Is climate change an actual threat to Earth? Or is it lies made up from the Environmentalists to push their agenda?
>>71077328
See how your life turns out when some globalist totalitarian state takes away your fossil fuels.
If fossil fuels disappeared tomorrow earth will depopulate to about 1 or 2 billion people inside 1 year. That's power so a (hydro)carbon grab is a power grab.
>>71077328
A few months ago i watched a video (in youtube) where some scientist explained that global warming is a thing, but is not caused by the human activity as mass media tell us
It's real, just not what Al "i'm a nigger" Gore was selling us in the form of "global warming".
>>71077328
>Is climate change an actual threat to Earth?
No, only a naturally occurring cycle of inconvenience over which humans have little to no effect.
>Or is it lies made up from the Environmentalists to push their agenda?
Almost entirely.
It's being used primarily by the left, for two main reasons.
1. Increase the size of government and amount regulation over the economy.
2. (Globalists) With this ability to regulate, kill clean coal and other cheap energy in order to make America non-competitive. This is for various reasons, like moving jobs overseas to China (who doesn't give one fuck about regulations) where labor is dirt cheap or to prop up alternative fuel sources in which the elites involved (and foreign globalist entities) have an interest.
It's also useful for shuffling money around.
Environmentalism is basically a non-factor, except for the "feel good" aspect which can be used to acquire useful idiots under the impression that they're doing something grand and important.
>>71077328
The climate is always changing, but people namely authoritarian leftists are using it for their own purposes. The only thing we can do about "climate change" is prepare and react accordingly, not deindustrialize or impose carbon taxes and other horse crap.
Climate change is real in the sense that yes, the earth's climate can fucking change on its own
>thinking weather has been static since the dawn of time
Environmentalists collude with big business and politicians. Mutual interest. It's like the baptists colluding with the bootleggers
>BUT MUH SCIENCE CONSENSUS
Science does not fucking work like a goddamn political machine. And that's what it's become. Not a body of knowledge but for politics. Bad methodology, bad studies, deliberately manipulating testing methods to get the desired outcome you want, among other things.
More methane is in the atmosphere than CO2 and traps more heat.
OP, see
>>71074553
>>71077328
You have two choices
A) Believe the climate SCIENTISTS who are actually educated on the topic, spend countless hours doing research, and have agreed its a thing
B) Believe some armchair politics from an anonymous guy on an imageboard telling you its all a jewish plot to inconvenience you into making the world more habitable.
>>71079587
This.
They aren't lying about it intentionally, they just want to feel relevant.
The whole thing started with AL Gore failing to amount to anything and restoring to this to save his face. His video about it was shameful.
Correlation=/=causation and there isn't enough fossil fuel in the world to burn to cause anything if it did
If environmentalists cared, they'd go to Nuclear but they have their heads so far up their ass they think all we need is a little socialism to get everyone on solar.
>>71077328
environmentalists didn't lie, they probably got co-opted though from what it seems like. climate change is a threat although paying money at it is somewhat questionable to what degree it could do much good to protect against it. I'm sure I'll get hate for saying this though.
>>71077328
>Or is it lies made up from the Environmentalists to push their agenda?
Nothing the democrats propose will stop global warming. And that's a scientific fact. They simply want to control the global economy by controlling c02. It's a giant communist conspiracy.
>>71081440
cont. theres kind of a ill thought somewhat surrounding the topic that is a strangely hidden dislike of our own species and admiration for nature. what they don't take into account is that people aren't actually all too much separated from nature and the natural world. and supporting our own species is a higher priority then removing ourselves for the sake of somewhat mostly empty unsettled land or a old ruin with vines growing on it or some forlorn idea like that
>>71077328
or op could stop blogging and google climategate?
