http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/12/swiss-banker-whistleblower-cia-behind-panama-papers.html
At this point everyone at Wikileaks have denounced the Panama Papers as they are funded by Soros etc. Even Julian Assange. But there is one motherfucker that is itching the back of my neck because he keeps shilling the shit out of the Panama Papers. Edward Snowden.
I really hope he's just a naive idiot like Justin Trudeau. But could he be a CIA plant, or something worse?
Called it like 2 hours after the headlines.
Snowden was officially CIA before he joined Booz Allen Hamilton (the contractor he was working for when he betrayed the US government), and you know what they say about ex-CIA.
>caring about who is responsible
>THE SOURCE DICTATES IF THE FACTS ARE RELIABLE
Go back to watching RT anon
>>70757978
in this exact case the source of the leak is very important. it's important because of the angle international media consortium funded by Soros and USAid is trying to put on this story:
on the day of the leak all international newspapers involved came out with Putin's face on their covers, implying that they found his dirty little secret. Turns out, Putin himself wasn't mentioned even once in leaked docs. But that's enough to put a dark spot on his reputation. Enough for useful retards, who already refer to Putin as 'Dictator who kills journalists and political opponents'.
>>70758676
What do you faggots care what the western world thinks of your leader -- I'm sure you understand our president is a weak limp wrist apologist. But the shit in the documents is real whether uncovered by kikes0rs or the CIA, although Putin isn't in it -- but I never claimed he was -- only liberal media kikes did.
>>70756734
Came here to say this. Actually it was more like,
Anyone hear that phone ringing? Because I called it!
But that sounded really gay, so take this as a bump.
>>70756324
Snowden's just shilling so he can see America again before he dies. Dude doesn't actually want to live in Russia, he's already given them all of the intelligence he can offer them.
>>70759092
the "leak" was a CIA attack on Putin. That's why we care. It's a part of new cold war, an attempt to destabilize our society, to ignite the protests.
Yes, it was probably based on real source. But the only goal was to attack Russia, all other intel regarding other countries were leaked only to create an image of real "independent" leaker. Even some of european leaders were thrown under the bus to create that impression.
And I really doubt that all data in Russian part of the leak is real and not forged, forged by some shitty lazy CIA operator.
>>70759896
Just help china with their gold backed yuan already and get this party started.
I've got some looting to do.
>>70759896
Meh, I just wish our countries could get along. I don't understand why it always has to be the west vs east. Oh well maybe if Trump is president things will be at least a little different.
>>70759896
cry about it.
>>70756324
The data is real, even the former king of Spain, under her sister's name, is there.
Probably done by a Western secret service. CIA number one suspect.
It is risible that Panama itself was created by Teddy Rooselvelt and JP Morgan
>>70759896
>0.00001% documents about Russians
>it is attack against Putin!
Russians still believe that they are center of teh unverse.
Soros is behind it.
>>70760022
you wish, we'll kick your ass
https://youtu.be/tXxV616uXuQ?t=183
>>70760798
It is an attack against Putin proving the he does not believe his own words about a strong Russia.
Don't try to hide your money from the anglos in a tax heaven created by them.
(ALL have been created by them)
>>70756734
>This.
Everything just seemed so controlled, like the Ashley Madison leaks.
Mossack Fonseca isn't even a big dog as far as tax havens and launderers go. The HSBC scandal received less coverage than this.
>>70760798
niggah, that's exactly my point, only you are too dumb to think it through to the end:
>0.00001% documents about Russians
>no mention of Putin in the leaks
>yet all newspapers came out with his portrait on the cover
>>70760022
>China
>Gold backed currency
Nigga do you even economics? A weak floating fiat currency is what the PRC needs to stay afloat with production. If they ever went to a pegged currency they would enter into a massive deflationary spiral.
>>70756324
Of course Snowden works for the CIA, everything he disclosed was not only already known but it impacted every single other govt agency, all the way down to local police except the CIA.
>>70761099
>Everything just seemed so controlled
If I had to guess I'd say there's some major infighting inside the top level agencies at the moment that probably somewhat mirrors the general population's sentiments.
>>70761091
Putin doesn't need to hide his money. Russian government openly buys US treasury bonds m8.
http://ticdata.treasury.gov/Publish/mfh.txt
>>70756324
snowden is controlled opposition so diaf
>>70760022
>he doesnt know that China will probably abandon BRICs now that it got more votes for IMF policies
>he thinks BRICs was something more than sword rattling directed at the IMF
wew lad
>>70757812
what do they say about ex cia?
>>70761356
>If I had to guess I'd say there's some major infighting inside the top level agencies at the moment that probably somewhat mirrors the general population's sentiments.
Yes and no, the leaders know what is going on and what is planned for the future. Right now they are just laying the pieces out in such a fashion that they will be easy to remove once the ball gets rolling.
>>70761640
That you never leave The Company.
>>70761640
That there is no such thing.
>>70756324
He's CIA.
Notice how the whole Snowden affair damaged their main rivals - the NSA
>>70756324
>2001+15.
>not knowing Snowden was intended to normalize the concept of citizens being under government survalience 24 hours a day.
I can't even...
>>70761640
Once a pig always a pig.
>>70761781
>rivals
They are not rivals, the CIA was just loosing control over their pet and just like training a dog a firm hand is needed to show who is in control.
>>70761662
I'm not entirely sold on the notion that the course of civilization can be planned that far out with that level of accuracy. I could buy a kind of fuzzy planning that points it in the general direction and gives it a poke when it starts to stray but I'd need some serious convincing on the world as a chessboard type scenario.
>/pol/ was right
I fucking love this board, it's like having a two week head start over the usual media outlets.
>>70761428
Top kek. I have been in tax havens, and the advertising in the luxury stores was in Russian.
Nice disinformation try, by the way. To all parts, east and west
>>70761781
>He's CIA
Dr Pavel
>>70756324
No links to said denouncement? Wouldn't shock me though, snowden's been a shill since the beginning
>>70762117
Then you need to subscribe to Foreign Affairs and start reading their archives from 30-40 years ago where they predict what will be happening now in geopolitics with a startling degree of accuracy.
>>70756734
This. It was too convenient.
>>70760022
China's economy is a bubble waiting to pop. They've just announced plans to build 10,000 football stadiums over the next 10 years apparently because they want to nurture the home talent. Whats more likely is that it'll created building contracts to keep the bubble from bursting a while longer
>>70762321
30-40 years isn't as far out as I was thinking. I got the impression you were referring to an absolute endgame scenario that could be a few hundred years out.
>>70760798
This
>>70760101
The significnce of WW 2 is never done justice in the history books; There were tension at the end of the war, and this consciousness has reverberated through each successive generation ever since. It's a damn shame.
>>70762623
Well there is an endgame, complete control. The path there though is only planned out 40 years in advance or so. My point is that if you know where to look those in control will state plainly for the masses what is going to happen, it is just that because it happens decades after they say it people forget. Each day we have a new normal thrust on us and the next new normal is always one step in the wrong direction further than the last.
>>70762321
like who, besides samuel huntington
Dr. Pavel?
>>70762804
If that's what you're talking about I'd agree with you then. It's hard to tell on /pol/ if someone is talking about these things being planned down to minute 200 years ago in a Freemason temple or if someone has a more grounded view on how things are planned.
>>70761428
must be uncomfortable to be so full of shit it's spilling out of your mouth.
>>70763012
Well the overarching plan is very old, as I said earlier the methodology used to attain it though is changed and modified to make it more and more effective as time goes on.
>>70762881
What, do you mean which articles one should look at in the archives?
>>70759456
>>70761099
>>70762339
I was the obnoxious German who made all the threads btw.
>>70756324
>CIA is responsible for Panama Papers
Wrong, putin did it.
http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/04/07-panama-papers-putin-gaddy
>>70763508
Like I said I can buy an old plan with constant revisions.
>>70763637
Good, I replied to a couple of your threads.
>>70763641
>http://www.brookings.edu
>trusting the Brookings Institute
wew lad
>>70763823
You were the bumpitalian.
>>70763827
Oh come on, it's 2016!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/04/09/the-not-completely-crazy-theory-that-russia-leaked-the-panama-papers/
>>70757812
>exposes clearly illegal shit a US Government agency is doing
>betrayed the US Government
lol...wut?
>>70763641
>>70764037
>oi vei, our original story is falling apart, we did a shitty job, so let's better create a cover for ourselves and put all the blame on russians!
>one way or another, we will finally get them!
>>70756324
Why wouldn't Snowden be pro-whistleblowing/leaks?
>>70763641
I've heard this too
They've theorized the maybe he did it as a potential fuck over tool for upcoming elections.
Or maybe he did it to rid the Kremlin of some of the people trying to oust him out of power.
>>70764168
You've to agree they're pretty consistant.
>>70763641
>>70764378
also I've heard theories that they didn't release American names so they could potentially use it as a bargaining tool for upcoming negotiations
>>70756734
>>70761099
Exactly.
I'm shocked they never found something about the br politicians (from all parties) or Globo (br media conglomerate) related with Mossack Fonseca when even the federal police confirmed their ties. HSBC was involved with everybody and no one cares.
>>70764378
Operation Mockingbird went global some years ago. Snowden is one because mainstream covers him. Remember in these troubling times, censorship is more about what is not covered.
>>70764082
I thought the shit he exposed was legal under the Patriot Act, and that was the complaint.
>>70761008
No, you'd help us (rebels, patriots) take back our country.
Putin doesn't want a ground war in america. Send us aid and Ivans, and we'll take care of the rest.
>>70761235
They plan on inflating the price of gold. Think 20 to 50k an ounce.
>>70765317
Do you have any link from someone who doesn't happen to sell gold?
>>70766560
Does Bloomberg count?
Granted, it's a hypothetical based on the reserves we ASSUME china has. Still an interesting read.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-20/chinese-gold-standard-would-need-a-rate-50-times-bullion-s-price
>>70765086
some of it, the rest was not and even if it was, we were never told that it was happening
>>70764863
>censorship is more about what is not covered
Yup. Once you start paying attention to what's not being said, you see a lot more.
The dude is an obvious head fake of an agent.
Once you leave the company then you go to work
>>70767226
Is silver too abundant/useful to back a currency? It's been spiking lately.
