Shades of Chebucto Heights High School. The Canadian mainstream media, like the mainstream media all over the West, would apparently prefer that non-Muslims in the West get murdered in jihad attacks and brutalized by Muslim rape gangs than that people start to think that a massive influx of Muslim migrants might be a bad idea.
https://youtu.be/gPyQQJ7RGZ8
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/04/cbc-wont-name-sex-assault-suspect-because-hes-a-muslim-migrant
RED BAR RADIO
Canada yes
Here's an answer for you that makes sense. Straight from the CBC:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/naming-names-how-cbc-decides-to-identify-the-people-we-cover-1.2927786
It's not a conspiracy. Just individual editors making decisions about stories in their jurisdictions.
White genocide family. Our children and grandchildren will suffer unlike any other people of modern times. Their demise will be justified using the deeds of people hundreds of years before them who they happen to share a common skin color with.
>>71502686
I like how you're saying it is PURE COINCIDENCE they all come to the same conclusion.
>>71502686
come on dude
>>71502686
Is there actually real substance to this? It seemed to have been one of the most powerful non answer in the history of everything.
>>71502686
>"Simply put, we believe it is irresponsible to name every person charged with a crime if we can't reasonably expect to tell you if they all are guilty or innocent in the end. "
what the fuck kind of logic is that? if they're found guilty, it'll be covered by everyone and no everyone will know that they're guilty. if they're not, it'll be shoved down our fucking throats that these rapefugees are off the hook for a solid month.
>>71498669
DUDE
>>71503062
I'm not saying they come to the same conclusion. I'm saying that there most likely isn't an apparatus at work here and anyone who thinks there is is being fucking paranoid. I just spent 20 minutes looking up various articles about sexual assaults to see who the CBC did and did not name. Yes there were immigrants who were not named, but there were also white people who were not named. The rationale makes sense.
People complain all the time about mens rights not being respected, specifically in sexual assault cases. How a single false allegation can ruin a man's life. Imagine having a charge made against you and every time someone googles your name, a CBC article comes up talking about how you were charged with sexual assault. I straight up know someone that happened to. I don't actually know how his case went because NO ONE COVERED THE RESULT OF THE PROCEEDINGS. So now everyone just googles him and assumes the worst.
The CBC has to commit to following this story up, and them making a judgement call as to whether the public will be interested in a story 6 to 18 months from now totally makes sense to me.
The CBC comments section is actually pretty based anons. Nothing but Trump supporters and serious real talk going on. I think they are trying to get rid of it now though.
/pol/ is like that ride that never ends.
>>71500821
Now why is it that even tho you have the perfect example of what "political correctness" will cause in the long run, you still want to pursue it?
Pic related.
