Will pedophilia become a social justice cause in the future?
>adults trying to control children's bodies
>why should society and the government interfere with two people who love each other?
>age is a social construct
>>70723564
Probably. The "they're not old enough to make a wise decision" or whatever argument still holds up today but it's only a matter of time.
>>70723564
>Mom! I'm a gurl!
>Woopsie doopsie off comes de dick! Bring the body destroying drugs!
this is K
>Mom! Am in love with class room teacher jenny!
this is not K.
>>70723564
To be honest, probably not. Pedo shit is one of the only areas where pretty much everyone is on the same page.
we was romans an shit
>>70723564
>Will pedophilia become a social justice cause in the future?
of course
the entire ideology of the left is "how far can we go til everything is fucked?"
they will go as far as allowed and as far as society can take them.
polygamy is next. then real hardcore tranny stuff. once that's done it'll be pedo rights. after that necrophiliac rights.
not sure what's after that nor does it matter, society won't last long enough to reach the necro phase.
>>70724317
We were in the same page about homosexuality 100 years ago, now look at the present we are living and im really afraid the start lowering the underage rate from 18 to 16 then 14 and then 12. If we analyze the believe of a SJW and their evolution we shouldnt be surprise about this.
>>70723564
No because its a luxury reserved for the elites, who have been buggering children since they've existed. The peasants aren't allowed to join in their fun.
>>70724317
nah look at how many letters they keep adding to LGBTQIA.
Soon they will start to push more fucking retarded stuff like that guy who wanted to be a girl and be 6 years old. Is it illegal to have sex with him cause he identify as a 6 year old.
There will be this stupid grey area that will be discussed
>>70723768
That's ageism and dumbshaming.
Just because someone is young doesn't mean that they can't make decisions, and how do you even know they're young? Maybe they identify as 18 and older, shitlord?
And what if they haven't developed their brains yet, you neurotypical cis male racist? Just because someone is dumb doesn't mean they can't make decisions about their own bodies!
#pro-choice #stoppedophobia
Nope. Or rather, social rules will be unevenly applied as usual just even more extremely
Tyrone/Muhammed luring a 13 year old white girl into prostitution with drugs and threatening to beat or kill her? We might just see where this goes for a year or so...
Be a white man who wants to hit up some 15yo PTP? Enjoy your time in Federal Nigger Rape Camp.
Be a liberated cougar who wants to fuck high school boys? Well, come on they obviously wanted it amirite? Also NICE
>>70723564
Most likely. They already force sex change on their kids. One child abuse or another makes no difference for those degenerates.
>>70723564
SJW's think children should be treated as adults, that they should be brought up in a "democratic household" where somehow their views are important, or as important as adults. So maybe, they will argue that if the child is OK with it.
It will probably start with homosexuals though, as there are a lot of homos who like young boys and probably feel society is oppressing them for their degenerate and disgusting behaviour.
>inb4 b-but I was born gay.
>>70724737
>>70724737
>ageism
>pedophobia
from now in 10 years or less, i wouldnt be surprise is this become a trending on twitter
>>70724858
Ageism is already a thing, it only refers to old people and stuff like saying an 18 year old doesn't know shit because he's too young.
I guarantee that they will get to pedophilia in the future. Salon already started writing pro-pedophilia articles.
First they have to make us comfortable with people who want to fuck kids, and then they can start with the ''stop pedophilia'' shit.
>>70724567
>We were in the same page about homosexuality 100 years ago,
No we are not. Anglo started criminalise homosexuality, age of consent and prostitution last 100-150 years. You take anglo habits as norm.
>>70724306
This times infinity.
Just another thing to add to the list of "progressive if done by women, blasphemous if done by men" pile.
>>70723564
No. If anything the current trends will continue and people will consider wanting to fuck 21 year olds to be pedophilia.
Back in the early days of the pro homo movement, pedophilia was a big part of it, but women, knowing they have an extremely short shelf life, have been pushing to raise the age of consent, the age girls get married, and the age that you are allowed to find attractive.
In the 50's 12 and 13 girl's got married fairly regularly, in the future you'll need the states approval to marry a girl in her mid twenties
>>70723768
>Will pedophilia become a social justice cause in the future?
It was part of the civil rights movement for a little while. At least in Europe, lots of psychologists going on about how it was healthy to not impose restrictions on sexuality and so on in the 70s. But it never really catched on and I don't think it will.
>The "they're not old enough to make a wise decision" or whatever argument still holds up today
Nobody ever gets old enough to make a wise decision. Nobody makes wise decisions except in fiction. But that has always been true and the argument works in practice even if it don't make sense.
>>70724842
>there are a lot of homos who like young boys
Catholic priests are homos now?
Only if Muslims become the majority.
>>70724980
Anglo habits are the norm.
>>70724735
If Michael Jackson identified as a child, then him having sleepovers with children was completely healthy and natural.
Anybody else compare dicks with their mates when they were kids?
salon.com already published an article by a pedophile defending his pedophilia.
>>70723564
My grandpa grew up in an age where homosexuality was understood to be a mental disorder, now the flag of the LGBT community is flown from the highest towers in the land and their lifestyle promoted in almost every kind of media.
God only knows what will be normalized in our lifetime, 50-60 years ago people likely would've be incredulous at the thought of homosexuals and transsexuals being given so much attention and acceptance by society as a whole. They'd probably faint if you were to show them a photograph of the gay pride parade in San Francisco.
No, feminists will instead push to raise the age of consent higher and higher, and most men will have realistic companion dolls with AI instead.
>>70725261
For eternal anglo maybe.
>>70725873
No, for everyone m8.
>>70725483
This. I more often see SJWs saying that everyone should push the age of consent to 18 or more than the other way around.
Only for gays. Dont you people remember that little boy dancing in some gay convention here in brazil? People will turn their eyes to little boys being abused.
>>70725952
Daily reminder for potato cucks that eternal anglo norm is also to starve potato niggers to death for the profits of the Crown.
>>70726066
Imagine a world with the age of consent being 25.
Or 35.
>>70726419
Why are you getting upset? I'm only speaking the truth.
>>70724317
The people that will advocate Pedo shit don't have children. Anyone with a child will be against it.
>>70724858
What should we do about it, Dr?
>>70724317
Nah, you'll see changes the more mudshits flood our countries
>>70724812
See, the whole incest thing is because they're flooding their countries with retarded third worlders who have been inbreeding for centuries
>>70726601
Do you know how many potatoes are needed to kill an Irishman?
>>70726601
You are right eternal anglo has its own norms and live potato niggers don't have place in them.
>>70723564
What the hell is this picture about? Is she going to eat that poor little boy that's why she's flashing her teeth like a predator?
>>70724507
Don't forget incest.
>>70724317
>we compromised on x and y, but we'll never accept z.
I'm sorry, anon. It's called incrementalism.
100 years ago, divorce was considered abnormal and wrong.
50 years ago, homosexuality was considered abnormal and wrong.
5 years ago, gender dysphoria was considered abnormal and wrong.
In each case, the social attitudes were shifted bit-by-bit to become more tolerant of the behavior. Then laws were changed to codify and cement their acceptability.
At the moment, there is a full-court pressin effect to shift public attitudes in favor of transgenderism. Notice that this wasn't even an issue being discussed a few years ago. People with gender dysphoria make up such an insignifact percentage of the population but their "plight" is receiving such enormous levels of attention. Why?
Because if people can be convinced that a man is a woman, or a woman is a man, and I mean really convinced, and if the State itself condones that belief with laws, then people can be convinced of absolutely anything.
They can even be convinced that a child can consent.
It will start slowly, possibly as an offshoot of the transgender rights movement.
>if a child can identify as a different gender and make decisions about their body, why are we pretending they can't consent using their bodies for sex?
Pedophiles will be humanized and rationalized and apologized for
>it's a neurological condition, they can't help themselves
>there's plenty of historical and cultural examples of people under the age of 18 who marry..., we can't enforce our western values...
People will be encouraged to think back and remember how young they were when they first developed sexual urges
>12? 11? Younger?
As pedophilia is in the proccess of being sympathetized, laws will be put forward to protect and eventually condone the behavior.
Wait and see.
