this anymore. But he still drops hints in this regard (e.g., last August, he heaped praise on Germany and the Wehrmacht and as an after-thought through in 'sure it was bad that a lot of Jews suffered')
He pisses me off when he plays the cuck game hard. But then again, I am not the one at risk of endless FCC/FTC/FDA/IRS investigation. He is on our side even though he seemingly attributes all 'NWO' activities to the NAZIS. In his mind, I'm guessing, it comes down to this: Do the American people care to get to the truth? Until a greater percentage do, he's going to hedge. With that said, I do wish he were a little more bold with regard to immigration and the undeniable reality that importing Central Americans and others by the million will destroy forever America qua America (viz., an extension of Europe.)
Jones jumped the shark when he started backing trump, i have unsubscribe, and I suggest you do the same.
>>71551243
I know what you mean, it seems like he's holding back a lot to reach a broader audience, I like the content infowars puts out and he's got some solid reporters working for him. I'm not sure but it seems his viewership skyrocketed when he started backing Trump and started going after the regressive left and exposing what shills the trump protesters really are. I hope he starts getting bolder and talk about the heavier topics I know he wants to talk about.
Plus he's very high energy, I like that.
>>71551405
They were both trained at Jesuit Fordham.
>To control the opposition we shall lead it ourselves - Lenin
Ole game is ole.
>>71552108
his face looks like those zika sisters
>>71552108
What rant video is this from?
I see this picture all the time
>>71553049
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdqd8l9R95k
Love his energy lol
>>71551243
Original Thread Creator here...
I was a blue-pill until I read a blogger by the name of Byron Crawford...a red-pilled black-guy.
He reposts a lot of Alex Jones Jew-tubes and that's how I started to get blue-pilled.
After a while, it started to be a bunch of hit and miss and just sensationalism to me...and from there I discovered even more red-pilled people (which he links us to through his connections with guests that he brings on and articles he links to).
The point is, even though I think his public persona is shill-level controlled opposition, I truly believe he's red-pilled at heart and that he's just throwing them off his scent....
>>71553953
Self-bump again to clarify my root point:
He brings people to side of truth or at the very least challenges people to LOOK FOR THEMSELVES instead of eating up the trendy narratives and that makes him inherently good (weather he's doing it this way deliberately or accidentally)...
>>71551243
why does she this blank stare face? is it for the dudes to get their dick hard or for her female fans to mimic her? ;_;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpzo7p1ZlMg
>>71552108
>it seems like he's holding back a lot to reach a broader audience
Yeah exactly. He always says "globalists/NWO" and not kikes/zionists