http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/careers/army/enlisted/2016/04/08/army-enlists-first-female-infantry-recruit/82807418/
I wonder if she has nudes
Whats term for "on leave due to pregnancy"?
>>70734235
Honorable discharge
>>70734276
While you're not necessarily incorrect, it's a "maternity discharge"
>>70733895
She won't leave the base, wherever she ends up beeing deployed.
I thought women were already in the army???
>>70733895
What are the physical requirements for an infantry troop?
>>70734526
Non combat arms roles only. Support, admin, etc.
>>70734526
Only for photo ops, we don't trust them in combat.
>>70734526
why the fuck do we still use m4s
>>70734758
whats wrong with them?
>>70733895
So how long do you give her /pol/?
>>70734758
Because there's nothing wrong with it
>>70734667
>>70734628
well what makes op girl so special?
is she really stronk?
>>70733895
>My gun keeps jamming, se-"
I give her a week.
>>70734628
so now when they're out in battle male soldiers have to smell her fîshy period vagina
It's over. America had a good run while it lasted.
>>70734758
Because anything more "modern" would require a shit ton of money for marginal benefits.
>>70733895
she's super cute :3
>>70734575
Depends what unit you're in to be honest. Mechanized Infantry units are maybe less strenuous but you still have to be in good shape with PT runs etc: Now in straight up Infantry units like the electric strawberry you're in for a much tougher physical time. Forced road marches etc:
My issue is this however. There were times when I came back to base in the same underwear I left in 2 weeks prior. Showering was impossible within mission parameters. How could a female possibly deal with that?
>>70734235
>>70734276
Vaginal discharge
>>70734933
Probably give away their position eventually and they will all get killed and come to be known as the Menstruation Massacre.
>>70734758
Funny you should mention that. I just saw a video of someone's short-stroke piston "M4".
For some reason, the extractor assembly was getting all battered and chewed up.
ERMAGERD SHORT STOKE PISTON THING WILL SAVE US ALL
>>70735079
topkek
It's just a matter of time before she comes down with a hip injury because the equipment isn't designed for her and she sues for lots of money because that's actually cheaper for the military than spending billions on new equipment specifically designed for a woman's body.
Yah diversity
>>70733895
I give her about 2 months at best.
>>70734235
Convalescent leave. Father's get it as well but women have the option to separate if they want to after birthing a child.
>>70734985
Fucking nice.
>>70733895
>>70734985
that's going to become the new army slang for dd for sure
>>70733895
So they lowered the standards? Don't see how she could pass without that happening.
>>70735160
i give her 9 months
>>70735282
more like this?
>>70735282
What's funny i that even with an exoskeleton, they would probably still underperform since their psychology, which is 100% genetic, isn't suited too combat.
>>70735282
>>70735371
>>70733895
>>70733895
>fat face
>saggy body
Lacking strength and will struggle with endurance due to lack of testosterone.
If you allow women in the infantry, there is no point in having an age limit.
The whole point of having an age is limit (normally 32 for infantry) is because mens testosterone drops at a rate of 0.5% each year (on average from 32), making small drops in test significantly harder to recover from endurance and strength training, which causes more injuries. It's why older men struggle, because their body doesn't repair the same as a 25 year old man.
So a women who has extremely high testosterone, doesn't even have as much testosterone as really low test beta male.
Therefore If you allow women in the infantry, who can join despite the same risks that bar 32+year old men from joining. Then there no point in an age limit.
A 20yo women has the test as a 60yo man.
>>70735371
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCVHw5yJEJc
>>70735389
they'll be out in the battlefield designating combat safe spaces and bending over for the ragheads in the middle of a fight just like in germany
>>70735389
Are women best suited for higher positions? Don't you have a lot of tranny generals?
Things are going off the rails.
It boggles my mind that intelligent people can't agree that males are better for the army.
It really is a form of sickness. We are indulging in delusional loopyness. It can't last
>>70733895
Any chance for her to be real life Operator Chan?
>>70735447
i could be her target and i'd be less scared of that gun than she is
>>70735447
oh that's a keeper
>>70735502
>earns expert field medical badge
>ends up in coma
>>70735546
We're going the same way.
Looks like we'll be opening the infantry ro women too this Autumn.
Channel 4 has already started the SJW propaganda. The shoes they're putting out now on at the 9pm main slot are all about women in the military and women being as strong as men. Clearly edited too.
>>70735156
this
>>70735447
tfw no helpless unqualified qt wannabe soldier gf
>>70734976
Implying she'll ever be deployed
>>70735502
she could've shot herself a few times there.
if she was a dude would be she be mocked relentlessly, or would she receive encouragement (albeit to a much smaller degree)?
>>70734855
Forever. They will protect her to keep their Image and the narrative up. In fact i bet she might get some medal in a year for doing nothing
>>70735950
it's so obvious they shouldn't take on such roles
>>70735502
In the full vise there's a guy you can see who was beside her, clearly stayed with her and provably helped. You can see him casually strolling towards the finish at the end.
I fear the future.
Armored cav unit. If anything i put money that female scouts will be the gunners and all i see i failures at gunnerys and smoking Bradleys in a combat zones
>>70734985
Underrated
>>70733895
US Army has been reduced to a politically-correct joke of a vehicle for political correctness and social justice for a long time now. My condolences. We're sadly following in the latter part of this year.
>>70735810
>we're just as good as you
>waaah why were we made to be just as good as you?
>>70734758
Because its the good guy gun
>>70733895
can a female even carry the full fieldpack load + body armour + wrapped in the body vest nonsense + rifle and grenade launcher?
and what happens when she has her period in the field?
female soldiers will just get preferential treatment like always
>>70734855
It will depend on her character and her sense of personal discipline. Her chain of command has no inclination to keep an inevitable failure-to-adapt washout around, but if she fits, fine.
Her recruiter is probably getting either an endless stream of fucked up phone calls, or is going through smaj school now.
>>70733895
this will be used by women to complain that american men can't even protect their own women. just give it time
>>70735447
>>70735282
tfw no based commie sniper gf from WW2
>>70736205
nevermind that, can a female carry or even drag a wounded male comrade to cover, much less get him to da choppa?
>>70733895
Dude, it's 2016.
[spoiler] Every whore has nudes [/spoiler]
>>70735447
I want to cuddle that so hard
>>70733895
what a time to be a terrorist.
That bitch is going to get knocked up by an E5 in less than a month. She won't be able to do the job. Shit I'm a decently built male in the infantry and dread the prospect of having to fireman carry some 225lb motherfucking in full kit if shit goes down.
It is an absolute embarrassment and travesty that the military is caving to political correctness.
Pls Trump Make America Great Again.
eh i really doubt its going to be some 50% bullshit. hundreds of thousands of women took part in stalingrad and they performed just fine. im sure the few women that make it through can perform as well as the average dude.
>>70736422
Topkek
>>70736422
>>70735468
When is someone going to sue the military for ageism?
>>70736576
desu the russians were not models of efficacy they had 9 million soldiers die in WW2 they gave anyone a shitty rifle no matter what they had between their legs
>>70735447
Goddamn slav girls are so fucking feminine hnnngggggg
>>70736422
Ahmed pls go
Nice. As long as they are qualified, I am happy. Everyone should have the opportunity to protect their country.
>>70735502
I did that road march for Air Assault qualification and it sucks in unique and powerful ways.
But collapsing at the last few paces is just silly. Set a better example, Captain; you came this goddamned far.
>>70736793
they are never qualified and they never are held to the same fitness standards as males
Everything just keeps getting worse.
The least they could do would be to up the fitness standards, so no woman can get in.
>>70736793
That single statement alone gives you away as having never worn a uniform.
See >>70736876
>>70736335
Why would she? Fuck that rapist.
>>70736876
I would not say never. There are always the outliers. And they should be held to the same standards.
>>70735810
sometimes I just despise women.
>>70735546
They're best suited for procreating and staying at home.
>>70735282
>play new Xcom games
>developers shove in female troops everywhere for muh equality
>anyone who tells em it breaks the sense of disbelief is shitposted about aliens and plasma guns
>>70736335
They can and have, though dropping the armor and fireman's-carry is a more-proper way if you want to haul ass.
>>70736576
the stuff you have to carry as a modern soldier is a lot more than what it used to be
even for a fit male, having to constantly run around in all that shit already comes close to getting heat exhaustion
>>70737013
Your only female "outliers" that would hold scrutiny are trannies. Because they're actually men.
>>70733895
I feel sorry for Army dudes who are not only pawns for the New World Order but have to ferociously compete in a severely limited pussy market. She's a ten in the army but a four in civilian life.
Than again I don't feel sorry for these dumb fucks at all. But thanks for keeping me (less) safe and the for keeping the war machine on the rails.
>>70736412
cuddle? fag. maybe you should cuddle a dick fuckin homo.
>>70736711
yeah thats true but from what i've read a decent amount of those women performed quite well compared to capable men. if say 50 out of 20,0000 could do the job why not let them? its not like every solder is the absolute cream of the crop.
>>70736477
>That bitch is going to get knocked up by an E5 in less than a month
This, the USAF is a slut's paradise, no risk - all reward. If she isn't caught sucking dick by the end of the year then I'll start rethinking my position on women in combat roles.
>>70737067
females should run slower but have a smaller hit box desu
>>70736919
I never claimed I did. And there will always be a few that do.
>>70737407
Yeah if they take fucking roids you fucking dipshit.
>>70737082
I was watching a show in UK where they FOLLOW ROYAL Navy recruits. The women came on kept saying they're held to the same standards as men.
Two men were back trooped for not being fit enough. They later showed Women from the same class who couldn't do a single pull up and could make one inch on the rope.
Then there was the fireman carry. The men were carrying other men. Literally all the girls were choosing the same small girl to do the carry, they ended up piggy backing the the girl because they couldn't lift her. I understand this isn't infantry and they are gonna be on a Faggot ship. But still, you should at least be held to the same standards as men, as there was obviously men waiting to take those roles, they were waiting 3 years to get into basic and the women were in, in a few months.
Then Chn4 cut away from it to some swole guy (who can't offend or he'll be funked( saying women are better than most men and try harder.
>>70737105
Chill, man. If a woman is qualified and wants to fight for her country, why not let her.
>>70733895
i hope she gets raped and dies
>>70736422
Based Terlan bringing the bantz
>>70737097
>Heat exhaustion
3 soldiers doing the SAS selection died from that last year. If these are top of the line men who made it to near the final stage of SAS selection, seriously, what would this do to a woman's health?
>>70737097
>$170 in 1944
I hope whoever made that infographic fucking knew about inflation.
>>70737590
Because they are physically weaker ?
Even as a drone operator they would underperform due to hand-eye and reflexes and plain intellectual inferiority.
Why would i "chill" when you're advocating for the death of western civilisation, "man" ?
>>70736726
why would yusuf charge if he's covering his friend
>>70737590
If a child or retard wants to fight for their country, why not let them?
>>70737097
there is a least 100 women that could perform as well. i dont think we should pander to them and act like its the normal but i also see no reason to exclude them.
>>70737590
Seems like they require extra accommodations and people having to tip toe around muh feels. Kinda seems like a waste of money/time/effort so a handful of women can be army stronk.
>>70737557
Disgusting and irresponsible. The rope-climb aspect is actually baffling, because as long as you're of an appropriate weight, you don't even need a great deal of upper-body strength to climb - lock your feet in and you don't even need to hold the rope with your hands.
Still, recruits are all shitty. Those chicks might end up all right with some time in service.
And I must maintain that I've seen female medics perform admirably in combat operations firsthand. Naturally under such situations there aren't many fags wandering around with clipboards evaluating comparative performance metrics; we were just glad to have them moving, treating, and extracting.
>>70735810
So what about the smaller men, do they get any compensation? During basic my platoon had a guy that was 2,11m and the shortest was maybe 1,65m, the bigger guys always marched in the front and then in descending height so the smaller guys were last, maybe that helped or the drill sgts just did so we didn't look completely retarded while marching
But I guess it falls perfectly in line with wasteful government spending that were so keen on.
>>70737776
>due to hand-eye
Actually, women have better hand-eye coordination, Pierre.
Reflexes can be trained, and intellect varies greatly from individual to individual. There are more women that have average IQ, but there are less female geniuses, and less complete utter female idiots too.
Men are the opposite, more utter idiots, more geniuses, less averagely intelligent ones.
>>70738085
>this pol pussy worshiper
>>70737867
it also hurts unit cohesion men are OK with getting their brothers blown up and killed but most still have a white knight complex and durkas threating to rape captives will be effective
>>70737776
You are generalizing way to hard man. I know that the average is inferior to men, but not every woman is the same.
>>70736477
I was nearly 370 pounds in full kit and knew that if I went down, I wasn't coming back home. Terrifying to think women might be relied upon to carry a soldier to safety
>>70737813
Exactly. As long as they meet standards.
>>70738085
There are more female retards.
Even with the distribution being less spread out.
Real life isn't an RPG, there's no balance.
Females are inferior, period.
>>70738301
Yeah 1 in 330 Million might be able to perform as well as a man in some capacities, so #notallwomen
Sure convinced me brah
>>70737867
They are not going to get it. If they complain, they can leave.
>>70734985
Keked
>>70735312
She hasn't even went through training yet. She will stub her vagina and get placed in another job, or she will be protected to the point where failure is impossible.
>>70736711
Let's also keep in mind those Soviet women were "snipers". All they had to do was occupy an apartment for several days waiting to fire at troops on the street from their window. It's not hard to sit around in a living room all day with a rifle.
>>70737968
>So what about the smaller men, do they get any compensation?
they weren't faggy enough to bitch about it in the first place.
>>70738442
The standards have been repeatedly lowered, just so that more than 10 women out of every 10000 could meet them.
>>70733895
>look at me i cant even carry half of what other soldiers carry or fight every time i'm on period but i'm still in the army !
>>70738622
>It's not hard to sit around in a living room all day with a rifle.
Or a kitchen
>>70737704
I thought SAS selection was on some foggy Scottish island?
Also, isn't there any medical supervision, I mean if that bloke is about to die, wouldn't it be better for the army to force him to stop and keep a capable soldier rather than to let him die trying to join the sas?
>>70737714
The most expensive parts are most likely the rifle. helmet and boots, but all the equipment was mass produced and as cheap as possible, even back then, so $170 for a rifle, set of cloths plus helmet isn't that low
>>70738301
Yeah, just like not all niggers are complete subhumans.
Good luck finding that one.
Oh, and even when you do find a female that is not intellectually inferior. Well, look at Merkel or any female leader in South america. All are quite educated, and to get such a position you have to be an outlier.
Speaking of that, except funny shenanigans since a female got elected as president of Taiwan.
China is already refusing to talk to her until she recognise China and Taiwan are one country :DDDD
>>70738622
i read somewhere I being able to hold their piss longer than men made them extra good snipers
>>70734985
some of you turks are alright
don't go to Constantinople tomorrow
>>70738549
I want to believe it. But then always comes the inevitable lawsuit.
>>70734985
VICTOR DELTA I REAPEAT WE HAVE A VICTOR DELTA SEND EVAC DO YOU COPY ?
>>70738712
Brecon beacons
>>70738716
I meant to say even the outliers are overly emotional, making for both poor leaders and soldiers.
You'd have to find an outlier both in intelligence and emotionnal control, an outlier of outliers.
Again, good luck.
>>70738743
Actually iirc women's bladders are something like 1/3 the size of men's because of the larger reproductive tract taking up a large amount anatomic real-estate.
>>70735502
Don't drop the rifle you adfhiblaputq3jsduahjnghfkgjhiafjdg
>>70737962
>some time in service
So don't train them and hold them to same standards with hopes they might eventually gain some strength months down the line?
That's the point I make before.
A man is capable of rapidly gain strength and endurance because of test, whereas a woman has either strength (nowhere near men levels) or endurance (usually skinny girls who have no strength).
Same as a man who is on the line, he can retain strength and endurance in his muscles because he produces test, he could a few months on the front line and still be relatively fit without doing to much working out.
Whereas a women who's on the front line and hasn't worked out in a few months, will be basically back at square one because there is little test being produce to retain that. It's why women take so long to make strength (not muscle) gains, and why they lose them rapidly.
It's fact and biology, a woman who just barely passes or even passes easily, will not be able to retain strength and endurance without working out often and doing strength training. This isn't my argument, it's actually a high ranking British General (woman) who says letting women in the British infantry is too bad for women's health.
>>70738760
(or any other day)
(just leave it please)
>>70738678
Then I disagree with that. The standards should not be changed. Unless they are unfair and unrealistic.
>>70737590
Because women will entire units killed because of SJW pandering.
>>70738716
Sure. It is hard to find one. But not impossible.
>>70736477
Exactly and women in combat environments is bad in so many ways let's say she starts fuckin some Joe in her platoon he catches feelings because war sucks and she has a pussy in combat she takes a round to the face Joe who has been fucking her and having feelings is going to lose combat effectiveness or forget the mission and try to protect her and I'm not even going to get started on the physical requirements that's not to say that some females can't handle it female in air assault school finished the last ruck run right next to me but the same exact female could not carry me for 10 yards
>>70737590
in the field you're not just responsible for yourself, but also for everyone else in your platoon
you can kill someone else with your failure.
If I comes to war I dont know if I can trust a female to not slip up physically or freak out emotionally. Its just biology. Why would you want to risk it?
>>70738712
people try hard and overstep their limits. You can ask a guy whether hes okay but he'll always answer yes to not appear weak. The people who apply for SAS are probably gung ho as fuck too.
>>70738477
Women score on average the same marks across all races too. They tend to have an IQ that is similar to other women, despite environment.
Whereas men score completely different from each other, men tend to swing from higher to lower and don't hover around the same mark as women do with other. It why they say there are more male philosophers and geniuses and women tend to be average.
>>70739117
Then I am against that. I am for qualified personal being allowed to enlist, that anything with a vagina for equality.
>>70739176
Of course it's impossible, since the amount of women that are interested in joining the army is so small in the first place.
The only way to find those outliers of outliers is to install mandatory military service for females.
Good luck passing that law :^)
![1920px-Brecon_beacons[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/RsOWsvG.jpg "1920px-Brecon_beacons[1].jpg")
>>70738891
Wow, looks nice but also really empty.
The picture reminds me a little of my home state, but we got more farming than animal pens and the only mountain is a potash mountain
>>70739018
>Unless they are unfair and unrealistic.
>unfair
These are the standards for a combat soldier, every infantry soldier has already met them. The only thing unfair is that women already have lower standards for physical fitness during training and entry.
>>70737058
Wow, Frenchman, didn't expect you to be so determined out of all people.
>>70738760
D-don't make j-jokes like that
Just let her go into a non-combat oriented role like being a medic/pilot/driver
>Oh Wait
>Fucking bad idea
>Bad memories from army days surfacing
>Oh Shit, forgot I said anythin'
I use this pict to fulfill my dreams of an army waifu.
>>70736477
In my stupid and uneducated opinion, the first time some shit goes down and people get killed cause of a female in combat will be the last we hear of this nonsense. Political correctness and feminism only thrive in environments where the consequences aren't immediate or have some kind of mitigation. If our soldiers know with certainty that they WILL be killed because of a female in their unit, they won't even bother leaving the base, and who would blame them?
>>70735312
>So they lowered the standards?
Standards are already lower for women in the general Army, so she probably just has to pass the women's PT test. She doesn't look like she can do 50 pushups and 60 sit-ups, which is the minimum to pass training if you're a 24 year old guy. Speaking as a former Infantryman, you're a shitbag if you only do the minimum. Barely passing is not acceptable.
>>70739406
That ok Poorland.
>>70735447
My girlfriend is a Slav. She thinks my Glock is pretty and would never in a million years shoot it because they're so dangerous.
>>70734985
Lost.
>>70739423
what nation would i have to invade to pillage this pussy?
>>70739304
Here's the problem that you need to understand.
Women cannot serve in combat roles. They just can't. They can't make the standards, they don't have the same level headedness in stressful situations that men have and knowing infantry guys, they will be major fucking whores.
The only way to get women into combat roles is to lower the standards. Allowing women to join will encourage lowering the standards to that way some cock sucker in DC won't complain that there aren't any women in combat roles even though it's been X amount of time since it's been allowed.
>>70733895
She's not going to make it, unless Benning lowers it's standards like Jackson and the other basic camps have when females were allowed in.
>>70739423
bring back field cooks and let them do it
>>70739411
sorry turkman
sometimes I forget that other ppl on the internet actually have to live around muslims. I pray for the safety of you and yours.
>>70733895
The Marine Corps did an experiment in putting female commissioned officers into infantry training for officers and every single one of them washed out.
Now if this girl somehow manages to pull off going through ranger school, then it is because the Army wanted her to get through ranger school.
>>70738622 thats not true, a good chunk of those women took the role of retrieving wounded, and operating anti aircraft guns iirc. it wasn't a lot but a few were capable. i just dont see any reason in keeping these women out.
>>70733895
She looks just as strong as other infantry members.
>>70735869
She will be, so she can be captured and they can make up a big story about how is being raped in a hospital to drum up support for a war.
>>70733895
Who cares about the gender? More goyim blood for the American jew machine to spit out.
>>70738712
It's in Wales, in the Brecon Beacons.
They are given maps and sent to march by themselves, they are tracked by GPS and there's usually some random SAS soldiers out there too watching them.
They are sent off at different times, the guys apparently went on the GPS and they thought they were resting, it was like 30 Celsius+ that day. They never sent out an regency signal, probably out of pride and fears they'd get medically discharged from selection after making it so far, then ended up dying.
>>70739423
kawaii
>>70738477
He's actually right he just explained it in a really stupid way, women's IQ distribution has a lower mean and a lower standard deviation so their average IQ is more tightly clustered around the mean.
>>70734235
The army isn't worried about any contact she has with Seamen.
>>70734526
Not in Combat roles Anon.
>>70733895
She might as well not even bother wearing pants, to save having to pull them up all the time. Since she'll have buckets of cum running out of her from the entire battalion.
If she doesn't get pregnant and is actually dedicated to the job I'll respect her a billion times more than most of the lard asses on /pol/
>>70737082
I think the actual statistic was 0.1% of females that tried(chosen from the actual army, not the average woman) could actually perform the requirements for men.
>>70738348
Jesus Christ, everyone in my unit was around 90 - 100kg WITH equipment.
I wouldn't drag your ass. Sorry.
>>70739932
I would agree with this, but it won't happen.
A lot of the females in my unit are pretty soft, but there's definitely a few that could easily be in the infantry. You can't understand unless you've seen the Army from the inside, but there's a clear distinction between tough females who are there to be soldiers, and the weak ones who are not good anywhere near combat.
>>70739999
Nice series of four repeating digits anon
>>70739815
That was exactly the way he explained it
>>70734758
Because it 'just works' it's the apple of guns.
>>70740055
How do you know if you're not in the infantry or Been on selection.
>>70740055
>but there's definitely a few that could easily be in the infantry. You can't understand unless you've seen the Army from the inside
You stupid faggot I bet you've never even met somebody that was in the military.
I can tell you from personal experience that most women in the military don't fucking belong there. There might be one in a few, but from a physiology standpoint, they couldn't cut it in the infantry.
>>70740055
What mos?
>>70739900
Training is going to be crazy for her. They'll have her sleep somewhere else I assume, but still. I went through Benning, and you literally spend all day every day with the same 200 dudes. The only women you see are the 50 year old black lardasses working in the Dining Facility, who are really only women by technicality, and after a few months you start noticing when they get new hairdos.
If there were an actual reasonable looking girl there, guys would lose their minds. She's kind of qt, but when she's the only girl in a group of 200 guys, she's a 99999999/10.
I predict a lot of guys spending a lot of time in the front leaning rest position for screwing around bothering her during training.
>>70740332
Probably 42A I'm guessing.
The only combat arms I see females being tolerable in is the mps mainly because most of them are worthless as well
>>70733895
>I wonder if she has nudes
No way she has the upper body strength to be in the infantry. Wonder how many men will die defending her?
>>70740378
Kek
>>70739800
>>70739621
Good taste.
the infantrymen will love her....literally. dont need to fap to snucked in porn anymore.
>>70737704
They wouldn't have made it past the first couple of weeks. They would most likely fail one of the basic fitness tests before they even started selection.
South Korea
>>70740533
hnnnnng
>>70740730
they pay for plastic surgery for enlisted?
>>70740730
So are South Korean females required to do the mandatory 2 yrs military service? If so, what kind of MOS do they end up doing? Do they have a say in what their job will be?
>>70733895
AMERICA YES
>>70740484
>No way she has the upper body strength to be in the infantry
That's sexist
>>70740533
Fuck I have a fetish for military women now. Especially asian military women.
>>70734985
Okay.
>>70734758
>why the fuck do we still use m4s
busy work for soldiers -> cleaning rifles
existing contracts for cleaning gear
From my personal experience, if I were a soldier and was shooting more than four mags during a firefight I'd insist on a gas piston rifle due to carbon fouling and malfunctions that happen in DI rifles.
But 90% of the Army doesn't mag dump and never will, its not an issue really.
>>70735670
Nope.
3DPD
>>70740958
rare
>>70737272
[spoiler]I'll cuddle you[/spoiler]
>>70739411
yo, what the fuck is going on in Turkey with the potential bombing? I'm half Turkish, I have family there.
>>70740816
>>70740818
I'm pretty sure it is on a voluntary basis.
They serve both in support and combat roles (Supposedly, somewhat similar to Israel)
>Here have some tits
>>70736216
She has already proven that she is willing to put an entire unit at risk to satisfy her personal goals.
I don't think character will have much to do with it this time around
>>70741042
>doesnt mag dump
I was watching an Iraqi war documentary and at one point this squad was on a roof top getting shot at. They all pop up after trying to figure out where they're getting shot from and just start shooting shit. As one of the soldiers reloads he asks where they are shooting at.
Then while running back to the fob someone fires a shot and all the humvee guns just light up the fucking neighborhood.
>>70741478
Alasnackbars must be crazy pulling aggro like that
>>70739674
lol top tier bantz. The entire army at fat stupid fucks.
>>70734985
>>70735447
the fuck is she doing
>>70735447
Man, what a qt
>>70740991
RARE
So what the fuck, what happens when she gets her period in a combat zone? Just call a timeout and hope ISIS respects it?? Fucking ridiculous, this is just another step in Obama's campaign to neuter the military. Why, you may ask? Because the military is the only one that would stand up to Obama if he used his DHS goons (who are ultimately loyal to Obama alone) to declare himself President for Life. Consider that Obama has purged SIX generals and admirals from the military that had conservative leanings, all six on trumped up, nonsense charges, like CURSING.
>>70734926
Pretty sure she has some training dude
id say 10 days
>>70734855
I give her pretty much as long as she's in.
I give everyone around her about a week to a month tops, as they now have an effectively half-strength, undisciplined promo soldier mucking up the works and demanding almost constant priority over their own lives as it would be a PR nightmare for higher ups.
>>70735447
Whoever let her hold a gun endangered every single person who was there. HAHA lol I forgot near the end she starts crying. Could you fucking imagine this in combat? Women can't handle the pressure of basic training like this but they're not going to lose it under the threat of rape and Muslim tier torture? Yeah right.
>>70734933
Fags like you who say shit like that have probably never dated a woman or you would know that she can take the pill continuously (meaning with no break for period once a month) and she won't get periods. It's often used by sportswomen because periods get in the way of the training or competition so this argument nowadays is bullshit. Not that I'm in favor of women serving active roles but find another valid reason.
>>70747110
So what you're saying is women can't do the same things men can without ingesting unnatural substances?
>>70735468
>making small drops in test significantly harder to recover from endurance and strength training, which causes more injuries. It's why older men struggle
Pretty much this. Even if it was mandatory for female soldiers to get on TRT, they would still be several times weaker than a man. That's not even factoring in psychology, the average Western woman just does NOT have the mindstate to survive combat. And then there is unit cohesion, love triangles, jealousy, and whiteknighting just do not work when you need everyone to be on the exact same page, as a team. It endangers the lives of every member of that team if there is a woman on it.
t. been shot at by hajis AND niggers
>>70735468
is late 20s prime test age? im 27 and literally fap at least 6 times a day. i need an excuse besides my own degeneracy
>>70735950
From my experience, you usually get one free pass for a fuck up, then after that if you do it again you are mocked relentlessly. This video is a perfect example of the deleterious effects of women on unit cohesion. Men will bend over backwards not to offend her, even if she is putting everyone else at risk.
>>70737590
>if a woman is qualified
yes, this is the issue.
Can any woman be said to be 'qualified' when there is blatant partiality toward them in training?
>>70736216
It doesn't matter if she's the bionic woman, she could be as strong as 5 men, its still a terrible idea to have women in combat roles alongside men. She is still a woman, and male soldiers WILL act differently around her, often to the detriment of the team or the mission. Also, menstruation.
>>70747316
I'm just saying that his argument doesn't work anymore, just like warfare has changed since the introduction of modern weapons, don't you think? Sometimes innovation can actually bring major changes. I think bringing up women's lack of upper body strength is a much better argument. The period blood and smell shit just doesn't work anymore. Gotta accept it.
>>70747891
Yeah but then you could say they can meet those standards too by fucking their bodies up on roids.
>>70735447
She looks just like a kid that got in trouble and is going to start crying at :59
I'm a college washout with a useless degree who is thinking of joining the military as an officer. I want to get a desk job like intelligence. Should I really be concerned for muh feels and muh soggy knees in the military?
>>70739649
Thanks bro
>>70741180
Turkey will self-destruct from the looks of it
>>70747316
Please ignore that faggot.
He's just white knighting too hard.
>>70734985
>>70739454
Yup. All its gonna take it ONE female soldier being captured by ISIS and getting raped and tortured on a live feed. Think of how bad that would be for PR and war morale. The military would be blamed, even though its the fucking limp wristed liberals who demanded women in combat positions in the first place!
>>70748107
I'm not sure if this comparison works for you if you're a fresh washout, but do you know where all the female "equality" hires go in every other industry that hires men by necessity?
>>70746833
Absolutely this. At one point she even faces the other fucking direction and starts shooting. Holy fuck.
>>70734985
kek
>>70747991
Well, you could. The difference is just that taking the pill is already done by like 80% of women and the whole 5 days a month break for period was designed because it was thought that women would go mad if they didn't have their periods, but in terms of negative effect on your health, whether you take them with a break each month or continuously is exactly the same.
When the first wookie infantrywoman hits the fleet the hazing and NJPs that follow will be GLORIUS
I can imagine an entire company losing a rank because of hazing. God knows I'd have her digging fighting holes every second she wasn't memorizing knowledge.
>>70740055
You are right, there are some absolute Amazon bitches who are pretty strong. But guess what, they're still weaker than men. They still have female psychology and brain wiring, they still have a massively detrimental effect on unit cohesion. The lack of physicality is actually the least of the problems with letting women in combat roles, the other stuff is way more likely to get our boys killed.
>>70748365
HR and customer service.
>>70748206
I think rape is a powerful argument against allowing women in combat roles.
Feminists want to bitch about equality and "stare rape" but when it comes to women being taken POW they WILL without a doubt be beaten, raped, and probably killed. But wait they don't care about real rape.
>>70734985
>>70748610
Desk jobs
>>70740816
No but plastic surgery is so ubiquitous in South Korea it makes sense that even army recruits would have work done. Although, there ARE some Asian beauties who look like that naturally.
>>70748739
Ah, shit.
>>70747110
Okay sure, but even without periods women soldiers are still inferior in every way. What's your point? Also I highly doubt every female soldier is going to be suppressing their periods with drugs.
>>70735447
She is a journalist doing a report of the army.
>>70736422
>>70737067
tell them
>do you see an alien put outside of a role its capable of
>>70734976
In Officer training the females were given shower runs to the rear every 3 days while we stayed in the field.
>>70734985
Impressive.
>>70734985
Don't think this gets you off the hook, Mehmet.
>>70733895
She'll run away.
>>70752783
lel she literally has a canary-in-the-coal-mine effect. the man watching the floor notices somethings up at the entrance when the bitch runs away.
>>70753228
Actually not a bad approach to layered security. If the big guy were up front he might have just gotten popped.
>>70733895
Little late to the thread, but I have some info you all might find interesting. The current poster child for the Marine female integration in combat arms is Callahan Brown. In hs she was a druggie slut, typical degenerate. Her dad is a af higher up in the pentagon, which makes it funnier. Anyways she joined the marines and because she was in good physical shape she got selected to go to ITB after boot camp. She passed, but not without self admittedly fucking one of her Combat Instructors throughout the duration of the school. Then she went to that Special MAGTAF where they did the actually integrated Battalion test And now, even while performing in the bottom 25% of males and continuing to be a ho she's somehow become some kind of golden child to lawmakers in DC.
>>70753228
What if this was part of their plan?
>>70752783
That big guy is pretty cool tho
>>70733895
>woman in infantry
>not a fuck toy for the entire regiment
This is why women shouldn't be in combat roles, as written by a woman who served in a combat role
http://www.westernjournalism.com/the-problems-of-women-in-combat-from-a-female-combat-vet/
>>70734917
>Command says can't be sexist and they have to pass at least one woman or else they get fucked
Thats literally it.
