>then-Texas high school teacher Brittni Colleps having group sex with four 18- and 19-year-old students at her suburban home.
>gets 5 years in prison
>18-19 years old
What the fuck am I missing here /pol/?
Why is this a criminal matter in Texas?
>>70794760
You don't fuck your students
>>70794760
>Though the students with whom she had sex -- there were five -- were all older than the minimum age of consent in Texas, state law prohibits any educator in a primary or secondary school from having sex with any enrolled student, no matter their age.
how is it legal for the state to outlaw sex between consulting adults?
>>70794872
Their consenting adults.
Fire her sure, but 5 years in prison?
That's bullshit, plain and simple
>>70794760
bad troll thread, kill yourself
>>70794760
Oh please. If it was a male teacher he'd be fired, in prison, and branded a pedophile and unhireable after going on the sex offender registry. Bitch should be thankful she only got 5 years.
>>70794874
The state makes the laws; they can make whatever shitty law they want. Bureaucrats are generally not talented and well educated people and usually just want to maintain their own political power so shit like this happens all the time.
>>70794760
In a row?
Anyone have a link to the video?
>>70794874
>>70794920
She's a civil servant who is having sexual relations with students. No parent should have to worry about their kids being fucked by the teacher when they send them off to school.
>>70794874
Most places have an age of consent law that will prevent a person from a position of power from taking advantage.
Here the aoc is 16 but for caretakers and things where there is potential for abuse the aoc is 18.
She's ugly and was probably fucking niggers anyway
>>70794760
>>70795085
Probably a gangbang instead of a train
Wait, their teacher is Bruce Jenner?
>>70794874
>legal
>for the state
found the contradiction
Were the students black or white? This is important.
>>70794760
The students were all black (not joking), there were accusations of racism. That she took advantage of black men because she knew they were marginalized and couldn't fight back.
>>70795299
>couldn't fight back.
Like that stops niggers.
>>70795121
But the parents have no control over their 18-19 year old children.
>>70795272
Black. seems like 9 times out of 10 the teacher is white and the male students are black.
>>70794874
State law precedes Federal. Shit, I thought the law was true for all states desu. Teachers shouldn't ever fuck students.
>>70794920
Conflict of interest from a government institution.
>You all get A+ ;)
Oh it get better! She was married at the time and her husband was doing an overseas tour
>>70795121
cuck dads mad their kids are getting more pussy than them
>>70794760
It's never legal to have sex with students in a public school.
It violates every kind of ethical thing. They control your grades. If they can have sex legally, the next step is outright blackmail for grades, etc.
>>70795354
How would you feel if your daughter was being solicited for sex by her male teacher? There is always an element of grooming involved in these cases. She's a predator.
>>70795299
>black
That explains their age. I was a month into my first term at college when I turned 18. Can't imagine being 19 and still in high school.
>>70794760
>fivesome
this is advanced coalburning
>>70795557
>I can't imagine being born in a different month
okey
>>70795121
Not if the kids are 18+ though.
>>70795522
I mean if your daughter is 18 she doesn't have a legal guardian anymore and can fuck whoever.
I get the law when it comes to minors, but this? Nonsensical to me. Maybe reason to get her fired, but not reason for prison.
So where's the pictures?
>>70794760
In most places in the western world it's illegal for someone in a position of power to have intercourse with one of their subordinates.
Like employer/employee or teacher/student
<iframe width="640" height="384" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E6p5RLDCoTQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
>weak willed cuck brainwashed white woman thinks she's going to make a "difference"
>runs into males who haven't had their balls systematically taken away from them
>literally gets trains run on her like a prison bitch
She was probably just weak-willed and passive. Niggers are stupid, but they are tuned to a razor's edge for spotting weakness.
>>70795691
By that logic, as soon as a high school girl becomes 18, she can be fucked by any member of the faculty? I pray your daughter never rides the gym teachers dick to get out of playing dodgeball.
>19 years old
>high school student
explain
>>70795722
>>70795691
>>70795354
C U C K
U
C
K
>>70795881
Literally the ugliest teacher I've ever seen in one of these cases.
Granted, niggers have zero standards, so she's a 9/10 to them compared to Loqueesha's 400 pound ass.
>>70794920
This.
I get fired. I get license revoked forever. But prison for sex between consensual parties seems pretty fucking outlandish.
>>70796006
Blacks are stupid
>>70795468
No, then she would be fired and barred from teaching for gross misconduct of a position of power when could lead to conflict of interest not fucking jail time you stupid fucking piece of shit.
The problem is creating a situation of conflict of interest because she's fucking retarded not the fucking sex.
Kill yourself plz. thx. <#
>>70794874
Would be interesting if she launched a constitutional appeal
Lawrence v. Texas invented a constitutional right to any type of private degeneracy, I don't see how this would be exempt
It should be illegal, it's illegal in Australia and countires not cucked by activist judges who invent rights to stop laws being passd against sexual deviants.
>>70796075
>lol you want to make more pussy available to yourself
>YOU'RE A KEK LOL
Stupid leaf.
From what I understand, it implies you used your position of authority to get your means. Same reason college students here aged 18-21 can get a teacher expelled for sleeping with them (even with verbal consent)
>>70795663
Pretty sure the oldest a highschool student should be is 18 (even if they are born in the latest month possible for their year group)
>>70794874
A state can do whatever it wants until someone takes them to federal court on constitutional grounds. Most people don't have the resources for that, so the states just trample on their rights.
>>70794874
Because people in position of power aren't allowed to fuck people under their care
The teachers having sex with students are always, without fail, mudsharks. It really is a mental illness.
>>70795424
yeah pretty sure its against law in every state
This fucking country is ridiculous. I love being an Amerifag, but some of the shit that haappens here is just fucking retarded.
The issue is she's a teacher and when teachers have sex with students it overwhelmingly involves grooming via outside tools like grade bumps, or other shit.
It's the same as in college. You can sleep with your professor, but don't be surprised when they get fucking fired for it. You just don't do it. It's one of those "things" that I thought everybody understood, but it's probably just a north american thing judging by the thread.
>>70794760
Some bullshit laws about teachers not being allowed to sleep with students, claiming that they're taking advantage of them.
Here in Iowa a 24 year old teacher was arrested for sleeping with her 18 year old student. Didn't make any sense to me.
I should note this is high school, it's perfectly legal for college teachers.
>>70796579
See>>70796496
It prevents black mail and abuse of power
>>70796496
Except is every other walk of life other than high school teachers.
I went to kennedale (the school she's from) we were pretty much only known for sex scandals.
10/10
>>70795350
lol
MFW realized I'm probably the last hold out who hasn't said "kek" like a fag in the last 10 years.
>>70796850
>I went to kennedale (the school she's from) we were pretty much only known for sex scandals.
Were the students white or black? What was their deal? Did you know any of them?
>>70795299
99% of these teacher scandals are teachers fucking the local athletic star dindus.
that's why i'm always happy to see them prosecuted and why they get trotted out as these poor victims who just had sex with willing young men
nope
they burned coal with pampered dindus who already rape and get away with it as long as they can kick a ball
>>70794760
5 years?
They better let her "victims" come visit her
>>70796836
and doctors
>>70795121
>>70795038
>>70795134
>>70795424
All people involved are non-retarded adults engaging in consensual behavior.
This shouldn't be a criminal matter at all.
Its full retard.
Becuz
>>70796328
>Lawrence v Texas
this anon is smart
>>70795858
>In most places in the western world it's illegal for
No its not. It is only a civil matter that ends with someone being fired or sued. All parties are of the age of majority.
No case.
>>70796723
you got it
this law is bat shit stupid.
AoC and sex laws are all fucking bullshit
None of this is the states business
>>70794760
>five years for coal burning
should be life.
>>70797277
The incest constitutional challenge based on Lawrence vs Texas is going to be spectacular to watch.
When do you think that will happen? Over/under by the end of the decade.
>>70795121
I hope you don't consider yourself a freedom lover - you're as authoritarian and in favor of a nanny state as much as leftists.
>>70794760
Women really are like jews. They cry out in pain as they strike you.
>>70798447
Most conservacucks here throw freedom out the window if it's muh chilluns or muh turrurism. I'd imagine it's even worse when it's Canadians.
>>70798237
>incest
I don't think their are laws against that.
its just considered disgusting and degenerate.
>>70797367
leave the premises
>>70798561
no cuck
>>70798631
no u
>>70794872
This. She just should've waited for them to graduate
>>70795038
This tbqh. Our leaders are dumber than a bag of rocks and motivated by little more than press headlines and greed.
>>70794760
>>70794874
She is abusing her position of power but since you are some horny virgin you wouldn't understand why its wrong.
>>70798537
Yeah there are m8, there are laws against incest itself. One of tumblr's big activisms is the legalisation of gay incest, no children can result so no reproductive issues. It's just immoral, and no one believes in sexual morality in 2016, just whether people to consent to the (immoral) sexual acts.
Legalised incest is coming up soon on the ride down the slippery slope.
>>70794760
glad to see this happen to a womyn desu
>>70799114
>adults should go to jail for consensual sex
>She is abusing her position of power
sounds like a contract dispute to me.
why lock them in prison?
If a boss sleeps with his secretary, should he go to jail for 5 years?
>>70799503
isnt degeneracy punishment enough?
>>70799627
Two consenting adults is different than a student in a public school and his/her teacher.
Teachers, and schools moreover, generally are responsible for the welfare of their students during school hours and are expected to preserve this relationship until the students are adults and no longer considered students in the school system. While it is true that this instance,or any other incidents, it likely was not on school property, their professional and personal relationships become blurred and she has a clear way of abusing her power to take advantage of the students. This manifests in her duty, to educate students, becoming blurred. (skewing grades, forcing students to perform sexual activities to obtain positive grades, rape, blackmail, etc).
An executive isn't the legal guardian of a secretary, but even still there are professional codes of conduct which usually prohibit any sexual relationships from occurring between staff members. With this being said, such regulations are usually only enforced in the case of it affecting workplace performance, otherwise a great deal of marriages would have been squashed before they began.
tl;dr If you can't get this, you're likely autistic and hung up on trying to find a loophole for the sake of finding one.
>>70799690
No, because first they demand legalisation, then tolerance, then enforced celebration, and the forbidding of criticism as a thoughtcrime (homophobia, transphobia, incestphobia etc.).
You won't be able to condemn degeneracy as wrong and immoral without severe social saction. Like it is now with homosexuals and trannys, the same will be for incest and whatever comes next on the ride. You won't be able to teach your children at school that sexual immorality is wrong, instead they will be forced to celebrate it as a choice they can consent to (and will be championed and celebrated if they do choose to).
If you can't say "this is immoral, and therefore it is a crime" then the inevitable result is tolerance and enforced mandatory celebration of immorality.
>>70794874
Because the state is allowed to define the age (and i guess the circumstance) of consenting adults
Are you people that ignorant of law?
imagine losing your virginity with sloppy 4ths to some fucken ugly slag geography teacher
jesus bros id rather be a wizard
>>70800536
>An executive isn't the legal guardian of a secretary
what business does the school have being the "guardian" of an adult person?
are that much a bootlicker you cant see how fucking retarded that is?
At most this is sexual harassment.
> but even still there are professional codes of conduct
>professional codes should result in jail-time.
pretty fucking authoritarian to tbqh
why dont we save the jail space for real criminals, m'kay?
>>70800897
are you ignorant of the OP?
they are all over 18
u retard
>>70794920
As a consenting adult she also knows the law and must follow it. Don't like the law? Change it! But break it? Get punished.
Really simple.
>>70796075
you act as if i'd want to fuck my daughter
>>70794760
>that ugly bitch
>fucking anyone
Must've been niggers.
>>70794872
Why not?
>>70800994
If you go to highschool that isn't an adult high school you legally still have parental guardians
For fucks sake you can legally still have guardians up until like 21 or something
Learn the Law
>>70801062
Well the law of the land according to , Lawrence v Texas, is that sexual acts between consenting adults are not allowed to be criminalized.
So Texas broke the law and now they will be punished by a lawsuit.
ITT degen kikes pushing for old ugly whores to be getting gangbanged by young upstanding men
*tips vape inhales fedora*
>>70801172
> legally still have guardians up until like 21 or something
source?
becuz thats bullshit dummy
>>70801050
Yes and the state can decide the age of consent and circumstance of consent when it deals with parental guardians
And you can't do anything about it
You don't even know the legal rights of high schoolers
>>70797277
Moth is very cute. Cute!
>>70795299
>Help please this woman is forcing my penis inside her, and those of all my lads!
>>70800994
The children were placed into the school by their parents, funded by the tax dollars of their parents, and there is a clear problem with allowing the people who should be educating to have sex with them. FYI, depending on the charge, sexual harassment can land you in jail.
If you seriously do not understand the need for professional codes of conduct, and how a specific degree of violating that does merit punishment (either civil or criminal depending on the infraction), you are signaling that you are under 18, severely autistic, or have never worked anywhere worth mentioning. The only exception is if you work in high finance where you essentially can still belittle women and get away with it if you are high enough up the chain.
>>70801274
no source.
confirmed for talking out his ass.
The SCOTUS doesn't give two shits about your po-dunk state law.
At the age of majority, you have a constitutional right to have sex with any other consenting adult.
It doesnt matter what their job is, or whether they are gay, or two different races.
Its fucking irrelevant to case law.
>>70794760
>getting mad at this shit
Please
I assumed you were one of those cucks who got mad about women getting off light from sexual crimes by the way your post started
Now I know you're another one of those aoc cucks
>>70801224
Wrong. You are allowed to go to high school until you are 21. After that point you are not allowed on the premises and to finish your education you must take the GED. That is primarily the purpose for its existence. Read a fucking book, autist
>has 3 kids
>lets students gangbang her
damn roasties
>>70801478
And you still think there aren't legal distinctions made for high schoolers
Fucking dumbass
>>70801556
Confirmed single mother
Fuck her desu
She should get locked up longer
>>70794760
A lot of people have said it that teachers can't fuck students but I'll throw in another version.
>company fraternisation policy
Some employers will make you sign this policy in order to prevent abuse of varying degrees.
>want a promotion? Fuck me!
>you fucked me behind your partners back, give me a better wage and I won't tell
Security / armed forces have similar also but it's more intended to prevent leak of vital information via pillow talk rather than just promotion blackmail etc.
>>70801446
>The children
18 year olds are adults, stupid.
>sexual harassment can land you in jail.
no thats a civil matter
lrn 2 law
>If you seriously do not understand the need for professional codes of conduct
and your an idiot who never stepped foot in a law school, or else you would no the difference between criminal conduct and torts.
never date a teacher or a woman that owns a male dog
>>70801653
If they wanted to fuck her so badly why didn't they just drop out?
>>70801546
Learn to read law retard
it doesnt matter whether they're in a high school or not
your are an adult at 18.
and you are imbued with all the rights of an adult on your 18th birthday.
you are clearly an idiot, if you dont know what the age of majority means.
>>70801478
>At the age of majority, you have a constitutional right to have sex with any other consenting adult.
and no american can consume marijuana, yet colorado disagrees
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
>>70801446
>If you seriously do not understand the need for professional codes of conduct
Since when can you be jailed for violating professional codes of conduct?
>>70801772
>your are an adult at 18.
>and you are imbued with all the rights of an adult on your 18th birthday.
including the right to be charged as an adult for breaking student teacher relationship laws
>>70801743
because their constitutional rights aren't suspended at the schoolhouse
>>70794874
Are you surprided? Western World is fucked, in UK you can't defend yourself, in France you're not allowed to have paternity test and forced to feed kid even if you get proof it's not yours, in Sweden there's no freedom of speech, America supports positive racism, Czechia is democracy only on paper...
Everywhere is FUCKED.
>>70801817
since the taxpayers paid for that teachers paycheck
>>70801772
Why would I go to law school when I can just pay lawyers to tell me what to do and actually be gainfully employed without $200K in debt? Math-Stats going into finance.
>>70795508
this
coalburning whore with 3 kids and a husband serving overseas gets train ran on her by niggers, then plays victim when she has to suffer the consequences
on top of that, she's an english teacher
>>70801828
>as an adult for breaking student teacher relationship laws
an completely unconstitutional law that will be struck down on appeal.
just like all the stupid church laws that inbred rednecks like to impose.
>>70801594
You still can't cite the law that was broken because you don't know the law either, dipshit.
>>70801830
the tenth amendment to the constitution disagrees
>>70801871
>Math-Stats going into finance.
better drop out since you don't know what the number 18 means.
>>70801783
So basically you don't know what the constitution is?
>>70801890
>an completely unconstitutional law that will be struck down on appeal.
>just like all the stupid church laws that inbred rednecks like to impose.
what, you mean those inbred states go against federal law? damn those stoners!
>>70801909
14th amendment disagrees
>doesn't know the amendment process
>>70802000
so basically you aren't even going to refute me
Meanwhile
>>70802023
nothing in the 14th amendment about sex
try again
>>70801870
It was unprofessional to bring up penises in a presidential debate as a tax payer employee, so why isn't Little Marco in jail for 5 years?
>>70802022
i dont see what jailing people for sex to appease skylord worshipping cucks has to do with marijuana.
How has nobody asked for the video?
>>70802087
cite the law he broke
wheres the video
>>70800718
What I find puzzling is that most ideologies have something of a utopia. There is a point at which the goals are realized and society enters a golden age. Islamism, nationalism, and communism all have their own end goals, but what is the progressive end game. A system built upon exploiting fault lines and manufactured grievance can possess no fully idealized state.
>>70802100
you claim its against federal law
guess what else is against federal law
>>70801944
Lawyers like you make me wonder why abortion isn't mandatory above a certain level of income
>>70802085
SCOTUS says your stupid
>Kennedy wrote: "The petitioners [Lawrence and Garner] are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime."
Lawrence v Texas
sorry try again in an alternate reality
>>70802048
What is there to refute? The right of the government to ban marijuana isn't in the constitution, your argument is a non sequitur and I pointed out why in my first reply.
>>70802254
cuz poor losers and other parasites are the ones needing abortion.
>>70801772
yeah but the problem is that it's not legal for HER to fuck them.
it has nothing to do with the alleged victim.
it has everything to do with her actions and violations of the code of conduct.
It's against the law, it's called "improper relationship between educator and student" and is a felony in the state of texas.
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/pe/htm/pe.21.htm
shut the fuck up and kill yourself you stupid piece of shit.
>>70802227
i bet you dont know a fucking a thing about what your talking about.
so might as well state ur case.
>>70802150
Its a violation of a professional code of conduct.
>>70801446
What law did OP break?
>>70802339
>is a felony in the state of texas.
and ur stupid fucking state gonna get sued, and that woman is gonna be released from prison and given a nice big paycheck.
and im going to fucking laugh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas
>>70802427
OP didnt break any law newfag
read the story
>>70802455
Do you really believe this or are you baitposting?
>>70801446
You are right that there is a need for such laws.
But your Supreme Court cucked you. Anon here is right >>70801478
Lawrence vs Texas made any law concerning sexual morality between consenting adults unconstitutional.
I don't think these particular laws have been specifically overturned yet. But if the court follows the principles they invented in Lawrence, which they are supposed to, what she did can not be a crime.
>>70795521
Not true. It is plenty legal when it comes to college students. Against school policy a lot of the time but iv'e never heard of a case where a law was on the books so long as there wasn't any abuse of power/special treatment involved.
>>70802578
its like some states cant listen to what the judges say.
this will get overturned 100%
>>70795038
People like this retard are why you're going to lose your rights
>>70802455
>and ur stupid fucking state gonna get sued, and that woman is gonna be released from prison and given a nice big paycheck.
>and im going to fucking laugh
This isn't even unlikely.
She'll cry "I'm a womyn, I'm oppressed" and lawmakers will realize these laws exist only to keep male teachers from banging young girls.
She gets reparations and a pat on the back for what would ruin a man.
And we all shrug as it's fucking expected.
If it was male teacher he'd get more than 5 years. If women get to vote and own property they should get the exact same consequences that men get for breaking the law. It has nothing to do with morals. It's about equality. She got off easy compared to a, man.
>>70802522
Oh yea, we jail people for 5 years without breaking any laws just being unprofessional.
someone find the video
>>70802690
see
sweden knows the drill
>>70801830
Yeah they are
You don't have free speech on campus
>>70802645
>>70794874
Something something about authority
>wanna good grades?
>fuck me first
There is some sense in it. Though more prohibition should be between workers of government structures. No boss fucking.
>>70796987
>PUPPETMASTER
>>70802791
better remind them of this little doozy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinker_v._Des_Moines_Independent_Community_School_District
Every now and then, the tree of liberty must be littered with fresh lawsuits.
>>70802837
screencap if you dont believe me
>>70802896
She had group sex.
Into the degenerate jail she goes.
>>70802942
It's limited free speech lad
Why do you care so much about this?
Honestly?
This is like one of the least significant issues out there but you seem super worked up about it
It's literally the rights of a female slut to fuck her students
Why do you care about it?
It's just some random court case
Did you fuck the slut or something lad?
>>70795121
>parent shouldn't have to worry about kid having sex in college
why are canacucks so retarded?
>>70794760
>18-19yo
>land of the free.jpg
The US Supreme Court ruled that there is a constitutional right to any consensual sexual actvity between adults in Lawrence vs Texas:
>Lawrence explicitly overruled Bowers, holding that it had viewed the liberty interest too narrowly. The Court held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by substantive due process under the 14th Amendment. Lawrence invalidated similar laws throughout the United States that criminalized sodomy between consenting adults acting in private, whatever the sex of the participants.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas
>>70803328
>seem super worked up
>making a post on /pol/
>debating retards
yea sounds like any other thread to me tbqh famalam
lurk more newfag
>>70800994
Idiot.
As a child in the US, you are forced to attend school. The teacher is an agent of the government in charge of you during that time. If you need some reasons why this is illegal, for (You), a pragmatic autist, the reason is that it looks very bad and might cause parents to lose faith in the public school system. For everyone else, it is immoral to abuse authority. For sjws, it is fucking+power = rapism.
>>70803328
>seem super worked
Maybe they just seem super worked up because your opinion was so easily disproven even though they wrote half as much?
>>70794760
>have sex with consenting young adults
>go to prison
Fuck this country.
>>70803841
>As a child in the US, you are forced to attend school.
>child
>18 - 19 years old
wow thats funny all those gangbangers that are 18-21 are just po' chilluns that dont deserve adult trials. k
thats for clearing that up dummy
I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but you guys would have different opinions if the teacher was a man instead of a woman.
>>70803841
>might cause parents to lose faith in the public school system.
shitty education and violence isn't enough to do that.
but the football star fucking his teacher will
good one
autist
americans are so terrified of sex. what a degenerate culture
>>70804037
Wew
I kinda expected you to get caught up on the semantics of my first sentence. Did you like your (You)s tonight?
>>70795783
please respond
>>70804470
>I kinda expected you to get caught up on the semantics
oh so you wanted you words interpreted without any meaning ascribed to them?
thats probably why you keep using the word "child" to describe 18 and 19 yo adults.
>>70804550
go ask the bitch going to jail lol
>>70794760
>things that will never happen to you
Feelsbatman
>>70804281
just like /pol/
>>70804013
Most of the responses in this thread are him desu and he's the OP
>>70803531
The thing is no one cares about this
Personally I don't give a shit about rights
They're spooks
Ahah and I just realized this article was 4 years old holy shit
Nicely memed lad
>>70805084
>Nicely memed lad
thankx i try
:^)
>>70794760
I love a woman getting her come-uppance so this is great news. Hopefully she's stuck in prison for the full five years.
>>70803461
You're missing a major point, which is a major problem when /pol/ pretends to be lawyers:
Lawrence rests on a theory that a law prohibiting homosexual acts between consenting partners in the privacy of their own home deprives them of liberty.
Nevertheless, a law can still survive such a challenge if there is a compelling state interest furthered by the deprivation of liberty, and whether the statute is narrowly-tailored to forward the state interest.
So, in this case: the Texas law prohibiting high school teachers from sleeping with their students can survive scrutiny if Texas is able to demonstrate the above. The legitimate state interest would be something like address sexual corruption and coercion stemming from an abuse of power by state actors (teachers). The law prohibiting teachers from sleeping with students is narrowly-tailored to further that interest. Thus, the law is valid, even though it deprives the sexual partners of a liberty interest.
sooooooooooo video?
