Is Agenda 21 real /pol/? or just another jew plot?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZzSEOgbAaA
>>70587831
I dunno faggot, did you look it up on jewgle? or wiki?
>>70588831
why are people so upset about it?
>>70589031
why are people upset at a plan to remove our property rights, ban us from large swathes of the countryside, reduce our quality of life and usher in global fucking socialism?
>>70589167
So its real then?
>>70589492
http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
yeah
>>70589167
REMOVE UN
>>70589167
can't be any worse than this
>>70587831
http://youtu.be/JDLAUmqp8f4
>shameeeee, Tony, shameeeee
>>70589746
wut?
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
tl;dr
but yes it's real
>>70590038
If Agenda 21 has a goal to reduce the population's impact on the environment than they will probably resort to cramming people into cities. In Oregon, the pic I showed, our governor decided to put homeless camps in public parks because they are "open spaces". So now we basically have to deal with homeless degenerates shitting, pissing, drug usage, and fucking in open public
Agenda 21 sounds like a better idea
>>70590332
>Agenda 21 sounds like a better idea
do you just want me to bump your thread?
>>70590332
Its only real goals are global socialism and the UN becoming the world government
But that goes for everything the UN touches
>>70590641
I think its bullshit. Since when did the UN matter in anything ever?
>>70590580
When you reply that is generally how it works
>>70591081
no, I am happy to bump you're thread, since I support disemantation of agenda 21 info
>>70590834
since one of your presidents signed a UN treaty restricting firearms?
>>70591732
>restricting firearms
>When the USA sells more arms than all other countries combined
Agenda 21 is non-binding and voluntary. Why do people even care? If the UN can't enforce it, why does it even matter? It seems to me that spreading info on agenda 21 is a jew plot to get people wound up over nothing. Like national debts
>>70592536
>Agenda 21 is non-binding and voluntary
voluntary in what way?
when city councils adopt it, is it still voluntary? oh right they adopted it voluntarily, but now it has the force of law over YOU!
>restricting firearms
http://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/un-guns-treaty-changes/2015/01/25/id/620223/
>>70592865
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21
literally first line:
>"Agenda 21 is a non-binding, voluntarily implemented action plan of the United Nations with regard to sustainable development."
also, not a treaty therefore unenforceable even if city council "adopts it" whatever that means:
>"The United States is a signatory country to Agenda 21, but because Agenda 21 is a legally non-binding statement of intent and not a treaty, the United States Senate was not required to hold a formal debate or vote on it. It is therefore not considered to be law under Article Six of the United States Constitution. "
>>70591732
>>70592536
Remember there's a difference between civilian arm sales and military arm sales.
>>70593232
you are missing the point, if a city or state adopts it, it is now law... but they made it law voluntarily, taht law is now binding on YOU!
>>70594255
thats not how it works.
If a city or state adopts it as a guideline that means they target it as a goal. Without the law in place there is no way to enforce it. It is voluntary, non binding means non enforcible which means useless.
>>70593647
It doesn't really matter. An MP4 and AR15 are practically the same weapon system. All the country has to do is modify it themselves to make it full range auto. When major systems are sold without restriction, small arms are a moot point
>>70587831
You left out the most likely option: NOT real & NOT a Jew plot.
(PS: its not real.)
>>70595168
It's getting late here and I am surprised to say I agree with a shitposter for once. But I think I have been thoroughly red pilled and this is just BS
>>70589704
Oh, there is a thing called "agenda 21" - but it isn't a NWO plan. It is merely a statement of unrealisable goals, like "world peace". Some morons have misconstrued this into an actual plan for achieving all the warm fuzzy objectives. You'd think they never heard of "mission statements" and "vision statements". :-(
>>70595371
kek gg
>>70595371
spoken like someone who hasn't read it
