I don't get this argument?
Is he saying men and women should be allowed to have the same sexual past?
I don't see a way to refute this.
men and women should have an equal amount of sexual experience :)
(a low amount because casual sex is for fucking retards)
>t. Virgin
>>70641713
He's saying that if 20 dudes shoved their dick into a bowl of cereal and shot a fat load into it, he would still eat it. Then he would thank the cereal for allowing him to eat it.
>>70641713
I wouldn't eat a bowl of Cheerios that had 20 dicks dipped in it.
>>70641713
Well look at this limp wristed faggot, can you honestly expect him to be picky? Any pussy he gets no matter jow desperate or ravaged the bitch is he'll take it and ask for Jamal's seconds.
>>70641713
A good key etc etc bad lock etc
And microchimerism on females
Feelings BTFO yet again by science
>>70641713
How many times are we going to have this thread?
SAGE
>>70642275
I am sorry i am not original enough for you.
you should downvote me for reposting. faggot.
Sex is not a treat, not for useless pleasure. It is only for strong and stable relationships. So no, neither men and women should be dicking around just because it makes them feel liberated
>>70641713
>>70641713
Do you think he even realizes that the example he just gave is the same as a dude who fucked 48 girls shaming a virgin into sleeping with him?
The cheerios in his example are a virgin, no one has eaten them before. He then makes them feel bad that they may have a problem giving their first time to someone who has fucked 48 other women.
This is almost the exact opposite point I think he thinks he is making.
>>70642947
If someone dropped 10 billion dollars to your lap you'd eat those words and go bang 10/10 women every day.
That is if you have testosterone and aren't a full cuck to a meme someone implanted in your mind about "the right thing to do"
>>70641713
Look up male microchimerism, essentially every mate a woman has leaves a genetic imprint on her DNA and her not conceived child's DNA. You settle down with a slut you get a baby that doesnt look like either of you.
Not to mention the female biological imperative is different than a males which is to shoot his seed into everyone he sees.
Lastly being a slut is easy, it takes no skill effort or finesse, and women derive worth from the value of their holes look at HAES movement.
>>70643143
Came here just to post this.
/thread
>>70641713
So in his arguement he is a bowl of cherrios that gets rejected by a whore, and this man is not an LSE cuck with no self-respect why?
>>70643761
>microchimerism
This fucking meme from idiots who know NOTHING about how HUMAN reproduction works, jesus christ.
>>70641713
>Casual sex
>Sexual liberation
>Radical sexual education
also known as Cultural Marxism
nice to see the Long march has worked
step 1: ignore all of sexual evolutionary history
step 2: make epic analogy
step 3: take 4 photos of yourself
congratulations, you are now le intellectual reddit glasses man
>>70644062
>>70644062
Read the ncbli study about microchirerism then kill yourself for being a retard.
I cant link it because im on a data plan just google it
Fucking idiot loser faggot you should be embarrassed
>>70641713
He's saying that men aren't allowed to decide which woman they want to have a relationship with, and must have a lawyer present if they want to even consider turning down a woman for any reason.
He's a cuck faggot who needs to stay out of other peoples business.
If a man doesn't want to date or have sex with a woman then they shouldn't be forced to.
Lying about sexual past is on the same level as lying about possessing an STD.
He needs to realise that some people will make choices and he needs to fuck off to let people decide their own future.
>>70644224
>the female human egg starts developing during EMBRYO development of the female in question
>During FETAL development of the same female, her eggs stop developing and enter a stasis till puberty
>From that point on she does not produce any more eggs, and never will ever again, and the number of eggs she has is reduced continuously until menopause where she runs out of eggs
>The egg is encapsulated by a protective layer of cells that feed the egg kept in the stasis, during this time it does not gain or lose any genetic material
>When the female ovulates and one of many eggs matures, it must encounter a sperm cell or DIE
>in addition a developing embryo/fetus does NOT receive genetic material from its mother beyond half of her genes that were in the egg, because of the syncytiotrophoblast, and microchimerism in humans is actually the opposite, with fetal cells passing to the mother and possibly causing cancer
It seems to me you retards think human cells can incorporate foreign DNA like bacteria do.
>>70641856
>casual sex is for fucking retards
virgin detected
>>70644224
You are an imbecile. Male microchimerism in a woman doesn't mean that the male cells in her body pass onto the embryo's DNA. And it's not even known how those women got that male DNA, sexual intercourse was just one of the possibilities listed.
The only ones who spout that "the past is the past" bullshit are people who:
>A
Has got a fucked up past
and / or
>B
Are dating someone with a fucked up past
>>70644945
You completely embarrassed yourself because you couldnt do a google search
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184
>>70645961
You completely embarrassed yourself because you don't understand that study, the implications of that study or how human reproduction works.
>>70645961
Do you even understand how human reproduction works?
Here, I laid it out for you:
>>70644945
>>70641713
Research shows that the more sexual partners you have the less likely each relationship going forward is going to last.
You're basically "training yourself" to engage in temporary relationships.
That being said, just find a girl who's had 1-3 serious relationships before you and stop being insecure. Women are pursued younger and that's more due to societal negligence.
I'm sure if women were trying to jump your bones during your masturbatory teenage years you would have made a couple mistakes as well.
>>70641713
>boffin cuck comedian pushes cultural marxism
Oh I've never heard that before, rabbi.
>>70643761
>slutty women's kids don't look like their fathers
>"it must be some kind of microchimerism!"
I think you're missing the obvious explanation here... Occam's Razor abides.
>>70646123
The fetus in utero in the new situation where the mother's DNA is changed is exposed to different elements than they would be effectively making your baby a nigger. Its a secondary change.
>>70646342
Can you rephrase that to make it intelligible you stupid fucking retard?
>>70644224
Micro what?
>>70641713
Would you like to eat from the same bowl of cereal as 50 other people?
>>70641713
Harams destroy nations, women want harams, their beta cucks accept their harams because they're happy to just sit in the corner and play with their little willy the whole time.
I've solved the code.
>>70641713
>I don't see a way to refute this.
Because you're retarded and lack basic critical thinking abilities.
Also stop making this fucking thread.
>>70643143
BTFO by a fucking Robot.
GG John Green, you were refuted by a NEET virgin.
>>70643526
>I'm so insecure all I can think about doing with money is fucking women
How many bulls did you prep today alone?
>>70645754
Depends on the severity or degree I'd say.
Someone fucks up in the past once a long time ago, I'll probably take the risk and assume it was a learning experience.
Someone has a history of fucking up multiple times, lack of values that are completely chaotic, degenerate etc.
No dice, their past is telling.
>>70646342
Nigger it doesn't work like that at all
How are people like cereal? This guy sucks dicks and he seems to be retarded.
>>70646342
The mother's DNA isn't changed. The DNA in her eggs isn't changed.
How do you propose these male cells that might be in the woman's body in tiny quantities could affect the genes of the fetus?
>pol struggles with simple analogies
>>70646342
Is the mother a nip? Why is her DNA actively chanting fast enough to make the baby a nigger?
>>70646456
>harems destroy nations
I like this observation, people ought to be loyal to each other. Loyalty in friendships, relationships, business, etc. It says a lot about a person's worth when they are reliable.
>>70646744
>>70646447
Cucks fail to respond to actual arguments against it
>>70641713
This analogy is retardet, no one would eat cheerious if it had had 48 dicks in it.
>>70646615
>I would do thing X if I was super rich
>I would only do thing X if I was super rich
These two things are different. The reason I mentioned women is because this thread is about that topic. You mongoloid.
I post this in every thread like this, usually quite long but ill keep it short:
Man has sex with 1000 women,
Whose the dad?
>he is
Whose the mum?
>each individual woman
Reverse this,
woman has sex with 1000 men,
Whose the mum?
>she is
Whose the dad?
>who knows?
There you go, and thats why since literally the dawn of time female promiscuity has been critical and mens has not.
Throw property into the mix and it's nagnified 10,000x
This has literally been know for thousands of years.
OP cannot refute this, OP BTFO.
>>70646414
Changes in the mother's DNA effect the baby through the fetal stage as the baby lives in side his mother and all of it's life functions are impacted by the mother. We also know that nurture can structure neural pathways and effect DNA. Therefore microchirism has a secondary change to the baby.
>>70641713
>I'm the 48th cereal you tried eating
>still enjoying tasty crunchy freshly poured cereal
this applies to men
>you're the 48th person to stick your spoon in my bowl
>eating stale and soggy left-over cereal with mold
this applies to women
>>70646985
Let me redirect you to this post:
>>70644945
>in addition a developing embryo/fetus does NOT receive genetic material from its mother beyond half of her genes that were in the egg, because of the syncytiotrophoblast, and microchimerism in humans is actually the opposite, with fetal cells passing to the mother and possibly causing cancer
>>70646912
>if I was rich I would (do) x every day
You seem to forget what you posted.
Besides, I have a lot more shit to do with 10 billion USD than buy women to fuck. I'm at least building a kickass house and buying a fucking library's worth of books
>>70645092
degenerate detected
>>70644068
>Cultural Marxism
Funny how none of what you listed was present in the USSR. Even more hilarious is how during the most capitalistic few decades of your history, that being in the middle of the Cold War with us and communism, you were all going through your "Sexual Revolution" and "Swinging" period, while we were upholding strong family values.
>>70646623
Sure, fuck-ups that happened to be "isolated incidents" aren't the same as a solid track record of fucking up.
But we are now asked to completely disregard a persons sexual / romantic past, to give to the benefit of the doubt in absurdum.
I ask you, who would you rather hire? Someone with a history of being late for work, failing to meet deadlines and with complacent tendencies, or a person who's right on time every morning, does what he's assigned and who keeps a solid tempo in every aspect of his work?
Why shouldn't we as men be able to apply the same principles when seeking out a partner?
>>70647116
Because Cultural Marxism=/=Economic Marxism. You missed that basic tenant. I'd say look up the Frankfurt School, but I know you won't because you're cucked as it is. Russia is on the cusp of being perfect, it's idiots like you holding it back
>>70647082
That does not preclude anything I've said,changes to her DNA change the cage the baby us formulated in her eggs might not be changed and the baby's DNA doesnt change but her womb does leading to the baby being changed in some way to a nigger that would not have been there had she had only 1 sex partner.
Hence secondary change, whats a matter Jameel cant wrap your head around that?
>>70641713
He's saying he likes the taste of cum.
>>70647404
>this whole post
But especially:
>changes to her DNA change the cage the baby us formulated in her eggs
>change the cage the baby us
I can't breathe.
>>70643526
>this
>from a Finn
Disaboinded :ccc
>>70647116
Cultural Marxism has nothing to do with actual Marxism, it's only similarity is "liberation" of the "oppressed" (in their minds, minorities, ethnic, sexual or otherwise). Just a term.
>>70647343
Or maybe it was your own debauchery which lead to this outcome. Your easy lives created an atmosphere where you were never satisfied and sought out new ways to stimulate yourself through degeneracy like sleeping around and drugs of all sorts. And now you're reaping the results of what your predecessors unleashed upon you with their immoral behaviour.
You know, on second thought you're right, it's probably the Jews and Marxism that's at fault.
>>70647099
You do realize fucking a woman doesn't take all day? Unless you're munching on her pussy for 8 hours like a cuck.
>>70642040
I wouldn't eat a pussy with a bowl of Cheerios in it, either
When you mature as a sexual creature, you eventually get to realize that the whole "virgin goddess waifu" meme is a selfish, infantile, hurting stupid thing тbqh tho. It's because for you sex is a life-changing experience, while for normies it's just a fun thing to do when people are attracted to each other. It's also because you look at sex as a really fucking disguisting form of self-validation and self-esteem boost, where you are the specialest snowflake world ever created. This perversion makes you constantly nervous, totally self-concentrated (am _I_ better or worse than all these imaginary bbc's that were in her?) rageful, unsatisfied, problematic creepster that is nowhere of being alpha who doesn't give a shit and just fucks for fuck's sake and often hunts for those experienced just because they're way more enjoyable in bed.
>>70641713
>what are STDs
>what is a sex addiction
>what is a giant gaping vagina
it definitely matters how many guys a girl has been with
>>70647886
Пoшлa нaхyй, шлюхa.
>>70647721
Years of having it so good softened the west, no doubt about that. But that's what made it so easy to subvert our cultures.
>>70647545
Androgen exposure for one. Sounds to me like you got ass fucked and now you are reaching.
The mother's blood contains her DNA mixed with others DNA.
BTFO faggot
Embarrassed
>>70641713
how much more are you gona post this shit ?
>>70648203
I can't tell if you are serious or retarded.
>>70648038
Удaчи тeбe нaйти cвoю aнимe-дeвcтвeнницy, злoбный хиккaн c тapaкaнaми. Этo я кaк кyн кyнy гoвopю.
>>70648391
Don't choke on all the dicks on your way out, whore.
>>70648300
>memeing
Yea you never had any idea what you were talking about.
>>70641713
This video will explain:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVT7YGGG9kE
yes, i know it looks like shit, but the points he makes are right.
>>70648430
Kill ghouls for me.
>>70641713
>Do you think it matters how many people someone has slept with?
Yes, actually. Refute that, faggot.
Why do tumblr posts always have the last one being in CAPS LOCK yelling about THE PERSON AND NOT THE SUBJECT MATTER
>>70648531
You forgot that here still works "tits or you are guy" rule tho. Also dicks are disguisting
>>70648624
>(you)
>>70641713
>You shouldn't judge people by their behaviour.
I don't see a way to defend this.
>>70641713
This post has been made a million times and the short answer is men have to work for sex woman don't
>>70641713
A man should not have sex with a woman he is not willing to die for, a woman should not have sex with a man she is not willing to have children with.
>>70648799
>the environment the embryo is nurtured in has NO EFFECT HERP DERP DERP DERP
>>70641713
So is this an applied memetics shill, a jidf shill, a Reddit shill or is he sent by the powers that be?
>>70649016
I am not saying the embryo is receiving DNA from its mother I am saying that the environment the embryo is being nurtured has changed
Event A-> Event B
Event B x situation 1 = new result
>>70641713
How many penises dipped in your Cheerio's would be acceptable before you refused to eat them, /pol/?
>>70649262
1. The baby doesn't receive any more DNA from the mother except for the initial half of her DNA
2. Unless the microchimerism caused her to develop an androgen-secreting tumour or any other kind of weird hormone-secreting tumour it means absolutely nothing
>>70649332
No more or less than 3 but all of them have to be lady boy penises.
>>70649539
It also gets her mitochondrial DNA
>>70641713
Men and women should be held to different standards, as their reproductive strategies are profoundly different.
>>70649766
Mitochondria gets passed from the ovum, so what I said is right.
But Mitochondrial DNA doesn't matter as much considering Mitochondria are bacterial obligate endosymbionts.
>>70649766
Thanks
We won
>>70649913
>>70649948
Haven't read your whole conversation, now i have read it all, I fully support the romanian guy.
Amerifat, no, you lose anyway, what i said was a small piece of info that wasn't said till then.
>>70650147
The guy wrote off mitochondrial DNA and did not address how the changes to the mothers DNA effect the fertilization environment. They do
>>70641713
In evolutionary terms more partners means less faithfulness, a higher chance offspring aren't of the male in question, and obviously, before birth control more sex meant more kids, and more kids means lower fertility and less chance the male now mating with her will successfully pass on his genes.
Male and female reproduction is not equal, why would anyone expect attitudes around it to be equal?
>>70650282
He forgot it, that's why I reminded him of him. The changes of mothers DNA affect the fertilization environment only if they occur at the uterus area or a reproductive cell (if they occur after the mother was born). At 1st case the embryo has a problem of surviving in an unhospitable environment, in second it has a slightly different DNA or doesn't survive till birth. BUT what YOU are saying is that multiple sexual partners can alter mothers DNA, which CANNOT be done.
>>70649777
>9gag
Kill yourself
>>70650575
Great meme, you are still wrong. Embarrassment.
>>70641713
Is he suggesting that women go out and buy men, and we should accept this because we are a product and not a human being? Why are food analogies so retarded?
>>70650900
It does read the link. >>70645961
>reasobs for male microchimerism
>sexual intercourse
>>70646912
>Finn calling someone a mongoloid
Pot's calling the kettle black I see
t. Genghis
>>70650900
The only way an ovum will change its DNA in HUMANS is by virus infection or mutagenics.
>>70641713
>I don't see a way to refute this.
By realizing that he came up with that 'argument' to justify his wife's past and keep his beta ego intact.
>>70651053
Where in that study does it say the woman's DNA is changed? All it says is that there were a tiny amount of cells with Y-chromosomes in their blood.
>>70651266
>Urist
Did he marry a dwarf?
>>70641713
>be bland Beta-Flakes
>women spends entire early life gorging herself on CrunchyChads, which though incredibly unhealthy are also mind blowingly tasty
>one day girls doctor tells her that she can no longer enjoy CrunchyChands because she is older now and it's negatively affecting her health
>So the girl goes to eating Beta-Flakes, they are boring and tasteless, and the girl doesn't enjoy them anywhere near as much as the CrunchyChads but she has to eat them her own good in the long run
>Beta-Flakes are supposed to feel happy about this
>>70651207
Was writing with the example of a random mutation in mind, it is rare, it can be done, yet it has nothing to do with the amount of someones sexual partners.
>>70641713
They can be sluts as they please, just as long as they don't mind me denying them because of it.
t. wizard
>>70645754
The only ones shouting 'the Jews are evil' bullshit are people who
>A
Has lost a job to a minority
And/or
>B
Lost a girlfriend to minority
>>70651354
It says Y chromosomes and male DNA were introduced into the woman and since they werent there before we can assume its a change.
>>70641713
Clearly the analogy to vapid consumption of cereals is correct, because we don't form meaningful bonds with one another, we just pick out and consume what looks good to us based on tastes and mood, or maybe because it's something exotic and showy, then when we get bored we move on to the next.
If this type of lifestyle gives me some kind of reputation with others who disagree, perhaps it's because they don't like Fruit Loops.
>>70652414
How do you propose these Y-chromosome cells first of all reach the fetus, and how do they effect it?
You do realize the fetus isn't within the same blood circulation as the woman, only specific things like nutrients and oxygen get through the placenta.
>>70647078
Looks like Spain missed a few kebab during the reconquista.
>>70646790
>>70646456
Anon is correct. Monogamy is the foundation of stable societies
http://henrich.fas.harvard.edu/files/henrich/files/henrich_boyd_richerson_2012.pdf?m=1444400888
http://news.ubc.ca/2012/01/23/monogamy-reduces-major-social-problems-of-polygamist-cultures/
With polygamy/harems, males will simply focus resources and effort on acquiring more and more mates (biasing more r-selection strategies). But with enforced monogamy, males will invest more in their offspring, (K-selection), and accumulate and invest resources.
>>70652957
Mitochondrial DNA for one, the placenta is unaffected by the mothers new DNA as she goes through life? Its not like the placenta is a freeze frame of her puberty DNA.
Or if she was molested before puberty.
>>70653811
Do you even know what mitochondrial DNA is and what it does you fucking retard?
Also you can't modify Mitochondrial DNA except by mutagens.
>>70647545
Why does an Eastern Euronigger have such superior english to my burger bro. God damn shameful
>>70642001
kek
>>70642001
made me spit out my drink cunt
>>70642001
My sides
>>70654406
No I do not I'm not a scientist though your second part does not hold true as the DNA that was mutated was not specified therefore it may be possible that mitochondrial DNA could be changed from sex partners.
>>70655115
>mitochondrial DNA could be changed from sex partners
>DNA of a bacterial endosymbiont that divides by binary fission independently from the host cell, that literally self-destructs along with all the DNA it has on cell death, somehow receives DNA from a mitochondria that is hosted in another cell
You can't possibly be this retarded.
>>70651556
This is why anons should get out and go after health-conscious girls early instead of complaining on the internet all day.
Unless you're posting this in between fuck-sessions with your financially-stable and mentally-sound wife/fiancee/gf on your iphone, in which case excuse me.
I have never had sex.
Mov>>70655397
Moving goal posts are we fact is, the environment the baby is nurtured in changes therefore a change occurs to the baby that would not be there otherwise
>>70656904
>the environment the baby is nurtured in changes therefore a change occurs to the baby that would not be there otherwise
You never explained what those changes would be and how they would affect anything retard.
>>70642040
>>70642001
kek
>>70641713
>putting people in public school and college automatically improves their IQ!
liberals are fucking retarded
>>70657020
I dont have to. There is a possibility of a genetic mutation that effects the baby's maturation and thus DNA.
Checkmate
>>70655937
it's overrated m8, don't worry
just find a high-end hooker and pop your cherry, it's literally no different than banging a random on tinder nowadays except for the fact that the professional whore has a better reason to stay STD-free
>>70657771
I pretend it doesn't affect me but it does me brain in. I don't have money for anything, but thanks for the advice friendo. :)
>>70641713
>man doesn't like used goods
>woman claims there's some institution that declares sluts to be worth less, which is unfair
>woman accepts used goods
>woman claims that this is unfair
>>70658977
Yeah this is a point I try to make a lot. Men prefer women that haven't had a dozen loads dropped into them. That's the way we've always been, and there are many biological and psychological reasons for it, but it's never going to change, at least fully.
It's not that women are forbade by law from having sex with multiple partners. It's just that if you do there may be consequences in relation to how others view you.
Plus, the average male measures his sexual achievement by numbers while the average female measures her sexual achievement by the quality of partners. This has very obvious biological reasons: men can get many women pregnant, women can only be pregnant with one man's child.
>>70658461
Hey broski, it's truly overrated and you risk STDs, babies or attachement.
Before doing it people see it has a kind of milestone, achievement that will give you answers, and is essential. Just don't sweat it,don't put the pussy in a pedestal and try some LSD, it will be much more beneficial.
>>70659506
>LSD
I've been thinking about that for the longest time. I just don't know how to get some.
>>70641713
I'm a 26 yr old virgin by choice.
And I hate both male sluts an female sluts they ruin everything. I put more blame on women for being to naive an spreading their legs
I blame men that seek out women just for sexual gratification,
I blame women who get with men an trick them that their feelings are real
Sluts are sluts schlampe schlampe
>>70660232
>I'm a 26 yr old virgin by choice.
>>70645092
so progressive Canada
>>70641713
>I don't see a way to refute this
dick in cereal etc
>>70641713
1. People aren't comparable to different types of cereals
Dont treat people the same way you treat your choice of cereal you repulsively sociopathic wretch.
2. Men and women face the same standards in sex.
>Implying that they do not requires numeric evidence which i doubt anybody has on this subject and the burden of proof now lies on those making the claim.
Men treat each other more respectfully and celebrate each others percieved victories and tend to leave our personal life tactics to ourselves when doing so.
The problem is not that we have a double standard as a race, the problem is that women are trying to shift the weight of this nonproblem on men and make it about something completely different than what it is. The main issue here is that women are incapable of genuinely celebrating other peoples victories where men do all the time. You can see this everyday in how much they try to hide this hard fact, one could even say it affects every single thing they do, it is why women exagerate excitement for others achievements, why they pretend their ugly friends are pretty on social media, it allows for them to one up that ugly bitch. why womens behavioral patterns can often be described as "fake", why women cant name the reason for the wage gap, why women constantly rant about how much they hate x y and z. It is why women use feminism as a way to get ahead of men rather than on equal terms. It is why women hate that men dont hate each other for getting laid a lot.
They dont want anyone to be better than them. This pointless effort of being "the best" defines their entire existence.
-why they love social media
-why they make up 75% of the global consumer market
-why virtue signaling is a way of life
Tl;dr; unless women get a slice of the pie they will never celebrate progress. Since women dont participate in progress, they redefined progress to automatically mean including them or its automatically deemed not progressive.
>>70660934
I'm Good looking I've gone on dates took chicks out, make out with a few, had boobs in my face, even chicks telling me they want the D I've let them fondle it but I never let them have it. :)
