Why do these topics cause so much butthurt in America?
>>70910358
Why is Sweden turning into such a shithole?
>>70910358
Evolution: Only partially true, we humans are not 200,000 years old - we are BILLIONS of years old.
Climate change: Used to be called 'global warming', but when evidence contrary to the notion of human-caused global warming became too blatant, it was called 'climate change'.
Abortion: There is nothing wrong with aborting niggers and Muslims.
>>70910490
It's still called anthropogenic climate change, you know.
>>70910424
>>70910490
remember kids
always check the flag before writing out a response
>>70910559
It's still false regardless of whatever new name they give it this month, you guzzler of Somali cum.
>>70910679
>It's still false
How so?
>>70910569
Here is merely SOME evidence (though DEFINITELY not ALL of the evidence) suggesting not only a human presence on Earth BILLIONS of years ago, but also suggesting complex human civilisations on Earth BILLIONS of years ago:
* A human skull fragment from Hungary dated between 250,000 and 450,000 years ago
* A human footprint with accompanying paleoliths (stones deliberately chipped into a recognisable tool type), bone tools, hearths and shelters, discovered in France and dated 300,000 to 400,000 years
* Paleoliths in Spain, a partial human skeleton and paleoliths in France; two English skeletons, one with associated paleoliths, ALL at least 300,000 years old
* Skull fragments and paleoliths in Kenya and advanced paleoliths, of modern human manufacture, in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, dated between 400,000 and 700,000 years
* Neoliths (the most advanced stone tools and utensils) in China of a type that indicate full human capacity, dated to 600,000 years
* Hearths, charcoal, human femurs and broken animal bones, all denoting modern humanity, in Java, dated to 830,000 years
* An anatomically modern human skull discovered in Argentina and dated between 1 million and 1.5 million years years (eoliths -chipped pebbles, thought to be the earliest known tools- at Monte Hermoso, also in Argentina, are believed to be between 1 and 2.5 million years old).
* A human tooth from Java yielding a date between 1 and 1.9 million years years
* Incised bones, dated between 1.2 and 2.5 million years, have been found in Italy
* Discoveries of paleoliths, cut and charred bones at Xihoudu in China and eoliths from Diring Yurlakh in Siberia dated to 1.8 million years
* Eoliths in India, paleoliths in England, Belgium, Italy and Argentina, flint blades in Italy, hearths in Argentina, a carved shell, pierced teeth and even two human jaws all bearing a minimum date of 2 million years (end of part 1)
>>70910559
I remember when they were saying the polar ice caps were going to be melted by 2012 and D.C. would be under water.
If they are going to grossly exaggerate why should I listen to or even believe what they say?
>>70910803
(start of part 2) Curiously enough, several of the very earliest artifact discoveries display a truly extraordinary level of sophistication. In Idaho, for example, a 2-million-year-old clay figurine was unearthed in 1912. But even this discovery does not mark an outer limit. Bones, vertebrae and even complete skeletons have been found in Italy, Argentina and Kenya. Their minimum datings range from 3 million to 4 million years. A human skull, a partial human skeleton and a collection of neoliths discovered in California have been dated in excess of 5 million years. A human skeleton discovered at Midi in France, paleoliths found in Portugal, Burma and Argentina, a carved bone and flint flakes from Turkey all have a minimum age of 5 million years.
How far back can human history be pushed with discoveries like these? The answer seems to be a great deal further than orthodox science currently allows. As if the foregoing discoveries were not enough, we need to take account of:
* Paleoliths from France dated between 7 and 9 million years
* An eolith from India with a minimum dating of 9 million years
* Incised bones from France, Argentina and Kenya no less than 12 million years old
* More paleolith discoveries from France, dated at least 20 million years ago
* Neoliths from California in excess of 23 million years
* Three different kinds of paleoliths from Belgium with a minimum dating of 26 million years
* An anatomically modern human skeleton, neoliths and carved stones found at the Table Mountain, California and dated at least 33 million years ago
But even 33 million years is not the upper limit. A human skeleton found in Switzerland is estimated to be between 38 and 45 million years old. France has yielded up eoliths, paleoliths, cut wood and a chalk ball, the minimum ages of which range from 45 to 50 million years.
There's still more.
>>70910824
(start of part 3) In 1960, H. L. Armstrong announced in Nature magazine the discovery of fossil human footprints near the Paluxy River, in Texas. Dinosaur footprints were found in the same strata. In 1983, the Moscow News reported the discovery of a fossilised human footprint next to the fossil footprint of a three-toed dinosaur in the Turkamen Republic. Dinosaurs have been extinct for approximately 65 million years.
In 1983, Professor W. G. Burroughs of Kentucky reported the discovery of three pairs of fossil tracks dated to 300 million years ago. They showed left and right footprints. Each print had five toes and a distinct arch. The toes were spread apart like those of a human used to walking barefoot. The foot curved back like a human foot to what appeared to be a human heel. There was a pair of prints in the series that showed a left and right foot. The distance between them is just what you'd expect in modern human footprints.
In December 1862, The Geologist carried news of a human skeleton found 27.5 m (90 ft) below the surface in a coal seam in Illinois. The seam was dated between 286 and 320 million years. It's true that a few eoliths, skull fragments and fossil footprints, however old, provide no real backing for the idea of advanced prehistoric human civilisations.
But some other discoveries do.
In 1968, an American fossil collector named William J. Meister found a fossilised human shoe print near Antelope Spring, Utah. There were trilobite fossils in the same stone, which means it was at least 245 million years old. Close examination showed that the sole of this shoe differed little, if at all, from those of shoes manufactured today.
In 1897, a carved stone showing multiple faces of an old man was found at a depth of 40 m (130 ft) in a coal mine in Iowa. The coal there was of similar age.
>>70910847
(start of part 4) A piece of coal yielded up an encased iron cup in 1912. Frank J. Kenwood, who made the discovery, was so intrigued he traced the origin of the coal and discovered it came from the Wilburton Mine in Oklahoma. The coal there is about 312 million years old.
In 1844, Scottish physicist Sir David Brewster reported the discovery of a metal nail embedded in a sandstone block from a quarry in the north of England. The head was completely encased, ruling out the possibility that it had been driven in at some recent date. The block from which it came is approximately 360 million years old.
On 22 June 1844, The Times reported that a length of gold thread had been found by workmen embedded in stone close to the River Tweed. This stone too was around 360 million years old.
Astonishing though these dates may appear to anyone familiar with the orthodox theory of human origins, they pale in comparison with the dates of two further discoveries.
According to Scientific American, dated 5 June 1852, blasting activities at Meeting House Hill, in Dorchester, Massachusetts, unearthed a metallic, bell-shaped vessel extensively decorated with silver inlays of flowers and vines. The workmanship was described as 'exquisite'. The vessel was blown out of a bed of Roxbury conglomerate dated somewhat earlier than 600 million years.
In 1993, Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson reported the discovery 'over the past several decades' of hundreds of metallic spheres in a pyrophyllite mine in South Africa. The spheres are grooved and give the appearance of having been manufactured. If so, the strata in which they were found suggest they were manufactured 2.8 BILLION years ago.
>>70910868
(start of part 5) What are we to make of these perplexing discoveries? They cannot simply be dismissed. If even ONE of these discoveries is TRUE (and I believe that MANY if not ALL of these discoveries are TRUE), then it changes EVERYTHING that modern mainstream anthropologists THOUGHT they knew about the human species. (end)
>>70910733
All of the planets in the Solar System are warming up, not just Earth.
>>70910358
>Evolution
Muh Jesus
>climate change
Big oil.
>abortion
Muh Jesus.
>>70910807
>I remember when they were saying the polar ice caps were going to be melted by 2012 and D.C. would be under water.
Surely laymen were saying that. I mean, it's pretty basic that rising sea levels has nothing to do with melting polar ice caps. In fact, meling polar ice caps would more likely lower sea levels.
No, why sea levels rise is because water becomes less dense as its temperature increases (above 4°C, where water is the most dense).
>>70910930
What is your evidence? I will also require you to elaborate greatly on the causal relationships of what you just said.
>>70910980
No, it was scientists working for the pentagon.
This is slightly funnier than the flat earther who visits us from time to time
>>70911211
>No, it was scientists working for the pentagon.
Wow. What were their names?
>>70910358
Because god forbid I don't agree with you.
>>70910358
>Evolution
Protestants.
>Climate change
Big oil and people who don't understand science on both sides. Plus we've got the alarmists who profit off of it on the other side but don't really give a fuck.
>Abortion
Women and feminism. Pic related. This clashing with the religious. Then you have that we're one of those countries who allows third trimester abortions thrown in the mix so you get things like the hospital in Chicago putting live and born babies in a storage closet to die because they were supposed to have been aborted but the doctor took too long.
>evolution
Conservatives being the controlled opposition they are making the US, themselves and their supporters be ridiculed.
>climate change
Just a political narrative supported by bogus """""science""""".
>abortion
See first.
>>70910490
Global warming = An increase in global mean temperature
Climate change = A change in climate patterns such as rainfall brought on by global warming.
A little thinking can go a long way :^)
>>70911276
Why would I waste my time looking that up for you?
>>70911542
Because, well, how else would I know that what you're saying isn't fabrication? You've gotta give me something here, buddy. I'm very interested in what you just said.
>>70911492
>rainfall brought on by global warming
So it's getting colder because it's getting warmer? Okay, whatever you say, Shlomo Shekelberg.
>>70911613
>So it's getting colder because it's getting warmer?
Well, yes, in certain places. That's how it works.
>>70911587
because typing "pentagon climate scientists" in google is so difficult.
>>70911683
Well, yeah. It is really hard finding anything to substantiate what you just said. So, I think it's fair that you help me out here.
>>70911613
Are you abbo mate?
Change in patterns does not equal more nor less for that matter.
>>70911613
Are you abbo mate?
Change in pattern does not mean more nor does it mean less.
