Republicans, completely, irreversably, BTFO
This is why I'm feeling the Bern this November!
You btfo fags are fuckin annoying
which side spent the most money again?
>>71001786
*fag
It's only me and some canuck that post these regularly
I'm just H I G H E N E R G Y
>>71001563
I like how Ike is ignored first off.
Its honestly just the economy back and forth for the most part, although I am surprised Jimmy Carter has such a high increase, assuming this is accurate at all.
>>71001857
>>71001563
There are so many other factors here besides the letter next to a president's name. All in all I think these threads are a good way to work on debate skills and making rationale and dependable points. I still maintain that president has very little to do with the economy.
>government spending stimulates job creation in the short term
welcome to econ 101 lad
>>71001948
Ike was basically a Democrat
>>71002007
>if presidents had balanced their budgets
>only house of representatives can originate spending bills
IF YOU WERE ASLEEP DURING U.S. GOVERNMENT CLASS IN HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE THEN STFU ABOUT POLITICS
>>71002296
I wasn't, stop projecting you conservatard
>The president creates jobs
I wish I was living in an alternative reality where people actually understand what politicians do and how much influence they actually have.
>>71002390
Apparently you were libtard, so let me make it simple for you.
>the
>house
>of
>representatives
>sets
>the
>budget
>not
>the
>president
>>71002537
You and me both anon.
>>71001563
GG FAGGOTS
>>71001563
>low paying
>part time
>jobs
Thanks Obama
>Internet Boom
Thanks Bill
>>71002563
>the president is irrelevant
nice meme
In that case, are the Democrats responsible for the economic recovery under Reagan? :^)
>>71001563
>Jobs created by each president
Soviet Union tier argument
>>71002563
>this
>fucking
>moron
The President's Budget for Fiscal Year 2017
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget
>>71001563
>Sources: politifact.com, factcheck.org
Absolute trash
>>71002752
>polack butthurt about the soviets building up their country and saving them from the Nazis
sounds right
>>71001563
>factcheck
>politifact
lel
Also, what is the definition of "Jobs created", for the sake of semantics?
>>71001563
>picking 5 random presidents
>missing the (plus?) sign next to Johnson's number
>counting part time and full time jobs the same
>>71001563
You do realize that in '94 BLS modified the stats to exclude people who can't find a job for over a year from them, right?
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts
>>71002785
>butthurt
opinion discarded
>>71003114
>p*land
opinion discarded
>>71003204
>polack butthurt about the soviets building up their country and saving them from the Nazis
that's totally what I said
>>71003279
That's an accurate description of you and your entire country
>>71002785
>>>>
>>71003316
>President create jobs because POLAND IS A SHITHOLE
Nice argument there bud
>>71003524
>>POLAND IS A SHITHOLE
yay, we agree on something!
>>71003564
now about president creating jobs
>>71003108
You do realize that this is just made up. Shadowshits just drew an extra blue line that somehow magically stays at 25% to show how stupid right wingers are.
>>71001563
>stereotypical liberal sound byte. Checkmate, /pol/
/pol/ stop fucking responding to these bait threads, I think they might actually be interlopers from r e d d i t
>>71003675
I'm not from reddit.
I post these to get the redditors out. I miss the days when it was socialists vs ancaps vs Nazis
>>71003670
Yeah, right. In a "constantly growing" economy with a "5% unemployment rate" the thing most discussed by all presidential candidates who have at least some degree of popularity is creating jobs and fighting unemployment. What kind of degenerate are you to believe that shit [watching meaningfully at a leaf flag]?
>>71004210
U6 is the broadest measure. It measures under-employment. Even shadowshits shows it plummeting.
When you have 73 straight months of private sector job creation, the longest streak in American history, you're damn right unemployment is going to fall.
U4 is 5.3%.
READ ME WHAT THIS CHART SAYS AT THE TOP. TYPE IT OUT.
Protip: You've just been BTFO
STOP SHILLING WITH THESE IMAGES
SAGED REEEEEE
>>71004633
why do you want me to stop?
>>71004335
>y'all lying man! *POW* mah good weed...
>posts another BLS bullshit
>You've just been BTFO
>>71001563
You are seriously retarded if you think Clinton had anything to do with the jobs created in the 90s.
>>71001563
>>70980055
WE SHOULD DO EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO KEEP THE GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS OF PEOPLE THAT DON'T HAVE THEM SO WE CAN CONTINUE DOMINATING THEM - bernie sanders 2016
>>71005071
Up until the Clinton administration, a discouraged worker was one who was willing, able and ready to work but had given up looking because there were no jobs to be had. The Clinton administration dismissed to the non-reporting netherworld about five million discouraged workers who had been so categorized for more than a year.
http://www.shadowstats.com/article/employment
>republicans: increased number of military, middle class, and millionares
>democrats: increased janitors, lower class, welfare slaves
More is better, rite :^)
>>71005450
I hate this shit more than anything else. Changing statistical definitions just to make sure nobody knows anything and to stay free of criticism.
>>71001563
obviously its Regan
>>71001887
>2am
thats a funny way of saying depressed, usually those people are the ones with insomnia.
>>71001563
>Occupy Democrats
>Politifact
>Factcheck
totally not skewed or unbiased here guys, I guess we should all become Liberal/Democrats now because we could not possibly challenge this solid work.
>>71002065
Why do liberals think they csn get away with spreading complete lies like this?
>>71002065
Yes. He could have ran for either party. But he didn't want democrats to have a monopoly on the presidency.
>>71006442
It's not though, prove it's wrong
hint: you can't
The jobs under the Republicans went to Americans. The jobs under the Democrats went to immigrants.
>>71001563
Mostly govt jobs created on the democrat side
>>71006442
>Why do liberals think they csn get away with spreading complete lies like this?
1.) Because most Americans are too retarded to fact check.
2.) Because their primary voting base is niggers and spics who can't even read at a level advanced enough to understand the words in that image.
>>71001563
never in my life, has the following saying ever made more sense than your post
"correlation does not prove causation"
cheers 4channer, 10-4 little buddy
>this thread again
>it's the Canadian who posts meme pictures and refuses to respond to anything that proves him wrong with evidence
I'm so tired of this
Just ban all Canadian posters already
