how would you explain this /pol/? its in my textbook
>helped the economy
Mass Immigration since the 1960s has caused stagnant wages
>>71017425
Mass Immigration has also caused a massive increase in private debt due to rising housing prices
>>71017164
So immigration for the past 30 years ? Literally nothing good I can think of
Political backlash would be people saying it's done nothing good with proof and getting told to shut up
>>71017453
now you get to look at shit like this
>>71017164
Cheap shit thanks to illegals.
No jerbs cause illegals took them.
>>71017482
>>71017499
thanks mass immigration
it helps busniess owners by giving them a pool oof workers tat dont have to be paid full price for or allowed protection of the law.
doesnt really help "the people" though, whomever that migt be.
>>71017518
>>71017536
>>71017164
The debt went from manageable to unsustainable after 1965. It "benefited" the economy, insofar as Jews being able to suppress wages because people became easier to fire.
>>71017425
>>71017453
Fed policy is responsible, not immigration.
>>71017671
Just ignore that the places with the worst mass immigration levels are also the ones with the worst debt bubbles
>>71017425
>>71017453
>>71017459
>>71017482
>>71017484
>>71017499
>>71017518
>>71017533
>>71017536
>>71017555
>>71017573
>>71017671
>>71017725
This is in my US history textbook, is it accurate/fair or have jews or libshits dug into it?
>>71017164
Jesus christ. Throw that textbook in the fucking trash. I'm so glad I'm done with marxism academy.
>>71017425
Reagan and fiat economy caused stagnant wages, not immigration.
More people to loan money to to enslave them through debt so that they could make more money to loan to countries in conflict so that they could continuously expand the Federal Reserve's empire. Political backlash was manufactured in order to instill fear and make the change look less orchestrated n' shiet. It was all about money and control. Also immigrants are often cheaper to employ because they are more often in debt and bought into the " American dream" propaganda that was used to promote immigration.
>>71018593
>the American dream is bait for bringing in cheap exploitable labor
now thats a redpill
>>71017164
Well it made wealth for the couple people who created jobs but it bled the general population dry, creating political backlash.
How is this even hard to figure out?
>>71018758
thank you
>>71018480
it all started after the 1965 Immigration Act (passed by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Celler)
Regan only mad a bad situation worse by deregulating wall street especially after Alan Greenspan took over.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Greenspan
>>71018758
Mass immigration didn't create jobs as much as it made higher profits for a few business men by lowering wages.
Just like slavery saved a few business men money in cheaper labor costs but fucked over the rest of the South.
>>71017164
That snippet is assuming that it helped the economy, but produced negative backlash. Only one of the premises are true.
>>71018260
Are you in high school or college? Either way I have to get my hands on some the stuff that's being printed today. If I have kids, they aren't going to public school.
