If the US were to nuke a hostile nation today that wasn't allied to Russia, what would actually stop us from just saying "Suck our dicks" when places like the UN try to condemn the action?
>>70828723
>implying anybody could even find your dicks
It would hurt foreign relations and send the whole world into another cold war because you have signed an agreement that forbids nuclear weapons, if you break that, Russia will start producing nukes again and back into the iceage we go.
>>70828926
Kind of adds to the insult frankly. We're pretty much telling you to shove your head in our front asses trying to find a tiny organ amidst rolls of sweaty smegma flab until either you magically succeed and get rancid cum down your throat or suffocate in a slew of burger sauce and lard.
>>70828926
IT'S A SHEATH FOR PROTECTION NIP
>>70828723
>Giving a valid Casus Belli to basically everyone in the world
Yeah nice try telling the rest of the world to suck your dicks
>>70829402
>valid Casus Belli
Eu4 lad?
>>70829541
Victoria II :^)
But memes aside, launching a nuke will get you a lot of infamy
>>70829402
>nuke Timbuktu
>this means that the entire world is going to rush to avenge a bunch of snow farmers
>>70829634
Infamy, bad boy, aggresive expansion.
Basically, they will have to savescum or gg.
>>70829678
>China would be pissed
>UN sanctions
>Mali declares war on the US
>Tumblr declares war on the US
>Western liberal media declares war on the US
>Muslim world declares war the US
>Israel allies with the US
>add a drop of Austria
And ta dah, you got a world war, congratulations ;^)
>>70829009
The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty doesn't explicitly forbid the use of nuclear weapons, and it's a farce anyways.
I've been thinking that in regards to NKorea
Just end the circus already please. All you have to do is get China to sign off on it.
>>70828723
the libtards who run your country
