https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC_B3q2QpeM
Also hitchens is a legend.
I always thought of the Queen in the UK as a symbol. Sorry in advance if I have offended any of you.
>>71124428
When you learn proper grammer, i'll answer your question
>>71124428
>IT'S FUCKING 2016 I MEAN COME ON
Get a better argument.
>>71124898
Fuck off you cuck, sorry I said "is" instead of "in" you cunt.
>>71124428
We don't need one but it brings more money in tourism than it costs to upkeep. There are much worse things to pay taxes towards.
>71124528
>Sorry in advance if I have offended any of you.
Hong Kuck
>>71124528
>Sorry in advance if I have offended any of you.
This is /pol/ m8
>>71124968
>>71124840
>>71124904
Are you fucking idiots. When old queenie dies in the next few years, we get the retard that is Prince Charles.
Yes he may only be the head of the church, state and armed forces; but the cunt does have an influence. He has some minor shitty things like believing in god, homeopathy and talking to plant to help them grow. But he has some damaging views aswell.
He's an avid supporter of islam, together with the Saudi royal family, they set up mosques in London. With one of those mosques having abu hamza and the fucking shoe bomber come out of.
Open your eyes, you fucking cucks.
>>71124428
England has had the monarchy for such a large extent of its history, why throw all that away for literally no reason?
Also we're the United KINGDOM ffs
>>71124428
>politely asking a mudslime to leave
GET HIM OUTTA HERE
OUT
DON'T HURT HIM
GET HIM OUT!
>>71125293
Then get rid of the Windsors. I still want a Monarch.
>Sorry in advance if I have offended any of you.
>it's the current year, get rid of all traditions regardless of their undeniable economic benefit and accept Muslim cock
t. Will Wheaton
>>71124428
AFTER ALL YOUR MOTHER HAS DONE FOR YOU!?
THIS IS HOW YOU TREAT HER?
>>71125366
Barbara Windsor for Queen.
>>71124428
Tourism, culture
I'm sure the revenue generated from people traveling to visit and see that aspect of your country is pretty decent.
So te royal family still gets to exist and make money for just existing in exchange for all that
>>71124428
>Also hitchens is a legend
He's a Jew. Literally.
>>71124428
because it's 2016
Because the fact that it is 2016 doesn't change the fact that Monarchies are the best form of government. If anything, it should reinforce this belief as we've had centuries to see how shit democracies and republics are.
>>71125293
Believing in God is not a bad thing, and talking to plants to help them grow genuinely works, Google it.
And as for the actual damaging views, yeah, that sucks, not worth destroying a thousand years worth of monarchy and the defining characteristic of our nation for just one bad ruler though is it?
>>71125661
>believing in god is not a bad thing
Republican filth OUT
>>71125709
It's better than not believing in one, that's for sure. Atheists are the worst kinds of people.
>>71124428
Countries with constitutional monarchies are better than countries without.
Prove me wrong.
>>71125299
Because it's corrupt.
>>71124898
*grammar
*capitalize 'i' in 'i'll'.
*full stop
>>71125299
check'd
Despite OP being a huge republican twat, what would the United Kingdom be called if we got rid of the monarchy? United Republic?
>>71125943
Commonwealth of Scotland and its vassals.
>>71125913
>capitaliZe
>>71125709
It's kind of a whatever thing. Doesn't really matter in the long run, mate.
>>71124428
hitchens was a
>jew
>homosexual
>communist
>fedora tipping atheist
>alcoholic
op is a faggot
>>71124428
It's tradition, why get rid of it?
It's not like they're abusing their power, if they even have any.
>>71124428
Do you ever want to hear words like 'President Tony Blair and First Lady Cherie?' I'll take history, tradition, culture and people who would kill their own family rather than see it become islamic, thanks.
>>71125943
I'm not a republican, I'm voting to leave. The shit about muh tourism is false look at the royal expenses study, when compared to revenue actually gained by tourism. It's costs about £300mil/year (with tourism revenue deducted) to keep the liver spotted fuckers going. I'm not saying abolish the enitire royal family. By all means keep the tourist attractions, but cut the fuckers funds.
>>71126081
>>71126155
>A FUCKING LEAF
Hitchens was brilliant.
>>71124968
It's just a sign that he doesn't have an argument against your point honestly.
>>71124428
I like the other hitchens position which is to stop someone else taking the power if she was vacated. Also you think in this day an age with the current political class you want them righting the constitution to a new republic i sure as fuck don't.
>>71126266
It's the amerifat spelling you cunt.
>>71124428
We (Australians) need the monarchy because if we gave any of the PMs we've had in the last 20 the power that a president would have, we'd be even further down the shithole than we are already. Some old bitch on the other side of the globe who does almost nothing is worth every cent we pay her.
>>71126266
Pretty sure Americans use Z and Britons use S
>>71124428
Best form of government there's is.
Most stable, most flexible, safest.
Only an idiot wouldn't realise the rich own all government's, so it is best to have in charge some one who cannot be brought.
>>71126212
Any witless, mouth-breathing republican who hates the Monarchy so much is free to leave to Uganda, Anglola, North Korea, Somalia, Cuba, China, Afghanistan and all those other republican utopias.
Just don't go to Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Netherlands, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, Australia or Bermuda. All of those third-world monarchic hellholes have Kings or Queens running them so must be terrible places to live in.
>>71126445
It's not our fault Turnball is a fucking cuck.
The whole Queen thing has always made no sense to me, why the hell would you guys ever want to give this family money for not only being a symbol of monarchy, but a fake irrelevant one at that. Then there is the obsessive culture around the "royal family" and that shit isn't even brits alone, I have seen Americans talk about them like they are somehow important and relevant, it's mind boggling.
Im all for republics like USA where the US Constitution is one of the greatest works we have as a people. In saying that i would be strongly against any commonwealth countries becoming republican at the present moment
>>71126691
No, but if you drop the Queen, can you just send her over here instead of going all French on her ass?
>>71126431
>>71124428
If you don't like where progressive shove their genitals you won't want to see what they would shove in a new constitution at this point.
>>71124428
What people don't understand is that someone has to sit at the top of society. If we didn't have the queen we'd have the Kardsahians like America does.
>>71124428
>need
It's their property, you don't have a say over it.
Friendly reminder that Liz:
>doesn't actually do much other than makes us look nice
>prois bably the main reason for tourism revenue
>and through some loophole I don't fully understand lowers taxes
To get rid of her would be a silly move.
>>71126882
This so much. Imagine the Lib/Lab/Greens making a constitution or bill of rights right now? Holy mother fuck we'd be destroyed within a decade.
>>71126948
>>prois bably
Don't know what happened there, that should be "is probably"
Because it's a neutral symbol for motherland. Like Uncle Sam for USA.
>>71127005
Yeah I totally agree with that. But when is a good time to form a constitution. When we become the Islamic State if Britain?
So, instead of being a debt slave I can become a peasant instead? No thank you.
>>71124428
Tourism
>>71126711
We train our royalty from birth for one job. How much training does your presidents get?
Your system, the best richest liar wins, we have the same, but with a governor. The queens the governor. A governor prevents things getting out of control.
>>71127158
Don't. Fucking revive the Monarchy in full. Reinstate Christian values. Go crusading. Don't you want to be knighted personally by his royal gingerness for successfully leading the siege on Mecca with your anglo brothers?
>>71127189
Yeah not when Charles reigns. When Royals get certified that are considered, "defender of the faith" (church of England). Charles has come out and said he wants to be "defender of all faiths".
He loves mudslimes, we're fucked when the queen dies.
>>71126834
Implying it's right that they use the Yank version
>>71124428
That Hitchens is a faggot and he's spouting baseless nonsense in that video, as expected. The other is atleast tolerable, and his reasoning is coherent.
>>71126887
This, although we seem to be slipping into celebrity worshipping.
>>71126266
Look, right, they're putting it there because it's still part of English. It's not British English, it's American English, hence the US tag.
>>71127403
Edward Visio wanted to marry an American divorcee, the system stopped him. Charles if he wants to be king, will do his duty.
>>71126115
>Doesn't really matter in the long run, mate
So Islam doesn't matter. Typical German liberal cuck.
>>71124428
if UK dont have royal family..then the only attraction is immigrants
>>71127403
How do you know he's not bullshitting? The modern Britian is very PC and the royals most likely have some deals with the Saudi Royals
