I know /pol/ thinks western women are the problem but I find that harder to believe by the day. I know plenty of bright young women and they all have trouble finding men their age willing to commit. All the men are too lackadaisical and self-centered, only caring about cheap lays and playing video games. Because of this, the women are considering dating older men.
Western women are making tremendous strides, leaving men in the dust. Tell me /pol/, how are young men not the problem?
>>70733121
The nu-male is a pussy. The a fault mostly lies on the actions of modern men becuase they are supposed to lead in a relationship, yet are not willing to.
Meh, they can keep their entitlement, I'll keep my vydia.
>>70733310
But the reason modern men are like this is because they were educated to be emasculated since they were born, in a society when any masculine act is seen as a bad thing. In the end, cultural marxism is to blame.
They're having trouble finding guys who want to commit because no one wants to commit to a brainless skank (4 out of 5 women, 9 out of 10 if they're attractive)
slide thread
>>70733310
>>70734210
Despite being a house husband and soon to be a stay at home dad, while my wife makes bank as a pharmacist, I still lead the relationship.
>>70734210
No, in the end, men are to blame because blaming other groups would be like blaming a dog for not pooping in a toilet - it's too stupid to know any better.
The advancement of society basically depends on white men, and now also East Asian men I'd argue. But white men have let themselves be walked over by lesser groups.
Other groups: women, Jews, blacks, etc. are almost inherently against white men. But white men, being one of the only noble creatures out there, shouldn't blame those groups - they are lesser groups, and we should expect no better of them. They are tribal goons trying to clip the wings of an angel. We should blame ourselves for standing up to the lesser groups and for allowing them to clip our wings. Kind of gay analogy...
>>70734263
Yeah, only women are the problem. Not men at all!
>>70733121
Nice bait.
Women aren't making strides, they're artificially propped up to an extreme degree.
Women have completely skewed expectations, they rate 80% of men to be below average.
Women have voted for parties which have started huge wealth redistribution programs.
Women have voted parties which fundamentally changed laws and systems in place to be extremly detrimental to men making marriage a huge financial risk for absolutely no benefit.
One can continue this list, bring up social dynamics, behaviours instilled in women due to the aforemented societal changes and so on. Women are the issue, they're not leaving anyone in the dust but merely sucking society dry like parasites. It's like saying a tick on cat is "making huge strides" because it's getting fat and full while calling the cat the problem because the hundreds of ticks are killing it.
>>70733310
Not being willing and having the government breathing down your neck with a gun leveled to your head every waking minute the moment you stray from the path they tried to indoctrinate you into your entire life are two very different things.
>>70735066
Oh we could fix this. If you can convince all men to lay down their work and refuse to support this system any longer. Alternatively overthrow it using physical violence. The problem here being that you can't get such large numbers and most countries have grown to be fairly big to do so.
Otherwise most of the decisions were made before many here were even born, can't retroactively blame them for things that happened long before they could've actively influenced them.
>>70734925
You're right on the whole. You can't spend all your time calling other groups inferior and then blame them when things go to shit. You either have the potential to lead or you don't.
I'd argue most modern people, not just men, have been raised in such a way that they are in a constant state of distraction and sometimes lack the tolerance necessary for the kind of work which would make them a bit more powerful. This is not something that affects everyone equally. /pol/ itself is an instance of this. It's very distracting and it's fucking choke full of rage and depression porn.
Nobody on /pol/ is actually striving to make the world they'd like to see.
>>70735165
/thread 100% t b h f a m
>>70733121
who you think is responsible for the increase of beta males? it's the women themselves who raised their children like white knights when in reality women want the alpha male that fistfucks them every night till they pass out:
https://archive.is/dR2KF
>>70735165
>It's like saying a tick on cat is "making huge strides" because it's getting fat and full while calling the cat the problem because the hundreds of ticks are killing it.
/thread
>>70733121
>be me
>be in my 40's
>friends who got married in their 20's most divorced paying cash out the nose every month
>girls in their 20s-30s constantly trying to date me
>have my own house and money
I see no problem with this OP
>>70735165
>women are the issue
You know, the thing I'm starting to see is this : organized groups > unorganized heap all the time.
One thing that happened with the rise of feminism is the active campaign to break the back of "boys club" seeing as they were "oppressive" all the while encouraging every body else to organize and lobby the government and social institutions for the serving of their interests. And they've been winning and making progress for forty fucking years.
The day you organize is the day this shit stops. I envision an organization that will be mostly made up of men and will represent male interests, not even because it will be closed to female in principle but because it will be closed to certain type of opinions or worldview which are closely associated with what many women want.
>>70735933
You benefit from this mess.
>>70733121
>I know plenty of bright young women and they all have trouble finding men their age willing to commit.
Let me guess... they are past 30, right?
