>Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>redpill me on X
as they do in /fit/: READ THE FUCKING STICKY
>>71025155
>nonvisible minority
WHAT DOES THIS EVEN MEANNNNN!!!
Only exists because of personal choice
Women would rather work in low paying areas with shorter hours and longer holidays
Niggers are lazy and take similar jobs
>>71025155
its all a big moan
>>71025155
>non-visible minority
???????????????????????????????
>>71025155
>non-visible minority
THEY BE TAKIN OUR SKULLS AND OUR JOBS TOO
I got you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRfERVPq2VE
>>71025336
Is that what they are calling illegals nowadays?
So are whites considered a visible minority in South Africa or is dat rayciss?
>>71025243
The very few people who master the art of electronic camouflage.
It's a result of hamfistedly interpreted statistics.
>>71025412
>"there is of course prejudice, racism and sexism in our world.."
what did he mean by this?
>>71025243
Any ethnic minority that looks white
>>71025243
White hispanics and jews.
>>71025544
The Jews hate you for being white and the Mohammedans will stone a woman to death at the drop of a burka.
>>71025155
>public sector wages
Litterally welfare for people unemployable in the private sector, who gives a shit.
The private sector wage is driven down by H1-Bs
>>71025155
Nowhere is it legal to advertise a position, then change the salary based on the gender of the applicant.
The published discrepancy comes when female kindergarden teachers are thrown in with male petrochemical engineers in the same calculation without allowing for outliers.
More women choose lower paying jobs and spend less time at work, so broadly speaking earn less than men, but no one earns less than another person in the same job based on gender.
>>71025243
>not checking your light reflective privilege
invisible lives matter
>>71025155
>shitskins are inferior in every way
more news at 11
>>71025922
Actually, they do. It's just that women ask for less money when they get the jobs than men do, and ask for less money on raises than men do. The data above was even in the LA times, but they tried to spin it as some huge problem everyone except women have to fix, when women are the weakest link in this situation.
1. Adjusting for a handful of obvious factors gets it up to women earning 93% of what men earn. Adjusting for more would presumably bring it closer.
2. We still have the older generation in place, when there was actual, measurable sexism in the workforce.
3. If you read more recent papers, they tend to do more statistical backflips to massage the data into looking just as bad as it always has.
4. Both women and men show an implicit bias towards men being leaders. Even if part of the pay gap is real, it's as much the fault of women as of men.
It's nonsense.
>>71025155
There is none. Women as a demographic earn less than men.
This is because they do not aspire to work high-paying jobs.. If you examine high paying fields in STEM there are few women but massive pushes for young women to enter the area. A woman can experience all manner of assistance to gain education or employment in these fields.
>>71025155
everyone that makes good money keeps their mouth shut.
Statistics do not matter...
>>71025155
Second time I've had to link this today. You cucks need to go back to whatever hole you crawled out of.
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/05/equal-pay-for-equal-work-examining-the-gender-gap
Wage gap myth
http://www.examiner.com/article/gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-08-13/don-t-blame-discrimination-for-gender-wage-gap
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html?_r=2
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/biggest-shock-fridays-payroll-report-sorry-men
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/share-of-men-in-labor-force-at-all-time-low/?src=recg
http://www.businessinsider.com/women-in-tech-make-more-money-and-land-better-jobs-than-men-2010-9
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-boardroom-women-idUSN0752118220071107?feedType=R
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=10630664
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704421104575463790770831192?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748704421104575463790770831192.html
>>71025155
Invisibility is a highly valuable skill. No wonder invisible people earn more
>>71025243
it's a new PolCor term for "unperson with white skin"
>>71025155
>visible minority
this is literally more racist than 4chan
>>71025155
>visible
Lol, coons getting upset because mexicans work hard and get good jobs and fight for labor rights, while they chimp out for gibsmedats.
