>show showing the decline of society
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a55093/most-of-americas-youth-arent-straight/
Teenagers are confused over their sexuality?
Shocking.
>>70679795
You need to keep in mind this includes minorities and women.
Gas the fags, gender war now?
>just fapped to traps
>exclusively fuck women
You mad OP?
looking forward to the suicide spike coming soon
>>70679795
rip the west
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-d4UJWQXaVw
How large was the sample size in that study? Not too long ago cosmopolitan gave a story about how "half of men are OK with rape", and then it turned out to be some crappy university petition with sample size of 10 men, and the questions were loaded questions.
>>70679795
This is literally impossible.
>>70679795
I blame plastic and whatever other weird chemical cocktails we are in contact without knowing it.
>>70680069
Child abuse by a mentally handicapped mother.
I don't identify myself as straight
i don't like to think about that it's confusing, i think sexuality is a meme, each person is different, thats why tumblr invented 800 new ''genders'', i think people should stop thinking/talking about that its pointless.
>>70679795
Lies to normalize the desired cultural proclivity.
> If more than 50% do this surely i should look into it.
> Got to jump onto the bandwagon.
>>70679795
>cosmopolitan
you might as well cite the Sunday Funnies OP
>>70679795
Pure propaganda. When they ask they say rate yourself 0 - 6, 0 being exclusively straight. My initial impression was that saying "0" meant I couldn't even think "hey that's a good looking guy", so I put 1. 1 doesn't mean I'm ready to get plugged in the ass.
>>70679795
Who cares, it's 100% of women and only 4% of men
>>70679795
Out of how many people? All they list are percentages.
This study could be on 5 people for all we know.
And they said Calhoun was crazy when he was talking about the behavioral sink
"Identify as exclusively hetero" - so if some confused 14-year-old chick thinks she might want to eat pussy one day, she counts as "queer" in this "study." Ok.
>>70680069
At age five I couldn't make my mind up on what socks to wear let alone understand and choose a gender...
>>70679795
>look at the article
>it cites another article on an equally shitty site
>that article does not have a link link to the report
>at least they name the company
Here's more information about the study. It's done by a marketing group, which sounds pretty sketchy.
https://www.jwtintelligence.com/2016/03/gen-z-goes-beyond-gender-binaries-in-new-innovation-group-data/
>>If you family would be killed if you didn't go homo... would you...
EVERYONE is HOMOSEX!
Remember when it was a crazy religious nutjob conspiracy to think that gay people were trying to turn kids gay?
