Alright, so, Syndicalism.
General idea seems to be workers unionising and managing their own workplaces, while sending delegates to syndicates and syndicate federations in order to co-ordinate on broader industrial matters.
But let's wind this back a bit.
The self-managed workplace. How does that work? In a factory, for instance, there needs to be co-ordination between the guys arranging for the delivery of raw materials, the guys working machinery tirning those raw materials into stuff, the guys handling delivery of completed goods, the guys handling the accounts, etc. Furthermore, each one of those tasks in themselves requires co-ordination. And not every worker is smart enough to self-manage 100%, especially in a situation like this.
So, in such a workplace, do the workers nominate co-ordinators amongst themselves? Or does everyone just kind of try to co-ordinate with eachother in a really inefficient, anarchic kerfuffle?
>>70679889
>page 10
>no responses
...Syndies btfo?
>>70679889
And the Jews get btfo
>>70682123
Syndicalism is a joke ideology though. Almost as bad as libertarianism
>>70679889
How is political group identity formed and recognized?
Does each workplace/factory/farming commune send their own delegates,
>The widget cutters, fitters, framers of Factory A all vote for one delegate, as do those of Factory B and C and so on
or does each industry/occupation
>cutters union votes for a delegate, fitters union votes for a delegate, framers union
and/or geographical location- what part does it play?
>The Widget factory group of the East may have different interests than those of the West, based on different resources under their feet, different weather.drought patterns, cultures, demographics, etc
>The cutter's union of the North may have different interests than those of the South, for the same reason
Also, someone give me a solid definition of personal property vs private property.
>>70683441
Right libertarian here. Substantiate yourself.
>>70683748
Good questions.
From what I understand, Syndicalism is anti-capitalism. Is there a capitalist version?
I wouldn't want such a operative scheme to take place at the federal level considering the United States (rightly) emphasizes the states in the federal system. I would, however, be interesting in experimenting a capitalist compatible institution as one branch of the state, and perhaps even local, legislature. The other branch, of course, would remain popularly elected.
>>70679889
They tried this in Tito's Yugoslavia and were surprised to discover that nobody wants to work an eight hour shift and then do four hours of white collar work stymied by politicking.
>>70679889
Fascism is just national syndicalism. It's far more efficient.
>>70686176
If you want to learn basic fascism (real syndicalism), read this.
https://pdf.yt/d/Xm3KNoxQuBK9mHlX
>>70686266
Seems legit.
>>70686266
Here's a facsimile of the book. It's 3.6 MB though. The other file is only 240 KB.
The Coming Corporate State - Saginaw Valley State University
http://www6.svsu.edu/~jalewis2/British/British%20Fascism/1935%20Corporate%20State.pdf
>>70688476
The website has more PDFs on British Fascism.
http://www6.svsu.edu/~jalewis2/British/British%20Fascism/
Where /leftypol/ when you need them?
>>70686023
It didn't fail completely. It worked much more than a command economy or capitalist oligarchy.
