My liberal professor told me that society hates the far right because there are no good words to describe anything the far right supports.
So I'm doing this project as a way to prove him wrong. So /pol/, below are some words which are very far right, and I need the word, or a similar word, or a fabricated word, to replace it to make it sound positive in the eyes of a liberal:
National socialism
Fascism
racial homogeneity
racial hygiene
state-religion
monarchy
If anyone can think up more words for this project, it'd be helpful. We gotta make it sound good. Who knows, this might be good for memes
>>70666897
>no good words o describe anything the far right supports.
What do you mean with this.
National Solidarity
>>70667044
Because all far right words are already charged with "hate speech". Like, if I said I supported "Racial hygiene" I sound like a nazi who wants to kill six million jews.
Racial separation leads to the development of individual cultures which enrich future multicultural societies.
>>70667392
The only one I can think of are
>Common sense policies - Reagan
>Pro-life
but liberals certainly take the cake
"Sharing"
Equality
>>70666897
your professor is correct though; liberals have turned everything associated with the right into a slur, and even associated things that are bad with the right to muddy it. see your picture: nazi germany and national socialism are far left economically, monarchy is not even on the spectrum but it's about as far from elected small government as you can get, as is state religion.
hell, your entire fucking list is fallacious, none of these things are unique to any part of the political spectrum. you are a walking strawman. shit thread, 3/10 had me going for a minute
>>70666897
Sure there are.
It's not racism, it's biodiversity. We wouldn't destroy different species of animal by deliberately interbreeding them, why would we do that to humans?
>>70667392
Is "Racial hygiene" that you only propagate with people from the same race? When yes where is there a problem with it?
>>70666897
Patriotism
Autarchism
Traditionalism
Don't know what the fuck it is because I'm not afraid of jews
Population reinforcement
Princeps among equals
>>70666897
Cultural/ Ancestral Appreciation
Strong public service infrastructure
Cohesive public identity
???
???
???
He is right though, the public has been tricked into hating these things by association without even giving them a second through by instantly conflating the terminology involved with some arbitrary concept of "evil"
These already exist. You need to do more research into the New Right. Do you want me to do your homework for you faggot?
>>70667559
I thought of these ones. But, they're too maintstream. It's crazy how liberals have a dialectic war with the right wing, and they're pretty much winning, because killing babies is wrong, but god-forbid we take away a woman's right to choose whats best for their own body.lol
>>70667483
Would "Conservative diversity" work?
>>70666897
>national socialism
>socialism
Nazis were lefties, retard.
A positive word for racial homogeneity would be harmony.
Your teacher obviously allowed you to get on with your project because he ha's intent on failing you. No matter what you present to him he'll likely just dismiss it as hateful because it does not fit in with his view of the world. Moreover, trying to teach a leftist about national solidarity when they believe that all cultures and nations are equal and without fault is ineffective.
>>70666897
National socialism -> Share Our Wealth Movement
Fascism -> ???
racial homogeneity -> Safe spaces
racial hygiene -> Biological diversity
state-religion -> Environmentalism
monarchy -> Anti-obstructionism
>>70666897
Remind him that leftists are inconsistent. They'd say a jungle tribe or Aborigines have the right to preserve their culture, but they don't extend the logic to Western civilization.
>>70667697
The far right is historically always been "socialist" in practice, not in name. The first conservatives suppoted social institutions and programs. Liberals are literally "For liberty". It's only lately it's been associated with equality, because equality and liberty were a big part of the declarations of the rights of man, which pretty much determined the fate of left and right.
>>70666897
Tell him that nazis were actually similar to today's faggots from antifa.
>>70668057
>>70668367
I should have remembered that.
Updated list:
National socialism -> Share Our Wealth Movement
Fascism -> Antifascism
racial homogeneity -> Safe spaces
racial hygiene -> Biological diversity
state-religion -> Environmentalism
monarchy -> Anti-obstructionism
>>70667875
Conservatives have
>Freedom
and
>Low taxes
so thats pretty good
maybe also
>in god's eyes
National Socialism is the nemesis of the New World Order, Communism and Capitalism. The only true system to support the worker, and the greatest economic recovery in the history of the world in the shortest time imaginable were National Socialism. That is why the entire Capitalist and Communist world combined to destroy National Socialism. The only real enemy of International Jewry. Is it any wonder they discredit it at every opportunity?
Adolf Hitler reformed the German Banking system in this way: Hitler nationalized the German Central Bank. He removed it from private Jewish hands and returned it to German Governmental control. That is why Germany had a healthy growing economy when the US & UK were trapped in the Great Depression. The real reason for the Second World War was because Hitler saved the German people from Jewish Debt Slavery by nationalizing the Jewish owned & controlled German Central Bank. Within 3 years Germany went from having the weakest economy in Europe to the Strongest & was debt free, had no inflation, no trade deficit, was at full employment, and no national debt. International Jewry feared this example of what a free people could do once the shackles of Jewish Debt Slavery were removed. They destroyed him for standing up to them. That is why the Jews hated him. National socialism puts the economy, the state, everything under the nation and the goal is to best serve the nation.
>>70666897
Just know by writing something proving him wrong, you'll get a fail.
>>70668027
see
>>70668179
Socialists exist on both sides.
>>70667939
It's the sowing phase of productive diversity. Currently many countries are reaping far too much diversity causing many of the unique cultural traits to disappear without any new cultural traits to replace them.
Europe especially suffers from this as many of the unique European cultures have been diluted with foreign European ideas while no new culture has been replacing it. This is extremely obvious in areas like Belgium and Germany where the native culture has become irrelevance and ww2 guilt respectively.
For productive and beneficial diversity there must be a cycle.
Destructive diversity destroys nations and fuels revolution.
Good luck explaining even a minute part of that to a Socialist though. They only believe in taking.
>Ruin tomorrow for gains today?
>Sign me up for double! (Debt, reduction of agriculture, mass imports without national production)
i was joking about how it must have been hard for the people who cleaned up the dead jews during the holocaust and all these normies looked at me like i was an insensitive psychopath
it must been some job to clean up all those dead jews. there should be a dark comedy film about that
>>70668530
Sources? I want to agree with you.
>>70668647
Gotta do it. For the truth.
>>70668530
Fuck this is the most based post. Love it
>>70666897
Your professor has a point
>National socialism
>fascism
NatSoc is Nazis. You will never ever get anyone who is not far right to agree that NatSoc was good. Fascism is essentially the same as the above.
>racial homogeneity
>racial hygiene
Neither of these are good things. They divide us and cause conflicts. There is nothing wrong with racial pride but trying to divide people always causes conflicts that will eventually grow into wars. We have seen enough wars revolving around those two to know this by now.
If people want to practice those things in their own life that is fine but making them state principles is the easiest way to fuck a lot of different people up.
>state-religion
>monarchy
Outdated crap that nobody in the West who isn't an edgelord would see any intelligence in. State's should be separated from religion in order to allow no bias when dealing with those of different religions. And monarchies become hell holes as soon as you elect an asshole, or whenever an uprising occurs due to no free way to become the leader.
>>70668500
>Fascism -> Antifascism
Kek. It's true.
>>70666897
alt right, white advocate, white genocide
>>70666897
Fascism/National Socialism removes the power from the banks, and print their own money debt free (though it can create inflation). This keeps taxes low, no debt slavery to the taxpayer. And this money is given out interest free. You will still pay some taxes in order for the government to finance shit, yet the banks have lost their power due to fractional reserve banking also no longer possible. It is also no longer legal to create profit from war, i.e. financing both sides with interest and things like this.
I.e. the rich will be stripped from their power and they just can buy stuff or create companies. They are no longer able to create debt slaves and create money at the same time causing inflation.
NatSoc/Fascism is monetary freedom.
If you want a fancy word, call it traditionalism.
>>70668179
america is not the world, so if you're talking about american left and right specifically you should say so, but in that context almost none of your listed examples apply; monarchism, fascism, national socialism, none of these things have ever existed in mainstream american politics on either side. you're a mess m8. the only one that could be argued to apply is state religion and even that not really; the christian right has always been a social swell within the right wing but even there it has grappled with separation of church and state.
>>70669153
>NatSoc is Nazis
Wrong, national socialism is an umbrella term. Nazis were German.
>Neither of these are good things
They don't divide. I think a proper eugenics program would prove well for a society after so many generations. And it's not like we castrate people. Hell, the gubment can just subsidize people with good genetics to grow a big family.
And I think the most proper way to support racial homogeneity is to support racial pride, for EVERYBODY.
>Outdated crap that nobody in the West who isn't an edgelord would see any intelligence in.
Problem with democracy is that lobbyism is elected, not the people. And if you think it's "collectivist", you're wrong, because it's about as individualist as one can be. If 2 people vote for the chocolate pie, because they're allergic to blueberries, they're gonna end up dead because of the three people who voted blueberry pie, when both parties could have compromised on a single issue. A reason why monarchy (Not ours, btw) is good, is because when someone inherits the throne, it's their fucking life; they know if they fuck up, they can't blame it on the next guy or the guy before them; they are born into the role, and therefore own that role.
I digress, I don't like theocracy. But it would be interesting if I knew a way to make it sound positive.
>>70669602
Left and right all stem from the same left and right, ideas created in france, because people who opposed the new government sat to the right, while the liberals sat to the left. Historically, the rightwing has always historically been socialist, because they had social programs in a seemingly "conservative" country.
>>70669844
National Socialism was specifically what the Nazis called their government type. It is unique to them.
If you seriously don't think that your untested fantasy of entire countries made up of racial homogeneous sub communities would not divide people and lead to conflict then you need to go back to high school before you continue your post-secondary career because you missed some fundamental history lessons.
>Problem with democracy is that lobbyism is elected, not the people. And if you think it's "collectivist", you're wrong, because it's about as individualist as one can be. If 2 people vote for the chocolate pie, because they're allergic to blueberries, they're gonna end up dead because of the three people who voted blueberry pie, when both parties could have compromised on a single issue. A reason why monarchy (Not ours, btw) is good, is because when someone inherits the throne, it's their fucking life; they know if they fuck up, they can't blame it on the next guy or the guy before them; they are born into the role, and therefore own that role.
I don't even know what the fuck you are babbling about at this point.
>>70670300
>If you seriously don't think that your untested fantasy of entire countries made up of racial homogeneous sub communities would not divide people and lead to conflict then you need to go back to high school before you continue your post-secondary career because you missed some fundamental history lessons.
They don't need to be completely racial homogenous. In fact, I'm not even a racist. I don't like the idea. I myself am like 95% white, and the rest is native. A lot of people where I live are the same. But we talk the same, have the same accent, eat the same food. Someone who lives here, I know what they're like, what they do for fun; I know their life even if I've never met them. We need the ethnic homogeneity; it's what makes us a prosperous people. I mean, Britain conquered the world, and America conquered the world, and Rome conquered the world, and it wasn't until their empires fell because of immigrants that they lost it all; empires crumble from within, because the empire is questioned. A roman empire with goths and celts and germanic barbarians isn't a roman empire; the empire fell because it wasn't a ROMAN empire.
western civilization is falling, because the west is no longer western.
More than enough proof
>>70669153
>racial homogeneity divides us and causes conflicts
It's funny, I don't recall a race war ever being on the cards when the US was mostly racially homogeneous
They've had two terms of a black president and racial tensions are the worst since lynching was a thing
>>70666897
Get on-board with the new codewords fampai, these days we're fighting for "cultural homogeneity" to "improve societal stability and national prosperity"
It's honest, it's a part of what we want, and it presents an image of a peaceful, united society. The best part is, if you get people thinking about how to achieve cultural homogeneity, they will soon have to consider the necessity of racial segregation and domination within a nation. It follows common sense logic; the less differences people have between each other, the easier they'll get along.
You cannot tackle the task of uniting a nation without considering race.
>>70668530
How about you nationalise healthcare and send a big fuck you to big pharma and people paying 20k for a godamn appendix surgery? Or free/mostly free education? Does it sound a little bit like socialist bernie? Then why the fuck do you all far right idiots vote for Trump?
>>70671530
How memed are you?
>>70670147
most people don't even know that today, so what does it matter to modern left and right? the KKK was a democrat institution, that doesn't mean racial purity is an important aspect of the modern left.
>>70671690
Nice argument there.
How much of a meaningless, uneducated existence are you anyways?
>>70669153
did someone ask for your opinion?
>>70671917
Are you angry about something?
>>70666897
>National socialism
Community involvement
>Fascism
Roman democracy
>racial homogeneity
Cultural cohesion
>racial hygiene
Ensuring that no baby is born in to a life which evil western society deems pitiful
>state-religion
A symbiotic relationship between two powerful organisations which keep each other in check
>monarchy
A devoted servant of the nation to act as a safeguard in the event of democratic collapse
>>70671917
Woah, rare flag! How's it going Cyprus?
>>70674027
Now that's some good shit. Keep on keeping on Goebbels.
>>70668974
>>70669089
TGSNT
>>70668530
"Of course, if we succeeded in losing two world wars, wrote off all our debts- instead of having $30 million in debts- got rid of all our foreign obligations, and kept no force overseas, then we might be as rich as the Germans." - Harold Macmillan.
(Now, one could argue Germany as a region suffered an institutional cost in defending against the hated Turk throughout the early modern era - a significant military expense that, by dint of priority, largely prevented the Austrians from capitalizing on colonial trade. But you're not going down that road so)
>>70674027
>>70674665
sheeeeeeeeeeeeeit
>>70666897
National Syndicatism
National Catholicism
Voluntary Sacrificism
Homeowners Association
>>70666897
NS: National Solidarity, through community building, business regulation, and reform of education and healthcare.
Fascism: giving a voice to workers in all their fields to change their own lives. I don't know if this applies to Mussolini, but for someone like Mosely, it makes sense.
Racial Homogeneity: (preservation of) native identity, resistance to colonization/erasure, pretty much any liberal buzzwords you can think of in this direction will make their heads spin.
Racial Hygiene: planned parenthood, taking into consideration the latest science to inform the community and offe
State-religion: union of brotherly love?? dunno, maybe reference my points for racial homogeneity.
Monarchy: (in its ideal form) rule of the best. A revolution against bureaucracy (in a manner of speaking--kings still relied on underlings to help with a lot of things, although they would be able to reach their entire countries and rule more independently now). An acknowledgement of the will of the people to determine their own government (in some forms that allow people to choose and depose kings based on virtue).
