Nuke ISIS already
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Nuke ISIS already
Why don't we just nuke Raqqa and Mosul already? It worked with Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We'll make them the martyrs they want to be.
>but it will kill a lot of civilians
Less mudslimes for Europe to worry about.
Using nuclear weapons does horrible things to the environment. Anyone who doesn't know this doesn't know much about nuclear weapons. There is a reason the civilized world tries not to even test them anymore.
Because if we nuke them leftists will behead you for being racist.
Because your government is friends with the opposition against Pro government forces in Syria.
Yes, not the JEWS. The AMERICAN government.
How does it make you feel that after 9/11 your own government still funds and arms sandniggers with advanced heavy weaponry while at the same time trying to keep on reducing it's own citizens from having guns?
Sometimes I wonder what the people in the US gov are actually thinking, it's like they have no memory of past events and is really terrible at making decisions when it comes to foreign policy.
>normalizing nuclear warfare
Big mistake.
why are you so antise.. I mean islamophobe?
>>70721341
>horrible things to the environment
>ISIS will continue to invade, disrupt and destroy nations and cultures for decades
Honestly the best solution is to wipe them all out at one time. Those children are forever tainted with the love of murder as games, and will only keep the war going as time goes on.
>>70721341
Nope. Airbursts leave no fallout, Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not get irradiated.
The reason why we don't test them is because A: If you test them in the open air people can go blind B: if you test them underground you can get venting which creates fallout and C: if you test them underwater the water is irradiated and creates bad fallout
Because Daesh isn't a state
>>70721791
I'm guessing it also had noting to do with Islam?
>>70721275
it wont stop ISIS. Even if we nuke syria, Iraq, London, Paris, Washington DC, Egypt, Libya there are still tens of thousands of ISIS fighters to grow again. And it will just give ISIS a boost.
They already believe that most of them will die, according to prophecy that will happen before they win.
Raqqa and Mosul may be the Wild West, but people do live there.
Plus, that would be a huge recruitment tool for ISIS.
yeah let's do it. fuck em they aren't people anyways.
>>70721874
They are using Islam as a tool like everything else to have people joining them against their own rational interest.
>>70721874
nothing*
>>70721993
ahmed pls
>>70721993
And what would that rational interest be? Owning a ruin filled desert?
>>70722090
Germoney pls
>>70721275
It would create more refugees in the immediate aftermath.
More importantly, it'll turn more against us. ISIS is the short term, the long term fight is against Islamic extremism.
Also ISIS is losing in Syria and have been losing in Iraq for months.
>>70721275
Because this would start a Holy War against 1.5 billion Muslims.
>why don't we just lower ourselves to ISIS and become ISIS and kill innocent people we've judged as expendable and worthless???
You'll find out why you shouldn't do that, in hell.
>>70722222
quints confirms it boys
>>70722111
That's what I'm saying you retarded fuck. they have nothing to lose.
The endgame (in 10, 20 years) is better supply chain management with greater free exchange between North Africa and Europe
>>70722283
>innocent people
>>70722222
we could win it easy.
>>70721993
Before we take over the world there will be a big war where 75% of muslims will die butbwe will win the second war.
>>70722333
>greater free exchange
of what?
>>70722536
Genocide against Muslims isn't possible. Stability in the Middle East is. So either you can start a crusade that you'll never win or ensure that whatever government rises from the ashes is powerful enough to hold the country together, and liked enough by its people to stay in power.
>>70722688
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_resources_of_Africa
>>70722772
7000 nukes just collecting dust vs 120000 camels. we could just drop half of the lot and call it a day and not physically invade anything.
>>70722772
so why does the USA remove middle eastern dictators from power, destabilizing their countries
>>70722870
>let's just drop 7000 nuclear bombs gaiz, it'll be sure to kill all the Muslims and have no environmental consequences
>>70722803
what that's ISIS gonna do when
>China often exploit Africa's natural resources today, causing most of the value and money from the natural resources to go to the West and East Asia rather than Africa, further causing the poverty in Africa.[1]
free exchange will also fall apart without a proper free market, something which ISIS is not fond of. Not to mention the quran forbids interest on loans. It's a system waiting to fall apart.
>>70722911
It wasn't even removing Hussein from power, it was the de-Baathification afterwards.
>>70721341
>oh noes nuffin will grow in the desert if you nuke it
>>70722911
When did I ever say the US was doing the right thing?
Although for stability's sake, a functional democracy will last longer. Dictators need to die sometime, and there's always a power struggle to replace them. Sometimes it's smooth, sometimes it's not.
>>70721275
The nukes in Japan was a american show for USSR.
They wanted to show Soviet that they had the nuke and they knew that Soviet was on their way to Japan.
The only country that might nuke IS if they start winning again is Russia. NATO would never nuke them.
>>70723093
You realize you share a fucking sea with the Middle East, right?
Also what is a nuclear winter?
>>70723246
>nuclear winter
>>70721453
The American government is in many ways controlled by the Jews, so what's your point?
>>70723095
name an african/middle eastern/slavic dictator foiled by insurgents not supported by the USA/NATO in the last 30 years
dictators don't need to die, the uprisings don't need to happen.
People sometimes ask me what would be the best way to defeat ISIS. I typically respond with 'turn the area into a glass crater' and I'm 100% serious. Too bad it would destroy the ancient buildings and stuff.
What about thermobaric bombs, /pol? What are the biggest in existence, who has them?
>>70723246
>Also what is a nuclear winter?
a myth
>>70722772
>Genocide against Muslims isn't possible
why do we have nukes ?
No need, isis will eventually implode into dozens of groups, who will then begin fighting each other.
>>70721275
Nuke would be too much, but napalm on the other hand, would purify with it's engulfing heat. I really want to think there is a better solution, but they way things go, a throughout steamrolling over the African continent feels like the only thing that'd do anything about the current situation.
>>70723246
Nuclear winter from a controlled Bulava missile detonation over Raqqa? Yeah okey buddy.
>>70721341
This, plus we don't kill civilians anymore
>>70723246
>2 nukes
>nuclear winter
high school spring break?
>>70721590
That isn't true. While yes airburst detonations do leave far less fallout they still make the environment lethal for a period of time. And nearly every nuke today is airburst to maximize its destructive range.
>>70723246
>Also what is a nuclear winter?
The answer to global warming?
>>70721275
Why would you want to nuke your (and Israel's) own citizens?
Give the "moderate" muslims an ultimatum.
They have to get rid of isis for us or we nuke mecca instead.
>>70721275
Cos nukes dont exist, just one more kike hoax. Einstein was an autist and a communist.
>>70724096
Someone seriously need to go and yank the Kaba and throw it in the ocean.
>>70721275
>mfw ISIS nukes you.
Does of 5k people anyone even understand the size and sophistication of the US Army?
They could make ISIS dissapear in a day, with conventional war methods.
>>70724473
But at what cost?
>>70723962
>the environment
>strip of useless desert full of mudslimes
pick one.
>>70724654
At the cost that a potenital proxy vanishes.
Right now ISIS can be controlled, it's a pawn on the field.
>>70723689
I'm gonna answer myself for your benefit. Biggest thermobaric bombs are: MOAB - Massive Ordnance Air Blast or "Mother of All Bombs". Also, Russia has tested in 2007 the "Father of All Bombs". It was like a small nuclear weapon.
Noteworthy, thermobaric bombs do not have fallout, they are "ecological". They would cleanly kill the slimes.
>caring about ISIL
But why? Non-White problems are not our problems. If we banned all Muslims from entering the West and deported all Muslims current in the West, we could completely ignore them.
>>70724837
>isis = all muslims
fuck this shit, i'm out
>>70721275
Why should Americans care about ISIS? ISIS are Muslims slaughtering other muslims. ISIS isn't even attacking Israel. ISIS isn't killing Americans. Muslims are flooding into Europe. If anyone should worry about ISIS, it's Europe. Let Europe deal with it in their own way. America needs to stay the hell out of the way and let Muslims kill Muslims. If the Middle East wants to immolate itself, so be it.
And look, sure, there are some good Muslims in the Middle East but they are cowards. They choose to flee their countries rather than stay and repel ISIS, Al Qaeda, Taliban, Muslim Brotherhood, and whatever sociopath evil crops up in their society. Muslims are cowards. They allow ISIS to grow rather than nip it in the bud. If anyone should be fighting ISIS, it should be Muslims.
>>70724939
They are though. ISIL represents the purest form of Islam in existence today. A Muslim who doesn't support ISIL isn't really a Muslim at all.
>>70723093
fuck you I live near the desert where the first atomic bombs where dropped, you have no idea the sickness and devastation it has caused people and animals.
>>70724939
All muslimes support ISIS, they just lie and say that they don't sometimes. Everything ISIS does is for the benefit of muslimes.
>>70724945
would be a lot easier for the sandniggers to repel isis if
>isis have no "stolen" american equipment
>countries isis are invading aren't destabilized by NATO-supported "peaceful revolutions"
>iran and russia had actual play room instead of being tied down by the UN and israel
>>70725252
Did it become deserted?
>>70721275
>but it will kill a lot of civilians
>Less mudslimes for Europe to worry about
Not many people here will disagree with you but if you really want to know, /pol/ doesn't control the big red button.
>>70722772
>Genocide against Muslims isn't possible
Sounds like a challenge to me.
