Humanity is defined by one thing: it's intelligence. This is what separates us from other animals. It has allowed us to develop language, complex societies, advanced technology, and high self-awareness. Without intelligence, we are nothing but chimps.
It's true that average intelligence varies by race, but ordering society based on race is lazy and misguided because it doesn't account for variation within races. A 100 IQ white person is much closer to an average black person than someone with a 150 I.Q.
The most rational way to order society is to do away with the crude heuristics of race and only use I.Q. Society is already ordered this way in general due to social Darwinism, with the exception of democracy. I propose that we only allow voting for people who have graduated college with at least a Bachelor's degree and at least a 115 I.Q., with the higher the bar the better. This simple change would solve all the problems with democracy, as competent and intelligent voters would do all the rest. Another idea is to have vote weighting based on I.Q.: if you have a 150 I.Q. your vote would count as much as 20 people, 100 for 1 person, and 80 for a fifth of a person.
Explain to me how this idea wouldn't make America and Western democracies better.
>>71019664
>Humanity is defined by one thing: it's intelligence.
Stopped reading right there.
>>71019664
Empathy is necessary for a cohesive society.
A trait not found in shit skins.
>>71019702
>Doesn't give alternate possibility.
You scored low and are mad about it, eh? Letting your betters run society is in your own best interest, though I guess that would take a certain level of intelligence to understand.
>>71019664
> wasting money on college
Nope
>>71019664
>without intelligence we would be chimps
No you stupid fuck we would be protozoa, as chimps are already intelligent creatures lacking the impulse regulation to work more on their abstract reasoning.
Implying high IQ people don't already run the world, and the west into the ground.
>>71019774
Creativity.
I did a project on why citizens should have to take a test to vote. It's not voter suppression it's saving the voter from themselves in my opinion.
>>71019664
Except liberals have a generally higher IQ, because smart people generally find themselves financially well off and not having to deal with a lot of very serious problems poor whites are aware of.
We shouldnt do anything like this with voting, or we'll end up in socialism and starving. If anything, we should sterilize everyone with below average IQ, or below 90, or something
>>71019905
They haven't, they've built the world. The problem is voting, which gives power to the mediocre. Politicians are usually high in verbal intelligence but poor in abstract and visual-spacial.
>>71019908
Creativity is a part of intelligence.
>>71019925
If you're talking about knowledge-based tests, they're poor because memorization doesn't require a whole lot of intelligence.
>>71019925
Who makes the test?
Libcucks i bet
>>71019905
This guy gets it. High IQ does not equate to philosophical or political positions that are rational or helpful. University cucks get brainwashed just as equally by emotional arguments as a factory worker, sometimes more so.
Voting and other rights should be based on military service or other significant contributions to a country.
>>71020140
>Creativity is a part of intelligence
Tell that to the chinks
>>71019849
desu i thought OP's thinking was very abstract.
>>71019664
>use IQ instead of race
>literally nothing changes except the terminology we use
So we should uproot our understanding of social hierarchy and cause undue confusion, just because it hurts your feelings to keep things as they are??
>>71019664
>it's intelligence
>>71020284
Since Japan and South Korea have become somewhat Westernized, a trend that is increasing, they are becoming more and more innovative. This is especially true in the last few years. Japan was geographically gimped by being an isolated island country, and China by coastline. Both these factors are irrelevant in the modern world. Europe owes much to its coasts, climate, and geographical access, which allowed for the conditions for superior intelligence to flourish and work on higher aspirations.
>>71019664
what do we do with people like Hawking who do great feats of the mind but think that IQ scores aren't important enough to take a test. Do we just consider them retarded or what?
>>71020506
It only would cause confusion for the low-testers who cannot grasp simple concepts and need a literally color-coded world to understand things. Racism doesn't hurt my feelings, it's just mostly arbitrary.
True, under this system many more blacks would not be able to vote than whites, but the few blacks who do have superior intelligence would be able to contribute the value they have, which is the entire point. Low-testing whites not contributing is also a big part of it, why should I care about you being white when you are nigger-like when it comes to brains?
>>71019664
>Humanity is defined by one thing
Stopped reading there
>it's intelligence
>it's
stopped reading there desu
>>71020782
>Stephen Hawking
>Popsci meme celebrity.
>M' single anecdote.
He'd get to vote, but I still get to laugh at him for trying even harder than Black Science Man for attention.
>>71019664
>Humanity is defined by one thing: it's intelligence. This is what separates us from other animals
So niggers, arabs, you, etc. are not human, thanks for clearing that up.
But high IQ people dont make good judgements.They tend to be subjective and afraid of conflict.And they will never join the army or risk their lives if things go to shit.
Only veterans should vote as only they had true belief in the values of the country.
>>71020902
If nigs had no intelligence they wouldnt even have huts or spears, if arabs werent intelligent they couldnt come up with an idealogy.
>>71020876
>He'd get to vote,
But does that not defeat the purpose of the system?
>>71020947
What's the worth of those values if they're thought up by inferior minds? I mean if everyone had high IQs then no one would be willing to fight and we wouldn't have veterans in the first place.
>>71020902
Humanity isn't binary, it's a gradient. On one end you have living vegetables that can't even talk and the comatose who are only marginally human. On the other end you have the geniuses of history who have shown the best of what humanity is and are better humans than you or me.
There's been black people and arabs who have contributed greatly to knowledge. There are also many that aren't. Lumping them in all together is lazy and throws the baby out with the bath water. Also, there are many (though less on average) white sub-humans.
>>71020984
No, because Stephen Hawking wouldn't represent the pool of all voters. Are you trying to troll, or are you actually retarded enough to think you have a point?
>>71019774
OK, let's separate people about intelligence. While Europe and Murrica might lose someone, Africa will pretty much stay in the same place. Anyone dumb goes to Africa. Done.
>>71021230
>No, because Stephen Hawking wouldn't represent the pool of all voters.
but why would he be allowed the right if the worth of his intelligence can't be determined by IQ? If he'd get to vote because he's done something intelligent despite believing that IQ has little relevance on smart decisions (something I think you would agree is the idea of a low IQ mind) then you'd be acknowledging that IQ doesn't determine intelligence as well as merit does and you'd be proving him right.
>Are you trying to troll, or are you actually retarded enough to think you have a point?
I don't know about you, anon but I only asked a question. Your reaction isn't becoming of a high IQ individual.
>>71021079
The quality of an idea do not depend on IQ.
If a man is stupid and still put his mortal body between wars desolation and his home then he should vote.Why the hell does a woman who cares more abput make-up then her country vote?
Or a man who only needs more money to feed his children with welfare?
Or a rich man who will vote to be richer.
They do not protect the body-politic they are not true citizens.
>>71021831
>If a man is stupid and still put his mortal body between wars desolation and his home then he should vote.
But what if he's doing this for a silly reason like say, if he dies while fighting he gets 72 virgins in death. Would you want him voting?
>>71019664
Do, maybe people like you should stop pushing identity policies?
why you must leave (and why you must agree)
>>71019664
>reducing human diversity and behavior to one number
>that number is IQ
Regardless of IQ, nigs tend to be more violent and more criminal. Asians tend to be more conformist. Whites tend to be more altruistic. Race is a suite of complementary genetics for a specific environment. Intelligence matters, but not as much as love for your people and your heritage.
>>71019758
I suppose you have a source for that statement? Along with a source for the typical 'whites are just more creative, that's why our intelligence is better than that of chinks and kikes.'
>>71019664
Who is gonna vote for the handouts?
Literly the only way bitches can get elected
>>71022017
Very good question...
My answer would be that his personal reasons do not contradict his actions.Othervise he would not fight for the state.His voting would also be consistent witn both his personal reasons and politikal.
>>71020136
So high IQ people shouldn't exclusively run the country because they're too liberal. But we should totally kill everyone with average and below IQ. How does this make sense?
>>71019664
>Humanity is defined by one thing: it's intelligence
Which you lack
>>71022639
but ultimately his choices would likely continue the originally silly idea of dying for the 72 virgins be it at the expense of his own life or those of the following generation.
However I do agree with you though, if my other posts haven't made it obvious. IQ is at best an indicator of how likely it is that an individual might have "good ideas" but the judgement on the worth of the individual comes down to the ideas that they hold and not what a number says is the probability that they hold those ideas.
Race DOESN'T matter. Culture matters. And nigger culture sucks.
>>71022482
>tend to be
See what you did there? You're not countering anything that OP said.
>Race is a suite of complimentary genetics
Yes, in general. Again, not a rule for all individuals. There are people that stand out from the average, quite a bit of them do actually.
>Intelligence matters, but not as much as love for your people and your heritage.
People of all races can belong to a people and heritage, give that they are born into and brought up in the culture. So what you're saying is, the only thing that matter is how genetically similar people are to each other? You don't see an issue here?
>>71023382
Culture is a reflection of intellect, not the other way around.
>>71019664
>only votes for college graduates
How about only for stem majors.
>>71023898
But what if culture tells a child not to think just to "get that paper" their whole life. They never learn to think for themselves because they're told not to and they end up having the capacity for intelligent thought but not the context. Would their intellect not then be a reflection of their dumb-ass culture?
>>71019664
>Humanity
stopped reading there
>>71023898
Is this why even nigger-tier IQ whites share a culture with higher IQ whites? If culture is intellect, then what's wrong with high IQ blacks?
>>71019664
THE LIBERALS AND NOGGERS MAKES IT MATTER!!
This whole subject about 'race here' and 'race there' would barely exist if the PC liberals and the niggers themselves wouldn't go around talking about it 24/7..
>>71024402
This I completely agree on. It sucks being "liberal" and watching all the hypocritical idiots shit all over some generally sound ideas. I've met a lot more racist illogical SJW then I've ever met anyone who legit hated someone just cause they look/talk differently.
If SJW could choke on the irony of yelling "bigot" at everyone who disagrees with them I think we'd be able to find logical solutions to most of America's social justice problems within a month.
>>71024402
Very true. Obama talk about race so much, that the race relation in America gone way south.
>>71024402
>two wrongs make a right
>>71019664
A meritocracy based on IQ, completely apolitical, logical and neutral would be our best shot.
Too bad there's no way it won't be infiltrated or biased towards chosen "people" if applied in our day and age.
