Mines would be:
1. a passing grade in Economics 101, American History 101, Political Science 101, and World History 101.
2. can't vote above 65, at this point, you shouldn't be allowed to vote for things like they were in your "good ole days", when you're going to die in less than 20 years and the economy is tremendously different. Old piece of shit.
3. must have a high school diploma
4. must have had some sort of job at least once, you must know what living costs are like in the current state of the economy. ALTERNATIVELY, if you're attending college or have graduated, you are allowed to vote if you were never employed.
5. must pass a simplified basic test on each candidate's positions, policies, tax plan, and history.
6. no criminal record of any kind.
Pay taxes that amounts to more than any refund, benefits, and welfare received.
If you are leeching, you don't get a say in the decisions of the society that is supporting your ass.
College students who have yet to try to support themselves should not vote.
Otherwise you're correct.
>male
>landowner
That's it
>>71379899
>>1. a passing grade in Economics 101, American History 101, Political Science 101, and World History 101.
>forced to sit through some libcuck's SJW propaganda machine
Also what about people who pursued trade jobs and didn't go to college?
>>71380484
glad I nailed it for you, I'm willing to include college kids because they tend to be much better informed then the masses.
>>71380599
>male
KEK
Landowner, that's tough though. Land can be expensive af depending where you live.
>>71380446
This one seems fair enough to me. Consider it 7.
>>71380869
I'm sorry but no, you could probably find these classes for free online. Or we'll hand out tests that you can take and if you pass them, we'll let you slide and vote.
1. Basic civics test (think similar to an immigration exam) to get voting license. License is good for 10 years
2. You've paid taxes on income for at least one of the past 4 years
The best system is one that maximizes participation while ensuring that you have a basic understanding of how government functions and are invested in the well being of the country.
>>71381079
And how will you stop them from becoming total leftist bullshit like all education has become? What about when the Economics class slants towards socialism? There's no way to objectively regulate these things, and it's why liberal arts education is in the shitter these days.
>>71379899
>Over 25
>landowner
no exceptions.
>>71379899
>be president
>have a shit ton of people have criminal records
>I know have a bunch of elite puppets
BRAVO
>>71381609
The 101s are rarely biased at all, they all pretty much just teach the basics, those classes are super hard to fit in any propaganda without making it obvious.
That being said, not all professors are left leaning cucks. If you get leftist BS, then report them.
>>71381565
Fair enough but to be honest, I think with my plan, sure you'd get less voters, but the votes you'd get would be much more intelligent and it would lead to much better candidates to lead America.
>>71382080
KEK.
>>71379899
Males only.
Would literally fix every problem in the West.
why should i have to prove all this shit its america thats the whole fuckin point of the place its not some socialist shithole
military service. that's it.
>>71382337
Women lib is always one of the first things in a failing society
>>71382201
You've clearly never been to college.
>>71382547
Fifth column.
>>71382348
Right now we have 9 million people voting for a corporate whore shitbag with no dick. We need more regulations so we stop electing incompetent people simply because the majority of Americans are horribly misinformed and stupid.
>>71382540
KEK, I would love this.
>>71382680
i refuse to believe all non whites voted blue
I demand to know what is considered non white in USA
>>71382756
You underestimate the racism of minorities. Also, we're talking Obama, remember. Muh first minority prez, fuck da white man.
>>71379899
>voting requirements
>anything but God-tier Starship Troopers society.
If you fight for your planet, you can vote for your planet.
>Economics 101
So everyone is gonna be Keynesians? No thanks pal.
IQ tested at over 100
minimum score on a policy questionnaire about the issues where each major candidate submits questions and only those approved by all candidates make the questionnaire
that's it. just remove the exceptionally stupid or uninformed.
>>71382922
do you understand the heavy implications of the image you posted?
That image confirms that a the end of the day democrats only exists to please minorities and that's all what they do ,it confirms they will spend more on welfare and in more laws to lower the scores required for minorities to enter to college . It confirms that US is still the most racist country up to date. And most important it confirms that democrats actually do NONE OF THEM because if they did they wouldn't have any arguments to still be in power
>>71383030
KEK
>>71382337
Dont mind me, just lurking, but what are blues and reds? Wich one is conservative?
>>71379899
1. Must hold title to at least one (1) acre of land, or serve at least one (1) year in active combat role in the military.
2. Must have IQ 105 or above
3. Must not be female
4. Ages 25-65 only, no exceptions.
>>71383111
this. carl menger and mises are god tier
>pic related: cuck shed captcha LMAO
>>71383252
I thought Australians were shitposters
this is a very good done post
>>71383252
>must hold 1 acre of land
>return of landed classes
Please go to New Zealand or something because you are fucking retarded
1. Must be male
2. Must be white
3. Must have served in the Military for a minimum of 2 years
>>71383228
wow, I was hoping you'd see it for what it was, but instead you doubled down on "muh racism"
>>71380599
So all the Jews in NYC will be the only ones who can vote over there?
>>71379899
Define criminal record.
No women. That's literally it.
>>71383243
The red is Republicans (right), blue is Democrats (left). Democrats represent all the SJW/feminist stuff more so.
>>71379899
being able to actually work
>>71379899
Older than 25
No run-ins with the law of any kind
Must have at least one living child
>>71379899
>40 years old or more
>Married
>Have children
>A basic income defined by law. More or less to put you in the middle class or upper middler class.
1. White
2. Male
3. 18+
Only answer
>>71380484
They're the upcoming generation who will be running the country, why should they not have a right to vote?
>>71383470
One acre in bumfuck nowhere is cheap as fuck, if you can't afford it you probably don't even meet the IQ requirement.
>>71383576
Thank you, have a meme
Mine's easy. Before you vote, you need to hand in a 200+ word explanation of why you're voting the way you are, and it immediately becomes a public record accessible on the internet. Would shame a bunch of morons out of voting, would encourage people to actually do their research, and would create a great resource for exposing idiots.
>>71383252
So a surgeon who lives in a city and has a bum knee that kept him from military service can't vote, but all the gibsmedat niggers in the army can?
>>71383704
This is it right here, senpai.
>>71383688
>40yo
u be siryous niga?
>>71383930
>surgeon who can't afford an acre in bumfuck nowhere
Yeah if he can't figure out how to buy an acre of cheap land in the middle of nowhere he doesn't deserve to vote.
>>71383252
>3. Must not be female
That's pretty sexist. Not including 50% of the population doesn't make a country a democracy.
>1) acre of land
While this may have been ideal in the 1850's, it won't work today.
>>71379899
Landowners only. Why should somebody have a say on something they don't own part of?
>>71379899
To either own a business, or be a partner in a business that is relatively successful, or to own an acre of land that is being used for either a business activity or for a house. Or to actually own a house.
Because only the people who have a stake in the success of this nation deserve to have influence in guiding the nation future.
>>71379899
Have an ID, be above 18, be an American citizen.
Ban voting and establish National Socialism throughout Europe, USA, and commonwealth.
>>71383111
To be fair, what you learn in ECO 101 is entirely dependent on your professor and school. My based professors would have slapped me if I tried to bring up that Keynesian nonsense.
Hell, this one old dude I had for "History of Economics"--that's probably dead by now--even spent a whole week teaching us how slavery's importance to the economy is overstated, how slaves in the US lead healthier wellfed lives than those left in Africa, and how the Civil War was only slightly due to slavery. Dude was redpilled as fuck; guys like him do a good job no matter what level of ECO they teach.
Property owner
Be able to pass a test based on your candidate of choice's position
>>71379899
I dont fully agree with the 65 limit, but it does need to change. Social security needs to be reformed but it's political suicide to even mention it.
>>71384273
What part of the country did you go to University in?
I go to school in the Northeast and all my Econ profs are bluepilled as fuck. All Post-Kenysian BS.
>>71384273
Macro at my uni was basically sucking Keynes' dick for a semester with Hayek mentioned in a footnote and no one else.
That course was literally econ101. Econ111 was introductory micro.
>no fellons
>over 21
>has filled income tax for the last two years
>has made over 20,000 on average of the last two years
>male
>>71383930
yeah what use would the army have for a surgeon?
>>71384696
Did you use Mankiw's textbook?
>>71384641
Northeast (Stony Brook University). I would expect other SUNY schools to be bluepilled, but Stony Brook is a science school that mostly refused to deal with nonsense when I was there. Hell, even the Feminism class I took (met a requirement, fit my schedule, lol) had a professor that let me air my anti-Feminist views because I could support them.
Could be totally different now, though, as the country seems totally different than 5 years ago when I wrapped up my studies.
>>71379899
Start putting academic requirements onto the right to vote and suddenly the next election is decided by whoever is currently in power, because the individual in power controls the education system.
Bad idea.
I would say the following:
>Be male
>Be at least 30 years of age
>Have to have had a job unless given exemption (ie physically disabled)
>Have citizenship
>Not a convict
>>71379899
IQ over 105
>>71384897
I graduated from stony brook in 2003. Still fuming about some of the fucking communist professors I had to endure-- and i studied EE.
>>71379899
Wow, if these things were required nobody would ever vote. It's already hard enough to vote as it is and the participation rate is already abysmal even without requirements.
>>71380599
This. Only correct answer.
>>71383704
>>71383487
>the president cant vote
Good job breaking the democratic system retards
>>71379899
Agree with most except #1
Way too many tests, and the retarded population would be up in arms with "muh voice" regardless of how moronic their views are. Simplify it to national IQ test every election. Let everyone vote but don't count the bottom half and don't let them know if their votes counted or not. Use them in statistics i.e. "the 5th percentile of IQ test results all voted for Bernie Sanders" but that's it. For fairness and transparency, let each participating party count the votes.
Voting age range 25-55
People with the following affiliations will not be allowed to vote, on the off chance that they pass the IQ test:
- Islam, all forms, past and current
- Unions
- Unemployed for 1yr
etc
>>71385058
This guy gets it
But i think that the minority that would vote, would be a upper class, educated and conservative, a patrician minority
>>71385376
>>71385455
Why unions? Also, would Rule 1 be better if it was just Economics 101?
Agree with voting age.
>>71385058
Intelligence > Number of votes
>>71379899
>high school diploma
>passes citizenship test
Oh, one more little thing...
>white, educated, adult male who owns land
>>71379899
>1
Fundamentally flawed in that these courses can and so eventually will be taught with bias. A single fact for fact set of questions on these topics would work better, though then you would have to work around people trying to cheat on it.
>2
agreed
>3
i think 1 rules out the need for this - in a world with the internet you could educate yourself on all you would need to pass 1 far before you finished high school
>4
agreed for the first 9 words
>5
agreed
>6
partially agreed. I'd set a level past which offenses would strip you of your right to vote, so small, common things like DUIs, public urination, and drug possession wouldn't lose you your right to be part of politica for the rest of your life.
In order to vote you should have proof you have completed a play through of New Game+++ on Dark Souls III without using sorcery.
>>71379899
All of the requirements are unnecessary.
Mine:
1. Be a married Christian.
2. Have sufficient knowledge of the Jews, their tricks and why they are evil.
>>71385455
>Muslims can't vote but Jews can
Fucking retarded.
>>71386579
Autistic child
No retards with an IQ of under 100.
No one over 65
No uninformed voters
>>71379899
Every citizen gets to vote, but must take two tests - IQ and civics. The IQ test is standard. The civics test covers basic facts about how the government works, how things become law, what powers the various officeholders have, etc. These facts are to be covered in school, but study materials can be provided for all. Your vote weight is determined roughly like this:
weight = (j*(civics test fractional score) + .01) * k^(standard deviation from mean IQ)
j and k are up for debate, pic related. I kind of like j,k=3, but j,k=2 is probably fairer. Everyone's vote counts. The most important voter is both informed and intelligent, but an average informed voter can still count for more than an intelligent uninformed voter.
Everyone posting >muh land >muh white male is just an edgelord tbqphwyf
>>71380599
Add white and heterosexual to that list, maybe even christian
>>71379899
inb4 stupid, this is *dream*
My only requirement would be they have to know who they are voting for. So they to say which office, political party, and platform correctly or cant vote.
>>71385455
>Islam
Isn't that against our constitution?
