>High-quality and immersive virtual reality is finally something anyone can have in her home
Why do journalists do this?
>>70622148
What's the issue?
>>70622148
Because video games are for little bitches
>>70622148
Typo maybe ?
Shouldn't it be "in their homes" ?
>>70622148
Never mind, I'm retarded. Well, I'd say stop reading Jezebel and Buzzfeed if that kind of stuff bothers you.
>>70622148
Because they're all SJW faggots that pander to people that don't even use or do the things they're writing about.
It's like the virture-signalling version of microaggressions.
>>70622192
>can have in her home
>in her home
>her
>>70622148
To trigger you
>>70622192
most americans are either rich boomers or poor millenials with no jobs living on boomers good will
>>70622237
Who is anime for?
>>70622254
It's engadget, a site that shills technology which is a male space if ever there was one. The article talks about requiring a powerful gaming computer, something that no woman has unless her twitch fans made it for her.
>>70622148
because when you put your finger in an asshole, you should expect to get shit on it.
I once wore an Oculus Rift for like 3 seconds, and the field of view was way too small.
How can it possibly feel immersive if it doesn't fill my field of view? That's the main point of goggles, to make the screen better dominate the view.
