What speech should be banned?
>Death threats?
>Hate speech?
>Holocaust denial?
>>71137742
>emotional harm
For liberals emotional harm is the worst thing they can imagine
>>71137742
>rosenbaum
>>71137742
>rosenbaum
None. Because it's free speech.
>>71137742
None.
Free speech protects unsavory, dangerous rhetoric.
> Free Speech
> Banning Speech
Pick one and only one, statist scum.
>>71137742
dude looks like fucking willy wonka
>>71137742
banning speech is censorship. nuffsaid
>>71137892
>>71137925
Pure coincidence.
>>71138027
/thread
>>71137742
>rosenbaum
/pol/ WAS RIGHT AGAIN
>>71137742
>>71137892
>>71137925
POL WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS RIGHT I WANT OFF THIS RIDE REEEEEE
>>71137742
theres a major problem with banning it
You can change the definition of what hate speech is
>>71137742
>Nickelback
>>71137742
>emotional harm
Christ
Either you have free speech or you don't. What's so hard to understand about this?
>>71137892
>>71137925
/pol/ is a hivemind
>>71137892
>>71137925
EVERY.
FUCKING.
TIME.
>>71138179
No, I'm pretty sure the Jews would like that.
SHUT IT DOWN OY VEY
>>71137742
None, you fucking cuck-commie.
muslamic speech should be banned. no press coverage no nothing. Suffocate them
>>71137742
Only death threats, spamming, and spewing ignorance should not be allowed.
>>71137742
my dilemma:
when the neo-nazis are wiped out (just like their heroes, the Nazis) who in fucking hell is going to want to rape their ugly women?
maybe gangs of dogs could be trained to rape them
ideas?
>>71138283
We have been trained to see the Jew, which begs the question, why can't you be trained to use the loo?
GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NOW
>>71137742
None.
>>71137892
really the rest of the world shoul just ignore jew when it come to free speech and 99% of these claim whould disappears
>>71138457
>Jew detected
>>71138463
>what is the first amendment
>>71137742
If we don't allow free speech for viewpoints we don't like, we don't allow free speech at all.
>Should Neo-Nazis be denied constitutional rights?
Literally T.Rosenbaum
Gee, I really do wonder how this could possibly have the slightest element of bias
>>71138463
>>71138686
Outdated.
>>71138463
Wew maybe you leaves can learn how to shitpost after all.
OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN THE GOYIM KNOW
>>71137742
Leftist speech. SJW cancer, Marxism of any sort, etc. The cucked response is to say "oh all speech should be allowed" but the only way our current problems can be solved is by shutting the Leftists up.
>>71138845
Free speech isn't outdated at all.
And even if it were, the commandments are the cornerstones on which your country is build and not respecting them is an insult to the ones who build it.
>>71139040
Amendments*
>Reichskreigsflagge
>alongside Swastika flag
This is why we can;t have nice things
>>71137742
Communist speech is not free speech, the writer of this article should be persecuted.
>>71138463
dob geg
>>71137742
>be britbong
>nigger named Muamba (footballer) dies
>tweet 'LOL, Fuck Muamba. He's dead.'
>get fined sentenced to 56 days in jail for "racist tweets"
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/mar/27/student-jailed-fabrice-muamba-tweets
so glad we broke away from the cuckbongs
>Rosenbaum
>>71139442
This thumbnail triggers me.
>>71137742
>Death threats?
Why is this one even a question? Threatening someone without violence is obviously a crime. Obviously, we need to be reasonable enough to distinguish between aggressive banter (i.e. you're being an asshole) and genuine threats (i.e. you're threatening to commit a crime), but it's pretty fucking clear that stating your intent to murder someone warrants locking you the fuck up so you can't actually murder that person.
>>71139442
d... do people really see us like that?
>free speech causes emotional harm
boo fucking hoo
also:
>rosenbaum
>>71140082
Not anyone with even a modicum of a brain.
>>71139442
AMERICA FUCK YEAH
COMING AGAIN TO SAVE THE MUTHA FUCKIN DAY YEAH
>>71137892
Ugh I'm starting to believe this whole jew thing
>>71139442
>"Here's all this shit you can't say or you'll be charged with a crime"
>"No no no, we totally still have freedom of expression, goys!"
>>71140293
>>71139442
THIS THREAD NOW BELONGS TO AMERICA
POST YOUR MOST AMERICAN PICS
>>71140032
but this is WRONG
the Jews CREATED 4chan and other anonymous forums to contain and pacify the opposition and also spread porn to intelligent white youth and keep the opposition associated with perversion and frivolity so nobody takes it seriously.
>>71137742
Yes, they should be allowed free speech. Everyone should be allowed free speech.
One you open the can of worms that is censorship, there is no going back. We are already seeing this to be honest. First they muzzle the so called radicals, soon every dissenting opinion is radical. If you aren't 100% progressive you are some sort of nazi.
The kikes WANT free speech on the INTERNET. They WANT you here. They WANT you to have "freedom" to be contained in a digital cage jacking off and wasting your life away, even if you know the truth.
what they don't want is free speech IN REAL LIFE.
destroy the internet and you'll see how quickly the facade falls.
>>71140397
>starting to
We have infected your mind
It's impossible to avoid the truth any longer
>>71137742
Pro-Jewish speech should be banned
>>71139442
This made me feel sick
>>71140082
Jesus fuck no, a handful of continentals so far up the moral high ground of their cavernous asses maybe but not people in general
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
Obviously not
Free Speech does not include hate speech
Even our founding fathers recognized this
Anyone caught openly denying the holocaust should be forced to do 20 hours of community service and have to go through an education course where they would learn about the horrors inflicted on the Jews by Hitler
>>71137742
>First they came for the National Socialists because I didn't speak up for them
>Then the- wait what?
>>71137742
Death threats yes.
Hate speech no.
Holocaust denial no.
Generally I'm in favor of all free speech but there do have to be some limits against violence. Of course there is a thin line with any censorship and we need to be careful not to prosecute people who are making satirical death/violence threats or edgy teenagers who are just shittalking.
>>71137742
>all hitler supporters are neo-nazis
when will this meme stop
>>71139442
All of that does not apply to the Netherlands. Stop using "Europe" as if it is one country you fucking shill. The only thing you might get arrested for here is making death threats or inciting violence on a large scale or anything like that that the secret service might be interested in. Only if you're a really famous person like a controversial politician and you say controversial stuff about the holocaust or other other things you might have to go to trial, but the average joe doesn't have to worry about that crap nobody is going to arrest you for doing that unless you yourself make a huge deal out of it.
>>71137742
Only speech that shows intent to harm someone else. Hate speech is not included in this.
>>71137742
>AMERICA IS LAND OF THE FREE!
>Wants to silence peoples opinions because it might huwt pepews feewings *Le cry*
And you guys think you're not cucked?
>>71137742
>Rosenbaum
>>71137742
>What speech should be banned?
None.
Why would you even ask that question, Ameri-bro?
Only death threats.
All other speech should be allowed without question, including """""""""""hate speech""""""""""". If you say "I support free speech, but..." then you don't support free speech.
>>71140724
Hmm? That last bit is really interesting.
>>71137742
>What speech should be banned?
None, first amendment bitch.
>>71138845
>>71143875
Netherlands is based Dutchbro.
>>71137742
No speech should be banned. If something can be proven to be false it matters not if someone says what is false. For it can by shown to be false, those speaking falsehoods lose their integrity and those who might have trusted them before become more weary in trusting them again because of their promotion of falsehoods.
>>71137742
>rosenbaum
Its not even fun anymore.
>>71145033
What about death threats or threats of violence though? If somebody yells that they have a bomb and are going to blow up some major public building, it can cause all sorts of problems.
I generally agree with you that most free speech should be protected but every issue has a few nuances to address. I don't think people should be able to directly threaten somebody and get away with it.
>>71137742
should liberals even be allowed to live? they are weak and shouldn't be allowed to pollute the gene pool.
>>71139442
I don't even know how to respond to this. It's almost like he's proud of being a cucked slave.
Calm down. Everyone calm down.
>>71138283
,meh
>>71137742
>rosenbaum
>>71137892
>>71137925
>Pure Coincidence<
