What is /pol/'s opinion on Ross Perot?
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: What is /pol/'s opinion on Ross Perot?
What is /pol/'s opinion on Ross Perot?
Should've won the '92 election.
Good
Prophetic, clairvoyant, a threat to the Order.
Unsavory voice
>>70700437
Faggot took all the boats from Bush 1 and we got Clinton.
Ross Perot was really the last chance America had from getting fucked in the ass by NAFTA and other 'free trade' meme shit. 1992 will go down in history as one of the biggest political rebellions in American history where nearly 1 in 5 Americans voted 3rd party candidate even though the winner takes all way elections work makes them completely unelectable. Most votes for Perot were completely decided on this issue of free trade, both left and right wing voters voted for him for this reason when both Bush and Clinton wanted to sell us down this river.
Trump has a lot in common with Perot and not only that they are both rich atypical candidates, the reason Trump has gotten a lot of support from blue collar union democrats is completely because of his dislike of NAFTA. Over 20 years later and 50% of both political parties voters still believe that NAFTA and other free trade agreements harm America. These people haven't gone away in the past 2 decades but they've been cucked by both parties to only have candidates that support this for the past 2 decades.
The greatest man to ever live
Am really not surprised he didn't win, by time the 1992 elections started, most the voting process was rigged. Debates were held by elite corporations and only the ones with millions to burn on top of leadership qualities could have a chance.
Should of won.
Did he really get a lot of the votes?
Did the news give him coverage or did he get ron paul treatment
>>70702642
He was polling at 40% but ended up dropping out because he didn't want the house to decide the election, despite dropping out he got 20% of the vote. Ross Perot is a billionaire, he could buy his own coverage.
FUCKING LEGEND
1776 POWERFUL
>>70703048
>the house to decide the election
I've heard of this before. Can someone explain it detail?
>>70703817
It's not that complex. If no candidate gets the majority of electoral college votes than the house of representatives chooses the president by voting on the 3 candidates who received the most electoral votes, each representative gets 1 vote. If this was to happen the senate would elect a vice president in a similar matter, if the house was unable to decide on a president than the senate elected vice president would serve as president till the house decided on a real president.
>>70700437
I still have his bumper sticker. I lost faith in politics over him because Independance don't have a chance of being elected.
>>70700437
your dad's donald trump
>>70704591
He should of ran under the Republican ticket. 3rd parties haven't been relevant since the 1920s
>>70707507
>Bush sr.
>January 20, 1989 – January 20, 1993
Dis-regard that comment.
He had to run independent, the Democrats wouldn't like him...
Proto-Trump
>5'5"
>>70709063
>height
Yeeep, that's what kinda fucked Dukakis too.
