At what age did you realize that most Conservashits vote against their own economic interests ?
Ofcourse , the non rich conservatives
Trump is also somewhat socialist in policies, supports single payer healthcare and less corporate-focused than the other GOP candidates.
you're correct, but those "conservashits" are the Kasich and Cruz voters. That's part of the reason Trump appeals to the working class.
inb4 >>he's literally hitler
>>71436787
>stop funding shitty corprate decisions
>keep funding my shitty decisions
Kill yourself.
>>71436787
It's nice when commies who are not working class pretend to know what the economic interests of the working class. Why is that? Why do the commies think that way?
liberals don't even believe in economics
>>71437318
Voting to sabotage unions , promoting right to work states and sabotaging workers benefits has never been in the working classes favor
Try again conservadolt
>>71436787
You know it's true when the infographic uses two fonts and cites an organization promoting "righting the wrongs of poverty".
Is it so crazy that some people would rather be poorer and freer than "richer" (in NEETbux) and more reliant on government?
>>71436787
So why didn't Obama do anything about it when he had 8 years of non-conservative power? A majority of non-conservashits are also currently voting for Hillary, who also won't do shit about msft, wmt, and aapl.
This isn't "conservative" vs. "liberal", and it's certainly not "Democrats" vs. "non-Democrats" (looking at you, Occupy). It's establishment vs. non-establishment, and there is currently one person running in each party who is non-establishment.
If the current front-runners both win their nominations, who will you support, OP?
>>71437454
Strawman fallacy.
Look at who signs free trade agreements and get back to me.
>>71436787
Those numbers are incorrect. Fortune 500 firms alone receive more than 16,000 subsidies at a total cost of $63 billion annually.
So, that means in the last 8 years they received 500 billion. A far cry from 11 trillion
>>71436787
That pic is bullshit. Our tax system allows business to take losses and roll them forward or backward, in order to keep things in business. Therefore if a company had a shit year, it can affect the net taxes by rolling it back 2 years or forward 20 years.
Also, there is double taxation on corporations. No matter what, the corporations are paying ALL their payroll taxes. However, the tax on corporate gains (an increase in retained earnings), may be reduced by special laws and stimulus policies, along with the fact that it can be absorbed by a loss carry forward/carry back.
As someone with even a minor knowledge of accounting, infographs like this are beyond infuriating.
>>71436787
>occupy democrats
I work for my money and I think it makes sense that my tax money goes to improving infrastructure than welfare niggers.
These evil corporations are hiding money from taxation goys, lets jack the rates up on them, that will do it.
Meanwhile, in reality they just incorporate in a low tax nation, drive more jobs overseas, and further erode america middle class.
>>71439873
Spoken like a true bootlicking shill
>>71438283
>>occupy democrats
>>71440515
>bootlicking shill
>posts occupy democrats
kek
>>71440633
> occupy democrats