Is it a health hazard, pol?
Up
>>71507278
yes the state of utah is a health hazard.
No but it's fucking degenerate anyway.
Good on Utah.
>>71508349
this
a step in the right direction for once
>>71507278
>Is it a health hazard, pol?
No, it reduces rape. Also pic.
>>71508349
>No but it's fucking degenerate anyway.
No, it's not.
>>71507278
Not for the society directly, but for the consumer yes.
The governor is /nofap/
he wants everyone else to suffer too
I think porn, done properly, can promote healthy sexuality. Softcore and nudes are not degenerate. But there's a lot of fucked up shit out there that leads to poor understanding of sex and the human body, which can have a seriously negative impact on people who get addicted to it
Yes, it should be banned
>>71508511
Saving people from a mortal sin is a noble thing to do.
>>71508453
>pornography reduces rape
indian rape crisis
>>71508510
>Not for the society directly, but for the consumer yes.
Prove it.
If you ban porn then you must give me a government paid for escort so that I may relieve my sexual emergiencies or so help me god little boys will get it in the pool -t. ahmed
>>71508483
emily grey
>>71508483
It's not about women. Nobody gives a fuck about women's rights and shit.
It's about men that consume it.
Gotta stop fapping because I gotta do extra weight on my left arm to even it out also tendinitis. Good 4 u utah
>>71508748
This.
The difference is getting noticeable now, help me God.
>>71507278
It's a social health problem.
>>71508653
>>71508638
Are you seriously this ignorant?
It's a terrible addiction, it will fuck your mind up worst than most things
>>71508638
Even if there aren't conclusive studies done, one does only have to look at the thousands of personal anecdotes found everywhere on the net to realize that many, many people see negative effects from using porn.
Check for example the numerous stories on this site http://www.yourbrainrebalanced.com/
They can't all be lunatic, can they?
Besides, Jews make most of the porn, does there need to be any further reason to approach it carefully?
I'm guessing the guvna is coming up with this shitty gay story to cover for something else. Moral posturing has absolutely no place in politics.
>>71508349
>>71508442
>>71508530
>>71508552
>>71508594
>>71508839
Glad to see /pol/ is finally coming around, seeing the light and siding with radical feminists and Islamic extremists :^)
Is porn hazardous in small amounts as well? Like once a week or something?
I only ever agree to it being bad for your health when it's on every day, consuming your mind entirely.
>>71507278
FUCKING MORMIES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>71509015
Wow, I agree with them on ONE thing. What a tragedy.
>>71508884
>thousands of personal anecdotes
Billions of men watch porn, and all you got are thousands of anonymous bullshit.
Actually having only a couple of anecdotes is proof that porn is harmless.
>>71509015
This no fap thing came about out of /r9k/ of all places. They believed that if they stopped leaking their magical man juices to porn and retained their vital essence, they would gain super powers, that women would instantly get wet at the sight of them, that other men would tremble in their presence. They also believed that unwashed ballsack sweat is a powerful aphrodisiac and should be dabbed liberally about the body.
All it takes is one look at /r9k/ to see that's bullshit. Take a look at /fit/ too. All these guys with baby faces and no chin spend six months getting ripped only to realize that they are still ugly betas.
Believe in whatever gay little fad you like, nothing will change your shit genes.
>>71509385
Exactly. Nofap is bullshit just as noporn. Only femishits, Muslims and other religious nutters support this.
>>71507278
BASED
>>71509385
>They also believed that unwashed ballsack sweat is a powerful aphrodisiac and should be dabbed liberally about the body.
This is actually true though.
Showering every day is degenerate
>>71509292
>Actually having only a couple of anecdotes is proof that porn is harmless.
That's just retarded logic ruskibrah.
I'm addicted to porn and feel very depressed.
Not sure if the two are related.
>>71509594
Except that's not anecdotes but science, the more porn the less rapes.
If you think that something as ubiquitous as porn is harmful, boy you better have solid studies to back it up.
>>71509696
There's more to porn than just two people fucking.
There's nothing inherently wrong with porn that depicts sex, but hardcore BDSM porn entering the mainstream has fucked up an entire generation. If you don't see the degenerate effects it's had on culture then frankly you are blind
It's a health crisis cause it's stopping men from giving women the undivided attention they deserve. I say we ban porn all together. Also get rid of all (men's) sex toys.
>>71509616
Very likely. I'm more lethargic and experience anhedonia if I ejaculate too often. Try abstaining for a week and see if you feel better.
>>71509696
>Except that's not anecdotes but science, the more porn the less rapes.
I agree with that, but it has nothing to do with our subject. It has nothing to do with why porn is harmful for the consumer. Porn simply offers endless overstimulation, much like internet in itself. If you can't see how that has the potential to negatively affect your brain, I'm afraid your opinions are not very qualified.
>If you think that something as ubiquitous as porn is harmful, boy you better have solid studies to back it up.
.
The thing is that you want to see studies, yet refuse to accept that those nonexistent studies would almost definitely use similar kind of anecdotes (although more systematically interpreted) than those you can already read and compile on the internet. You've been given enough your "proof" about people are experiencing side effects from porn to make any scientist interested.
If you're seriously interested you can look into this more yourself, I don't have interest to try to persuade someone I don't even know and who refuses to consider differing points of view.
>>71508884
"Thousands of people see UFOS/Bigfoot/Elvis/austims vaccines, they can't all be lunatics can they?"
bruh... lets ask actual scientists - oh shit they don't have a problem with wanking it case closed.
>>71507278
It causes severe swelling and a milky discharge.
>>71509696
>If you think that something as ubiquitous as porn is harmful, boy you better have solid studies to back it up.
Google it you dipshit. That porn is harmful to the brain is common knowledge. It's a terrible fucking adiction
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/9-things-you-should-know-about-pornography-and-the-brain
>>71509057
Mormons are keeping white culture alive while the rest of the west decays.
>>71509696
>Except that's not anecdotes but science, the more porn the less rapes.
*the same applies to prostitution. Guess who wants to outlaw it: Femishits and religious nutters.
>>71510151
>If you can't see how that has the potential to negatively affect your brain,
A lot of things can negatively affect the brain. Rock music for example. No reason to ban it.
It IS a hazard, but prohibition would be just as fucking dumb as prohibition on alcohol or nictoine or marijuana or speed or H or gay marriage or suicide.
>>71510642
>thegospelcoalition
Ahahahaha. Religious nutters as I said. And no single proof given.
Fuck off pol, Ahmed.
>>71511200
Yeah I'm not advocating banning it either. I'm suggesting that one should approach porn critically, be mindful (((who))) produce it, and not blindly believe that it has a net positive effect.
>Rock music for example.
kek
>>71511331
ffs you retard
here's a publication you find more "trustworthy" that basically says the same thing
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/26/brain-scans-porn-addicts-sexual-tastes
>>71508884
>Even if there aren't conclusive studies done, one does only have to look at the thousands of personal anecdotes found everywhere on the net to realize that many, many people see negative effects from using porn.
Even if there were thousands of cases of a negative effect, it doesn't mean that porn is bad, retard.
Guns killed 33000 people in the US last year. How many people were protected by guns?
How many people were killed by watching porn?
It's literally religiot logic.
>>71511621
>here's a publication you find more "trustworthy" that basically says the same thing
No, it doesn't, retard. That link is about porn addiction, not watching porn. It's like the difference between drinking tea and caffeine addiction. Two nearly unrelated topics.
It's religious nutters like you that destroy societies, Ahmed.
>>71507278
It was causing the mormon population to poke boner holes through their magic underwear.
>>71508483
It's fucking with a lot of Young men, wasting time and all that. A good jerk off once in a while ain't bad. But some muva fuckers are losing their shit on it.
>>71508622
Have you seen the bullshit porn India puts out?
>>71511753
If you jerk off to porn every two-three days it's an addiction. That's everyone that watches porn.
No one watches porn once a year
I will always defend it's right to exist because muh peach but I don't have to use it or encourage other people too.
You can keep your cigarettes but leave me and my wife's son out of it.
>>71509385
>self improvement is impossible!
I suspect your parents beat you too much. That, and you're a victim of fetal alcohol syndrome.
>>71509015
Do you like being retarded?
>>71511665
>Even if there were thousands of cases of a negative effect, it doesn't mean that porn is bad, retard.
You're right, porn is not good or bad in itself. If negative effects rise, it's the fault of the user, just like a person who gorges on food and gets fat has only himself to blame.
The anecdotes where porn has caused negative symptoms indeed does not mean that it is bad, but merely that it really does have noticeable negative effects on a portion of people who consume it.
>>71507278
So is weed
and alcohol
and smokes
and arguably most music
and liberalism
and being a fag
and being anti-social
and being overly social
and being fat
and drinking soda
>>71512103
Sugar?
>>71512131
god forbid
>>71512103
You forgot religion
