People will have the access, they just won't use it.

>>70860129
history is written by server owners

>>70860231

nailed it

History is written by the anonymous losers of Wikipedia

>>70860129
Yes.

>>70860129
The world is a business Mr Beale, if some part of history is important enough to warrant rewriting in the information age, it can certainly be done.

>>70860129
Yes, it is, because academia doesn't consider first hand accounts of people who were there as a credible source. Since academia controls what can be considered as a viable source of information, first hand accounts, even pictures and video can be discarded while histories are written. Government now controls western academia, directly in most of the world, through the student loan and financial aid boot in the US. Consider this, if you take a book published by a university press, peer reviewed, and then put it word for word on Wiki it is no longer a viable source of information by academic stations. Also, think about how the "educated" consume information after university indoctrination. If they hear something but some academic resource says its not true, they dismiss it at once without actually looking at or considering that information for themselves.

It is, see mandela

>>70860129
more than ever before
because of this:
>>70860231

a lot more people will read history, but they'll read the accepted one

>>70860129
History is rewritten by losers and then spread around to other losers via memes until it becomes the new history.

>>70860129

He did win the war.
And the loser totally did the holocaust, right? Right?

Put your information in the cloud, goyim. We'll keep it very, very safe for you!