Russian documentary exposes american attempts at colour revolution in Russia through cooperation with ''russian opposition'' (which is something everyone on /pol/ that has been paying attention has known for a long time).
>''Russian'' creates a thread on /pol/ about how the documents in question are ''weird'' and ''strange'', and goes for the ''bad english'' angle, insinuating it's forged by russian intelligence agency for propaganda puposes.
Thread is suddenly flooded by numerous american proxies, most of them a single post, all claiming the same things:
>''The U.S would NEVER do that!''
>''Why would America want to subvert Russia??''
>''Yeah the documents look fake! They have bad english thus they were written by russians as fakes!''
Initial thread by ''russian'' with all the americans with just 1 posts all repeating the same thing: ''The U.S would never do that!'' or ''The U.S doesn't seek to subvert Russia!''
>>71125925
>>71125925
Last picture of documents.
>>71130696
pls take your meds
>>71131140
tpbp
>>71131140
>one bulgarian proxy in other thread claiming the documents are fake
>another bulgarian proxy in this new thread telling me to ''take meds'', insinuating I'm ''mad'' for creating this thread
>>71131268
same guy, i'm just concerned
//he's onto us, change tactics
>>71126390
>Why would America want to undermine the existing constitutional order of Russia? It sounds stupidly over broad and vague for a real American goal.
>>71127282
>Well it seems odd that an entire plan for subterfuge is being laid out step by step in some random document.
>>71127467
>Wait so this supposedly from 1995?
>Why in the world would we want to undermine the Russian government at that point?
>>71128589
>Why do you assume if it was faked it would be faked by Russian intelligence and not just some underling whose job it is is to manufacture propaganda and release it to provide political cover at home for Putin?
>Stuff like that doesn't need to be perfect or flawless, just good enough to give fuel to fire of minds that are already suspicious of American involvement everywhere.
>>71128877
>If these are supposed to be US classified documents they would have classification markings all over them. Google "US classification marking guide" or something.
>>71129042
>These were not made by native speakers of American English, it just does not flow right. It is close though so give those FSB guys a big thumbs up.
This is obviously recognizable as CIA psyops.
>>71131437
>change tactics
Oh don't worry, your friend is trying by derailing the thread with INTERESTING ISRAELI ASSASSINATIONS
>>71131449
>>71130984
HAHAHAHAH
DAILY REMINDER:
If you support the U.S, EU and NATO, you're an anti-white.
If you oppose those who oppose the U.S, EU and NATO, you're an anti-white.
> bad english
Why would an American be directly involved with a politician in an operation like this?
Why would an American be directly involved with a politician in an operation like this?
Why would an American be directly involved with a politician in an operation like this?
