Argument thread
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Argument thread
In Stef's anarcho-capitalist society, how does one enforce things such as closed borders and the NAP?
>>71126529
He doesn't.
>>71126529
shut up. no one cares about your love affair with that jew
>>71126529
Prayer
>>71126529
he doesn't actually believe in the ''libertarian anarcho-capitalist free society''- meme, he's a national socialist using anarcho-capitalism as a cover to ''awaken'' the people listening to them to the white genocide threat.
proof: anyone with an IQ over 110 is a national socialist.
>>71126529
or private property.
NOT
>>71126529
In an ideal anarchocapitalist system, you and I would. However, with no government, some fuckhead will start gathering power and that ideal system will get replaced by something that you and I would probably dislike. A lot.
>>71126529
>enforce things such as closed borders
Uhhhhhhh you don't.
>>71126529
You don't, thats the point. If you want you just move to an area run by all white people. Or you just create such an area yourself. Nothing will be stopping you.
>>71126710
I'm pretty sure I'm at or below 90
>>71127326
Except the invading horde of shitskins
>>71126529
>In Stef's anarcho-capitalist society, how does one enforce things such as closed borders and the NAP?
Private courts and private armies paid on a voluntary basis.
>>71126529
You don't enforce borders but with 0 welfare they are not a problem like they are nowadays.
>enforce NAP
By ostracism, you don't associate with anyone who violates the NAP and they end up starving to death or moving far away. You of course have the right to self defence, so if there is let's say a murderer running around, the community would get together to stop him and if necessary, with lethal force.
>>71126710
He's just another youtuber fishing for views.
>>71127176
Stefan is extremely pro border control though.
>>71127494
Mongols invaded china because of chinese welfare payments?
>>71127421
>I'm pretty sure I'm a nigger
>>71127421
>I'm pretty sure I'm retarded
Uh...good for you?
>>71126529
With violence. Ultimately its the only way to enforce anything. Don't ever let anyone tell you otherwise.
>>71127421
The fact you posted that proves it's true.
>>71127563
Isn't that a new development? He's basically gone full /pol/ lately
>>71128180
It's been his position ever since the migrant crisis, but he's never stopped to address how this conflicts with anarchism
>>71127563
In the context of a statist paradigm with large welfare programs....
>>71129409
ARGUMENT
>>71127421
How the fuck do you even function?
>>71126529
>not theocrat
>>71126529
A (actual) social contract between property owners and dependants.
Contracts are enforced through lawful coersion.
>>71126710
I go to Oxford Uni, I meet a lot, a LOT of very intelligent people. While they are definitely more conservative than most UK Uni's, and we did have a spout of room-break-ins of Jewish students to right Nazi propaganda, I can assure you still that being over IQ 110 does not make you a National Socialist.
>>71126529
>how does one enforce things such as closed borders and the NAP?
This is not an argument
There would be no need for a closed border because of the free movement of labor, trade and people in such a society.
Also the NAP does not stop one from defending themselves but promotes non aggression for all.
>>71129462
No because iq
>>71126529
>it's fresh Stef
To answer your question, in a truly free society, borders are completely unnecessary and thus do not need to be enforced.
>>71130257
Love this man
>>71128845
he has addressed it, watch "Are Libertarians Wrong About Immigration?"
>>71130936
More accurately, border security simply becomes "property security", because the land that constituted the border would be privately owned by people, and they will presumably want to protect their land through whatever means, be it private security agencies, community protection initiatives, or just sitting on the porch with a shotgun.
>>71126529
Jesus fucking Christ. How many times does this have to be explained to you nigger cucks? The NAP is not the Non *Force* Principle. Its not pacifism you silly cuck. Its the Non INITIATION of Force. It doesnt need to be enforced. Its a universal. Toddlers understand it. Animals understand it. You live by it every day even if you dont know how to articulate it. Its just a universal axiom that says dont fuck with me or my shit. Its just an axiom from which everyone, even retarded children, can base their ethics and conduct, or society its laws. Its not some law that needs to be enforced you faggot. Its just the basis of ethics, law, conduct etc.
The NAP is not unique to AnCaps. Its a Classical Liberal concept out of the enlightenment. Its also the justification for the social contract. Its an Axiom and what you derive from it or use it to justify can be a number of things like: "we dont want to be agressed upon, therefore we need police, therefore we need government".
Its not unique to libertarians, its just that you only ever hear libertarians talking about it because theyre the only ones who care about consistency, epistemology, ethics, and starting from first principles with solid premises and identifying universal maxims. This is important because When you dont do this you end up with bullshit reasoning like "racism=prejudice+power".
You fucking Cuck.
