Why do you actually need a gun? Are you some pathetic fat manlet who can't defend himself against some nigger?
And what makes you think you could possibly survive a government onslaught in your neighbourhood to begin with? Your pea shooter Chinese handgun versus a highly trained SWAT unit. Good luck fatty
Or are you just compensating for the small penis you have? Be honest
Guns are fun.
You don't hate fun, do you?
You seem to think that a SINGLE one would attack you. Those fucking animals attack in packs, you'd be dealing with at least three at once. Anyone can beat the shit out of a single nigger or mudslime.
>>70654056
Know what the difference between the left and the right in those pictures?
The left requires an operator, ammunition, and a small amount of maintenance.
The right requires multiple operators, all willing to fire upon US citizens, ammunition, fuel, said infrastructure to supply fuel and ammunition as well as a substantial amount of maintenance and money to create and to keep running.
Get fucked fog breather and bin that knife.
>>70654056
Why do you actually need to go on the internet and shit post?
why is the top half commercial and bi planes.........
>>70654056
But muh 2nd amendment!
>>70654056
Ohh I see it now. Britbing is being """"""""ironic""""""""
Do you know how many people have guns in the US? Canada?
The government would have to mass murder its own citizens in order to control those who resist with guns.
>>70654056
They're easy to spot we aren't. We outnumber them. Most of them won't be willing to kill their own. We only need to get a few people in charge.
>>70654587
Your gubmint took out 2000 civvies with 2 passenger planes a few years ago
>>70654432
If your argument is "any revolution against the state would be supported by the army" then your own premise implies civilian gun ownership isnt necessary for a revolution. The military will side with you anyway. Or at least part of it.
Just tell the truth: guns are necessary to defend yourself against dindus.
>>70654056
>Are you some pathetic fat manlet who can't defend himself against some nigger?
Tell that to a woman who's 5'3" being followed by a 250 lbs 6'4" nigger
>>70654056
> jealous bong
> bitter over loss of empire and impending forced conversion to islam
>>70654056
Not an argument, senpai.
Don't even own a single firearm and yet I understand the basic necessity of a well-informed and well-armed populace for resistance against tyranny.
>>70654056
The only thing that can actually enforce martial law are soldiers. Not tanks, not jets, not drones, not subs, etc. Attempting to control what you want to own, by firing explosives at it, doesn't work that. You destroy your own infrastructure. That's why you need soldiers. And soldiers can be shot.
>>70654056
>what makes you think you could possibly survive a government onslaught
>what is the vietnam war
>>70654056
Is this the new "Everyday until you like it?"
>>70654056
How do many assorted commercial planes, including a cesna, a crop dusting plane and a 747 jumbo jet and assorted other transport planes pose any sort of a threat to the average joe?
A submarine? Really? Also, why would they be using an AK?
>>70654056
I wish we as a board could come together and agree to stop replying seriously to low effort shitposts like this every single day.
>>70654056
I go hunting.
I enjoy my pastime.
>defend himself against some nigger?
I live in a safe place. A gun isn't for defence where I live.
Word your post better son.
>>70654432
Actually half the stuff on the right isn't even armed. And a bunch of it is Soviet. So it either can't fire on Americans or would be pretty willing, but only because it's filled with Russians.
>>70654056
What do gun bans do and why should we pay for them? Do they even correlate with homicide? You want to misuse money taken under the threat of force while I merely want to shoot some paper targets.
>>70654056
>US military can't kill alquaeda in 15 years
>Wonders why we keep guns
tryharderfaggot.jpg
Right and people would gladly kill their own countrymen, families and support after the civil war? That is a stupid position most military personnel would leave and join state militia's.
Does anyone read the rest of the pic?
>>70654056
Civilians can actually own fighter jets in the like, it has been this way since the late 1700s; a rich man had his own private gunship and it was gucci.
Britbong btfod
can't oppress or overrun 300 million people with your shitty army 1/300th the size. pure bait.
Why do you feel the need to police a crime before it happened with no evidence that it will happen? typical indoctrinated britbong logic. No right of self defense here in england. better just let the nignog stab and rape me to death instead of popping his nugget.
Can someone post that "Who would win? A small militia of Vietnamese or entire US army?" picture?
>>70655229
Or stay in the military to sabotage equipment while drawing government paycheck.
>>70654056
>>70654056
>>70655348
Most would take anything equipment wise they could find and use it offensively.
>>70654056
I'm 5'6", 150lbs. If some 6'4" 300lb nigger comes after me, I'm fucked. There's just too much of a physical difference there. Am I just suppose to roll over and die because you're afraid of guns?
God made Man. Samuel Colt made Man equal.
I'm not even burger, but:
Bill of rights, not bill of needs.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
etc.
>>70654056
Purely to piss people like you off.
>>70654056
Somebody post that /k/ screencap of the logistical nightmare of a modern US civil war, i.e. da gubberment being totally unable to win against muh guns.
>>70654056
>Chinese handgun
If only
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun?
I don't. I can make high explosives in my kitchen using shit from fucking Publix and Ace god-damn Hardware.
Picric acid and DDNP are particularly handy, especially mixed with ammonium nitrate from instant cold packs.
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun?
Because Niggers and other non-whites.
>UK poster
You're about to experience this first hand.
>>70654250
He's a Muslim, of course he hates fun.
FTFU
>>70654056
Niggers usually have illegal guns.
I'm not quickly enough to dodge the bullets
>>70654056
>Or are you just compensating for the small penis you have? Be honest
Stop trying to grab my benis.
>It's another "Guns don't win guerrilla wars" thread by a European
>>70655699
http://www.theammosource.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=2_3_73&zenid=127e80868eb53130f87b6f9cc558e454
This is the same mindset that made it illegal for you to own a butter knife lmao
>>70654056
>Vietnan
>Middle East right now
I own a gun to trigger the left and Europeans who are even worse.
>>70654056
you should have posted an image that supports your point instead of one that makes you look like a retard
stop being such a jealous little cunt
>>70654056
Why would america BOMB ITSELF? AND WOULDN"T IDK HALF OF THE "Miltary" SIDE WITH THE NRA?
>>70654841
>If your argument is "any revolution against the state would be supported by the army" then your own premise implies civilian gun ownership isnt necessary for a revolution.
Good thing that wasn't his argument then, huh?
>>70654056
This did beat this multiple times in history. Heavily underestimating the effect guerrilla warfare has on Modern Militaries, especially when that military has to question to themselves if it's ethically moral to mow down citizens of the country you swore to defend.
So do away with the 2nd amendment just because militaries exist? Explain to me how that makes any sense at all. That should be an argument for MORE Americans citizens to be armed with MORE weaponry.
Oh come one now...we all know that nignogs fight in packs! I think having a gun to repel the average 6 vs 1 chimpout is a wise move.
>>70656574
This its never 1 on 1 with spics or niggers they never fight fair. That's why we carry the equalizer
>>70654056
When every random sperg has a gun, enforcing a police state/tyrannical government is impossible.
Do you think law enforcement will want to kick in a door looking for contraband or trying to arrest a dissident if they think there's a semi-automatic weapon behind said door?
Predator drones and tanks can't perform a raid, they can't police a corner, they can't stop 300 million people who want change.
Also this whole argument seems to forget that a bunch of tunnelnigger gooks with old soviet weapons gave the combined US armed forces one hell of a bloody nose.
Sure are a lot of NRA shills tonight. Let's point out the hypocrisy:
>w-we need it against the dindus!
Meanwhile claiming more guns make you a safer country, despite the apparent imminent dindu attack
>da gubmint wouldn't get the army to shoot it's own people!
It's like you've never heard of propaganda and divide and rule before
>b-bin that knife!
Literal memes
>>70656990
>>70654056
That's not a T-34, that's an IS heavy tank.
>>70656990
To add to this
Crown loyalist probably said similar things about not being able to beat the British military to American rebels in 1776, and look how that turned out, unfortunately.
>>70654056
If that pic is true, why haven't we beaten the Taliban in Afghanistan? They only have guns and we can't stop them.
Checkmate, Leftists.
>>70657096
NRA sucks and actually lobbied FOR stronger gun laws.
GOA and JPFO are both superior.
Best thing about high-powered rifles? They shred cop vests.
>>70657096
UK has few to no guns and has more violent crime than the US despite the population gap.
Have a free (you) though
>>70657096
What do gun bans do and why should we pay for them?
>>70657410
TIL my state makes you suicidal.
>>70654056
Fear is the control, weapons are measure of fear, weapons are controlled by people, and people are controlled by their minds.
So control the minds and you control all.
>>70657096
Yeah, because the state should regulate whether or not we can defend ourselves. After all, we just aren't trusted by our leaders.
Seriously, you're a fucking cuck m8.
>>70654056
I think you need them more than we do, but have fun with Jamal and Mohammed. Roll 1d6 for anal circumference
>>70654056
But it can beat pic related
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun?
I wanted one and they're constitutionally protected.
>Are you some pathetic fat manlet who can't defend himself against some nigger?
Yes.
>And what makes you think you could possibly survive a government onslaught in your neighbourhood to begin with?
Iraq, Afganistan, Vietnam, 1st Bundy Standoff.
>Your pea shooter Chinese handgun versus a highly trained SWAT unit.
Don't care.
>Good luck fatty
Thanks
>Or are you just compensating for the small penis you have?
5 inches by 5 inches.
>>70657096
How about you mind your own business? Guns are part of states culture. Who are you to preach what they should do?
If they take the piss out of us about knives they're only jealous, (the intelligent ones) we live in a much less violent culture.
>>70657392
Just like your definition of white and ours, violent crime is gauged differently.
>>70654056
>da governement is invading mah backyard with sumareens !
>>70654056
Walking downstairs with a shotgun in hand to investigate a noise in the middle of the night is an entirely different venture without the shotgun.
>>70654056
> implying you stand better chances against a tank without a rifle
When the muslims hit critical mass and make a push to install their caliphate, our gun laws will make a lot more sense to you.
>>70654056
SHALL
>>70654056
Everyone has a right to defend themselves, their family and their property. Having a firearm is one of the best ways to accomplish this.
If I could un-holster a cop on demand, I would gladly do so, but I take it you realize how stupid that sounds.
Cops show up AFTER the fact.
>>70657825
>a bike tire
>electronics
>>70654056
>image about why an insurrection in the US wouldn't work
>has a picture of a fucking T-34 on the US government side
It's really obvious that a no-guns liberal idiot made this graphic
>>70658000
Like 10% in France?
You're less than 60% white right now and declining.
Stop projecting your personal fears onto the rest of us.
We have decades to go before we get to you today.
/k/ here
Reminder that OP is a faggot and the UK is fucked
a """"""solviet"""""" t34
I'll just come out and say it. The reason it's so hard for us to kill insurgent forces like ISIS is because they consist of almost solely infantry that use guerilla warfare tactics. Hence why it's called an insurgency. The argument that "citizens couldn't fight against the military!" is absurd. What's the stop citizens from taking US military equipment, just like ISIS has, and what's to stop us from constantly hitting and retreating in the chaos of a dense city, just like ISIS is doing.
There's a reason people use guerilla tactics and fight insurgencies. Because it works when you are on the defensive and/or when you are severely undergeared/undermanned.
>>70654056
That "T-34" is actually an IS-2
>>70654056
Its not a t 34. Its a is 1.
This argument is so dumb. It seems to me completely obvious that the gun owners in america would win against the government. how retarded can you be? Just the morale alone of soldiers fighting in an urban environment that is their own country would ensure victory. Second, you can't just bomb the shit out of your own country. most of this stuff would even be used. Like haven't these fucks seen the wars the past 50 years??? and how none of them were won, against shitty poor people in countries nobody cares about? how the fuck would you win against your own country against like millions of people? And we'd probably get help from Russia or something. I mean what the fuck. A swat unit or a special ops crew costs a shit ton of money and resources. and most of the military would probably be against the government. navy seals for example would lead against tyrannical govt. and so on. basically what would happen is the secret service would grow and it'd be some new military division, against former soldiers and civilians in urban environments doing guerilla warfare. good luck with your high tech weapons that aren't made for such a conflict
The point of an armed civilian populace isn't to beat the government in an all-out war with biplanes and scud launchers.
It's to raise the political cost of tyranny to the point that the government wouldn't try that shit in the first place.
There's a reason why Occupy gets thrown out of the park by force while Cliven Bundy gets asked nicely to please calm down.
>>70658762
This semi frog has the right idea.
>>70658762
This is the first leaf poster I have agreed with. Good on you, Canada!
Don't worry, American Goyim, let us restrict your access to firearms. Don't worry, you can trust us with your safety. We have your best interests in mind.
>>70658269
>culture saturated with guns
>mock a culture where the most threatening things are knives
It's like Brazil mocking Portugal for not having favelas.
>>70654056
Nah its for the right wing civilians killing the left wing ones while the right wing military oversees the operation
>>70654056
ive never really felt in danger where I live, but its nice to know I have them if I need them, and that I can arm some of my friends and neighbors if shtf. but the main reason i own most of mine is because i have an interest in history and that they're fun as fuck to shoot. no reason to be upset, my friend. it's cool if you guys hate guns over in england.
>>70654841
Yeah, the Romanians did not have guns when the revolution in '89 erupted, but the army still sided with us.
>>70654662
>this is a bad thing
>>70654056
Tell that to the Vietnamese you brit-nigger. A revolution against the government would be fought guerrilla style against a fractured US military.
Don't make us dump your tea into the Boston harbor again faggot.
>>70657256
Plebs don't know any Soviet tanks besides the T-34.
They also think every German tank was a Tiger.
>>70654056
Does America need to kick your British ass again, you dirty cuck?
>>70658995
>culture saturated with ISIS operatives
>mock a culture where the most threatening thing is nig nog street crime
It's like North Korea mocking China for not being communist enough
>>70659018
This is a very nice Mauser, you've got there. Is it an original one?
>>70658266
We've got our own issues with brownies no doubt, but we're about to deport 20 million of them and have otherwise tamed them enough that they aren't calling to replace our institutions with Sharia. And if and when the time for action has come, we'll have the means to assert ourselves. What will the Euros do twenty years down the line when they're minorities in their own countries and their institutions are turned on their head I wonder.
>>70654056
Why does the British Army need guns? can't they just win all their wars with fistfights? What are they, total pussies?
>>70659344
Don't be salty lad.
We don't actually envy your current situation. Kinda pity you but, didn't want to say.
>>70659419
1944 BYF. unfortunately its not all matching, though.
>>70658620
>you can't just bomb the shit out of your own country
Russians did it. Considering your propaganda machine is 100x more effective I don't see how it would be impossible. They can spin a tune along the lines of domestic terrorists, blockade information/travel between states and create false flag attacks to divide and conquer any feasible civilian movement.
To be honest, your government doesn't even need to send in the army, just besiege the rebellious area and cut off power/water/food supplies while exaggerating any counter attacks by the opposition as horrific crimes against humanity eventually setting in a 'us vs them' scenario.
Just as a starter see Ukraine, they had their divisions and in under a few months some saw the others as subhumans.
>>70654056
this should be on the god damn sticky and posts like this should be terminated and banned
>>70654056
>that fucking t-34-85
>>70654056
Mine are for hunting. Also have a couple pistols for target shooting.
>who can't defend himself against some nigger
You mean like an old man? A woman? Someone who's physically disabled?
Why should old man Perry McPensioner and his wheelchair-bound neighbor Chrissy O'Cripple be at the mercy of thugs, thieves and all others who would use physical violence to bully the weak because you're scared of guns?
Guns are the great equaliser for this exact reason. They allow the most vunerable in a society to defend their property and life in the average fifteen minutes it takes for a police officer to arrive.
>>70659668
>Britain
>a monarchy that restricts free speech and free worship
UK = Saudi Arabia
You don't get to lecture free nations on policy.
Lmao of course it's a fucking brit crying about guns. Fuck off, cuck. We don't call emergency diving teams for a bunch of .22lr cartridges in a koi pond. Your society is so pussified that owning knives is taboo.
>>70659499
Mate, you have an insane gun crime problem and it's not enough to say it's just the nigs.
There's like a percent or two believing there should be sharia...
Do you actually think we should be envious of you? Really?
We all have our messes lad but you have the biggest of them all.
>>70659606
Don't be salty lad.
We don't atctually BTFO you out like that every day.
Kinda pity you didn't wanna say.
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun
>>70660581
>Portugal should be embarrassed they don't have favelas like Brazil
That's really how your argument works.
Absurd af.
>>70659819
And this is why they will never take guns away, only scare people that they will. that is what would start a civil war. They know guns are useless if you don't provoke people enough to use them. You just slowly take away their rights, and through social engineering people will accept things
>>70659943
The fun has only begun American.
>>70654250
Best answer. They're just for fun. People who own guns are just retards who enjoy feeling powerful and shooting guns, it's fun to them.
Who really cares, even if they're all retarded it's a free country. It's their right to act like fucktarded cocksuckers taking pictures of their guns all the time and showing off how super alpha they are.
>>70654056
In the event of an actual civil war, the government is going to lose a lot of its access to resources just because of the financial fallout alone. The military will also be divided.
Furthermore, the US is a much larger place than, say, the UK. Controlling that much area requires boots on the ground, and lots of them. It requires people that can go door to door. You would also find that predator drone coverage is very sparse, and that we can blend in in our own country so picking targets is not always easy.
We also would have a much easier time fucking up the government's supply chains, because many of us are part of them. If farmers and ranchers wind up not liking what Washington DC is doing, do you think that Washington DC is going to get fed? No, we will starve them out.
On top of that, most of us are not dumb enough to take on an M1 Abrams with small arms alone. What we can do, however, is wait until they have all rolled out on some mission, then kill the mechanics. When they roll out somewhere, we know where they are not.
There are enough privately held firearms in the US to arm every single soldier on the face of the Earth with around 5 firearms each Throwing in asymmetric warfare, and 320,000,000 people over nearly 4,000,000 square miles isn't going to happen if we don't want it to.
bait thread
>>70654056
>Dindus
I can take one or two dindus on my own, but if dindu's have knives or guns I need a fire arm.
>Inb4 why can't you defend like a man XDDD lol ebic b8!
If I have a choice between getting stabbed and not getting stabbed guess which one I prefer?
>Revolution
A revolution isn't likely, but in the event that one does occur, take this into consideration:
I can buy a Nugget for $200 and either hollow point or incenidary rounds in my state for cheaps.
This is enough firepower to cut through any infantry body armor currently produced.
Ans its not me vs military. Its the US vs the military. Our country was founded by 3% of the population who were brave enough to stand up: with those numbers today we have over 3 million combatants vs the military, who makes up less than a million on US soil.
>>70654056
>Need
Not called the bill of needs. I have a gun because I want one, and you will never, ever take it from me. Stay assfractured, thief.
>>70654056
>>70654056
>>70654056
Guns will defend you against niggers but only if you vote in that survey and derail it
>>70655486
>>70655486
>>70655486
>>70661119
Now I approve of Americans owning gunbs, My first post itt said that.
However, how many law abiding Americans exercising their second amendment right got wiped out in their own homes by the government?
It happens all too frequently and the rest of you are indifferent.
Where is this militia spirit when one of you gets their rights stripped away, in a hail of bullets?
It's a joke. You all live in a fantasy with toys.
>>70660284
You only have as many rights as what you can back up with force bruv. It's true of governments and also true of its citizens. We do have a problem with needing to civilize our black population, but if we manage that we'd have a gun problem only to the extent that countries like Switzerland do. I'd much rather live in a country that allows its citizens the ability to protect its own interests in a responsible manner than among a populace of pussies afraid of knives or how a stiff breeze might hurt them, that will inevitably be replaced by a people that don't consider their immediate personal safety the highest virtue anyway.
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun?
Cause I'm a fucking white male, you degenerate: I don't want to fistfight some scumbags who might be infected with god-knows-what, I want to pull the trigger and be on my way!
Also, was attacked by a crowd of about 20 football fans once for no reason at all. Was too busy getting the hell outta there to use the knife in my right pocket, but the pepper spray from my left pocket was quite useful: I was on a bike and gassed the whole lot of them as I was speeding away. Now, I only buy decent pepper sprays confirmed by YouTube tests on living subjects, so I know the bitches suffered, but still, I'd rather they all died. And if I was with my girlfriend, I'd have no other choice but to kill off as many of them as possible, and shooting motherfuckers is way more fun than stabbing them.
>>70661959
What are these mass murders of gun owners that you know about? I haven't heard a damn thing and I live here.
>>70661959
>Where is this militia spirit when one of you gets their rights stripped away, in a hail of bullets?
If I ever get cancer, I'm gonna go on a politician killing spree. Not like I have anything to lose at that point. I'll be sure to do some meth beforehand, maybe some a-PVP instead.
Then again, as long as I never get cancer, I will never commit said act of violence. So the government best hope I'm not one of those 1-in-3s that get cancer...
>>70654056
Remember vietnam, afghanistan, iraq?
>>70662190
Americans getting shot because they, in their own homes attempted to defend them when mistakes were made and police broke the wrong doors down?
There's quite a few been mentioned here over the years. And that's just here. Shameful state of affairs bud.
>Why do you actually need a gun? Are you some pathetic fat manlet who can't defend himself against some nigger?
I grew up in a rural area where the townies smash everybody who isn't them, I've been in dozens of fights, way, way more then you. And I'm still standing. And I am probably in way better shape then you too.
What I CAN'T do is punch out any of the grizzlies that live in the valley I overlook. I can mostly avoid problems with them by being smart and keeping my property less attractive to a bear then the rest of the mountain, but nothing is 100%.
>And what makes you think you could possibly survive a government onslaught in your neighbourhood to begin with? Your pea shooter Chinese handgun versus a highly trained SWAT unit. Good luck fatty
I have no intention of fighting the government. My government goes after politicians for mere thousands of dollars in misappropriation. I might not agree with everything it does, but I do not want to crush it or even harm it, it is fragile enough to begin with. I'd actually protect it if I could, and it was in need.
But if I retreated up beyond my house, there is a point near the summit where I can wedge in what is basically a horizontal crevice with a 1300 foot drop off at the end. Anybody approaching me would have to come single file around a corner. I could hold off a small army here by myself, unless they found a helicopter pilot with enough balls to approach from the other side and blow me to hell.
>Or are you just compensating for the small penis you have? Be honest
It's a decent size, I think. No women has ever complained. I'm happy with it. I often walk around nude.
>>70662660
Oh, you mean like a handful of cases? Learn to reword your sentences Nigel, you make it sound like thousands die in a month.
>>70662863
One case of your liberty taken isn't enough?
Shame on you.
That's a stain of your constitution lad. How many is big enough for you to consider?
>>70659606
yeah its pretty embarrassing that I can bust a cap in some negros ass rather than have to watch muhammed fuck my daughters and tut about it (quietly as to avoid prosecution for hate tuts)
>>70663235
You invented cuck porn lad, not us.
>>70654056
>3 commercial jets
>2 "sport" planes
Oh I'm laughing. Whoever made this just googled "big planes" and slapped them in.
>>70663075
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAH, is it shitty? Yes. Will I fight it? Yes. Is it as severe as you've dreamed it up to be? No.
>>70654056
Why have a fishing pole when there are commercial ships that do it better and faster? I fail to see your point OP
>>70663597
That's the spirit.
>>70654056
why do all these dumb faggots always assume that the people in the military will go along with fighting it's own people 100%? Do they assume they are robots or something?
>>70663235
Those Pakis in the Rotherham rape scandal were jailed for 100 years collectively. They'll probably hang themselves before they get out.
>>70662660
>tfw you know someone who got off shooting a cop because they raided his house without a warrant
>>70664120
In that case why have a gun at all? Someone inthe military will just defect and defend you.
>>70664642
why have a gun when you live in the bad part of town where the average police response time in over 40 minutes?
>>70664576
Or that guy in Texas who the grand jury no-billed him on homicide after he shot a cop who did have a warrant, but it was a no knock warrant.
The US is losing troops everyday. Seems to be working for the towelheads.
>>70664120
Look at them fraternising with their own kind.
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a bull? Are you some pathetic fat manlet who can't fuck his wide better than some nigger?
>And what makes you think you could possibly survive or induce a female orgasm to begin with? Your pee shooter British cockpistol versus a highly trained G unit. Good luck fatty
>Or are you just compensating for the small penis you have? Be honest
>>70654056
>Why do you actually need a gun?
Risk reduction. I could probably learn to jog barefoot but I wear shoes when I run because I'm not a poor African.
>what makes you think you could possibly survive a government onslaught in your neighborhood to begin with?
Deceit. I'm white, upper middle class, in my 30s and not even remotely "the type" to be some heavily armed militiaman. Roll in the tanks, roll out the new flags, I'm so glad you're here I've made you coffee. Niggers and hippies, huh? They suck! Thank you for your service.
The shooting comes later, when they're taking a shit or stuck at an intersection. Gun owners aren't soldiers, we're terrorists.
>Chinese handgun
The only Chinese weapon I own is one of the ones I'll be handing in when the confiscation comes. Gotta give them something to make it looks like you're complying. Maybe I'll tug a nose hair to get a nice tear rolling for my beloved SKS.
>>70666220
I love you /k/ please stay
>>70666450
We don't leave, we just get quiet and gray enough to blend in. If we stuck around long enough to win Chicago we can stick around for anything...
>>70654056
I dare you to look a handicapped man in the face and tell them "lol man up and fight them pussy"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TkkfTft-rpU
