Hourly reminder Trump's policies are the same bullshit supply side Reaganomics that has failed every time. Every time you slash taxes for the rich and spend more on military you get a huge fucking deficit.
>neoliberal who whines and bitches about public debt
fuck off only private debt matters
public debt can be monetized at any time.
>>70780833
Trump's policies are going to just get us into another economic crash. Deregulation of wallstreet is what got us into this mess and Trump wants even MORE deregulation.
>>70780619
Don't give bill clinton credit for being the president when the internet took off. He didn't have anything to do with it. He was just president at the right time.
>>70781060
>Deregulation of wallstreet is what got us into this mess
You mean over-regulation and the government bailing out wallstreet and printing fiat money is what got us into this mess and Trump is the only one who wants to pry the governments hands off of big business.
>>70780619
Looked at how well that worked out for the Obama administration
>>70781617
>Looked at how well that worked out for the Obama administration
>Obama
>progressive
0/10
>>70781660
Who talked about progressive?
>>70781060
>implying I don't know the economy is going to tank hardcore soon
I'm counting on it. Trump's policies will lead to an inert military collecting pay checks while the country experiences massive starvation.
And it's necessary to get the train back on the tracks. I'd rather no one died, but people have been asleep at the wheel for so long regarding fiscal policy, a correction is going to hurt.
We're setting bones here and we have to rebreak that mass before it can properly heal.
>>70780619
Running a bit of a deficit isn't bad. Republican policitians run deficits because they cut taxes. Then when the budget the next year comes in short they have political leverage to cut spending.
It's a tactic.
>>70781060
>Trump wants even MORE deregulation
Trump wants regulation and higher capital gains taxes, the opposite of Reagan. He was against the bailouts.
>>70781531
No it's under regulation
Regan basically legalized Wall Street market manipulation.
Hillary and Bill far far worse than Reagan
See
http://cepr.net/documents/publications/dereg-timeline-2009-07.pdf
>>70781783
after Regan/Clinton there was extreme Wall Street banking consolidation.
This need to be reversed and Bernie is literally too retarded to do it.
>>70781858
How do you cap growth and encourage competition?
>>70781770
>Trump's policies will lead to an inert military collecting pay checks while the country experiences massive starvation
>this is what Bernouts actually believe
Now I understand how you can believe in the magical "free everything" shit. You're not misinformed, you're simply mentally handicapped.
>>70780619
Who controlled Congress during these presidencies?
>>70781783
>Trump wants regulation and higher capital gains taxes, the opposite of Reagan.
Bullshit. he said he wants to abolish a whole bunch of government agencies and his tax policy is the same as bush's, massive tax cuts for him and his billionaire buddies.
>>70782117
>Who controlled Congress during these presidencies?
Bush it was 80% Republican.
>>70781935
you regulate the industry like before deregulation
see
http://cepr.net/documents/publications/dereg-timeline-2009-07.pdf
You need to ensure that banking is decentralized. Otherwise the kikes take over.
>>70782142
>Bullshit. he said he wants to abolish a whole bunch of government agencies
You are confusing him with Cruz
>tax policy is the same as bush's, massive tax cuts for him
Bush cut taxes for the middle class which was good. Trump already said he wants to increase Capital Gains tax which is what is important. Increasing capital gains taxes takes the tax burden off the white working class.
>>70782160
And during the others?
>>70782328
>You are confusing him with Cruz
http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-vows-to-slash-funding-for-education-epa-1452551107
>>70782408
>And during the others?
Reagan had the GOP Senate for a couple of years.
>>70782017
>bernout
I've already voted for trump once, and will do so come general election time.
>it's possible for people to know bad things are inevitable but necessary
I'm guess your command of the english langauge is lacking, or you're incapable of taking a pause to comprehend what someone said.
Protectionist and isolationist policies will lead to a historic economic downturn. Every country that has attempted both thus far has been categorically damaged by them. They just don't work. You can work toward loosening toward a free trade situation, but you cannot suddenly clamp it the other way. It doesn't work like that.
There's going to be all this prime real estate to build and move to the states for corporations, but he won't be in power long enough for anyone to actually see the benefit. And we'll have some other cuck faggot in the seat in time to eliminate anything he does and return us to the downward trajectory. Our only hope is that everyone capable of running in the next cycle just happens to die before they can, and a third party gains prominence.
>>70782328
>Bush cut taxes for the middle class which was good. Trump already said he wants to increase Capital Gains tax which is what is important. Increasing capital gains taxes takes the tax burden off the white working class.
No it won't you stupid fuck. He said himself we should have LOW wages. That means he wants to lower our wages to "compete" with the rest of the world.
>>70782413
>common core
oh fuck off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ8Nr3_2724
>>70782435
Cool, who controlled it a majority of the time during Reagan and Bush, who controlled it during Clinton?
>>70782549
>He said himself we should have LOW wages
He wants to block mass immigration and outsourcing specifically to ensure high wages in the US, dumbass.
>>70782578
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ8Nr3_2724
>I don't know what Common core is, but Obama supports it so it's anti-white
>>70782413
>paywall
fuck off
>>70781060
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Housing_Act
>>70782468
>isolationist policies will lead to a historic economic downturn
Except Trump isn't an isolationist
>protectionist
Yeah, totally didn't lift a hundred or two million people in China from poverty, you dumb fucking nigger.
>>70782647
>He wants to block mass immigration and outsourcing specifically to ensure high wages in the US, dumbass.
Donald Trump: 'Having a low minimum wage is not a bad thing
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/20/donald-trump-having-low-minimum-wage-not-bad-thing/
Trump also said this again in a debate. You ready to lick the boots of your capitalist overlords you stupid fuck?
>>70782413
>he thinks this is bad
lol
>>70782549
Low wages coupled with less tax burden results in a neutral net outcome and a more competitive local job market.
It's not that hard. You pay less in tax, the milk costs less, you get a lighter paycheck. No difference now as before other than shit's cheaper and you need less money for the same services.
>make 200 dollars in a week
>milk costs 4 bucks a gallon
>make 150 dollars in a week
>milk costs 3 bucks a gallon
Shit like that.
>>70782742
His policies are half retarded, a third make sense, and the rest is outright Nazism. If you support this guy you deserve what you get.
>>70782656
If you unironically support common core, you're as retarded as the kids that graduate from it.
Clintons got lucky with the rise of computers. He didn't do shit to get that money.
>>70782776
>You pay less in tax,
Roads are gone, bridges are gone, library is gone, public works are gone, etc.
>>70781060
This was incredibly non descriptive and vague, sounds like your repeating something that your liberal aunt told you but you dont really understand
>>70782739
>low minimum wage=low wage is good and high wages are bad
Jesus you are one special kind of fucking retard
>>70782843
>rest is outright Nazism
Point out the policies that resemble National Socialism.
>>70782739
>limosine liberals think
newsflash genius mass immigration brings down middle class wages not minimum wage
minimum wage is a literal non issue unless you are a liberal trying to keep everyone a happy wage slave.
>>70782843
>If you support this guy you deserve your country being made great again
Yeah I'd say so
>>70782949
>Point out the policies that resemble National Socialism.
What don't? The whole "killing the family members of ISIS" sounds like Nazism.
>>70782950
but in reality people on minimum wage will always need welfare
the idea is to keep as many people off minimum wage as possible
>>70782435
I'll answer you you. When Republicans control Congress, which has a greater effect on the economy, we do well fiscally. When Democrats control it, things go to shit.
>>70782913
>Roads are gone, bridges are gone, library is gone, public works are gone, etc.
funded by the state taxes
>>70782709
>trump isn't isolationist
His policies will lead to isolation. And I like isolationism. You charge countries for military protection, they'll opt for no military protection. They're going to decline to pay for our military. They just are. If not, they're going to have to cut their budgets to afford our military and I doubt they can entice europeans to be ok with paying americans with their taxes. So troops will be recalled and otherwise do little other than maintain or camp out people that paid their protection money.
>it worked for china
It's hard for it to fail when the current state was already utter starvation and massive genocide of political dissidents. Way to cherry pick outcomes though. Consider context. The US is in a completely different situation than communist china was. Like i said, you can work toward a looser market, but you cannot do the opposite. Shit's going to break. Then when the dust settles you can start again from a restrictive market and loosen it up to appeal to businesses.
>>70782656
>be victim of common core
>mfw people support it
>>70782950
>newsflash genius mass immigration brings down middle class wages not minimum wage
No it doesn't. BIG CORPORATIONS exploiting undocumented workers do, but if you legalize them all and give them workers rights and union and pay them the same wages..
>>70780619
All of these are liberal neocons fucks. the only reason clinton had a surplus is because he stole from Social Security to do it. none of these are fiscal conservatives.
>>70780619
Someone have the Obama edit of this?
>>70783129
>funded by the state taxes
Wait I though you said they pay less taxes?
>>70783059
>killing the family members of ISIS sounds like Nazis
>90% of Belgian muslim teens support terrorists
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/08/world/europe/belgium-brussels-islam-radicalization.html
Trump's policies are just common sense at this point
>>70783154
>none of these are fiscal conservatives.
Neither is trump so what's your point?
>>70783059
>killing the accomplices of terrorists is like gassing some store owner who happens to be Jewish
Proud Berntard, ladies and gents.
>>70783059
>sounds like
Sounds like, or is? You're not citing allegories. So I'm going to assume you're a moron or too lazy to do any real research. Give your employer his money back.
>>70780619
Daily reminder that pol is being shilled hourly.
>implying that supply side economics can work when you also have free trade
>>70783181
>committing literal war crimes
>common sense!
>>70783059
No, it sounds like someone who understands the culture of who we're fighting. These people still believe in blood fueds, who will seek vengeance. If you're not willing to wage total war against a foe like that, then don't attack them at all.
But go on, tell us what other policies are National Socialism.
>>70783138
>exploiting undocumented workers do,
They are exploiting the middle class by letting in illegal aliens and lowering the wages of the middle class working whites.
>>70783225
>women and children dead
>ah who cares they are sandnigs!!!!!!!1!!
>>70783257
>killing ISIS supporters
>crimes
kek
>>70783259
>No, it sounds like someone who understands the culture of who we're fighting.
I wonder what's going to happen to all those family members not killed on drone strikes? Hmmmm surly there won't be any blow back from doing this and won't lead to more terrorist attacks.
>>70780619
Economic policy takes many years to have a tangible effect on the economy.
Most people are entirely ignorant of economics. They presume that current economic conditions are a result of current government. The reality is that it is a result of past government.
For example, here in Canada our economic situation is decent compared to what it was in 2008. It still isn't wonderful by any stretch of the imagination, but compared to the rest of the Western world we're doing fine. This is a result of the Harper government (who had a masters degree in economics) keeping our economy stable. Now the Trudeau government is in power and things seem to be good.... but this has absolutely nothing to do with Trudeau. In fact, the policies enacted by Trudeau so far threaten to hurt our economy in the future. But, since he is following a stable period created by a conservative government, the ignorant Canadian public believes that he is helping the economy.
Basically what I'm saying is that the public is so fucking ignorant of how economics work that they do not give credit where it is due. Liberals get into power and fuck things up and push the country into poor conditions. Voters then turn to conservatives during hard times. Conservatives clean up the mess the liberals created. Voters then get complacent during good times and turn to weak liberal governments who make them feel good. This is the political cycle.
>>70783138
Then why have them at all when we could just pay Americans?
>>70783338
how are children and babies ISIS supporters?
>>70783290
>muslims
>people
>>70783373
>>70783366
>Then why have them at all when we could just pay Americans?
Because Americans are literally not having kids, we need more immigrants to keep our population stable you stupid fuck.
>>70783290
>the wife totally had no idea her husband was about to blow up a dozen civilians
#ListenAndBelieve
>>70783338
>he's still looking around and blinking
spooky
>>70783347
What?
>>70783434
>>70783169
state tax =/= federal tax
If I don't want to pay a state tax, I can move states. If I don't want to pay a federal tax, I have to leave the country.
Take a civics course.
And for the record, there's a fucking mountain of government agencies and public sector contracts that will be on the chopping block before roads and hospitals and shit.
>>70783440
So during WW II we should have killed the family members of Nazis and imperial Japanese soldiers?
>>70783131
>shits going to break ;-;
Don't be retarded. The trade balance between America and China is so one-side that the mere threat of American tariffs will have the Chinese scrambling to the table to negotiate. It's unlikely a tariff on Chinese good would ever actually happen. And even if it did - so fucking what? Oh noes, Trump accelerated the current slow trickle of businesses back from China and to American soil.
You're being alarmist for no reason.
>>70783436
holy fuck please kill yourself
a lower population means lower prices, nothing is better than having a decreasing population for cost of living
>>70783436
No we don't, we still have a growing population (albeit not growing as fast as it once was). Try again.
>>70780619
You forgot a President.
>>70783478
>If I don't want to pay a state tax, I can move states. If I don't want to pay a federal tax, I have to leave the country.
Yeah except your meme has been shown to be a failure in Kansas faggot. Slashing taxes leads to your state turning into shit.
>>70783355
This, bill clinton signed the deregulation bill that lead to the financial crisis as well as NAFTA killing the manufacturing sector. Yes these were bipartisan bills.
>>70783469
>>70783576
>>70780619
So how do you chart Obama adding 10 trillion?
>>70783436
aha! the troll has revealed itself
>>70783514
>a lower population means lower prices, nothing is better than having a decreasing population for cost of living
That's bullshit though. An older population can't maintain itself without a younger population. How we doing to maintain the welfare state if we are all old?
>>70783496
>terrorists
>the same as a country's official military
Typical Berntard autist, ladies and gents. When you're sub-70 IQ and proud of it.
>>70783496
that's what dresden, tokoyo, hiroshimah and nagasaki was for
>>70783563
>Yes these were bipartisan bills.
Neocons and cuckservatives are a branch of the Democrat Party anyway
>>70780619
Shut your fucking mouth. You limey cunt. I will nail your scrotum to a grind saw. I will devastate your anus with my massively erect penis.
Then I will rape your friends and immediate family members. I will even cum in your crusty grandmothers twat. Then when I am finished with her I will unplug her life support and bend her over for seconds.
>>70783496
Were the Germans or Japanese cultures ones that practice blood feuds and vengeance?
>>70783516
>we still have a growing population
How many kids does your average American have since 2008? I'm waiting......
>>70783508
>it will have china negotiate
China doesn't need american consumers. All the corporations are moving to mainland china.
Pop your heads out of your asses. It's not that fucking hard to understand how economies relate and what's been happening for the last 20 years.
>>70783622
>An older population can't maintain itself without a younger population
By your retard logic a population can literally never decrease or else apocalypse
You are so fucking retarded it's almost insane.
Japan is currently having an increase in living standards due to a lower population.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/due-to-a-lack-of-mass-immigration-japan-is-plagued-by-a-rising-standard-of-living/
>>70783496
We killed about a million Japanese citizens even before the atomic bombs
Fire bombings destroyed civilians
>>70783639
>Were the Germans or Japanese cultures ones that practice blood feuds and vengeance?
There was literal kids at the end of 1945 in Germany going around shooting at American troops.
In Japan, they would take planes and blow them up in ships.
Literally no different than what happens today you stupid fuck.
>>70783665
>It's not that fucking hard to understand how economies relate and what's been happening for the last 20 years.
it is though. I don't know what the fuck is going on.
>>70783496
We DID
>>70783558
>politicians have been shitty
>why do you want to shut down public sector infrastructure?
I WONDER WHY!?
>>70783723
>We killed about a million Japanese citizens even before the atomic bombs
Was that a specific American policy to kill women and children?
>>70783665
>China doesn't need american consumers.
do you take pills to make you this retarded?
>>70783661
Please cite the source that says we have a negative growth rate. I'll wait.
>>70783755
>We DID
Again, was it a SPECIFIC military policy to target and kill women and children?
>>70783774
Yes
Holy SHIT
>>70783661
>current growth rate: +0.77% (wikipedia and quandl)
Looks good to me
>>70783774
Yes, destroy the average citizen and make the survivors homeless (women and children) to make the men surrender fighting.
Guys check out "The Trump Effect" before the EA Cucks take it down.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7F082JKzJqE
.........
Plus check out this brand new short Trump video "The Evolution of Donald J Trump" right here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ofZsphTPf-U
>>70783735
Cool. Back in Germany, if someone 300 years ago killed someone else's great great grand uncle, did they still hate that family and occasionally kill a member? Because that shit still goes on in the Middle-east and every other region you see Muslims.
>>70783789
whites have lower birth rates
without mass immigration this would mean lower costs and a higher standard of living
with mass immigration it means higher prices and endless debt bubbles
>>70780619
You forgot obama, he's up to 19trillion and counting
>>70780619
>Surplus is good
>The president writes the Fiscal policy
Seriously both of those memes need to die
>>70783804
its pretty hard to target anything in a B-29.
>>70783959
Surplus isn't good
it drains money and demand out of the real economy
>>70783999
It's pretty easy to target civilian areas which they did
>>70783804
Listen pal, we killed fucking everybody in an attempt to weaken their national unity and force a surrender. This was rationalized as moral, because in the end it would SAVE hundreds of thousands, or millions lives.
We didn't go into Japan to win the hearts and minds of the fucking japanese, we went in there to fuck their shit up and force them to surrender through military might. Now Japan is one of our top 3 allies and one of the most scientifically progressive and democratic nations on the planet.
We did fucking good you faggot, and it was because we TRIED to win a war.
>>70783804
I was in the Marine Corps and would have no problem killing ISIS families. Alligators don't get born from rabbits, their family is other alligators. Either be willing to take them all out, or don't fight them.
>>70783204
What does Trump have to do with my point. I support the Pauls and will not be satisfied either way in this thing but will pull for Trump to get the nomination simply respect for the people.
>>70783774
Citizens working in factories that produce munitions for the war effort are targets.
Blowing up their homes and otherwise disrupting a nation's resolve or ability to make war is part of war. A member of a nation that stays in the nation is either combatant or a fool.
That was one of the last real nation v nation wars. We do proxy war shit now.
>>70783788
Relate it to all chinese world trade. How much of their GDP is american money, and how much longer can america pay that portion? Have some sense.
>>70783789
Most children born in the US are now hispanic. It dwarfs both white and black populations.
>>70782739
A low wage isn't a problem with a low cost of living, dingus
>>70784082
There are endless propaganda videos of ISIS training children
They're proud of it
>>70784082
thank you for your service lcpl fatass
>>70784157
Still not a negative rate, just not as high.
>>70784239
That's Sergeant Doublerats to you.
>>70784157
If it wasn't for the US China would have a deficit and not a surplus
millions of jobs have gone form the US to China because of our retarded trade policies that no one else on earth has.
>>70780619
No they're not. He is against open trade and shipping jobs over seas to maximize profits for those at the top. Trumps economic plan works for blue collar and white collar middle class workers and hurts the upper class.
>>70784178
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQQofc-jf5Q&nohtml5=False
>>70780619
> not understanding why Trump's pandering to the Reaganomics esque economy is more of a political tactic than what he believes works.
>Not understanding Clinton did more damage to the economy even though his presidency saw a surplus due to factors outside of government control
>>70784360
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVxZfP1fC_I
>>70783665
>China doesn't need american consumers
America buys billions of dollars worth more of goods from China than China buys from them.
Sure, they don't "need" America if they're willing to go through an enormous and immediate economic crisis that destroys the one-party state.
>>70784157
>Relate it to all chinese world trade. How much of their GDP is american money, and how much longer can america pay that portion? Have some sense.
You're a fucking retard.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonchang/2012/01/22/china-is-175-6-dependent-on-the-u-s/#175ee08e7e34
>America stops buying Chinese goods
>China enters an immediate trade deficit with the whole world.
>>70783804
>no I didn't watch Grave of the Fireflies because anime is for horse fuckers
>>70784442
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4da_1449237693
>>70784341
>good for low income
>bad for upper class
It's bad for the upper upper class. We're talking a fraction of a top 1% upper class.
It's good for medium size businesses that can't afford to relocate to another country for better taxes and regulations. It's good for competition, basically. Bad for monopoly.
>>70782739
When jobs are outsourced that leaves less jobs here in the country.
When jobs are given to illegal immigrants that leaves less jobs here in the country.
Less jobs means more competition for those jobs.
More competition means less value for those jobs.
It's simple supply and demand.
The numbers on the paycheck don't mean a damn thing if the dollar isn't worth shit.
>>70781783
This. Fuck the Clintons. They were the Reagan's 2.0
>>70780619
>>70781060
Obama had a 1.3 TRILLION deficit during his first term. :) Most of the second as well! :^)))
According to your image in the OP, that must make him literally Hitler.
>>70784157
>>70784082
>>70784062
>>70784047
>>70783922
>>70783804
Looks like OP hasn't made another post, everyone pack it up and go home because it looks like we won
It's a good thing we told him he was a fucking retard instead of trying to win his heart and mind
Not a sing
>>70780619
Regan actually created a laissez faire economy that was growing very healthily.
However, due to politics and timing, Clinton rode the success of Regans policy and got bonus points for the .com boom.
This is nothing but Marxist propaganda you failure.
>>70784568
And he gave trillions to wall street (Goldman Sachs) too
but apparently he is a liberal hero.
>>70782160
For four years out of 8. :))))
>>70782142
Proof? :)))))
>>70784458
>china enters a trade deficit
And that relates to the american system bottoming out, how?
Like the last time this was done, prices went up, voters threw a shitfit, and eventually companies left or went under.
China will withstand the downturn because we have much more to lose than they do and they want to maintain the status quo that's benefiting them. You don't give up just because projections would show a decline. They have a system they're benefiting from, they're not going to play nice just cuz. It's a matter of two people holding their breath and the american economy has much smaller lungs currently and they know it. It's the same shit OPEC tried to drive american frakking out of business.
Us national debt just after Obama was elected
>>70785080
Current us debt. 8 years and almost 10 trillion more debt for the win.
>>70784655
Added; one can argue that the build up of the military destroyed the USSR and more private contractors were probably working, creating more jobs in the private sector.
Further, nothing sells better than the improvement of survival. -the militaries only business strategy.
>>70784489
https://www.clarionproject.org/news/islamic-state-video-shows-8-year-olds-learning-how-kill
>>70785142
Nice thumbnail
>>70781060
Actually most of Trump's policies are surprisingly liberal.
>>70784859
>And that relates to the american system bottoming out, how?
Who was talking about the American system? You asserted that China doesn't need America, and we all pointed out that it manifestly does.
>China will withstand the downturn because we have much more to lose than they do and they want to maintain the status quo that's benefiting them.
American voters would be pissed off and vote Trump out. The Chinese people would revolt. The one party state has enough trouble keeping the lid on people's desire for democratic reform. Without economic goodies to bribe them with, the state will not survive.
>You don't give up just because projections would show a decline. They have a system they're benefiting from, they're not going to play nice just cuz.
China doesn't have a choice. They'll either nut up and deal with it, or they'll hold their breath and kill themselves.
1/2
>>70784859
>>70785762
>It's a matter of two people holding their breath and the american economy has much smaller lungs currently and they know it. It's the same shit OPEC tried to drive american frakking out of business.
Toppest of kek. First of all, OPEC simply tried to drive out American business by overproduction. They crashed the price of oil, and it worked in the short term because fracking is more expensive than traditional oil. But it's not a viable solution because OPEC countries' budgets depends on far larger oil revenues than they're getting now. The policy works, but the reduced revenue can't sustain the welfare state they use to bribe their population away from revolt. Kind of like China really.
The American economy is far more resilient than China's economy is. Don't try to pretend it's not. America is a fully industrialized first world nation with an enormous bounty of natural resources and technological expertise. China is partially industrialized at best, with a demographic situation as stable as an eight foot tall stack of oreos and a one horse economy entirely built on selling to one consumer.
If America cut ties with China, they'd enter economic shock as their corporations rushed to try and cross the Pacific again and the people in general faced short term spikes in the prices of cheap goods.
On the Chinese side, the state would collapse. Combined with the unstable yuan, the loss of American demand would cripple their economy and send the country into deep recession. The sudden loss of economic prosperity would combine with the discontent with the Chinese one party dictatorship and it would be Chinese Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo.
2/2
>us debt after 8 years of hillary
>pic related
>>70785248
Click on the pic. I just took a screenshot of current us debt clock and posted that up and it put that layer over top? It show debt clock when you click on it
>>70784082
>I was in the Marine Corps
So you a degenerate cock sucker.
>>70786094
Yeah, I know. It's just funny to have that image replace the thumbnail, and in this thread.
